• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.510-520
• /
• 2000

Despite the important of qualitative research method, little is used to understand dress and culture in Korea. This study proposed qualitative research method to understand deeply cultural aspects of dress. The articles which were selected from J. of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, The Korean Society of Costume, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Home Economics Research Journal, published master's thesis and doctoral dissertation, and interdisciplinary articles were analyzed from 1977～1999. Based on results of the analysis of articles, it was found that qualitative research method was appropriate to understand dress and culture. Many articles were dealt with non-western culture. However, the use of qualitative research method is very well suited to help the researcher understand concepts that are deeply embedded in western culture. Implications pertain to researcher in the area of human behavior and marketing. The importance of dependability and credibility was discussed in qualitative research method.

• 복식문화연구
• /
• 제10권6호
• /
• pp.601-616
• /
• 2002

Qualitative research is a method widely used in marketing research. However, the method has seldom been used in fashion marketing research in Korea. The purpose of this study was to prove that using both qualitative and quantitative research methods in main stage is much useful than using qualitative research method only in exploratory stage. Qualitative data were gathered by conducting Focus Group Interview(FGI) with 48 college students. Quantitative data were gathered by surveying college students, and 487 questionnaires were used in the statistical analysis. The data were analyzed using content analysis, mean, standard deviation, and t-test. As a result, FGI, one of the tools used in qualitative research methods, was proved to be useful in revealing consumers´deep emotional needs as well as purchase motives. FGI also revealed information which quantitative research method tools such as survey could have missed. Therefore, it is best to use multiple methods-simultaneous use of quantitative and qualitative methods-to understand fast changing consumers´needs and purchase motives.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.177-201
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 문헌정보학 분야에서 새롭게 대두되고 있는 질적 연구의 특성과 유형을 알아보고, 질적 연구의 신뢰도와 타당도, 그리고 이들을 저해하는 요인들에 대하여 조사하였다. 또한, 질적 연구와 양적 연구의 공통점과 보완점을 살펴보았으며, 국내 문헌정보학계에서 수행된 질적 연구의 수준을 가늠해 보고, 질적 연구방법으로 수행된 연구의 문제점과 개선점에 대하여 살펴보았다. 질적 연구방법과 관련하여 제기된 문제점은 질적 연구와 양적 연구의 병행 사용, 연구자의 주관성 극복위한 충분한 자료 제시, 연구과정의 철저한 관찰 및 조사과정의 반복, 타당도와 신뢰도 향상을 위한 체계적인 연구 설계, 다양한 질적분석 도구의 활용, 자료의 분석과 해석에서의 엄밀성 등으로 나타났다.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.113-125
• /
• 2004

This study aims to provide philosophical frameworks and approaches, and practical guidelines to interview research. While there are some studies which focus on the practical guidelines, there is a lack of studies which address the philosophical and conceptual issues integral to qualitative interview research. By discussing three different but related philosophical aspects of qualitative interviewing--phenomenology, hermeneutics, and dialectics--consistency among research purpose, research method, research methodology is pursued. Based on this discussion, four stages of interviewing--designing, conducting, analyzing, and writing of qualitative interview research--are presented.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2004

Purpose: This article explored issues arising from secondary analysis of qualitative data and analyzed the results of qualitative secondary analysis studies published in English, focusing on the methodological aspects. Method: A total of 29 studies were identified as qualitative secondary analysis studies, retrieving from the CINAHL database from 1982 to 3rd week of April 2003. These studies were analyzed by publication year, research method, and type of approach to secondary analysis. Result: The year that the qualitative secondary analysis study first published was 1992 and the number of the studies using secondary analysis has increased after the middle of 1990s. Grounded theory was the one the most frequently used(n=11, 37.9%) and phenomenological study the second most(n=6, 20.7%). In terms of types of approach, fifteen studies(51.7%) focused on the specific concepts that were not explored in the primary studies. Nine(31.0%) focused on the specific types of participants. Six were aimed to integrate contexts or perspectives to generate more general and abstract analysis of qualitative data. Conclusion: The results of this article will stimulate methodological discussion of qualitative secondary analysis and activate qualitative studies using secondary analysis.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.161-173
• /
• 2004

Although scholars have been using qualitative research commonly since 1990 in Korea, discussions on the criteria for the quality of qualitative research have been rare. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the trends of qualitative research methodology in Family Studies, and critically examine qualitative research articles published in the three most prominent journals in the field of family studies. The three journals were Journal of Korean Home Management Association, Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, and Journal of Family Relations. During the period from 1998 to 2003, twenty seven published articles were identified as qualitative research articles from the three journals. Qualitative research in family studies had a wide variety of purposes, but the articles shared similar characteristics: the main goal was to understand the nature of the research participants' experiences and perspectives. The common data collection techniques were in-depth interview, journal writing, and document analysis. Also, all research articles had applied various techniques to data analysis such as grounded theory, or van Manen's method. This article also discussed the usefulness of qualitative research methodology in broadening and deepening the knowledge body in Korean Family Studies.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.47-60
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 수학교육에서 혼합 연구방법(양적 연구방법과 질적 연구방법을 혼합한)을 활용한 연구에서 질적 연구 방법이 어떻게 적용되고 있는지를 분석하고, 질적 접근의 적용이 연구 목적 성취에 기여할 수 있는 시사점을 탐색하고 논의하고자 한다. 이러한 연구 목적을 달성하기 위하여, 본 연구에서는 한국수학교육학회의 초등수학교육 학회지에 2012년 게재된 전체 16편의 논문 중, 혼합 연구법을 활용한 논문 5편을 분석 대상으로 선정하였다. 비교 항목별 분석 결과를 양화된 수치로 간략하게 제시하던 기존의 혼합 연구물에 대한 분석 연구와는 달리, 본 연구는 질적 연구자의 관점에서, 자료 수집 및 자료 분석 방법, 연구 참여자 및 샘플링 선정 등을 중심으로 심도 있게 분석하여 그 결과와 시사점을 질적으로 제시하고 있다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.713-725
• /
• 1993

This paper presents methodological paradigms : quantitative positivistic (logical empiricism) as the received tradition in the scientific inquiry and qualitative naturalistic (post -positivism or nataralism) as a new paradigm in the Kuhnian sense. Various kind of qualitative methods under the umbrella term, qualitative inquiry, were briefly introduced. Details on the definition, epistemology, naming of subject, field technique (participant observation and ethnographic interview) of ethnographic research method as an adequate method for studying on the unique nursing phenomena in Korean culture were done. Besides, the concept of triangulation, issues on the methododogical paradigm, a criteria for rigor of qualitative naturalistic inquiry were mentioned.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.43-61
• /
• 2016

90년대 중후반 이후 질적 연구법이 우리나라에서 본격적으로 소개되기 시작한 이후, 질적 연구물의 수는 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 그러한 변화에도 불구하고, 우리의 연구 맥락에서 실제로 적용된 질적 연구물에 대한 분석이나 방법론적 논의는 매우 미흡한 것으로 보인다. 이러한 문제의식에서 본 연구는 출발하였다. 구체적으로 본 연구는, 수학교육에서 질적 연구방법을 어떻게 적용하고 있는지를 분석하여, 향후 질적 연구법을 활용하고자 하는 연구자들에게 연구에서 의도한 목적 달성과 연구 결과의 질적 향상에 도움이 될 수 있는 방법론적 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 이러한 연구 목적을 성취하기 위하여, 본 연구에서는 한국수학교육학회의 학회지인 '초등수학교육'에서 질적 연구방법을 활용하여 2012년 게재된 논문 5편을 대상으로 샘플링 선정, 자료 수집 및 자료 분석 방법 등을 중심으로 세밀하게 분석하여, 그 결과와 논의점을 질적으로 제시하고 있다.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.139-150
• /
• 1995

This research is planned to compare a quantitative methodology and a qualitative methodology in the study of the household work. For these research tasks this study is centered on husbands' participation in the household work. First it is reviewed study precedent using a quantitative method and a qualitative method to compare a research methodology of the household work. It is selected a survey method of quantitative methodology and a depth interview of qualitative methodology, Second the data are collected through the questionnaire and the depth interview with three couples,. Third to compare a quantitative methodology and a qualitative methodology it is looked about problems in the concept the grouping the collection of data and the interpretation of household work.