• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.52-63
• /
• 2005

National competitiveness is related directly to the strength of educational competitiveness of universities. Seoul National University (SNU) has been taking efforts to improve its competitiveness in University education in variety of ways and the classroom assessment is one key example of those. The current classroom assessment system practiced at universities is being used to evaluate courses and professors in charge by the university administration or evaluation committee. The classroom assessment system is not intended to put students and professors as the subject of the evaluation. In this case, the evaluation is intended wrongfully to rank the courses and evaluate professors' achievement by assigning grades on the lectures. Instead, a proper classroom assessment system should be targeted to improve the quality of lectures by encouraging communication among professor and students in the classroom. In this study, it was intended to investigate a suitable classroom assessment system to enhance the effectiveness of education, not to rank the courses and evaluate professors' achievement. For this purpose, research has been carried out to investigate opinions of professors at SNU on the criteria of classroom assessment and to analyze the criteria of classroom assessment at other domestic universities in Korea. The inquiries for feedback on the lecture by the student in the class was analyzed. The current classroom assessment system at SNU was reviewed and an improvement plan was devised to evaluate liberal art courses of engineering and science schools at SNU. In this research, the problems in the classroom assessment system was reviewed and improvement points were searched to utilize the classroom assessment system more effectively for the improvement of lecture quality.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.91-101
• /
• 2011

A lecture evaluation is an important factor to validate student's level and improve a reformation of the college evaluation as well. Therefore, this paper researches into the lecture evaluation to apply a better objective method and a fair assessment of all lectures. These researches are analyzed by each subject, based on the lecture assessment performed in K College. First, if a student absent more than 4 weeks, they cannot be participated in the lecture evaluation. Second, the lecture evaluation date takes place when the next class registrations start. Third, the connection between the number of students and the teaching assessment should be considered. Finally, various types of the teaching assessment tools, including the lecture evaluation method such as multiple choices or writing questions need to be applied. Finally lecture evaluation results must be reflected in the next lesson.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2021.07a
• /
• pp.465-466
• /
• 2021

본 논문에서는 강의평가 시스템을 이용하여 주된 이용자인 학생들에게 수업에 앞서 강의에 대한 전반적인 학습 분위기와 강의를 들었던 학생들의 평점을 제안한다. 이 시스템은 강의평가를 효율적으로 보여주어 수강 신청의 접근성을 최대화하고, 각 강의의 안내와 정보를 취득하는 데 도움을 준다. 또한, 이 시스템은 네 가지의 평점을 부여하여 이를 바탕으로 종합적인 평점을 할당한다. 이때 강의평가에 대한 평가를 곁들이면서, 평점을 제시하여 강의평가를 보려는 다른 이들에게 뚜렷한 정보력과 어떤 강의가 좋은지 잘 보여준다. 본 논문에서는 동적 웹 페이지를 사용하여 가시성이 뛰어난 강의평가 시스템을 제공하는 면에서 우수함을 보인다.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2011.12a
• /
• pp.163-165
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 해부학강의에 있어 혼합강의의 적용가능성을 평가하였다. 2007~2009년 매 1학기동안 강원대학교 의과대학 간호학과 학생(n=143)을 대상으로 해부학강의를 가상강의 9회, 면대면 강의 3회, 사체해부실습 2회로 구성된 혼합강의로 실시한 후 설문을 통해 자기평가요인(만족도, 난이도, 흥미도, 유용성, 평가의 적절성, 학업성취도, 운영의 적절성, 이론실습연계성), 학업성취별 자기평가요인, 자기평가요인간의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 자기평가요인의 난이도는 평균$2.96{\pm}0.63$점으로 전반적인 강의수준은 적절했던 것으로 나타났고 나머지 모든 요소들은 평균 3.82~4.21점 사이로 평가되어 간호학과에서 해부학강의를 위한 혼합강의의 적용이 매우 긍정적인 것으로 나타났다. 학기종료 후 화보한 최종성적을 기준으로 세 그룹(상위, 중위, 하위)으로 나누어 자기평가요인과의 관계를 분석한 결과, 모든 요소에서 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다(p>0.05). 자기평가요인 간의 상관관계는 난이도와 전공연계성의 유용성(r=0.300, p<0.0003),혼합강의의 유용성(r=0.210, p<0.0137), 평가의 적절성(r=0.323, p<0.0001), 이론실습연계성(r=0.216 0.0097)이 높을수록 상관성을 보였다, 만족도, 전공연계성의 유용성, 혼합강의의 유용성, 이론실습연계성에서는 학업성취도를 제외한 모든 요소에서, 흥미도는 난이도와 학업성취도를 제외한 모든 요소에서 유의성 있게 높은 상관성을 보였다. 하지만 학업성취도에서는 평가의 적절성을 제외한 다른 요소에서는 연관성을 보이지 않아 성적과 관련해 영향을 미치는 요소가 없다는 것으로 판단되어지며 본 연구를 위해 도입된 강의구성이 해부학의 균형 있는 학업성취를 유도할 수 있는 수업방식이라 판단되었다. 결론적으로 본 연구를 통해 해부학강의에 있어 혼합강의의 우수한 교육효과를 알 수 있었고, 간호학과만이 아닌 최근 급증하고 있는 의료-보건계열의 다양한 전공자를 위한 적용, 확대로 해부학지식의 질적 향상과 강의수요에 비해 부족한 해부학 전공 교수진들의 교육 부담을 경감할 수 있는 효과적인 교수법으로 활용가치가 있다고 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.11
• /
• pp.5033-5043
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to complement the problem of lecture evaluation items and to improve the lecture evaluation items to fit to original purpose of lecture evaluation to enhance the lecture's quality. For this, meanings of good teaching, lecture evaluation domains and elements of preceding study, the contents and problems of lecture evaluation tools in A college were searched, and in this foundation, an improved lecture evaluation tool was suggested. As the result of this study, important features of the improved tool are followed: First, the compositions of evaluation domains, evaluation elements, and evaluation items were reconstituted. Second, to acquire the important information for the better lecture, the items were devised according to the features of good teaching in colleges. Third, the items concerned of evaluation elements which is commonly suggested by the lecture evaluation tools of preceding study were developed. Forth, if there is the information which is required for the enhancement of the lecture quality, the items were developed though the result could not be presented in the arithmetical means. Fifth, evaluation items to improve the problems of lecture evaluation tools which had been carried out in A college were developed.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.64-73
• /
• 2004

Universities have to offer efficient education through measuring and evaluating courses precisely. Course evaluation gives instructors a chance of understanding quality and issues arisen in courses, and students a chance of the effective learning. This study investigates general characteristics and administration method of course evaluation in engineering education. The investigation includes elements of course evaluation, various evaluation methods, effective administration methods, and validation of the evaluation. A survey was undertaken to the students at Myongji University regarding course evaluation. The study summarized the results of the survey.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.35-45
• /
• 2011

Some researchers insist that many students respond to the course evaluation surveys without sincerity and even without reading the questions. To analyze the pattern of student responses, the results of course evaluations for five semesters at Jeonbuk National University are reviewed. In mandatory course evaluations, 20% of the students marked the same option numbers to all questions regarding their lectures. In addition, consistent responses were over 50%. These results show that the university administration should reform the current course evaluation system in all respects.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.92-98
• /
• 2000

We have analyzed the result of course evaluation in a department for five semesters. The results of the students' course evaluation varied on individual lecturer, however the average score was improved initially and it was saturated after several semesters. Based on these results, we suggest several effective methods of using the evaluation results. We also suggest to study more in improving the questionnairs of the evaluation format to receive students' positive responses for the better course in the future. As a conclusion, the course evaluation system must be carefully introduced and it should be used only for improving the course itself. When this system is applied to evaluating the capability of lecturers, lecturers would easy their requirements and standards of the education and this causes a lot of problems in the case of the USA.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.264-264
• /
• 2015

최근 기후변화는 우리 삶에 다양한 영향을 미치고 있으며, 이에 따른 수문순환 변화 역시 자명하게 받아들이고 있다. 이에 따라 수자원 취약성 평가 및 대책에 관한 연구는 다양하게 진행되고 있는 실정이다. 하지만 국내의 경우 전체 유역에 대한 수자원 취약성 평가 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 국내 총 12 수계인 한강, 안성천, 금강, 삽교천, 영산강, 섬진강, 탐진강, 만경강, 동진강, 낙동강, 태화강, 형산강 유역에 대한 수자원 취약성 평가를 실시하였다. 평가 방법으로는 장기간에 걸친 다양한 토양의 특징, 토지이용, 관리상태의 변화에 따른 크고 복잡한 유역의 유출량을 추정하기 위해 개발된 SWAT(Soil and Water Assessment Tool) 모형을 이용하여 수문 모형을 구축하였고, 유출 관련 매개변수 최적화 작업은 SWAT-CUP 모형을 이용하였다. 최적화된 매개변수의 적용을 통해 각 유역별 유출량을 산정하였다. 그 결과 2009년과 2011년은 한강, 낙동강, 금강, 영산강순 이였으며, 2010년은 낙동강, 한강, 금강, 영산강순 이였다. 면적별 유출량인 비유량(specific discharge)을 산정한 결과, 2009년에는 영산강, 낙동강, 금강, 한강순 이며, 2010년에는 영산강, 금강, 낙동강, 한강순 이였으며, 2011년에는 금강, 한강, 영산강, 낙동강 순을 보였다. 또한, 인구당 유출량 산정 결과 2009년에는 영산강, 금강, 낙동강, 한강순 이며, 2010년에는 영산강, 금강, 낙동강, 한강순 이며, 2011년에는 영산강, 금강, 낙동강, 한강순 이었다. 이를 바탕으로 국내 총 12 수계에 대한 수자원 취약성을 산정해보았다. 대응변수는 이수의 수요 및 공급적인 측면에서 구분하였으며, 사회/경제, 물 이용, 환경, SWAT으로 구성하였습니다. 수자원 취약성 평가를 위해 다기준의사결정기법(MCDM, Multi-Criteria Decision Making) 중 하나인 TOPSIS(Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)기법을 사용하였다. 산정 결과 삽교천, 동진강, 형산강, 안성천, 섬진강, 만경강, 낙동강, 영산강, 태화강, 금강, 한강, 탐진강 순 이였다. 본 연구 결과는 향후 다중 공간에 구축한 고해상도 모형을 통해 국내 수문상황 진단 및 고해상도 미래 수문 시나리오 생산을 통한 수자원 관리에도 활용될 전망이며, 기후변화 취약성 평가를 위한 지표 개발에 이용될 예정이다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.17 no.5
• /
• pp.1233-1238
• /
• 2013

The course evaluation is used in faculty evaluation model even the grade of course evaluation has a big gap in absolute value with the characteristics of subjects. It is important to obtain the reliability of course evaluation because the result of course evaluation is fed to instructor to assure the quality of instruction. The purpose of this paper are to analyze the relation of attendance rate and course evaluation to improve the reliability of course evaluation.