• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제54권4호
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 2005

This paper proposes a improved investment priority decision method of the facilities considering the reliability of distribution networks. The proposed method decides a investment order of the facilities combining, by fuzzy rules, the investment priority decision of KEPCO and the priority decision considering reliability evaluation indices. Where reliability evaluation indices are SAIFI(System Average Interruption Frequency Index) and SAIDI(System Average Interruption Duration Index), as referred to evaluation index for sustained interruption. The reliability analysis method of distribution networks applied in this paper utilizes analytic method, where the used reliability data is historical data of KEPCO. Particularly, we assumed that the failure rate increased as the equipment ages. To verify the performance of the proposed method, we applied it with the planned projects to reinforce the weak facility electrical facilities in KEPCO in 2004. The evaluation result showed that, under a limited budget, the reliability of the KEPCO in the Busan region using the proposed method can be enhanced than using the conventional KEPCO's method. Therefore, the results verify the proposed method can be efficiently used in the actual priorities method for investing the electrical facilities.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.367-376
• /
• 2009

This paper proposes an application methodology of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision making theory for improvement priority by assessment of various risk factors affecting on deterioration of water supply systems, as major social infrastructure. AHP method is organized with three level of hierarchy which is introduced for multi-criteria decision making in this study. In the first level, assessment outputs are calculated by AHP for each affecting factor. In the second level, criteria are estimated by using assessment results with respect to structural and environmental factors. Consequently, ranking decision is performed in the third level. In order to present the effectiveness, a proposed method is compared with FCP(Fuzzy Composite Programming) for decision making. Since the results of the proposed method show better performance with consistent results, it can be applied as an efficient information for the determination for improvement priority of the study infrastructure.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.101-113
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study are to develop a SDSS (Spatial Decision Support System) that can incorporate diverse opinions of stakeholders related the designation of protected areas (PA), and to employ the model for the readjustment of the boundary line of the Jirisan National Park of Korea. The SDSS would lead to more rational and less controversial decision-making during the expansion or removal of PA in Korea. Research methods are as follows. Firstly, to select evaluation criteria for SDSS for PA designation by using expert interview and literature survey. Secondly, to measure their preferences on the designation of additional PA or the removal of a part of PA based on the opinions of various stakeholders such as local residents, environmental groups, or public officials. Thirdly, to produce conservation priority maps based on a multi-criteria decision making technique. The SDSS would be used to rational decision making for the expansion of PA or the release of a certain part of PA by reflecting diverse preferences on biodiversity conservation and economic interest of residents. The visualization of conservation priority maps would also increase the efficiency of such decision making processes. The evaluation criteria for the expansion of PA for biodiversity conservation includes vegetation conservation value, wildlife conservation value, and the habitats of key species. The evaluation criteria for the removal of PA includes the proximity to roads and the boundary of PA, land use types, and conservation zoning of the PA. Preference weights are based on data collected from the Jirisan National Park. Both the conservation priority and removal priority maps are based on land parcels so that property rights of all parcels would be correctly represented.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권9호
• /
• pp.75-81
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 기업에서 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스를 채택하기 전에 판단 해야하는 중요한 요인들에 대한 우선 순위를 도출하고 평가한다. 연구 방법으로 전문가들에 대한 의사결정 사항을 반영하기 위해서 AHP 분석기법을 활용하였다. AHP는 복잡한 의사결정 문제를 계층적으로 표현하고 그 계층의 항목 간의 쌍대비교(Pairwise comparison)를 통하여 최선의 대안을 도출해 내는 의사결정 기법이다. 기존의 통계적 의사결정 기법들과 비교해 의사결정과정이 체계적이며 간단하여 이해하기가 쉽다. 또한 분석과정에서 의사결정자의 일관성을 판단할 수 있는 지표를 제공하여 절차 또한 합리적이다. 본 연구의 분석 결과 중요도 우선순위 항목으로 보안성, 신뢰성, 경제성 순으로 나타났다. 보안성의 하위 항목요인 중 제1순위는 접근권한의 통제성, 2순위는 외부위협의 안전성으로 도출되었다. 연구 결과가 추후 실무에서 기준으로 활용될 수 있는 방안으로 활용되는데 이바지할 수 있으며, 향후 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스 채택을 한 기업의 만족도를 평가하여 비교·분석하는 연구를 진행할 필요가 있다.

• ETRI Journal
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.558-569
• /
• 2017

In this study, a non-preemptive M/G/1 queueing model of a spectrum handoff scheme for cognitive wireless networks is proposed. Because spectrum handoff gives secondary users an opportunity to carry on their transmissions, it is crucially important to determine the actions of primary users. In our queueing model, prioritized data traffic is utilized to meet the requirements of the secondary users. These users' packets are categorized into three different priority classes: urgent, real-time, and non-real time. Urgent data packets have the highest priority, while non-real time data packets have the lowest priority. Riverbed (OPNET) Modeler simulation software was used to simulate both reactive and proactive decision spectrum handoff schemes. The simulation results were consistent with the analytical results obtained under different load and traffic conditions. This study also revealed that the cumulative number of handoffs can be drastically decreased by exploiting priority classes and utilizing a decent spectrum handoff strategy, such as a reactive or proactive decision-based strategy.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.91-108
• /
• 2007

To decide a reasonable investment priority of public enterprises, it is required to have an efficient evaluation standard. However, without having a standard, a budget for those enterprises has been allocated. In this research, for the efficient and reasonable budget allocation, it is discussed how to decide investment priority of information and communication enterprises of the government. In order to examine possible alternatives of the investment priority of information and communication enterprises of the government, seventeen enterprises were chosen from the enterprises of Ministry of Information and Communication. Public benefit, economic benefit, technology, politics, and step-up increase of budget were set up as evaluation standards and 16 specific standards were set up as subordinates. A hierarchical decision model was designed and analyzed by using AHP.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• 제13권1_2호
• /
• pp.323-334
• /
• 2003

This paper presents a goal-programming (GP) model for management decision-making for sugarcane fertilizer mix problems. Sensitivity analysis on the priority structure of the goals has been performed to obtain all possible solutions. The study uses Euclidean distance function to measure distances of all possible solutions from the ideal solution. The optimum solution is determined from the minimum distance between the ideal solution and other possible solutions of the problem. The optimum solution corresponds to the appropriate priority structure of the problem in the decision-making context. furthermore, the results obtained from sensitivity analysis on the cost of combination of fertilizers confirm the priority structure.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제85권2호
• /
• pp.149-157
• /
• 1996

본 연구는 22개 지역에 대하여 임목수확 및 무육작업을 위한 임도개설순위를 결정하기 위하여, 다기준의사결정법중에 선호보정이 없는 모형인 최대최소법 및 최대최대법, 선호보정이 있는 모형인 단순가중치법, 계층가중치법 및 TOPSIS법의 적용성을 검토하였다. 그 결과 단순가중치법과 TOPSIS법이 임도개설순위의 결정에 적합한 것으로 판명되었다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권12호
• /
• pp.145-153
• /
• 2017

Systemic management is required at each phase of the C4I system life cycle to achieve information advantage in the battlefield through stable operation of the C4I system under the NCOE. In particular, the maintenance phase is the longest period of the C4I system life cycle, and it is easy to utilize and analyze data such as faults that occur during system operation. However, according to the previous research, the maintenance is evaluated as a phase in which the definition and management of comprehensive indicators are insufficient compared to other phase. In this paper, we propose the method of C4I Maintenance Priority decision using Maintenance metric. As a result of modifying the Naval Tactical C4I System's preventive maintenance cycle according to the priority, the total number of faults is reduced and the maintenance efficiency is improved.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.161-166
• /
• 2011

This study proposes a priority model for program directors in charge of Corporate Social Contribution to make the best decision. This empirical analysis aims to discover the most significant area among various programs of Corporate Social Contribution Activities. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to test the priority model. The study attempts to demonstrate how the model helps providing better decision choices in corporate practices. The priority preference in Corporate Social Contribution Activities programs among corporate social contribution practitioners, PR professors and NGO activists are studied for their priority on corporate social contribution programs, among they valued com mon benefit social activity most important.