• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.15-26
• /
• 2015

1910년대 근대적 지적제도가 창설된 이후 100여 년간 새로운 기술의 도입과 사회발전에 따른 요구사항을 수용하기 위한 부분적 보완은 이루어졌지만 지적공부에서 등록 관리하고 있는 등록사항을 확장하기 위한 방향성 설정에 관한 부분에 대해서는 거의 논의가 이루어지지 않았다. 본 논문에서는 국제측량사 연명(FIG) 7분과위원회에서 미래 지적제도 발전방향으로 제시한 지적 2014(Cadastre 2014)의 내용 중 첫번째 선언문의 내용을 바탕으로 현재의 권리 관점의 지적공부 등록사항을 의무 및 제한사항으로 확대하여 등록하는 방안을 제안하였으며, 이에 대한 지적공부 등록사항 확장 방향성으로 법률적 확장성과 지하 및 지상 공간 객체로의 확장에 관한 기술적 확장성, 마지막으로 토지와 관련된 정보 공시를 위한 플랫폼 역할을 기능적 확장성으로 제시하였다. 또한 확장 방향성을 고려하여 지적공부 등록사항 확대를 적용할 수 있는 분야로 환경 분야와 안전관리 분야에 대한 적용을 검토하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제71권
• /
• pp.147-170
• /
• 2016

International maritime law conventions concerned with cargo liabilities have sought to achieve solutions which will be acceptable to a wide range of states. The Rotterdam Rules was approved by the UN Assembly on 11 December 2008. The Rotterdam Rules are intended to replace The Hague and Hamburg Rules. This paper is comparing The Rotterdam Rules with The Hague and Hamburg Rules for the carrier' liabilities and exceptions in order to find carrier' liability System, the burden of proof and exceptions in the International maritime Rules. The purpose of this paper is considering the carrier's principal recourse for defending himself inmost cargo claims. The first area analyze the transfer of carrier's fundamental Liability system in the International Rules. The second is the matter on the appointment of proof in order to establish liability or to be relieve of liability. And the third is the change of the carrier's possible exclusions from liability in the International maritime Rules. From the result of the said analysis, my paper suggests differences of the exclusions in the Rotterdam Rules comparing with the Hague and Hamburg Rules, and features of the Rotterdam Rules appling exceptions on the basis of the Hague and Hamburg Rules with regard to carrier's liability and burden of proof. The former is the inclusion of three exclusions, the deleted natural fault, and The provision making the carrier responsible for the acts of its servants or agents in the 'fire on the ship' of the Rotterdam Rules. The latter is deleting the principle of overriding obligation related to carrier's obligation of seaworthiness in the Rotterdam Rules, the burden of proof being diverted from the carrier to the carrier and the shipper in the cargo damage caused by two factors(one for which the carrier was liable and the other for which it was excusable) in the new rules.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.121-139
• /
• 2005

The case, Papera Traders Co. Ltd. and Others v. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd and Another(The Eurasian Dream), was occurred on July, 1998 when the ISM Code became mandatory under SOLAS and from that date it applied to oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers, bulk carriers and cargo high-speed craft of 500 gross tonnage and above. On July 23, 1998, a fire started on the deck of pure car carrier Eurasian Dream while in port at Sharjah. The source of fuel was the stevedores action of pouring petrol or transferring fuel in some way - refueling or pouring into a carburettor. The fire eventually destroyed or damaged the vessels cargo of new and second-hand vehicles and rendered the vessel itself a constructive total loss. Justice Cresswell held that the fire that destroyed or damaged the cargo was due to the unseaworthiness of the vessel they have the burden of proving that the vessel was unseaworthy before and at the beginning of the voyage and that the loss or damage was caused by that unseaworthiness. This case was a dispute between dependent and claimant alleging that the carrier should provide "properly man, equip and supply the ship and keep the ship so manned" under Hague-Visby Rules. Although ISM code was not officially applied to the carriage by car carriers until July 2002, a rule based on the code had customarily been employed as a mean for international dispute resolution. Examining the above case closely, the purpose of this study is to explore the relation of ship management and obligation to exercise due diligence in making the vessel seaworthy.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.191-210
• /
• 2017

지난날 경쟁력과 부가가치 창출의 원천이 토지 노동 자본에서 창출되었다면 오늘날 21세기 지식기반경제에서 새로운 성장의 동력으로 기술이 주목 받고 있다. 이러한 세계경제 패러다임의 변화는 국제적 기술이전의 확산을 가져왔고 국제거래에 있어서 물품과 같은 유형재뿐만 아니라 특허나 노하우 등 대표되는 무형재의 거래도 점차 증가하고 있다. 국제라이선스계약은 기술이전의 대표적 형태로 기술제공자가 기술의 소유권은 그대로 보유한 채로 기술이용자에게 일정기간 기술의 실시만을 허락하고 그 대가로 로열티를 취하는 계약이다. 이러한 기술거래를 통한 경제적 이익은 계약의 원만한 이행과 종료로 실현할 수 있다. 한편 국제라이선스계약은 기술이라는 무형재를 대상으로 하면서 일정기간 대여를 목적으로 한다는 점에서 당사자간 의무가 국제상거래의 대표적 형태인 매매계약과 상이한 부분이 많다. 이에 본고에서는 국제라이선스계약상 당사자의 주요 의무와 각 의무에서 분쟁이 될 수 있는 쟁점을 살펴봄으로써 분쟁의 사전적 예방에 도움이 될 수 있는 시사점을 도출하고자 함을 목적으로 한다.

• 지역사회간호학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.303-312
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to survey the knowledge level, attitude and practice of nurses toward their work. The subjects of the study were composed of 98 nurses from 3 general hospitals, 1 oriental medical hospital, 2 health centers and several community health posts and schools. Data were collected from May to October, 1998. In data analysis, an SPSS PC program was utilized for descriptions. 1) 16 nurses (16.3%) experienced medical accidents on the 7 nurses(7.1%) 1 time, 6 nurses (6.1%) 2 times, and 3 nurses(3.1%) 3 times. 2) Concerning knowledge of their legal obligations ; the prohibition of telling secrets was .89, the prohibition of reading medical records was .58, the keeping of medical records was 1.0 and the teaching of recuperation was. 79. The total mean score was. 86. Concerning attitude and practice; the prohibition of telling secrets was 81.6%, 63.3%. The prohibition of reading medical records was 61.2%, 60.2%. The keeping of medical records was 98%, 98%. The explanation for treatment, care and test was 91.8%, 66.3%. The teaching for recuperation was 63.3%, 63.3%. 3) Knowledge of their legal responsibilities; 29. 6% of the subjects thought that they should report a medical accident to their headnurse, but 75.5% of the subjects actually reported to the headnurse. 39.8% of the subjects thought that nurses were liable for the faults of nursing aides. The total mean score was .45. 46% of the subjects asked a senior staff's advide on difficult affairs. Nurses obeyed legal obligations when concern ing the protection of a client, but were passive when concerning self protection. Also, headnurses were required as adviser, guide and advocate.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.65-78
• /
• 2008

2005년 철도구조개혁 시행에 따라 한국철도공사가 출범하였고, 철도운영자가 제공하는 공익서비스비용에 대하여는 철도산업발전기본법 제32조 및 제33조에 의해 원인제공자가 보상토록 규정하고 있다. 이에 따라 공익서비스비용의 보상은 '05년도 처음 시행되었으나, 비용 산정의 적정성 및 기준 미비 등으로 보상규모의 공정성 객관성에 대한 외부기관으로부터 문제가 제기되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 국내외 유사사례를 검토하고, 공익서비스비용 보상의 주요항목인 벽지노선의 적정한 선정기준 및 비용 산출, 운임감면액 보상범위 등과 관련하여 문제점과 개선방안을 살펴보았다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제26권
• /
• pp.35-86
• /
• 2005

International distributorship contract(IDC), as well as international agency contract is a type of contract which is most frequently used in international trade. But one of the main difficulties faced by parties of IDC is the lack of uniform rules for this type of contract. This means that both parties should be careful about each clause of the contract when they draw up it. The ICC prepared model form which incorporates the prevailing practice in international trade, and which aims at protecting and balancing the legitimate interests of both parties. This author examined the several important clauses in this model contract. The purpose of this examination is to help the contracting parties for better understanding and applying them in their actual contracting practice, which based on this model contract. When the supplier and the distributor execute their contract or use ICC Model Contract, they should be careful about the following points: First, some terminologies(like, "territory", "product", "competing products" and "exclusivity") should be clearly defined in their contract. Second, regarding the supplier's functions including "supplying products" and the distributor's responsibility including "undertaking not to compete", and "attaining guaranteed minimum targets", both parties should make clear about each party's right and obligation as well as one party's remedies available when other party makes breach of its obligation. Third, both parties should examine the relationship between the "exclusivity" or "sole" and competition law which is regarded as a mandatory rule in the territory. Forth, when both parties lay down "termination clause" in the contract, they should make clear about the indemnity in case of termination. Fifth, as there is not uniform law for the distributorship contract, it is inevitable to choose any local law as an applicable law in case of litigation. So both parties should keep in mind to insert arbitration clause to avoid the application of the local law. Besides, both parties should consider their individual and specific circumstances and try to reflect them in their contract by Annex I to XI attached to the end of model contract.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제49권
• /
• pp.3-41
• /
• 2011

In this article, the author have studied on main revisions and some recommendations of the Incoterms(R) 2010. Main revisions are as belows. 1. Two new Incoterms rules -DAT and DAP- have replaced the Incoterms 2000 rules DAF, DES, DEQ and DDU. 2. New classification of the Incoterms(R) 2010 are adopted. First class is Rules for any mode or modes of transport(EXW, FCA, CPT, CIP, DAT, DAP and DDP belong to this class.) and second class is rules for sea and inland waterway transport(FAS, FOB, CFR and CIF belong to this class.). 3. Incoterms(R) 2010 rules formally recognizes that they are available for application to both international and domestic sale contracts. 4. The Guidance Notes and Introduction are not part of the actual Incoterms(R) 2010 rules. 5. Under the FOB, CFR and CIF, all mention of the ship's rail as the point of delivery has been omitted in preference for the goods being delivered when they are "on board" the vessel. 6. Incoterms(R) 2010 rules include the obligation to 'procure goods shipped' as an alternative to the obligation to ship goods in the relevant Incoterms rules. 7. Incoterms(R) 2010 rules give electronic means of communication the same effect as paper communication. 8. Incoterms(R) 2010 rules have allocated obligations between the buyer and seller to obtain or to render assistance in obtaining security-related clearances. such as chain-of custody information. Some recommendations are as belows. 1. The parties must incorporate the Incoterms(R) 2010 rules into their contract of sale. 2. The parties must choose the appropriate Incoterms(R) 2010 rules. 3. Specify the place or port as precisely as possible in their contract of sale. 4. Remember that Incoterms(R) 2010 rules do not give the parties a complete contract of sale. 5. Incoterms(R) 2010 rules do not prohibit alteration of Incoterms rule, but there are dangers in so doings. In order to avoid any unwelcome surprises, the parties would need to make the intended effect of such alterations extremely clear in their contract.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.184-194
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 전국적으로 확산된 시내버스 준공영제를 통해 시내버스 노선에 대한 공공의 개입이 가속화 되면서 수익성은 부족하지만 복지적 측면에서의 소위 정책노선 도입의 요구가 증대되는 현 상황을 파악하고, 정책노선의 개념 정립 및 분류방법을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서는 정책노선은 운송비용에 비해 운송수입이 현저히 낮은 수익성이 없는 노선, 노선 배분이 공정하게 배분되지 않아 형평성이 타 노선에 비해 부족한 노선, 고령화 인구 분포가 높은 지역을 운행하는 공공성을 갖춘 노선으로 정의하고, 이를 분류하는 정량적 지표를 마련하였다. 이렇게 정립된 개념을 통해 부산광역시에서 운행되고 있는 일반버스 130개 노선을 대상으로 정책노선을 분류하여 8개 노선을 도출하였다. 또한, 정책노선이 운영됨에 있어 대체 노선이 없는 지역을 운행하는 노선에 대해 공공버스 도입을 제안하였다. 공공버스의 경우 수익성이 현저히 저하되지만, 지역 주민들의 활동성 증대와 공공 커뮤니티 확보라는 측면에서 긍정적인 영향을 미쳐 정책적으로 도입 가능성을 확인할 수 있었다.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.81-90
• /
• 2015

International Seabed Authority (ISA) is currently developing rules with regard to exploitation of manganese nodules which will be contained in its first regulations governing the exploitation of deep seabed mineral resources. A stakeholder survey was conducted in the early 2014 by ISA with the aim of facilitating participation of interested entities in the development process of the rules. The stakeholders who had replied to the survey included existing contractors, sponsoring States, environmentalists, academics, and nongovernmental organizations. Opinions given by them largely reflect their own interests. This paper aims to clarify the scope of the obligations regarding the environmental protection which may be imposed on contractors under the new regulations for the exploitation of manganese nodules. To do so, it first analyses the express provisions on environmental protection applicable to deep seabed mining included in the Law of the Sea Convention, its agreement on implementation of Part XI, and the regulations on exploration for manganese nodules. Secondly, it categorizes these obligations based on the categories of international obligations suggested by Combacau and Alland. Based on the categorizations this paper concludes that, in addition to the existing duties to protect deep seabed environment within the Law of the Sea Convention system, the following new obligations could be added: conservation of exploitation sites for a limited time after the contract is ceased; taking all necessary measures for rehabilitation of destroyed ecosystems that occurredas a result of mining activities; monitoring exploitation sites for a limited period time after the contract is ceased; observing rules and standards on safety of ships and environmental protection adopted under IMO instruments; regulation on the discharge of mine tailings from the facilities used for exploitation of deep sea minerals. Lastly, this paper attempts to provide ways of reflecting national interests in terms of potential obligations which may be included in the new regulations.