DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Behavior of Surface Settlement due to the Excavation of Twin TBM Tunnels in the Clay Grounds

점토지반에서 TBM 병렬터널 굴진 시 지표침하거동에 대한 연구

  • You, Kwangho (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Suwon) ;
  • Jung, Suntae (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Suwon / Dongah Geological Engineering Co. Ltd.)
  • Received : 2018.11.16
  • Accepted : 2019.01.07
  • Published : 2019.02.01

Abstract

Mechanized constructions have been frequently increased in soft ground below sea bed or river bed, for urban tunnel construction, and for underpinning the lower part of major structures in order to construct a safer tunnel considering various risk factors during the tunnel construction. However, it is difficult to estimate the subsidence behavior of the ground surface due to excavation and needs to be easily predicted. Thus, in this study, when a twin tunnel is constructed in the soft ground, it is proposed a simpler equation relating to the settlement behavior and a corrected formula applicable to soft ground and large diameter shield tunnels based on the previously proposed theory by Peck (1969). For this purpose, it was analyzed to long-term measurement values such as the amount of maximum settlement, the subsidence range by ground conditions, and interference volume loss due to the parallel construction, etc. As a result, a equation was suggested to predict the amount of maximum settlement in the soft sediment clay ground where is located at the upper part of the excavation site. It is turned out that the proposed equation is more suitable for measurement data in Korea than Peck (1969)'s.

최근 터널 시공 시 여러 위험요인을 감안하여 보다 안전한 터널의 시공을 위하여 해상이나 하상 밑의 연약지반에서, 도심터널공사나 주요 구조물 하부 통과를 위해서 기계화 시공의 빈도가 높아지고 있다. 그러나 굴착으로 인한 지표면의 침하거동 산정이 어려워 간편하게 예측하는 식이 필요한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 연약지반에 병렬로 터널이 시공되어지는 경우 침하거동에 대해 보다 간단한 식과 기존에 Peck(1969)이 제안한 이론을 근거로 연약지반 및 대구경 shield 터널에서 적용 가능한 수정식을 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 최대 침하량, 지반조건에 따른 침하범위, 병렬시공에 따른 간섭 체적손실 등의 장기간의 계측값을 분석하였다. 그 결과 굴착면 상부가 퇴적점토인 연약지반에서 간편하게 최대 침하량을 산정할 수 있는 식을 제시하였는데, Peck(1969)의 식보다 국내 계측데이터에 더 적합한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Five phases of settlement occurrence according to TBM construction

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Definition of gap (Lee et al., 1992)

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Transverse settlement trough (Peck, 1969)

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Site investigation (longitudinal section)

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Characteristics of clay

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Characteristics of sand and soil

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Grain size distributions

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. The schematic diagram of a shield TBM

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Instrumentation locations

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10. Surface settlement monitoring data

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 11. Ground surface settlement in the longitudinal direction of tunnel against time

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 12. Surface settlement by various depth tunnels

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0013.png 이미지

Fig. 13. Volume loss of interference

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0014.png 이미지

Fig. 14. Volume loss vs. rock cover of tunnel

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0015.png 이미지

Fig. 15. Volume of interference vs. separation distance of tunnels

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0016.png 이미지

Fig. 16. Comparison of settlement range and monitoring data by excavation diameter

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0017.png 이미지

Fig. 17. Comparison of 1.0 D and 1.5 D settlement data and monitoring data

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0018.png 이미지

Fig. 18. Settlement proposal model

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_f0019.png 이미지

Fig. 19. Theoretical settlement by Peck vs. Modification

Table 1. Specifications of a shield TBM

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Volume loss by monitoring data

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Settlement measurement results

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Proposed equations for the estimation of 𝒾 (Kim, 2013)

HJHGC7_2019_v20n2_29_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Attewell, P. B. and Farmer, I. W. (1974), "Ground deformations resulting from shield tunnelling in London clay", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 380-395. https://doi.org/10.1139/t74-039
  2. Attewell, P. B. and Woodman, J. P. (1982), "Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soil", Ground Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 13-20.
  3. Clough, G. W. and Schmidt B. (1981), Design and performance of excavations and tunnels in soft clay, Soft Clay Engineering, pp. 569-631.
  4. Glossop, N. H. and Farmer, I. W. (1979), "Settlement associated with removal of compressed air pressure during tunnelling in alluvial clay", Geotechnique, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.67
  5. Kim, S. C. (2013), Development of predicting model of ground surface and field settlement measurement in shield TBM tunnel, Doctor's thesis, University of Seoul, pp. 38-40 (In Korean).
  6. Kim, Y. J. (2017), The effect of depth of rock cover and gap parameter on the settlement behavior when excavating a shield TBM tunnel, Master's thesis, University of Suwon, pp. 1-7 (In Korean).
  7. Koh, S. Y., Kwon, S. J., Hwang, C. H., Kim, S. I. and Choo, S. Y. (2011), "A study on gap parameter and influence area of ground settlement using back analysis constructed by shield tbm with shallow depth", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, No. 5, pp. 1509-1518 (In Korean).
  8. Lee, K. M., Kerry, Rowe. and K. Y. Lo. (1992), "Subsidence owing to tunnelling. I. Estimating the gap parameter", Canada Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 929-940. https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-104
  9. Lee, S. D. (2013), Mechanics of tunnels, CIR, Korea, pp. 881-883 (In Korean).
  10. Mair, R. J., Taylor, R. N. and Bracegridle, A. (1993), "Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays", Geotechnique, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315
  11. Nam, K. M., Choi, M. K., Kim, J. J., Jafri, T. H. and Yoo, H. K. (2017), "Stability analysis of an existing utility tunnel due to the excavation of a divergence tunnel emerging from double-deck tunnel", Journal of Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 231-248 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2017.19.2.231
  12. O'Reilly, M. P. and New, B. M. (1982), "Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom - Their magnitudes and prediction", Tunnelling'82, pp. 179-181.
  13. Peck, R. B. (1969), "Deep excavations and tunnels in soft ground", Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanic sand Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, State of the Art 3, pp. 225-290.
  14. Son, M. R. and Yun, J. C. (2009), "Numerical analysis of tunnelling-induced ground movements, Jornal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association", Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 229-242 (In Korean).

Cited by

  1. Prediction of Subsidence during TBM Operation in Mixed-Face Ground Conditions from Realtime Monitoring Data vol.11, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112412130