디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권6호
  • /
  • Pages.27-35
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

마이크로크레딧 사업 운영의 효과성 측정을 위한 척도개발 및 타당화 연구

A Study on Developing and Validating of a Scale for Business Effectiveness of Microcredit

  • 임은의 (극동대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 김학령 (이화여자대학교 사회복지연구소)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.13
  • 심사 : 2018.06.20
  • 발행 : 2018.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 마이크로크레딧 이용자를 대상으로 사업 운영의 효과성을 파악하는 척도를 개발하는 것이다. 이를 위해 마이크로크레딧을 실증적으로 다룬 국내 선행연구와 이용자 및 전문가 대상의 초점집단인터뷰(Focus Group Interview)를 바탕으로 30개의 예비문항을 구성하였다. 본 조사를 위해 310부의 설문지를 발송하였으며, 128개의 회수된 설문지 중 부실 응답지 1부를 제외한 127개의 설문지를 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석을 하였으며, 분석결과 3개 요인, 24개 문항의 척도 타당도가 검증되었다. 또한 확인적 요인분석을 통한 모형의 적합도를 고려하여 마이크로크레딧 사업체 차원의 효과성 척도를 확정하였다. 구체적인 요인으로는 점포운영 요인 5개 문항, 창업만족도 요인 3개 문항, 경영역량 요인 16개 문항으로 구성되었다. 마지막으로 본 연구를 통해 개발된 사업체 차원의 효과성 척도를 바탕으로 마이크로크레딧의 연구의 방향을 제시하였고, 아울러 마이크로크레딧의 실천적인 발전 방향을 제언하였다.

This study aims to develop the scale for business effectiveness targeting microcredit users. For this, based on domestic preceding researchers empirically handling the microcredit and also focus group interviews with users and specialists, total 30 preliminary questions were composed. After that, conducting the exploratory factor analysis targeting 127 finally collected surveys, in the results of analysis, the scale validity of three factors and 24 questions was verified. Also, considering the goodness-of-fit of model through the confirmatory factor analysis, the effectiveness scale of microcredit business was determined. The concrete factors included 5 questions of the store operation, 3 questions of business start-up satisfaction, and 16 questions of management competency. Lastly, based on the effectiveness scale of business developed by this study, the research direction and the practical development direction of microcredit was suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. R. Song. (2017). New Thing on Inclusive Nations in Korea. Seoul: 21cbooks Publishing Co.
  2. E. Rhyne. (2009). MICROFINANCE for BANKERS and INVESTORS, Washington, DC, McGraw-Hill.
  3. E. E. Yim & E. J. Park. (2013). Policy Changes on the Microcredit in Korea. The Journal of the Korea Contents Society, 13(1), 234-246. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.01.234
  4. Sisa Journal. (2018). Deregulation of establish stage in the Social Finance Bank. http://www.sisajournal-e.com/biz/article/182147
  5. Y. S. Jung & K. Y. Lee. (2013). Trends of International Microcredit Industry and Lessons for the Development of Korean Smile Microdredit Bank. Korea Development Economic Assoiciation, 19(1), 35-79.
  6. E. E. Yim. (2015). Study on the Influence of Start-up Factors and Self-efficacy on Economic Performance of Microenterprise. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(12), 1-12. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2015.13.12.1
  7. M. H. Ryu. (2008). The study of the outcome for the labor welfare program: Micro-enterprise Program. Social Science Research Review, 24(1), 41-62.
  8. S. G. Kim. (2006). Study on result of business startup support program for female breadwinners : Focused on contribution case toward society of S life insurance company. master's thesis Sungkyunkwan university.
  9. C. G. Park. (2010). Microfinance and Business Education in Korea, Korea Business Review, 13(3), 87-117.
  10. Y. J. Im, E. E. Yim, S. K. Park & Y. S. Lee. (2014). A Study on the Construct of the Change of the Recognition of Low-income Female Single Parents after using Microcredit-Q Methodological Application. Korea Family Welfare, 45, 121-147.
  11. N. Schreiner & J. Morduch. (2001). Replicating Microfinance in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges, edited by Jim Carr anc Zhong Yi Tong, Replicating Microfinance in the United States. Washington, D.C: Fannie Mae Foundation.
  12. K. Lamia. (2015). Microfiannce and Its DIscontents, Seoul, Maybook Publishing.
  13. R. Marguerite. (2001). The Microfinance Revolution, Washington, D.C., World Bank Publications.
  14. L. Mayoux. (2002). Women's Empowerment and Participation in Micro-Finance:Evidence, Issues and Ways Forward,, 1.
  15. Y. S. Chung & S. Y. An. (2017). Social Performance and Sustainability of Microfinance Programs: Comparison of Korea and U.K. Korea Social Policy Review, 24(3), 27-53.
  16. P. Clark & A. Kays. (1999). Microenterprise and the Poor: Findings from the Self-Employment Learning Project Five-year Study of Microentrepreneur, Washington, DC, the Aspen Institute.
  17. S. Raheim & C. Alter. (1995). Self-employment as a social and economic developent intervention for recipients of AFDC, Journal of Community Practice, 5(1-2), 41-61.
  18. C. K. Sanders. (2002). The Impact of Microenterprise Assistance Programs: A Comparative Study of Program Participants, non-participants and other low-wage worker, The Social Service, 76, 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1086/339664
  19. Y. S. Chung & Y. K. Song. (2008). Survival Probability and Multivariate Survival Analysis of Micro-enterprises after Start-ups, Korean Social Security Studies, 24(1), 307-332.
  20. E. E. Yim. (2015). The Study on Survival of Microcredit Start-up : Focused on the Poor Single Mother. Woman Study, 88(1), 373-402.
  21. Y. S. Chung. (2008a). Determinants of the Financial Outcomes of Micro-enterprises, Korea Social Welfare Policy, 33(3), 531-557.
  22. Y. S. Chung. (2008b). A Path Analysis of the Impact of a Micro-Enterprise Support Program on the Participants Increased Income and Independence from Public Assistance, Social Security, 24(4), 89-115.
  23. J. H. Sung & J. H. Kim. (2009). A Study on the effectiveness of Micro-Credit Loans for the Low-income Female Heads : The Case of "urgent support cash sos project" of Korean Women Fund, The Korea Social Welfare Research, 21, 73-95.
  24. Y. Baek. S. E. Cho, K. H. Kim & K. H. Kim. (2010). The Study of the Sustainability and Business Potential of the Self-employment Community Supported by Korean Microcredit Joyful Union, Social Welfare Policy, 37(2), 291-324. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2010.37.2.291
  25. S. Y. Kim & B. H. Park. (2011). A Study on the Social Values of the Micro-Credit: Focusing on the case study using SROI model. Social Welfare Policy, 38(1), 277-304. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2011.38.1.277
  26. T. Y. Um. (2014). A Study on Developing a Scale for Emotional Self Sufficiency, Korea Social Policy, 21(4), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.21.4.201412.81
  27. E. J. Lee. (2014). Factors Affecting Emotional and Social Self-Sufficiency of Welfare-to-Work Recipients: Focused Social Adaptation Program, Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(12), 539-548. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.539
  28. I. O. Jeon. (2012). Established business start-up support Impact on The youth of business performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(1), 103-114.
  29. T. Y. Um & J. S. Im. (2014). Study on Self-support performance of Participants of Self-support: Focusing on Participants of Local Self-support Center in Daegu province, Social Welfare Policy, 41(3), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2014.41.3.79
  30. V. Hartarska. (2005). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States, World Development, 33(10), 1627-1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.001
  31. World Bank. (1989). The World Development Report 1989. Washington DC., The World Bank.