대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제38권7호
  • /
  • Pages.45-55
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건축의 공공성 향상을 위한 건축전문기관 사례 비교연구 - 네덜란드, 덴마크, 노르웨이의 건축센터를 중심으로 -

Architectural Institutes for Improving Architectural Public Concern - Cases Involving Architectural Centers in Netherlands, Denmark and Norway -

  • 투고 : 2022.04.07
  • 심사 : 2022.05.28
  • 발행 : 2022.07.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The study aims to examine the role and operation of architectural centers in European countries, clarify why architectural policy institutions are needed and how they should operate to improve the publicness of architecture in Korea. Several architectural centers in Europe with experience going through various changes were chosen to examine their operation, organizational types, and programs. A comparative analysis was performed on the characteristics of domestic and European architectural centers. The results were used to propose the applicability and promotional tasks for similar domestic institutions. To increase public awareness and promote participation, various programs and efficient systems need to be implemented. Although Korea has mainly focused on research to establish industrial promotion policies related to urban architecture, there have been insufficient interchange and a lack of public functions. Therefore, establishing a specialized, integrated agency like European architecture centers that develop various programs while acquiring political support will help to equip Korea to provide quality architectural and urban designs with technological competitiveness.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, I. (2009a). A study on the international architectural policy promoting the publicness of Architecture, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 25(1), 45-52.
  2. Cho, I. (2009b). A study on the role of international architecture center in promoting public awareness and participation in architecture, a case study of the Netherlands architecture institute, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 25(1), 53-60.
  3. Cho, S., Seo, S., & Kim, Y. (2013). A comparative study on public architecture design advisory and management organizations, A case study on England, France, United states, and Finland, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 29(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2013.29.1.91
  4. EFAP-FEPA Board of administrators, (2014). Survey on architectural policies in Europe, European forum for architectural policies, www.efap-fepa.eu
  5. Figueiredo, S. M. (2014). The NAi Effect: Museological Institutions and the Construction of Architectural Discourse, Thesis, University California, Los Angeles, 460-462.
  6. Ford, H., & Sawyers, B. (2003). International Architecture Centers, 1st ed., Academy Press, 13.
  7. Jeon, Y., & Shin, D. (2010). A study on the promotive programs for the architectural culture and public, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 26(1), 125-133.
  8. Kim, Y. (2009). European Architectural Policy Enforcement Situation and Implications, AURI BRIEF, No.10, 5-6.
  9. Kim, Y. (2014). The Current Status of Architecture Policy and its Future, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 59, 38-42.
  10. Kirsten, S. (2005). Action Program on Spatial Planning and Culture: Architecture and Belvedere Policy 2005-2008, The Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, 5-8.
  11. Lim, Y. (2017). The establishment and operation of the national public architecture center, Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 27(1), 19-25.
  12. Nam, J., & Jo, H. (2019). A study on the role and programs of architectural centers at home and abroad according to the main body of operation, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 35(3), 31-40 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2019.35.3.31
  13. Sam, L. (2004). Architecture centers: bridging the divide between architects and the public, Architectural Record, 192(7), 80-87.
  14. Shin, D. (2008). A Study on the Policies for the Promotion of Architectural Culture to Improve the Publicity, Thesis, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, 64-71.
  15. Shin, S., & Cho I. (2003). The Netherlands architecture institute: the organizational embodiment of the complex program management, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 47, 44-45.