Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Evaluation Perspective of Stream Weight in AHP

계층분석법을 이용한 하천의 중요도 평가기법

  • Published : 2002.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is very useful to estimate easily the various characteristics of streams and to manage objectively streams, as the order or grade among streams is determined by the natural characteristics and the degree of human utilization. With obtainable various statistics data and expert examination, we proposed the measurable evaluation index of "stream weight" considering the natural characteristics of streams, the utilization degree of streams and the social conditions of the regions crossed streams. The each stream weight is calculated as follows. Firstly, select the various factors which influence to streams in AHP. Secondly, determine the each weight of factors by the result of expert examination. Finally, sum up after multiplying the normalized factors by these two values. The stream weight can be used such divisions as the recognization of relative weight between streams, the determination of the stream management direction in the near future, the enhancement of the efficiency of stream management through the adjustment of the present stream grade and the determination of the management method concerned the stream weight as well.t as well.

하천의 자연적 특성과 인간의 이용정도에 따라 하천들간의 서열이나 등급을 정하면, 하천의 여러 가지 특성들을 파악하기 쉽고 하천관리에 객관성을 부여할 수 있게 되어 매우 유용하다. 본 연구에서는 현재 확보 가능한 각종 통계 자료와 전문가 조사를 이용하여 하천의 자연적 특성, 하천의 이용정도, 그리고 하천이 관류하는 지역의 사회적 여건을 고려한 "하천별 중요로“ 라는 계량화된 평가지표를 제시하였다. 하천별 중요도는 계층분석법을 이용하여 하천에 영향을 미치는 여러 가지 인자들을 단계적 절차를 거쳐 선정하고, 전문가 조사를 통해 항목별 가중치를 결정한 후 표준화된 인자값에 각 인자별 가중치를 곱한 후 합산하여 산정하였다. 하천별 중요도는 하천들간의 상대적 중요도 파악, 하천의 향후 관리방향 판단, 현재의 하천등급 조정을 통한 하천관리의 효율성 제고, 중요도를 고려한 하천관리방식의 결정 등에 이용될 수 있다.수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부 (2000). 한국하천일람
  2. 건설교통부 (2001.4). 댐 건설지역 경제활성화 방안 및 투자우선순위 결정방안 연구, pp. 386-387
  3. Brussock, P.P., Brown, A.V. and Dixon, J.C. (1985). 'Channel from and Stream Ecosystem Models.' Water Resources Bulletin 21, pp. 859-866 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00180.x
  4. Frissell, C.A., Liww, W.J., Warren, C.E., and Hurley, M.D. (1986). A Hierarchical Frameworks for Stream classification: Viewing Streams in a Watershed Context, Environmental Management, 10: 199-214
  5. Mosley, M.P. (1987). The classification and characteristics of rivers. River Channels: Environment and Processes. (Richards K. ed). Blackwell
  6. Rosgen, D.L. (1994). A classification of Natural Rivers, Catena 22: 169-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9
  7. Rosgen, D.L. (1996). 'Applied Reiver Morphology.' Privately Published by Wildland Hydrology Consultants, Pagosa Springs, Colorado
  8. Schumm, S.A., and Lichty, R.W. (1963). 'Channel widening and floodplain construction along the Cimarron River in southwestern Kansas.' U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 352D

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Risk Factors to Detect Anomaly in Water Supply Networks Based on the PROMETHEE and ANP vol.39, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.1.035
  2. Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis vol.16, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0008-z
  3. Development of Assessment Index for Water Resources Sustainability and Weights Evaluation of It's Components vol.39, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.1.059