• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.89-105
• /
• 2019

This paper reviews and analyzes the U.S. cases and statutes on the issue of party autonomy in arbitration agreement. Arbitration agreement has been interpreted somewhat differently from general contracts because its legal characteristics are not purely contractual by nature. For example, some legal scholars insist that an arbitration contract is more about an agreement on a process of dispute resolution than a creation of rights and obligations to avoid litigation. Party autonomy was discussed in diverse legal perspectives including contract of adhesion, VKI principle, and separability of arbitration clause. These three legal perspectives are discussed to set the legal relationship between party autonomy and protection of consumers in consumer arbitration. In addition, it was discussed how legal defects in the formation of an arbitration contract can influence the party autonomy. The legal defects that were discussed to analyze the relationship between arbitration agreement and party autonomy included misrepresentation, fraud, mistake, duress, and undue influence.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.14 no.11
• /
• pp.5964-5970
• /
• 2013

The recent budget planning for highway infrastructure implied that the investments for Operation & Maintenance(O&M) became greater than that for new construction. This circumstance made many stakeholders pay attention to the O&M of road infrastructure and adopt other countries' policies and system for effective management. In other countries, most O&M for road infrastructure have been done by private entities using long-term contract and Korea is about to shift from one year contract to long-term contract. The most important parts for the expansion of the long-term O&M contract for road infrastructure are valuation of the O&M contract based on accurate prediction of O&M costs and instrument for proper risk sharing between contracting parties. Thus, this study provides a methodology to estimate a reasonable O&M contract price and a framework to share contract risk between contracting parties using real option. The analysis results showed that the contract price and ceiling and floor conditions for the 20 year-contract of 20 km-highway project were 45.7, 60 and 42.3 billion won, respectively.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.173-184
• /
• 1998

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.273-294
• /
• 1999

인터넷은 단순히 통신수단의 변화에 그치지 않고 문화 사회 정치의 각 방면에서 커다란 변혁을 불러일으키고 있으며, 물품매매계약이 전자적으로 이루어지는 경우 전자상거래계약의 성립시기, 방식 및 전자문서의 효력, 준거법(applicable law, governing law), 재판관할(jurisdiction)등에 관하여 복잡 다양한 문제점들을 야기하게 된다. 전자상거래 계약상에서 청약의 기준에 관해서는 매도인의 행위를 청약으로 보는 것이 다수설이다. 따라서 매수인이 선돼한 상품에 대하여 구입의사를 표시, 즉 승낙하면 바로 전자상거래 계약이 성립한다고 할 수 있다. 그리고 인터넷을 이용한 전자상거래의 경우에는 국경을 초월하여 세계의 모든 소비자들을 그 대상으로 함으로써 준거법의 문제와 재판관할권의 문제가 상당히 중요한 문제로 부각되고 있는 바, 준거법의 결정은 일반적으로 당사자의 자유로운 의사에 따라 결정된다. 재판관할권에 대해서는 재판관할에 대한 합의가 있는 경우에 우려 나라는 이를 유효한 것으로 인정하고 있으나, 일반 소비자들을 대상으로 하고 있는 전자상거래의 특성을 고려할 때 이는 다소 무리가 따른다고 생각된다. 또한 재판관할에 대한 합의가 없는 경우에는 피고의 주소지국이 재판관할권을 부여받는바, 격지자간의 소액거래에서는 그 실익을 기대할 수 없는 것이 현실이다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.293
• /
• pp.94-97
• /
• 2014

그동안 건설업계가 한목소리로 지적했던 실적공사비 제도를 폐지하고 시장거래가격을 토대로 하는 표준시장단가제도 도입 등의 주요 내용을 담은 국가계약법 시행령 및 시행규칙이 개정되어 지난 11월 4일 공포와 동시에 시행에 들어갔다. 대한설비건설협회가 건설공사의 적정공사비 확보를 위해 현실가격을 반영하지 못하는 실적공사비제도 개선을 협회 중점추진 과제로 선정하고 국회, 국토교통부, 기획재정부 등에 지속적으로 건의해 온 결과 정부가 받아들여 개정된 것이다.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.99-118
• /
• 2011

According to the National Contract Law, when determining Estimation cost Contract officers should consider contract quantity, contract period, supply and demand condition, difficulty of contract enforcement, terms and condition, and other various conditions based market price, costing based pricing, and appraisal. And they should not overestimate or underestimate the estimation cost. But the estimation cost system is used as preparedness for audit against the contract law. In this study, we identified the factors affecting estimation cost and analyzed their influence on estimation cost.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.10 s.183
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 2005

기계설비공사의 하자담보책임기간은 <건설산업기본법시행령 제30조 관련 별표 4>, <국가를 당사자로 하는 계약에 관한 법 시행규칙 제70조 관련 별표 1> 및 <주택법시행령 제59조 제1항 관련 별표 6>에 의하여 2년 이내로 규정되어 있다. 그러나, 일부 발주기관 및 건설업체에서 기계설비공사의 하자담보책임기간을 법으로 정한 기간을 초과 설정하여 하자보수 비용 및 하자보증수수료 증가 등의 민원이 발생되고 있어, 건설교통부 및 재정경제부는 하자담보책임기간을 법으로 정한 기간을 준수하여 줄 것을 발주기관에 협조 요청한 바 있다. 이와 관련 대한설비건설협회에서는 기계설비공사 하자담보책임기간을 법으로 정한 기간을 정하여 줄 것을, 시공능력 300위 이내의 일반건설업체 대표이사와 하도급계약담당 부서장에게 요청하였다. 또한 계약 체결한 기계설비공사의 하자담보책임기간이 법으로 정한 기간을 상회하는 경우에는 회계통첩에 의하여 계약서상의 기간을 조정하여 하도급계약시에는 법으로 정한 하자담보책임기간을 설정하여 줄 것을 요청하였다.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.195-217
• /
• 2016

The Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods(CISG) endeavors to increase international trade through the creation of a uniform law of international sales. The CISG applies to contracts of sale of goods between parties whose places of business are in different States. If a party has more than one place of business, the place of business if that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance. Despite the importance of a definition for 'place of business,' the CISG does not provide one. Lack of a definition of 'place of business' may cause problems for parties trying to determine whether the CISG applies to their contract. Also Contracting parties can opt out of the CISG. But the CISG does not state whether the parties must expressly exclude the CISG's application to a transaction or whether they might do so by implication. we need to consider how effectively opt out of the CISG. Under U.S. law, the CISG is considered to be a self-executing treaty. So the CISG's provisions apply directly as substantive sales law to contracts for the international sale of goods. Despite the CISG's political and economic significance to U.S., U.S. Courts have overlooked the terms of the CISG. This article considered how to the CISG was recognized, interpreted and applied by the U.S. Courts in related cases.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.409-417
• /
• 2017

The study is concerned with doing research on the plan to prevent the dispute occurring between contract parties regarding the additional cost generated when the construction period is shortened during construction work. After the review of the claim cases and the judgment cases of the court regarding the additional cost caused by the shortened construction period, the representative problem is the incomplete regulations on calculating the additional cost. In the 1st stage of the results of the research on the problem, the procedure handling the additional cost is presented, and the process of planning and approving the shortening of the construction period is gone through in the stage of the procedure to prevent the dispute on the additional cost between contract parties. In the 2nd stage, the plan on enacting and revising the regulations on removing the incomplete problems of the current regulations relating to the calculation of the additional cost. The basis for the advanced contract management is provided by resolving the incomplete problems of the current regulations relating to the shortening of the construction period with the prevention of a dispute and the resultant loss.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.253-283
• /
• 2014

Ob das Erbitten der Behandlung durch einen Dritten einen Behandlungsvertrag oder lediglich eine Gesch${\ddot{a}}$ftsf${\ddot{u}}$hrung ohne Auftrag darstellt, richtet sich nach dem allgemeinen Grundsatz der Auslegung der Willenserkl${\ddot{a}}$rung. Auch wenn ein Dritter f${\ddot{u}}$r eine andere Person die Behandlung erbittet, l${\ddot{a}}$sst sich dadurch kein zwingender R${\ddot{u}}$ckschluss ziehen, dass daraus eine vertragliche Pflicht auf Verg${\ddot{u}}$tung anhand der Behandlung an den Behandlungserbitter entsteht. Das Erbitten der Behandlung eines Dritten stellt n${\ddot{a}}$mlich weder einen Antrag dar, noch ensteht dadurch ein Rechtsgesch${\ddot{a}}$ft zwischen dem Behandlungerbitter und dem Behandelnden. Stellt das Erbitten der Behandlung durch den Dritten eben kein Rechtsgesch${\ddot{a}}$ft dar, handelt es sich um eine Behandlung ohne gesetzliche Pflichten. Dadurch ist f${\ddot{u}}$r den Behandelten eine Gesch${\ddot{a}}$ftsf${\ddot{u}}$hrung ohne Auftrag er${\ddot{o}}$ffnet. Wird das Erbitten der Behandlung als Antrag ausgelegt, ist dies ein Antrag eines echten oder unechten Vertrags zugunsten Dritter, oder der Behandlungserbitter hat als Vertreter des Patienten oder Unterhaltspflichtigen als Vertretende, einen Behandlungsvertrag abgeschlossen. Wenn der Vertragspartner die Tatsache kennt oder kennen musste, dass es sich um einen Vertreter handelt, ist die Vertretungshandlung wirksam.