• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.349-367
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 확률교육 실제의 개선 방향을 제시하기 위해 2000년 이후 출간된 국내 확률교육 연구논문 85편을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 지난 20년 동안 국내 확률교육에 관한 논문의 양이 상당히 적은 것으로 나타났으며, 인간 대상 연구가 인간 비대상 연구 비중보다는 조금 더 높았으나 더 많은 교수실험 연구가 필요함을 확인하였다. 연구 주제별 분석 결과, 독립성과 조건부확률, 조합과 세기가 많이 다루어지고 있었는데 국외에서는 이 주제들이 어린 아동들을 대상으로 다루어져야 하고 직관적인 수준에서 어떻게 교수-학습이 가능할지 많이 연구되고 있는 것에 비해, 국내에서는 대부분 고등학생 이상을 대상으로 이루어졌음을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 향후 국내 확률교육 연구의 과제와 발전 방향에 대한 시사점을 도출하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.233-244
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between creativity development and debate in solving a probability task. We developed the probability task with instructional strategies facilitating debating among students. 33 students in grade 11 who were identified as gifted participated in this study. The findings indicated that debating leads students to critical and reflective thinking on prior learning regarding probability concepts, which nurtured creative ideas on sample space.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.203-218
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to see what the essential characteristics are in teaching probability and statistics among various mathematical fields. we also tried to connect the study of probability and statistics education with what is needed for a science be synthetic to have its own identity as a unique research field. Since we searched for the future direction of the pedagogic study in the probability and statistics we first selected papers on probability and statistics published in (Series A), the Journal of Korea Society of Mathematical Education, and establish the following research questions. What kinds of characteristics can be found when papers on probability and statistics published in (Series A) are classified into low categories; contents of probability and statistics education, research method of the mathematics education, methods of teaming and teaching, and finally measurements and evaluation\ulcorner We classified papers into two kinds. One is related to the educational contents, consisting of the methods of learning and teaching, and of the measurement and evaluation. The other is reined to the methods of research, which is not a part of the educational curriculum but is essential for establishing the identity of mathematics education. According to the periods, papers on the curricular contents in 1960s were influenced by the New Mathematics, and papers on the curricular contents in 1980s were influenced by 'back to basic'. In 1990s, papers on methods of learning and teaching, and measurement md evaluation were increasing in number. Besides, (series A) from the Journal of Korea Society of Mathematical Education covers contents, methods of Loaming and teaching, and measurement and evaluation. And when I examined the papers on the contents of textbook of a junior high school related to the probability and statistics education and on methods of learning and teaching, 1 found that those papers occupy 1.84% in . When it comes to the methods of loaming and teaching, most of studies in (series A) are about application of concrete implement like experiment and practical application of computer programs, Through this study, I found that over-all and more active researches on probability and statistics are required and that the studies about methods of loaming and teaching must be made in diverse directions. It is needed that how students recognize probability and statistics, connection, communication and representation in probability and statistics context, too. (series A) does not have papers on methods of study. Mathematics pedagogy is a mixture of various studies - mathematical psychology, mathematical philosophy, the history of mathematics and Mathematics. So If there doesn't exist a proper method of study adequate in the situation for the mathematics education the issue of mathematics pedagogy might be taken its own place by that of other studies'. We must search for the unique method of study fur mathematics education so that mathematics pedagogy has its own identity as a study. The study concerning this aspect is needed.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.361-384
• /
• 2007

우리나라 초 중 고등학교 수학과 교육은 1997년 교육인적자원부 고시로 제 7차 수학과 교육과정(교육인적자원부 발간)이 개정되어 현재 초 중 고등학교 현장에서 시행되어 오고 있다. 확률 및 통계교육도 이러한 수학과 교육 과정의 한 부분으로서 시행되어진다. 본 논문을 통하여 제 7차 초등학교 수학과 교육과정에 맞추어 출간되어 교육 현장에서 쓰이고 있는 교과서를 대상으로 확률 및 통계영역에 대한 통계적 분석을 행하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.561-577
• /
• 2003

Because statistical concepts are important parts in school mathematics, mathematics teachers have trained by special education model. In this study, a desirable direction of curriculum on probability and statistics at pre-service for mathematics teacher is considered. We proposed four subjects as Exploration and Analysis of Data for Mathematics Teacher, Probability and Statistics I, II for Mathematics Teacher and Statistical Software for Mathematics, and suggested the constituents and something being kept in mind for each subject.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.353-358
• /
• 2009

The article discusses the independence concept occurring in the learning of probability. The author does not distinguishes the independence in the events from the independence in the trials. Instead, the author suggests the physico-empirical independence and the logico-mathematical independence to distinguish between the two concepts.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.199-225
• /
• 2007

초 중 고등학교 확률 및 통계교육 시 우리는 통계패키지로서 R을 사용할 수 있다. R은 대화식 처리방식을 따르기 때문에 배우기가 쉽다. 또한 R에서의 그래픽스는 아주 강력하다. 가장 큰 장점은 R의 사용이 무료라는 것이다. 이러한 많은 장점을 갖고 있는 R을 초 중 고등학교 확률 및 통계교육 현장에서 사용하는 표준 통계패키지로서 고려할 필요가 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.541-557
• /
• 2007

장대흥(2007a, b)에서는 R 패키지에 대한 전반적인 설명과 응용에 대하여 언급하였다. 본 연구에서는 제 7차 수학과 교육과정 내의 확률 및 통계영역 목표와 내용을 중심으로 하고 제 7차 수학과 교육과정에 따라 집필된 중 고등학교 수학교과서들의 확률 및 통계단원을 참고로 하여 R Cmmmander를 구체적으로 수업에 어떻게 적용할 수 있는 지를 제안하여 보고자 한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.381-406
• /
• 2006

This work aims to investigate mathematics teachers' knowledge and belief on the high school probability and statistics. For this aim, two research questions are estabilished as follows. (1) How is mathematics teachers' knowledge on the main contents of the high school probability and statistics in the 7th mathematics curriculum? (2) What is mathematics teachers' belief on the high school probability and statistics? Survey and interviews were carried out to answer the above research questions. Subjects of the survey were 2 7mathematics teachers who were answered to questionnaire. Among them, 3 volunteers were chosen by provinces for in-depth interview. Research findings in mathematics teacher's knowledge are as follows. Firstly, mathematics teachers do not have much of mathematical knowledge on the newly added and changed contents of the high school probability and statistics in the 7th mathematics curriculum. Secondly, mathematics teachers do not change their teaching-learning method for probability and statistics. Thirdly, many teachers think that the use of technology and reconstruction of the textbooks are required in teaching and learning of the high school probability and statistics. But, they stick on their own way. Research findings in mathematics teachers' belief are as follows. Firstly, many mathematics teachers view the nature of statistics as a branch of the applied mathematics and put the value of high school probability and statistics on the practical usefulness, Secondly, many mathematics teachers think that understanding concepts and improving problem solving ability are the best method of the teaching and learning. Thirdly, many mathematics teachers think that high school probability and statistics textbooks should cause motivations and interests in order not to give up studying probability and statistics. It is expected that the above findings can be used to change teachers' teaching and learning methods and to improve teachers training program.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2011

본 연구의 목적은 확률을 학습하지 않은 3, 4, 5학년 학생들의 확률 개념에 대한 이해 수준을 살펴보고, 확률 학습에 대한 가능성을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 3, 4, 5학년 학생을 대상으로 지필검사를 통한 조사 연구를 실시하였고, 선행연구를 토대로 한 확률 이해 분석의 틀을 분석기준으로 삼았다. 본 연구의 결과 학생들의 확률 개념 평균 이해 수준은 표본공간에서 가장 높게 나타났고 사건의 확률, 공평성, 확률 비교 순이었으며, 특히 표본공간에 대해 가장 높은 수준을 나타냈고 이러한 결과는 3, 4, 5학년의 공통적인 현상이었다. 반면 학생들의 독립성에 대한 이해 수준은 낮은 편이었고 학년 간에 유의한 수준 차이가 없었으며, 조건부 확률에 대한 이해는 가장 낮았다.