• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.397-413
• /
• 2010

교사가 자기평가를 통해 많은 평가 요소를 일일이 측정하기는 쉽지 않으며, 또한 평가기준 요소가 방대하거나 해당 내용이 추상적이고 형식적인 것이라면 그 기준의 달성 여부를 판가름하기란 쉽지 않을 것 같다. 이러한 인식 하에, 본 연구에서는 교사 전분성의 핵심 영역인 수업과 관련된 일련의 활동에 대하여 교사 자신의 자기평가 방법에 따라 측정 용이한, 즉 실제적 활용 가치 및 의미가 높은 수업평가를 위한 요소를 탐색하고자 하였다. 다만, 본 연구에서는 수업 상황에 관한 교사 지식의 부문에 초점을 두어 수학 수업평가 요소를 마련하고자 하였다. 이러한 연구 결과로부터의 기대는 합리적이고 효과성을 거둘 수 있는 평가기준이 마련되어 이를 토대로 교사의 수업 전문성 신장이 보다 적극적으로 고무됨으로서 교실 수업이 개선되도록 하는 데 도움이 되고자 함이다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.207-216
• /
• 2012

Through quantitative video analysis of four algebra classes and statistical analysis of various types of teacher evaluation behavior in the classroom teaching, we get: (1) Teacher evaluation behavior in classroom is close to take 1/5 of the total time of the classroom teaching, and it appears most frequently in class exercises and take the longest time; (2) There are many forms of teacher evaluation behavior in classroom, and most of the behaviors are positive assessment; (3) Recognition evaluation is relatively conservative in a single form without losing fairness; (4) Classroom assessments of teachers' behaviors are primarily concerned about students' knowledge and skills mastery, and it is less involved in student feelings, attitudes and behaviors; (5) The correct teacher evaluation behavior in classroom will inspire students to create internal motivations; and (6) The correct teacher evaluation behavior in classroom can stimulate the potential of students.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.105-115
• /
• 2024

The hybrid teaching approach of "MOOC + SPOC + Flipped Classroom" overcomes the constraints of time and space that are typically associated with traditional teaching methods, thus compensating for the shortcomings of traditional approaches. These changes in education are driven by the "Internet+" wave and the growing popularity of online teaching. The "MOOC + SPOC + Flipped Classroom" hybrid teaching mode can successfully compensate for the drawbacks of traditional teaching methods, thereby overcoming their restrictions. By defining relevant concepts, one can distill the key characteristics of the "MOOC + SPOC + Flipped Classroom" hybrid teaching mode. Formative assessment was employed to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of this teaching approach. By leveraging the advantages of massive open online course (MOOC), small private online course (SPOC), and flipped classroom, the "MOOC +SPOC + Flipped Classroom" teaching mode incorporates real-time student assessment through peer evaluation, computer-aided evaluation, and teacher evaluation. This mode promotes the simultaneous development of theoretical knowledge and practical skills, helping students to establish strong foundations while fostering their practical abilities. While the traditional teaching method remains fruitful, the convenience of today's network allows the teaching profession to continually evolve. The traditional teaching mode heavily relies on teachers, making it impossible to conduct lessons without them. However, the development of MOOC enables students to seek knowledge online from their preferred teachers, rather than solely relying on their assigned instructors.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2005

One of the main factors that determine the quality of instruction is the teaching ability of the instructor administering the class. To evaluate teaching ability, methods such as peer review, student feedback, and teaching portfolio can be used. Among these, because feedback from the students is directly associated with how well the students feel they have learned, it is essential to improving instruction and teaching ability. The principal aim of instruction evaluation lies in the evaluation of instructor's qualification and the improvement of instruction quality by enhancing professionalism. However, the mandatory instruction evaluations currently being carried out at the term's end in universities today have limitations in improving instruction in terms of its evaluation items and times. To improve the quality of instruction and raise teaching abilities, instruction evaluations should not stop at simply being carried out but also be utilized as useful data for students and teachers. In other words, they need to be used to develop teaching and improve instruction for teachers, and consequently, should also exert a positive influence on students' scholastic achievements and learning ability. The most important thing in evaluation is the acquisition of accurate information and how to utilize it to improve instruction. The online instruction diagnosis item pool is a more realistic feedback device developed to improve instruction quality. The instruction diagnosis item pool is a cafeteria-like collection of hundreds of feedback questions provided to enable instructors to diagnose their instruction through self-diagnosis or students' feedback, and the instructors can directly select the questions that are appropriate to the special characteristics of their instruction voluntarily make use of them whenever they are needed. The current study, in order to find out if the online instruction diagnosis item pool is truly useful in reforming and improving instruction, conducted pre and post tests using 256 undergraduate students from Y university as subjects, and studied the effects of student feedback on instructions. Results showed that the implementation of instruction diagnosis improved students' responsibility regarding their classes, and students had positive opinions regarding the usefulness of online instruction diagnosis item pool in instruction evaluation. Also, after instruction diagnosis, analyzing the results through consultations with education development specialists, and then establishing and carrying out instruction reforms were shown to be more effective. In order to utilize the instruction diagnostic system more effectively, from planning the execution of instruction diagnosis to analyzing the results, consulting, and deciding how those results could be utilized to instruction, a systematic strategy is needed. In addition, professors and students need to develop a more active sense of ownership in order to elevate the level of their instruction.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.1071-1081
• /
• 2002

This article describes the status of science teacher education in Taiwan. The pre-service and in-service science teacher training system, institutes, curricula, programs, and evaluation on the institutes were briefly introduced. The differences before and after the 1996 reform of science teacher training system were compared. Finally, the attempts and efforts that have been done through the channels of research to promote science teachers' professional development were addressed. These efforts include the Case studies of exemplary science teachers' teaching performances, the development of licensure instruments for the certification of science teachers, the use of computers and distance education for supervising student teachers, the exploration of promoting science teachers' understanding about the nature of science, the exploration of promoting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, the exploration of promoting science teachers' ability of increasing effective student-teacher and student-student interactions, and the exploration of effective teaching strategies.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.88-106
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 초등학교 경력교사를 대상으로 그가 인식하는 자신의 과학수업과 수업 관찰 도구인 RTOP을 활용해 평가한 과학수업을 비교하여 교사의 과학수업에 대한 인식과 학생 중심 탐구수업의 실행에는 어떤 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 연구 대상의 '온도와 열' 단원 수업 녹화 자료와 교사 면담 자료, 그리고 연구 참여자의 교실 수업 스타일 설문 결과를 수집하였다. 녹화된 수업은 RTOP을 이용하여 분석하였고, 교사의 교실 수업 스타일 설문 결과와 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 연구의 대상 교사는 탐구 지향/학생 중심 수업을 실천하고 있다고 인식하고 있었지만, RTOP 점수로 판단한 결과는 근소한 차이로 과도기적/학생 영향 수업인 것으로 밝혀졌다. H교사는 교육과정에 대한 높은 이해와 내용 지식을 바탕으로 수업을 계획, 실천하였으며 학생과 학생, 학생과 교사의 활발한 상호작용을 촉진하는 과학 교실문화를 조성하였다. 하지만 교수 설계 및 실행에서 여전히 교사 주도적인 측면이 강조되었으며, 프로젝트 주제와 내용이 학생들이 과학 탐구에 대한 전반적인 경험을 하기에는 부적합한 면이 있었다. 결국 탐구 지향/학생 중심 과학수업을 위한 교사의 인식과 실제 수업 실행 사이의 근소한 차이는 '교수 설계 및 실행'이 얼마나 학생 중심적인가, 어떻게 학생의 과학 탐구 과정 경험을 위한 '절차적 지식'이 뒷받침되는 수업을 계획하고 실행할 것인가와 관계있는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 교사의 의도와 노력이 실제로 실행되고 있는가를 파악하는 일은 교사의 자기 평가만으로는 부족하며, 외부 관찰자에 의한 과학수업의 객관적 분석과 평가, 결과에 대한 논의가 함께 이루어질 필요가 있다는 점을 말해준다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.38-50
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze the current evaluation methods on faculty performance at Korean engineering colleges and develop teaching evaluation indicators for faculty performance. We investigated the faculty performance cases in engineering colleges inside and outside of the Korea, the engineering faculty's awareness of evaluation factors for their educational performance, and the appropriate ratios by indicating factors. Also we developed evaluation indicators for educational achievements to improve the current faculty performance system. 227 engineering faculty members answered our survey questionnaire. The result in the case study on faculty performance evaluation is as follows. First, most items of faculty performance evaluation are about quantitative indicators that can easily conduct objective evaluation. Second, evaluation items of faculty performance are mostly focused on instruction in a classroom. Third, the evaluation by students and administrative managers is more dominant than that by professors or their colleagues, document evaluation than on site evaluation, general evaluation than formative evaluation, and static evaluation than dynamic evaluation. Lastly, Some universities tend to substitute outstanding articles for underperforming instruction. The evaluation indicators that we have developed can be implemented by four types of subjects, such as students, professors, their colleagues, and deans. Also, based on the evaluation indicators, faculties can freely select their evaluation domains depending on the their tracks, such as a teaching track, a research track, or an industry-university cooperation track. The mandatory evaluation fields include teaching, student counselling, teaching portfolio evaluation by mentors or colleagues, class management evaluation by deans, and self-evaluation. The other areas are optional and professors can choose their evaluation factors.

• 대한간호
• /
• 제15권1호통권81호
• /
• pp.58-65
• /
• 1976

Development of systematic evaluation is regarded an important part in planning for student learning. The systematic evaluation is devided into three phases; the diagnostic, the formative and the summative. Nursing education, to provided comptent professio

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.219-230
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 이미지기술을 이용한 교과목과 과제물을 개발하여 강의 한 후 학생들을 평가한 사례연구이다. 이 결과 문헌정보학의 여러 과목에 기존의 시청각과목에서 가르치던 멀티미디어 기술과 새로운 이미지 정보기술 방법을 종합하여 강의하게 된다. 학생과 교수는 최고의 인간관계를 맺게 되고 문헌정보학의 과목은 재미있고 수강 학생수가 증가하면서 교수의 강의 평가점수가 많이 향상되었다.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2021년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.52-54
• /
• 2021

인공 지능 시대가 도래함에 따라, 로봇 교육과 그 역량 강화에 대한 교육은 전 세계적으로 널리 적용되고 적용되었습니다. 본 연구의 목적 : 학생 교육 및 교육에서 AI 교육 로봇의 응용 효과를 체계적으로 평가; 본 연구의 방법 : 컴퓨터를 사용하여 "Web of Science", "CNKI", "ERIC", "IEEE"와 같은 검색 도구에서 관련 교육을 검색하십시오. 로봇 티칭과 전통적인 티칭의 효과에 대한 비교 연구 검색 시간은 2000 년 1 월부터 2020 년 1 월까지입니다. 포괄적인 MetaAnalysis 2.0을 메타 분석에 사용했습니다. 본 연구 결과 : 31 개의 유효한 연구 문헌에 대한 정량 분석과 메타 분석이 AI 교육 로봇에 미치는 영향에 대한 객관적인 평가 분석 결과 AI 교육 로봇이 학생 학습 효과에 미치는 효과는 0.465임 이는 교육용 로봇이 학생의 학습 효과에 어느 정도 긍정적인 영향을 미침을 나타냅니다. 이 연구의 결론 : 학생 교육 및 교육에서 AI 교육 로봇의 적용 효과는 전통적인 교육 방법보다 우수하며 학생 학습을보다 효과적으로 홍보 할 수 있습니다.