Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

On the Inventive Thinking Principles in the Arts and Literature

문화예술 분야에 내재된 발명적 사고원리에 대한 소고

  • Chung, Won-il (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Young-taek (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 정원일 (경북대학교 컴퓨터학부) ;
  • 박영택 (성균관대학교 기술경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2018.08.19
  • Accepted : 2018.09.28
  • Published : 2018.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The need for integrating the arts and literature into the engineering education has been emphasized to cultivate the creative talent in recent years. However, there have been few studies to investigate how the arts and literature can be linked with nurturing creative talent in the engineering fields. In this paper, it is examined that inventive thinking principles for creative ideation in the engineering fields can be applied to the arts and literature. For the purpose, creative works in the arts and literature, which can be explained by the five thinking tools of SIT(Systematic Inventive Thinking), are collected. The result shows that engineering and the arts share common thinking patterns.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영우(2012). 패트리샤 무어가 말하다. 월간 디자인, 10월호: 127-129.
  2. 김중현.박영택(2017). SIT 5가지 사고도구에 내재된 TRIZ 발명원리 분석. 공학교육연구, 20(6), 35-42.
  3. 김중현.여형석.박영택(2017). 트리즈 도구별 활용도 분석: S사의 적용사례를 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 20(4), 3-11.
  4. 박영택(2016). 박영택 창의발상론. 한국표준협회미디어.
  5. 배재호(2016). TV부처, 백남준. 불교신문, 7월 2일.
  6. 신수정.이문규(2010). "고객의 눈에 딱 맞췄다" 듀얼뷰 백만대 신화. 동아비즈니스리뷰. 66호, 69-75.
  7. 신종호.이신형.윤주현.조은별.백아롱.조수연.이병윤(2017). 공학 창의성에 영향을 미치는 예술경험의 속성 탐색. 창의력교육연구, 17(1), 1-25.
  8. 이명옥(2012). 가까이 보는 것과 멀리 보는 것이 다른 그림. 뷰스앤뉴스, 12월 28일.
  9. 이민하(2016). 공학 창의성에 영향을 미치는 예술경험의 속성 탐색. 예술교육연구, 14(3), 29-46.
  10. 이용우(2009). 물질과 종교의 이질적 만남. 동아일보, 9월 23일.
  11. 정상영(2012). 백남준과 스승 존케이지. 한겨레신문, 3월 22일.
  12. 전원경(2009). 천재 화가 파블로 피카소. 신동아. 595호: 574-585.
  13. Boyd, D. & Goldenberg, J.(2013). Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results. Simon & Shuster.(이경식 역(2014). 틀 안에서 생각하기. 책읽는 수요일).
  14. Chenaug, B. X.(2014). Simplifying the bull: How Picasso helps to teach Apple's style. New York Times, 11 August.
  15. Furnham, J., A.(2000). The brainstorming myth. Business Strategy Review, 11 (4), 21-28.
  16. Goldenberg, J., R. Horowitz, A. Levav and D. Mazursky(2003). Finding your innovation sweet spot. Harvard Business Review, 81 (3), 120-129.
  17. Horowitz, R.(2001). From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 steps. The TRIZ Journal. Available from: https://triz-journal.com/triz-asit-4-steps/
  18. Naja, R.(2013). AD Classics: Tower of Winds. ArchDaily. 18 March.
  19. Sheth, S.(2017). The most impressive shoes ever made. Yanko Design. 20 June.
  20. Taylor, Z.(2014). 'Fantastic voyage' of Technion professor. ERSA Magazine. Issue 173, Feb-March.
  21. Terninko, J., A. Zusman, and B. Zlotin(1998). Systematic Innovation: An Introduction to TRIZ. New York: CRC Press.
  22. https://www.brainyquote.com/
  23. https://www.sitsite.com/