디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이러닝의 품질특성과 만족도에 관한 학습유형의 조절효과

Moderating Effect of Learning styles on the relationship of quality and satisfaction of e-Learning context

  • 안동희 (한국산업기술대학교 경영학부)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.12
  • 심사 : 2017.12.20
  • 발행 : 2017.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 이러닝의 품질요인이 학습자 만족도에 미치는 영향과, 그 관계에 있어서 학습유형의 조절효과에 대해 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구를 위해 이러닝시스템을 사용하는 대학생을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 데이터 분석을 위해 신뢰분석, 요인분석, 분산분석, 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 실증분석 결과 이러닝의 품질요인은 컨텐츠, 시스템, 서비스, 상호작용 등 요인으로 나뉘었고, 학습자 유형은 적극적 협동학습유형, 자기주도적 학습유형, 환경의존적 학습유형, 소극적 학습유형으로 분류되었다. 이러닝의 각 품질요소는 사용자 만족도에 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤으며, 특히 자기주도적 학습유형을 가진 그룹이 만족도 수준이 높았다. 학습유형은 품질요소와 만족도 간의 관계에서 조절효과를 보였으며, 특히, 소극적 학습유형은 커뮤니티, 교강사와의 다양한 상호작용에 미치는 조절효과가 타 유형보다 큰 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 이러닝의 성과에 있어 품질요소와 학습자특성 간 관계에 실증적 연구성과를 추가하였으며, 추후 이러닝 사용목적, 사용형태, 학습자 특성, 학습전략 등 이러닝의 성과 연구에 있어 타 요인들과의 관련성 연구로 확대할 필요가 있다.

This study aims to explore the effect of quality factors and learning styles on users' satisfaction in e-Learning context. For this purpose, statistical methods such as reliability test, factor analysis, ANOVA, regression analysis were carried out using the survey data from university students. The quality factors of e-Learning were classified into contents, system, service, and interpersonal activities while learning styles were classified into positive-cooperative, self-directed, environmental-dependent, and passive styles. The results showed that each quality factors of e-Learning has a strong positive effect on user satisfaction, and self-directed group has higher satisfaction than other groups. Learning styles have moderating effects on the quality-satisfaction relationship, and especially, the group of passive learning style has a strong moderating effect on the interpersonal activities. Theoretical and practical implications and future research directions are drawn from these findings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korea Elearning Promotion Committee "The 3rd basic plan for the development of eLearning industry and promoting the use of eLearning (2017-2019), 2017.
  2. Marc. J. Rosenberg, e-Learning: Strategies for delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
  3. Lin, H. F. Measuring Onine Learning Systems Success: Applying the Updated DeLone and McLean Model, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, Vol. 10. No. 6, pp. 817-820, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9948
  4. Alireza Hassanzadeh, Fatemeh Kanaani, Shaban Elahi, "A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities", Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 39, pp. 10959-10966, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028
  5. Jong-Yeon, Lee, Suwook Kim, Juri Kim, "Analysis of Quality Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction on Mobile Learning Linked to e-Learning in Universities", Journal of educational technology, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.209-240, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.2.209
  6. Ahmed Younis Alsabawy, Aileen Cater-Steel, Jeffrey Soar, "Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems", Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 64, pp. 843-858, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065
  7. Hanho Jeong, An investigation of continuance intention of e-learning use designed for learning assistant tool in university: Based on ECM, TAM, TPB, and FT, Journal of educational technology, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.307-334, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.2.307
  8. Tae In Han, "A Study on the Technical Evaluation of the Quality Certification for e-Learning Contents", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 49-66, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.49
  9. Selim. H. H., "Critical success factors for e-Learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models," Computers & Education, Vol 49, pp.396-413, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
  10. Pei-Chen Sun, Ray J. Tsai, Glenn Finger, Yueh-Yang Chen, Dowming Yeh, "What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction", Computers & Education, Vol. 50, pp.1183-1202, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  11. JaMee Kim, Yong Kim, Seongjin Kim, "Development of Quality Assurance Criteria for Mobile Device Based e-learning Contents", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.475-482, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.475
  12. ChoongJin Song, "A Study on the Teaching and Learning Activities, Student-teacher Communication, and Course Satisfaction" Asian Journal of Education, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.171-200, 2014.
  13. Chang Gab Seo, Seok Young Lee, "An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting e-Learning Learners Satisfaction", Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.1-25, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2009.18.3.001
  14. D. A. Kolb, "Experiential learning", Englewood Cliffs, Nj: prentice Hall, 1984.
  15. Gregorc, A. F, Gregorc style delineator, Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems, 1982.
  16. Felder, R., Silverman, L. "Learning and teaching styles in Engineering Education", Engineering Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, pp.674-681, 1988.
  17. Vimala Balakrishnan,., Gan Chin Lay, "Students' learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning", Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 33, pp.808-821, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.004
  18. Kwangsik Ahn, The Development of the Measuring Tool of Learning Styles in an e-learning, Doctoral dissertation, Chungnam University, 2005.
  19. Choi, W. S., Ahn, K. S., & Rho, T. C. "The Development of the Measuring Tool of Learning Behavioral Styles in an e-Learning Environment in Korea", Paper presented at the 2007 ITEA San Antonio 69 the Annual Conference, 2007.
  20. Hong, Seongyoun, "Analysis of Teachers' Perception on the Successful Distance Learners by Q-methodology: Focused on Teachers entering the Cyber Graduate School, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.429-463, 2011. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2011.28.4.429
  21. A. Ezzat Labib, Jose H. Canos, M. Carmen Penades, "On the way to learning style models integration: a Learner's Characteristics Ontology", Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 73, pp.433-445, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.054
  22. Yi-Chun Chang, Wen-Yan Kao, Chih-Ping Chu, Chiung-Hui Chiu, "A learning style classification mechanism for e-learning", Computers & Education, Vol. 53, pp.273-285, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.008
  23. Eun-Jin Oh, "The analysis of on-line learning satisfactions among learners who have the different learning styles", Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 75-101, 2004.
  24. Jaemoo Lee, "Development of an Adaptive Instruction System Applying Gregorc's Learning Style", Journal of The Korea Association of information Education, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.383-391. 2013. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2013.17.4.383
  25. Choi, Mina, Rho, Hye-Lan, "The analysis of learner characters, e-learning academic achievement, e-learning satisfaction and motive to take mobile learning courses according to a student's learning style in University", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.555-570, 2016.
  26. Jeong-Hee Kwon and Jae-Kyung Lee, "Effects of Learning Style on Learning Achievement and the Preference for Learner-Support Functions in a Web-Based Instruction", Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 111-138, 2002. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.18.4.111
  27. Jeong, Mu Goan, Choi, H. S. Lee, H. Y., Kim, M. J. "A Study on the Effect of Learner's Characteristics and e-learning System in the e-learning Satisfaction : Focused on the Mediating Effect of Lecture Commitment", The Korean Research Assocation for the Business Education, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.21-50, 2014.
  28. Kim, Han-Ju, Roh, Seak-Zoon, Yu, Byeong-Min, "The Effect of Learner Characteristics, Teaching Presence, and Content Quality on Learning Effets in the General University e-Learning: Focused on the Mediating Effet of Learning Flow", The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.171-194, 2015.
  29. Jeongmin Lee, Youngju Kim, "Examining structural relationships among self-regulated learning, flow, satisfaction and continuous intention to use smart learning", The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.127-150, 2015.
  30. Jeon Kwang Ho, "The Different Effect of e-learning Content Quality on Student Satisfaction", Journal of Product Research, Vol.34, No. 4, pp.137-149, 2016.
  31. Patricio E. Ramirez-Correa, F. Javier Rondan-Cataluna, Jorge Arenas-Gaitan, Jorge L. Alfaro-Perez, "Moderating effect of learning styles on a learning management system's success," Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34, pp.272-286, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.006
  32. Chihyun Ahn, Soo-Kyoung Joung, Sangwon Kim, Inho Choi, "The Analysis of E-learning Learners Characteristics for Improving Teaching and Learning in Online", The journal of Korean institute of information technology. Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.187-194, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2016.14.4.187
  33. Mi-Kyung Park, Myung-Sook Park, "Effects of psychological empowerment on achievement in team based learning: Mediating effect of co-regulation", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 15, No. 10, pp.367-376, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.367
  34. Eun Hee Kim, Ho Seung Byun, "Developing Guidelines for Training Program to Increase Faculty E-learning Competencies", (The)Journal of educational information and media. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.573-599, 2015.