DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

풍화된 암반에 근입된 현장타설말뚝의 선단지지거동

End Bearing Behavior of Drilled Shafts in Weathered Rock

  • 권오성 (대림산업(주) 기술연구소) ;
  • 김명모 (서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부)
  • 투고 : 2006.11.27
  • 심사 : 2007.02.03
  • 발행 : 2008.07.31

초록

풍화된 암반에 근입된 말뚝의 선단지지거동은 신선암의 강도보다는 절리를 포함한 암반 상태에 의존한다. 본 연구에서는 암반상태가 말뚝의 선단지지력에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 먼저 총 4부지의 암반에 근입된 13본의 현장타설콘크리트 말뚝에 대한 재하시험, 그리고 재하시험 부지의 지반조사 자료를 포함하는 데이터베이스를 구축하고, 말뚝선단부의 거동과 암반물성치의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 선단지반반력계수와 암반물성치의 상관관계 분석 결과 암석의 일축압축강도와 지반반력계수 사이에는 일관된 상관관계를 찾을 수 없었으나, 암반의 상태를 나타내는 물성치인 $E_m$, $E_{ur}$, RMR, 그리고 RQD 등과 지반반력계수의 상관계수는 대부분 0.7 이상으로 매우 뛰어난 상관성을 보였다. 또한, 기존의 방법으로 추정한 선단지지력과 실측 선단지지력의 비교를 통해 기존 방법의 적용성을 검증하였다.

The end bearing behavior of piles socketed in weathered/soft rock is generally dependent upon the rock mass conditions with fractures rather than the strength of intact rock. Therefore, a database which includes 13 load tests performed on cast-in-place concrete piles and soil investigation data at the field test sites was made first, and new empirical relationships between the base reaction modulus of piles in rock and rock mass properties were developed. No correlation was found between the compressive strengths of intact rock and the base reaction modulus of weathered/soft rock. The ground investigation data regarding the rock mass conditions (e.g. Pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure, RMR, RQD) was found to be highly correlated with the base reaction modulus, showing the coefficients of correlation greater than 0.7 in most cases. In addition, the applicability of existing methods for the end bearing capacity of piles in rock was verified by comparison with the field test data.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 도로교설계기준(2001). 하부구조편, 대한토목학회, pp. 135-137
  2. Kwon, O.S., Choi, Y., Kwon, O. and Kim, M.M. (2005) Comparison of the Bidirectional Load Test with the Top-Down Load Test, In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1936, pp. 108-116
  3. AASHTO (1996) Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
  4. ARGEMA (1992) Design guides for offshore structures: offshore pile design, Association de Recherche en Geotechnique Marine, P.L. Tirant, ed., Editions Technip, Paris, France
  5. Aurora, R.R. and Reese, L.C. (1976) Field tests of drilled shafts in clay-shales, Proceedings of the 9th International conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Vol. 2, pp. 371-376
  6. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1976) Rock mass classifications in rock engineering, Proc. Symp. exploration for rock engineering, Bieniawski, Z.T.(ed), Vol 1, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 97-106
  7. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989) Engineering in Rock mass Classifications. Wiley-Interscience, New York
  8. Carter, J.P. and Kulhawy, F.H. (1988) Analysis and design of drilled shaft foundations socketed into rock. Report EL-5918, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California
  9. CGS (1985) Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 2nd Ed., Can. Geotech. Soc., Toronto, Ont., Canada
  10. Chang, M.F. and Broms, B.B. (1990) Design of Bored Piles in Residual Soils Based on Field-performance data, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 200-209 https://doi.org/10.1139/t91-027
  11. Coates, D.F. (1967) Rock mechanics principles. Monograph 874, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Mines Branch, Queen's Printer. Ottawa, Canada
  12. FHWA (1999) Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods, Publication FHWA-IF-99-025. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation
  13. Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 106(GT9), pp. 1013-1035
  14. Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. (1988) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion - a 1988 update, Proc. 15th Canadian Rock Mech. Symp. (ed. J.C. Curran), pp.31-38. Toronto, Dept. Civil Engineering, University of Toronto
  15. Hoek, E. (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses, ISRM News Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 227-229
  16. Hoek, E. kaiser, P.K. and Bawden, W.F. (1995) Support of underground excavations in hard rock. Rotterdam: Balkema
  17. Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. (1997) Practical Estimates of Rock Mass Strength, International Journal of Rock Mech. & Mining Sci. & Geomecahnics Abstracts, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 1165-1186 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X
  18. Horvath, R.G. and Kenny, T.C. (1979) Shaft resistance of rock-socketed drilled piers, Drilled shaft design and construction in Florida. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainsville
  19. Jeon, K.S. (2000) Analysis of vertical and horizontal resistance behavior of cast-in-situ concrete piles in completely weathered granite gneiss, PhD Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  20. Kulhawy, F.H. and Phoon, K.K. (1993) Drilled shaft side resistance in clay soil to rock, Design and performance of deep foundations. Geotech. Spec. Pub. No. 38, pp. 172-183
  21. Kim, J.H. (1997) Analysis of resistant behaviour of cast in-situ concrete piles socketed in gneiss, PhD thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  22. Kwon, O.S. (2004) Effect of rock mass weathering on resistant behavior of drilled shaft socketed into weathered rock, PhD Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  23. LCPC-SETRA (1985) Regles de justificaton des fondations sur pieux a partir des resultats des essais pressiometriques. Ministre de L'Urbanisme du logement et des Transports, Paris. (in French)
  24. McVay, M.C., Townsend, F.C. and Williams, R.C. (1992) Design of socketed drilled shafts in limestone. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 10, pp. 1626-1637 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:10(1626)
  25. O'Neill, M.W. and Reese, L.C. (1972) Behavior of bored piles in Beaumont clay. ASCE Journal of the Soil mechanics and Foundation Division, Vol. 98(SM2), pp. 195-213
  26. Peck, R.B., Hanson. W.E. and Thornburn T.H. (1974) Foundation Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 361-363
  27. Rowe, R.K. and Armitage, H.H. (1987) A design method for drilled piers in soft rock, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 126-142 https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-011
  28. Teng, W.C. (1962) Foundation Design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  29. Vesic, A.S. (1977) Design of pile foundations, N.C.H.R.P. Synthesis of Highway Practice 42, pp. 22-26
  30. Whitaker, T. and Cooke, R.W. (1966) An investigation of the shaft and base resistance of large bored piles in London clay, Proceedings of the Institution for Civil Engineers Symposium on Large Bored Piles, London, pp. 7-49
  31. Williams, A.F. and Pells, P.J.N. (1981) Side resistance rock sockets in sandstone, mudstone, and shale, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 502-513 https://doi.org/10.1139/t81-061
  32. Zhang, L. and Einstein, H.H. (1998) End bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 7, pp. 574-584 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:7(574)