Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

A Relationship between students' perceived instructional strategies and their use of learning strategies in Engineering Courses

공학수업에서 학생들이 지각하는 교수전략과 학습전략 간의 관계

  • Received : 2018.06.08
  • Accepted : 2018.09.03
  • Published : 2018.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between instructional strategies applied to engineering courses and students' learning strategies. As a result, students perceived that the application principle was the most applied and then the problem-centered principle was applied to engineering courses. In addition, the students showed that rehearsal strategies are the most used in courses. The most important instructional principle in this study was the problem-centered principle, and the higher the degree of application of problem-centered principle in engineering course, the students were likely to use more deep learning strategies such as elaboration and organization strategy, critical thinking strategy, and metacognitive strategy.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동일, 조영희, 전호정(2015). 학습전략 중재의 효과에 관한 메타분석: 다층메타분석 적용. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(11), 403-425.
  2. 김연순, 정현미(2013). Meriill의 수업기본원리를 적용한 면대면 수업의 설계 및 효과. 교육공학연구, 29-3, 599-636.
  3. 김종렬(2014). 내재적 동기, 학습전략, 수업참여 및 학업성취도의 구조적 관계 : 고등학생의 성별에 따른 차이를 중심으로. 아시아교육연구, 15(1), 93-113
  4. 김현진, 정재학(2011). 지각된 교수자 특성과 대학생들의 학업적 흥미, 즐거움, 내재동기, 인지적 학습전략 사용 및 과목만족도의 관계 분석. 교육심리연구, 25(3), 2011.09, 569-589.
  5. 노원경(2008). 학습전략 루브릭의 개발 및 효과 연구: 대학생 학습전략 교육 프로그램을 중심으로. 교육공학연구, 24(4), 259-294.
  6. 노원경(2009) 학생이 지각한 교수전략과 학습전략 및 학업성취도 간의 관계. 한국교원교육연구, 26(4), 169-190.
  7. 박성미(2009). 전문대학생을 위한 학습전략 진단 도구의 개발. 수산해양교육연구, 21(1), 16-27.
  8. 박영예 (1999). 대학생들의 학습전략, 학습스타일, 학습자 변인간의 상관관계에 대한 분석. 영어교육, 54(4), 281-308.
  9. 박완성, 정구철(2014). 대학생의 학습전략과 부정적 정서, 학업적.사회적 적응이 성적에 미치는 영향. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 14(3), 490-499. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.03.490
  10. 서은희, 김은영(2015). 성취목표지향성, 학습전략 및 학업성취의 관계. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(10), 99-119.
  11. 신민희 (2009). PBL 수업에서 공과대학 학생들의 자기효능감 수준에 따른 문제해결 능력 차이. 공학교육, 12(4), 30-37.
  12. 이명자(1997). 자기조절학습전략 훈련이 아동의 문제해결력과 자기효능감에 미치는 효과. 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 대학원.
  13. 이성혜(2014). 대학생이 지각하는 Merrill의 제1교수원리가 수업에 적용된 정도가 학습자의 인지적 참여에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 30(1), 77-103.
  14. 이혜정, 성은모(2011). 대학교육에서 대학생 중심의 교수설계를 위한 최우수 학습자의 학습특성 및 학습전략 탐색. 교육공학연구, 27(1), 1-35
  15. 임효진(2009). 대학생의 학업성취와 자기조절 학습전략. 아시아교육연구, 10(4), 57-84.
  16. 전명남(2003). 높은 학업성취 대학생의 학습전략과 수행 분석. 교육심리연구, 17(4), 1-28.
  17. 전명남(2004). Kolb-McCarthy 학습유형에 따른 심층학습의 차이. 교육심리연구, 18(4), 279-292.
  18. 조일현, 김연희 (2014). 대학생의 학습동기, 인지전략 및 학업성취 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 교육과학연구, 45(2), 77-98.
  19. 최지혜(2014). 성취목표, 성취정서, 학습전략 및 학업성취간의 구조적 관계. 한국교육학연구, 20(2), 167-183.
  20. 한순미(2006). 대학생을 위한 자기주도적 학습전략 프로그램의 개발 및 효과. 아시아교육연구, 7(3), 1-30.
  21. 황희숙(1999). 대학생의 학습력 증진을 위한 학습전략 훈련프로그램의 개발 및 효과분석. 대학상담연구, 10(1), 7-24.
  22. Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research and Development, 24 (1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541
  23. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
  24. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. (2004). Does Training on Self-Regulated Learning Facilitate Students' Learning With Hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (3), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
  25. Bedard, D., Lison, C., Dalle, D., Cote, D., and Boutin, N. (2012). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering and medicine: determinants of students' engagement and persistence. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6 (2), 7-30.
  26. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research. Pearson.
  27. Borich, G.D. (2011). Effective Teaching Methods: Research- Based Practice.(7th Ed.) Pearson.
  28. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. London, England: Kogan Page.
  29. Copper, M., Bentley, J., & Schroder, K. (2009). "How Well Do High-quality Online Courses Employ Merrill's First Principles of Instruction?" In Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, edited by Michael. Orey, V., J. McClendon, and Robert. Maribe. Branch. Breinigsville, PA: Springer.
  30. Cox, F. W. (2001). The relationship of skills and mathematics anxiety to success in mathematics among community college students. Doctoral dissertation, Delta State University.
  31. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice : A frameworks for teaching. Alexanria VA: ASCD
  32. Davis, D. M. (1997). The effects of a study skills course on improving the academic success of at risk college students. Doctoral dissertation, University of SanFrancisco.
  33. Dembo, M. H. & Seli, H. (2007). Motivation and Learning Strategies for College Success: A Self-management Approach(3rd E.) Taylor & Francis group, LLC.
  34. Derry, S., & Murphy, D.A. (1986). Designing Systems That Train Learning Ability: From Theory to Practice. Review of Educational Research, 56 (1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001001
  35. Dupeyrat, C., & Marine, C. (2005). Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck's Model with Returning to School Adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
  36. Edvantia (2005). Research digest: Effective instructional strategies. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory. Retrieved June, 7, 2018 from https://1atestacna.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/effectiveellpractices031109.pdf
  37. Eley, M. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145015
  38. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Ludtke, O., Pekrun, R., Sutton, R.E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom : exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of educational psychology 101 (3), 705-716. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014695
  39. Frick, T.W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., Green, P. (2008). Theory-based course evaluation: Implications for improving student success in postsecondary education. AERA conference, New York
  40. Frick, T.W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., Green, P. (2009). College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality. ETR&D, 57 (5), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9079-9
  41. Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Zlatkovska, E. (2010). Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education. ETR&D, 58 (2), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9131-z
  42. Gagne, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  43. Gall, M., Gall, T. P., Jacobsen, D. R., & Bullock, T. L. (1990). Tools for Learning: A Guide to Teaching Study Skills. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
  44. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on course performance: Goals, perceived ability, and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
  45. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
  46. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10 (3), 588-600.
  47. Jung, J. (2011). A Cross Cultural Investigation of Cognitive, Metacognitive and Motivational Factors Affecting Student Achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  48. Kostecke, R.D. (1990). Relaxation and study skills training for underprepared community college students. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester.
  49. Lyke, J. A & Kelaher Young, A. J. (2006). Cognition in context: Students' percpetions of classroom goal structures and reported cognitive strategy use in the college classroom. Research in Higher Education, 47 (4), 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9004-1
  50. Marton, F., and Saljo, R. (1984). 'Approaches to learning', in Marton, F., Hounsell, D.J. and Entwistle, N. J. (Ed.), The Experience of Learning (pp. 36-55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  51. McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., & Lin, Y. G. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. The University of Michigan: NCRIPTAL.
  52. Mecham, M. S. (2003). The effects of self-monitoring check lists and performance feedback on study skills of college students with disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, Utah University.
  53. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First Principles of Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (3), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
  54. Merrill, M. D. (2008). Why basic principles of instruction must be present in the learning landscape, whatever form it takes, for learning to be effective, efficient and engaging. In J. Visser & M. VisserValfrey (Ed.), Learners in a Changing Learning Landscape: Reflections from a Dialogue on New Roles and Expectations (pp. 267-275). Springer.
  55. Merrill, M. D. (2009). First Principles of Instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base (Vol. III, pp. 41-56). New York: Routledge Publishers.
  56. Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient and engaging instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  57. Moore, K. (2009). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  58. Nie, Y.,& Lau, S. (2010). Differential relations of traditional and constructivist instruction to students' cognition, motivation, and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002
  59. Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2005). Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learning Environments Research, 8, 67-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3
  60. Orlich, D., Harder, R., Callahan, R., Trevisan, M., & Brown, A. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
  61. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational psychology review, 18 (4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  62. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning component of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  63. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
  64. Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & De Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14 (2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400204
  65. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D,., Garcia, T., & Mckeachi, W. (1993). Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53 (3), 801-813 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  66. Reynolds, D., & Farrell, S. (1996). Worlds apart? A review of international surveys of education: achievement involving England. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
  67. Rotgans, J., & Schmidt, H. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16 (4), 465-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
  68. Ryan, K. & Cooper, J. (2010). Those who can, teach. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
  69. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  70. Schmidt, A. M. & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes.. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00156.x
  71. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional Design. John Wiley & Sons
  72. Stough, L. M., & Songeroth, M. S. (1994). Minority students who persist: A three-year study of undergraduate engineering majors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
  73. Lee, S, & Koszalka, T. A. (2016). Course-level implementation of First Principles, goal orientations, and cognitive engagement: A multilevel mediation model. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 17, 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9431-z
  74. Todd, R. H., Sorensen, C. D., & Magleby, S. P. (1993). Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers. Journal of Engineering Education, 82 (2), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00082.x
  75. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
  76. Walker, C. O., Greene B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Leaning and Individual differences, 16, p. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
  77. Weinstein, C.E., and Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third Edition (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
  78. Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003251770
  79. Wolters, C. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structure and goal orientation to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
  80. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., Hyde, A. (2005). Best Practice, Today's Standards for Teaching and Learning in America's Schools (3rd Ed.). Heineman.
  81. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284