• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.17 no.31
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 1994

Sequentiality in decision making is an inherent characteristic of the R&D Process, Conceptual changes are noted during the Course of the Project which represent a continuous improvement in the quality of the data available during the various project stages. In this paper, Eight characteristic types of project evaluation models have been developed economic index models, portfolio models, decision theory models, risk analysis models, frontier models, scoring models, profile models and checklists. Each of these will be critically reviewed and appraised.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.8
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2015

Reviewing the previous researches related to SW quality, we find that they are mostly quality evaluation models for SW quality improvement and maturity-design models for software project management evaluation. There are few studies for the appropriateness of SW quality management by Quality Control(QC) functions. Moreover, they are bound for government's SW R&D projects in the view of the third party. Therefore, we propose means for the objective evaluation of SW quality management's appropriateness by QC functions. For this reason, there are three research proposes in our study as follows. Firstly, we produce problems for the evaluation of the existing government's SW R&D project management's appropriateness. Secondly, to overcome the drawbacks for the evaluation of the appropriateness of SW quality management, new appropriateness evaluation methods are proposed. Lastly, we investigate the availability and effectiveness of the appropriateness evaluation methods for WBS projects.

• Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.158-175
• /
• 2000

Up to date, the economic feasibility analysis on land consolidation and on-farm development projects were mainly depended upon the direct benefits from market value of project outputs. Therefore the projects were neglected in allocation of the government's financial funds and loans on account of undervaluation of the project benefits including socio-economic and environmental values of the projects. Accordingly the Extended Benefit Cost Analysis Method should be adapted to cover not only the benefits such as non-market values of environmental functions of the projects and but also the economic market values of the project outputs. The main objectives of this study is (1) to provision of the guideline for economic feasibility analysis based on the IBRD and ADB guidelines, (2) to estimate the benefits such as Productivity increase effect, labor saving effect, off-farm income increase effect during off-farm season, saving of O&M cost of farm mechanization, enhance of farmer's public health, increase of environmental public function of paddy fields, effect of food security and establishment of peaceful and uncontroversial rural society by implementing the land consolidation and on-farm development, (3) to introduce the newly adapted analytical method as the extended benefit cost analysis which could make possible the analysis of non-market goods such as the food security value and the environmental public value of paddy fields. To carry out the study, the publication on the guideline for economic analysis of agricultural projects were reviewed and consulted and for the post evaluation of the land consolidation and on-farm development project, field survey in Jeongja area were made for the feasibility study of the project by new method. According to the initial project plan, Jeongja land consolidation and on-farm development project has 96ha of benefit area and the project was started in 1989 and completed in the spring, 1990. The total project costs were amounted to 1,052 million won and the annual project benefits were estimated at 135.4 million in 1989 constant market prices. On the other hand, the newly estimated project benefits as a part of post evaluation of the project were amounted to 602.1 million won including all the benefits from the market and non-market commodities of the project as mentioned above column. The original IRP(Internal rate of return) of the project was estimated at 15.81%. On the other hand, the IRR of the post evaluation of the project was amounted to 16.83%. In case of including the benefit from the environment public function of paddy field, the SRR(Social Rate of Return) was reached to 38.81% and when we added the benefit from food security of the project, the SRR showed very high rate as 46.41%. In conclusion, the project were verified socio-economically feasible and environmentally sustainable considering the above decision making criteria.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.972-975
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to integrate Decision Theory Approach(DTA) and OR Theory Approach(OTA) systemically. and to develop Combination Theory Approach to build an optimal R&D project portfolio by strategies. To Integrate two approaches. Utility theory is introduced. Evaluation Results aye converted into utility values by the utility functions and the values are optimized by 0-1 programming. Scoring method and Integer programming is used to evaluation a correspondence with a goal and to allocation the limiting resources. And utility function is used to reflect the preference of decision makers on the project evaluation.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.20 no.11
• /
• pp.163-168
• /
• 2015

Various methods have been used to solve the problem of the evaluation of the complex decision-making. In the case of public projects, used the AHP method to evaluate the pre-feasibility of the projects. In this paper, The pre-feasibility was referring to the 'General guidelines for the pre-feasibility' of the KDI and was used the AHP to evaluate for public projects of the H-city. In order to achieve this object, the structured hierarchical model and questionnaire developed based on the evaluation guidelines of the KDI. Also, the weight of evaluation factor was calculated based on the AHP method and was obtained the evaluation results for the project implementation alternative.

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2008.11b
• /
• pp.1697-1702
• /
• 2008

The objective of the review is to introduce the evaluation method of welding joint designs by using forces extracted from FE models. This evaluation method is currently being used for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) project in the United States by request of the customer Engineer. The evaluation method was applied to critical joints connected by Fillet or Partial Joint Penetration (PJP) welds in car body structure for SEPTA project. The additional manual analysis is required based on the fact that Technical Specification in the United States requires the Contractor to apply Complete Joint Penetration (CJP) welds to all structural connections in Car body. However, in the car body design for Septa project there are some areas where CJP welds are not applied due to structural and manufacturing problems.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.3-11
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to verity the effect of project method on the task performance ability in development of a solar-tracking-control-system of specialized high school. In order to carry out this study, 2 classes of technical high school in Jeonbuk are chosen as experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught by project method and the control group was taught by traditional instruction. Project method was designed by 4 stages-selection of goal, planning, implementation and evaluation. According to these stages, experimental group's students carried out the project that developing solar tracking control system in solar generation. The results of this study are as follows; the project method was more effective than the traditional instruction in planning ability for task performance and implementation ability, subordinates of task performance ability. However, information gathering ability and evaluation ability on task performance, others in subordinates, it is not clear that the project method is more effective.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 2011

The Ministry of Land, Transport & Maritime Affairs(former-The Ministry of Construction and Transportation)establish & promulgated the guide line of The Law of Post Evaluation on May 10, 2001(Article 58824-318) to public construction project under the Operation Law of Construction Engineering Management the 18 clause of Article 38 in order to induce & collect useful data about construction project when plan new similar project in the future about the initial planning phase, former and past accomplished businesses to construction works, results, efficiency, effectiveness. Ever since The Ministry revised 5 times, the former contents are composed for SOC, big volume civil project, and revised contents Article 2010-14(Jan 15, 2010) included some architectural project, but that was not definite the evaluation contents, direction & objective standard. So evaluation index implements are ambiguous about accomplished project. This research arranged the correctness evaluation indicators, criterions for decide the grades in order to helpful informations for similar architectural project in the future.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 1998

Corporations are pursuing maximum returns from their R&D investment. They are also interested in sound measures to quantify returns. In fact, they use various measures and criteria for measuring returns from the R&D investment. But the fundamental problem is that there is no generic and widely acceptable measures and criteria. To make things more complicated, measures are very powerful and influential to the people in the corporations. Herbert Simon already indicated that people do many things but people usually do their best for the only tasks which are measured. Many researchers, like Chester(1995), are interested in R&D productivity measures and risks because what the company measures really influence R&D people and output. This article present design concepts of the R&D project selection and evaluation system in POSCO(Pohang Iron & Steel Company). This is an output extract from the 6-month joint activities with POSRI(POSCO Research Institute) researchers and POSCO R&D personnel. Process changes, new organizations and new selection and evaluation criteria are developed to improve R&D performance and to enhance technology management of the POSCO. This article covers new selection and evaluation criteria only. We would like to share our experience about how we redesign the selection and evaluation of R&D projects. We also bring insights how we seamlessly integrate 4 different project selection and evaluation steps as a whole. We hope that this case will give you a clue to improve your R&D management.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.10 no.12
• /
• pp.3645-3652
• /
• 2009

Most important factor for successful operation of collaborative project, which is a project based curriculum, is systematic and rational assesment. In this paper, we design and implement multidimensional performance assessment support system which can overcome simplicity of result-oriented evaluation. In the proposed system, learner can diagnose problems and improve those by oneself. We design the system satisfying both professor and student about evaluation results through evaluating total course of collaborative project.