• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.113-131
• /
• 1999

이 연구는 필자들의 선행연구로 이미 제시되었던 공공도서관 평가지표에 대해 도서관 관리층과 사서직은 물론 이용자들이 생각하는 중요성에 대한 인지도를 비교, 분석하였다. 전국의 공공도서관을 무선표집하여 설문 조사하였는데, 분석된 결과는 공공도서관 평가작업을 위한 지표선정 및 가중치 부여 등의 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.97-114
• /
• 2019

This study aims to analyze the effect of urban ecosystem restoration projects by evaluating the short-term restoration performance of the project sites, from both qualitative and quantitative evaluations. In this study, for the qualitative evaluation, we derived the evaluation frame from previous studies and literature. For the quantitative evaluation, the changes in ecological connectivity after the restoration project were described using landscape permeability and network analysis. In addition, changes in habitat quality after the restoration project were evaluated by using InVEST Habitat Quality Model. These evaluations were applied to the three natural madang (ecological restoration) projects and two ecosystem conservation cooperation projects. As a result, three categories, 10 indicators, and 13 sub-indicators were derived from literature as the evaluation frame for this study. In the case of quantitative evaluation of restoration performance, habitat quality increased by 45% and ecological connectivity by 37% in natural-madang, and habitat quality by about 12% and ecological connectivity by about 19% in ecosystem conservation cooperation projects. This implies that the ecological restoration project can increase the ecological connectivity and the habitat quality of degraded sites even in a short period of time by improving the land-cover and land use. The results by applying the evaluation frame indicated that ecological and environmental factors and the ecological functions were improved by the restoration works, even though the magnitude of performances were diverse depending on the specific evaluation items, project type, and site characteristics. This study clarified that the success of ecological restoration project should be assessed by both of the short-term and long-term goals, which can be achieved by the maintenance and sustainable management, respectively.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.250-260
• /
• 2022

Evaluating the effectiveness of educational programs involves measuring learning processes as well as outcomes. It is essential to study cohorts of students and graduates to evaluate the long-term effects of educational programs with data generated both during education and after graduation. The purpose of this study was to establish cohorts of students and graduates to evaluate their performance, thereby providing a basis for evaluating the social accountability of medical education. In this study, student and graduate cohorts were built for both students currently enrolled and graduates at Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM). A model involving the process of cohort establishment and an evaluation indicator framework was developed. In the process of cohort establishment, the following steps were conducted: defining the goals and objectives of the student and graduate cohorts, organizing a cohort committee, developing regulations, registering cohorts, acquiring consent, and building a database. A framework of evaluation indicators according to the graduate roles of IUCM was developed by adapting Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. Next, items to be collected in student and graduate cohorts were selected, and the current status of existing data was analyzed. Moreover, a preliminary analysis was conducted, including analyses of the evaluation indicators and graduates' performance. This study suggests that it is necessary to include additional evaluation indicators considering students' learning environment and well-being in student cohorts and to develop strategies or methods for graduates to continue participating in data collection for a long-term study.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2009

본 연구에서는 대학도서관 정보봉사시스템의 성과를 측정하기 위하여 선행연구 문헌조사를 통하여 도서관 이용, 문헌자료 대출, 참고봉사 및 이용자교육, 전자서비스 등 4개 영역에 16개 성과측정을 위한 지표를 개발하고 이를 바탕으로 대규모, 중규모, 소규모 대학도서관을 각각 2개 기관씩 모두 6개 기관을 조사하였다. 조사된 결과를 바탕으로 지표의 의미와 활용 방안 및 정보봉사시스템의 성과 향상을 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2012년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.177-180
• /
• 2012

Korean government has developed and implemented a five-year master plan in order to enhance construction technology competitiveness and its level of development. However, without detailed assessment of past plans it is not likely to retain feasibility and sustainability of a new five-year plan, This study analyses adequacy of the 4th five-year master plan in terms of evaluation strategies such as indicators, methods, targeted performance through benchmarking various construction policies utilized by developed countries. In addition, this manuscript provides the basis structure and critical factors for establishing future construction policies or plans.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.77-95
• /
• 2013

평가지표(evaluation indicator)란 공공기관이나 기업 등에서 공정한 평가를 진행하기 위해 작성하는 문서로서, 평가표 작성에 앞서 그 기준이 되는 사항을 정하고 이를 명시한 문서를 말한다. 평가지표에는 평가기준과 평가요소, 평가항목, 평가방법, 배점 등 평가 전반에 관한 사항이 구체적으로 명시되어야 하며, 이를 통해 평가의 공평성과 투명성을 확보할 수 있다. 본 연구는 공공도서관 운영평가지표의 효용성 정도를 면밀히 분석하여 실제 운영평가에서 개별 도서관 담당자가 평가내용을 이해하기 쉽고, 평가지표를 통해 객관적이고 신뢰성 있는 데이터를 수집할 수 있도록 개선이 필요한 평가지표 항목을 선정하고 이에 대한 개선 내용을 제시하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 본 연구에서는 한국 공공도서관 운영평가지표의 면밀한 분석과 평가지표의 평균 도달률, 운영평가지표와 통계지표와의 비교분석을 통하여 개선이 필요한 항목을 선정하고 이에 대한 개선 내용을 제시하였다. 제안된 내용은 향후 공공도서관의 운영평가지표의 개선에 반영될 수 있다.

• 인간식물환경학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2021

Background and objective: The vitalization of urban agriculture has increased various forms of experience-based education using school gardens, which raised the importance of school gardens in terms of value as well as the need to develop an implementation system for education-based agricultural experience service using school gardens. Thus, we reset the evaluation indicators from the previous study to establish objective evaluation indicators that enable quantitative comparison of school garden education services. Methods: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and direct question (DQ) surveys were conducted on 20 experts from October 12 to 19, 2020 after establishing the purpose and subjects of evaluation, and then the weights were calculated using the Expert Choice 2010 program. Results: First, we analyzed the problems of the previous indicators by categorizing the performance indicators and comparing and verifying them with six requirements of valuation. Then, we added 'welfare values' and established sub-indicators accordingly. The importance of value indicator in AHP was in the order of education values (0.544), health values (0.182), welfare values (0.164), environmental values (0.062), and economic values (0.049). The importance of environmental and economic values was relatively low, less than 0.1. The importance of sub-indicators was highest in cultivating character (0.144), followed by enhancing ecological sensitivity (0.141) > promoting mental health (0.134) > cultivating agricultural literacy (0.120) > improving social skills (0.104). And mitigating climate change in environmental values was lowest (0.009). Increase in income was the lowest (0.036). This can be regarded as the expression of change to increase the educational effect based on collective life and the connotative meaning of 'school'. In the case of DQ, the AHP weight and order were the same, but the environmental and economic values were relatively low, and the result was different from AHP weight. For sub-indicators, the importance in DQ was highest in promoting mental health (0.136), followed by promoting physical health (0.085), ]cultivating character (0.082), social integration (0.072), and enhancing ecological sensitivity (0.071). After reviewing related experts, we came up with 5 evaluation indicators and 16 sub-indicators for school garden education service, which are objective evaluation indicators that enable quantitative comparison. Conclusion: In the future, we will validate the socioeconomic values of school garden education services and contribute to revitalizing school gardens by establishing policy alternatives for effective operation and management of school gardens.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2013

The current manufacturers have generated tremendous amount of digitized product data to efficiently share and exchange it with other stakeholders or various software systems for product development. The digitized product data is a valuable asset for manufacturers, and has a potential to support high level strategic decision makings needed at many stages in product development. However, the lack of studies on extraction of key performance indicators(KPIs) from product data management(PDM) databases has prohibited manufacturers to use the product data to support the decision makings. Therefore this paper examines a possibility of an architecture that supports KPIs for evaluation of product development performances, by applying multidimensional product data model and on-line analytic processing(OLAP) to operational databases of product data management. To validate the architecture, the paper provides a prototype product data management system and OLAP applications that implement the multidimensional product data model and analytic processing.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.99-116
• /
• 2012

이 연구는 국가적 차원에서 외국학술지의 효율적 이용을 위해 설립된 외국학술지지원센터들의 운영전반과 성과를 평가하기 위한 평가지표를 개발하기 위해 시도된 것이다. 이를 위해 이 연구에서는 평가지표를 운영전략과 운영시스템, 운영성과의 세 부문으로 나누고, 이를 다시 8개 세부부문, 16개 지표, 35개 세부지표로 구분하여 제시하였다. 각각의 지표는 AHP 전문가설문조사 결과 도출된 가중치로 배점을 결정하였으며, 최종점수는 운영전략부문 190점, 운영시스템부문 440점, 운영성과부문 370점, 총 1,000점 만점으로 구성하였다. 개발된 평가지표를 바탕으로 평가지표정의서를 개발하였으며, 이 정의서를 기반으로 시범평가와 자체평가를 실시하여, 차후의 실제평가에서 나타날 수 있는 문제점들을 검토하도록 하였다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제54권3호
• /
• pp.81-104
• /
• 2023

이 연구는 부산광역시 금정구 소재 3개 공공도서관을 사례로 하여, EBSM과 collectionHQ에서 제시하는 핵심성과 지표를 적용하여 장서성과평가를 시도한 사례연구이다. 장서의 성과를 중심으로 평가하는 장서성과평가에 집중하며, 개별 도서관 평가뿐만 아니라 평가결과에 나타난 도서관별 차이를 검토하였다. 연구에서 선정한 핵심성과지표는 누더기 아이템, 사망 아이템, 인기저자 공급, 인기주제 공급, 과잉재고 주제분야와 재고부족 주제분야이다. 주요한 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 누더기 아이템 평가에서 3개 도서관 모두 전체 아이템에서 누더기 아이템의 비율이 낮게 나타났다. 둘째, 사망 아이템의 경우, 3개 도서관 모두 높은 비율로 나타나, collectionHQ에서 제안한 기준값을 초과하였다. 셋째, 인기저자 상위 10명을 확인하였으며, 도서관마다 차이가 났다. 넷째, 인기주제 공급 평가에서는 3개 도서관 모두 기준값에 미치는 인기주제가 없는 것으로 나타나, 도서관별로 상위 10개의 인기주제를 식별하였다. 다섯째, 과잉재고 주제분야 평가에서는 금샘도서관은 과잉재고 주제분야가 하나도 없었지만, 금정도서관과 서동도서관에서는 다수의 주제분야가 과잉재고 상태인 것으로 나타났다. 여섯째, 재고부족 주제분야 평가에서는 금샘도서관에서만 재고부족 주제분야가 나타났다.