DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Official Development Assistance and Environmental Assessment

공적개발원조사업(Official Development Assistance)의 방향과 환경평가

  • Lee, Jong Ho (Department of Urban Planning, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2013.12.20
  • Accepted : 2014.02.07
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

ODA projects such as multi-purpose dam, industrial complex, road construction etc. have resulted in environmental damage and resident relocation including destruction of site of living. Even the grandiose developments as ODA projects have made clear the value clashes between development and environmental conservation, and have brought about conflicts between public interests and public environmental right, and the discordance between public interests and private property rights in the recipient country. This study summarizes and analyses the Korea's ODA projects and will suggest the public participation and governance system based on Saemaul Movement, Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment based on the guideline of OECD DAC, and emphasize Strategic Environmental Assessment and Social Impact Assessment in the procedure of ODA projects. In the future the ODA project should be implemented for the overcome of poverty and response to climate change based on the experience and trial and errors of Korea's compact growth and past ODA projects.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성규, 2013, 개도국 지역공동체개발사업 사례연구-새마을운동 ODA 확대가능성을 중심으로, 개발과 이슈, 13, KOICA.
  2. 박명지, 2009, KOICA사업의 녹색화방안, KOICA, 23-24, 27, 101, 103-104.
  3. 소진광, 김선희, 2011, 공적개발원조(ODA)사업으로서 새마을운동 활용방안, 국토연구원.
  4. 이윤 외, 2012, 국제환경협력사업 내실화를 위한 국가전략개발, 한국환경정책.평가연구원, 24.
  5. 이종호, 2008, 환경갈등과 사회경제영향평가, 한국사회과학연구, 30(2), 청주대학교 사회과학연구소, 29-52.
  6. 임소영, 손혁수, 2012, KOICA환경주류화 가이드라인, 8, 14-16.
  7. 조공장, 한상운, 김보미, 2011, ODA사업의 환경평가 관리방안 연구, KEI, 17-23.
  8. 최은봉,한송이, 2011, 담론201, 14(1), 149-150.
  9. 대외경제협력기금, 2013, EDCF안내, 19, 36
  10. 대외경제협력기금, 한국수출입은행, 2013, 우리나라 ODA 통계자료집, 32, 37-39, 89.
  11. 환경부, 2012, 환경영향평가법 전부개정법률안 설명자료, 12.
  12. KOICA, KOICA사업 이해하기, 4-5, 32.
  13. KOICA, 2013, KOICA 평가연보, 9.
  14. KOICA, 2011, 2010 KOICA 대외무상원조실적통계, 122.
  15. KOICA, 2013, 2012 KOICA 대외무상원조실적통계, 114.
  16. KOICA, 2011, 동아시아 기후파트너십 성과보고서, 8, 10-11.
  17. 기획재정부 보도자료, 2012. 5.1.
  18. 2012. 7. 11. 환경일보.
  19. 이창호, 2012. 6. 14, 공적개발원조 약속지켜야, 중앙일보.
  20. Burdge, Rabel J., 2003, Benefiting from the practice of social impact assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(3), International Association for Impact Assessment, 225-229. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766284
  21. Burdge, Rabel J., 2004, The Concepts, Process and Methods of Social Impact Assessment, Social Ecology Press, Middleton, 3.
  22. Lee, Jong Ho, 2013, Prevention and Resolution of Conflicts on Development and Environment in Korea, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 22(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2013.22.1.051
  23. OECD, 2000, UN Millenium Development Goals.
  24. OECD, Development Assistance Committee, 2008, DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance.
  25. 국무조정실 개발협력정책관실(http://www.odakorea.go.kr)
  26. 한국국제협력단(KOICA: Korea International Cooperation Agency), http://www.koica.go.kr/
  27. 한국수출입은행(Korea Exim Bank: The Export-Import Bank of Korea), http://www.koreaexim.go.kr/
  28. 대외경제협력기금(EDCF: Economic Development Cooperation Fund), http://www.edcfkorea.go.kr/
  29. www.odakorea.go.kr