• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.199-204
• /
• 2022

이 연구의 목적은 경비업법에 대한 연구자들의 관점이 아닌 언론보도 빅데이터를 분석하여 경비업법에 대한 이해를 넓히고 다양한 현상들에 대한 의미를 살펴보는데 연구의 목적을 두고 있다. 연구방법은 우리니라의 범죄예방과 사회질서유지의 중요한 주체로써 경비업무의 대한 규정하고 있는 「경비업법」을 키워드로 검색하였다. 자료검색은 빅카인즈에서 제공가능한 1990년부터 2021년까지로 하였다. 또한 자료검색 기간동안의 구체적인 분석을 위해 정착기(1976~2001), 성장기-양적(2002~2012), 성장기-질적(2013~2021)로 구분하여 분석하였다 연구결과에 따른 경비업법의 언론보도 인식은 시대의 흐름에 따라 민간경비의 사회적 역할 및 중요성은 계속 강조되고 있다고 볼 수 있다. 그에 따른 민간경비의 시장성은 앞으로도 다양한 산업군과 결합되어 국민의 생명과 재산을 보호하는데 큰 역할을 할 것으로 판단된다. 하지만 경찰과 더불어 치안서비스를 제공하는 민간경비산업은 법적 규제 및 불법적인 문제들로 야기되는 다양한 사회적 이슈로 인해 민간경비산업의 발전을 저해하는 요소로 부각될 수 있기 때문에 거기에 따른 책임 및 역할을 더욱더 강화시킬 필요성이 제기된다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제7호
• /
• pp.95-124
• /
• 2004

It can be said that 'the September 11th Terrorist Attacks' in 2001 were not only the indiscriminate attacks on innocent people but also the whole - political, economical and military - attacks on human life. Also, 'the September 11th Terrorist Attacks' can be regarded as the significant events in the history of world, which were on the peak of the super-terrorism or new-terrorism that had emerged from the 1980s. However, if one would have analysed the developments of terrorism from the 1970s, they could have been foreknown without difficulty. The finding from this study can be summarized as the followings, First, in spite that the USA responsive system against terrorism had been assessed as perfect before 'the September 11th Terrorist Attacks', the fragilities were found in the aspects of the response on the new-terrorism or super-terrorism. The previous responsive system before 'the September 11th Terrorist Attacks' had the following defects as the followings: (1) it was impossible to establish the integrated strategy, because the organizations related to the response against terrorism had not integrated; (2) there were some weakness to collect and diffuse the informations related to terrorism; (3) the security system for the domestic airline service in USA and the responsive system of air defense against terrors on aircraft were very fragile. For these reasons, USA government established the 'Department of Homeland Security' of which the President is the head so that the many organizations related to terrorism were integrated into a single management system. And, it legislated a new act to protect security from terrors, which legalized of the wiretapping in spite of the risk of encroachment upon personal rights, increased the jail terms upon terrorists, froze the bank related to terrorist organization, and could censor e-mails. Second, it seem that Korean responsive system against terrors more fragile than that of USA. One of the reasons is that people have some perception that Korea is a safe zone from terrors, because there were little attacks from international terrorists in Korea. This can be found from the fact that the legal arrangement against terrorism is only the President's instruction No. 47. Under this responsive system against terrorism dependent on only the President's instruction, it is expected that there would be a poor response against terrors due to the lack of unified and integrated responsive agency as like the case of USA before 'the September 11th Terrorist Attacks'. And, where there is no legal countermeasure, it is impossible to expect the binding force on the outside of administrative agencies and the performances to prevent and hinder the terrorist actions can not but be limited. That is to say, the current responsive system can not counteract effectively against the new-terrorism and super-terrorism. Third, although there were some changes in Korean government's policies against terrorism. there still are problems. One of the most important problems is that the new responsive system against terrorism in Korea, different from that of USA, is not a permanent agency but a meeting body that is organized by a commission. This commission is controled by the Prime Minister and the substantial tasks are under the National Intelligence Service. Under this configuration, there can be the lack of strong leadership and control. Additionally, because there is no statute to response against terrorism, it is impossible to prevent and counteract effectively against terrorism. The above summarized suggests that, because the contemporary super-terrorism or new-terrorism makes numerous casualties of unspecified persons and enormous nationwide damages, the thorough prevention against terrorism is the most important challenge, and that the full range of legal and institutional arrangements for the ex post counteraction should be established. In order to do so, it is necessary for the government to make legal and institutional arrangements such as the permanent agency for protection from terrorism in which the related departments cooperates with together and the development of efficient anti-terror programs, and to show its willingness and ability that it can counteract upon any type of domestic and foreign terrorism so that obtain the active supports and confidence from citizens.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제2권
• /
• pp.31-67
• /
• 1990

One of the first issues which arose in the evolution of air law was the determination of the vertical limits of airspace over private property. In 1959 the UN in its Ad Hoc Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, started to give attention to the question of the meaning of the term "outer space". Discussions in the United Nations regarding the delimitation issue were often divided between those in favour of a functional approach ("functionalists"), and those seeking the delineation of a boundary ("spatialists"). The functionalists, backed initially by both major space powers, which viewed any boundary as possibly restricting their access to space(Whether for peaceful or military purposes), won the first rounds, starting with the 1959 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space which did not consider that the topic called for priority consideration. In 1966, however, the spatialists, were able to place the issue on the agenda of the Outer Sapce Committee pursuant to Resolution 2222 (xxx1). However, the spatialists were not able to present a common position since there existed a variety of propositions for delineation of a boundary. Over the years, the funtionalists have seemed to be losing ground. As the element of location is a decisive factor for the choice of the legal regime to be applied, a purely functional approach to the regulation of activities in the space above the Earth does not offer a solution. It is therefore to be welcomed that there is clear evidence of a growing recognition of the defect inherent to such an approach and that a spatial approach to the problem is gaining support both by a growing number of States as well as by publicists. The search for a solution of the problem of demarcating the two different legal regimes governing the space above the Earth has undoubtedly been facilitated, and a number of countries, among them Argentina, Belgium, France, Italy and Mexico have already advocated the acceptance of the lower boundary of outer space at a height of 100km. The adoption of the principle of sovereignty at that height does not mean that States would not be allowed to take protective measures against space activities above that height which constitute a threat to their security. A parallel can be drawn with the defence of the State's security on the high seas. Measures taken by States in their own protection on the high seas outside the territorial waters-provided that they are proportionate to the danger-are not considered to infringe the principle of international law. The most important issue in this context relates to the problem of a right of passage for space craft through foreign air space in order to reach outer space. In the reports to former ILA Conferences an explanation was given of the reasons why no customary rule of freedom of passage for aircraft through foreign territorial air space could as yet be said to exist. It was suggested, however, that though the essential elements for the creation of a rule of customary international law allowing such passage were still lacking, developments apperaed to point to a steady growth of a feeling of necessity for such a rule. A definite treaty solution of the demarcation problem would require further study which should be carried out by the UN Outer Space Committee in close co-operation with other interested international organizations, including ICAO. If a limit between air space and outer space were established, air space would automatically come under the regime of the Chicago Convention alone. The use of the word "recognize" in Art. I of chicago convention is an acknowledgement of sovereignty over airspace existing as a general principle of law, the binding force of which exists independently of the Convention. Further it is important to note that the Aricle recognizes this sovereignty, as existing for every state, holding it immaterial whether the state is or is not a contracting state. The functional criteria having been created by reference to either the nature of activity or the nature of the space object, the next hurdle would be to provide methods of verification. With regard to the question of international verification the establishment of an International Satelite Monitoring Agency is required. The path towards the successful delimitation of outer space from territorial space is doubtless narrow and stony but the establishment of a precise legal framework, consonant with the basic principles of international law, for the future activities of states in outer space will, it is still believed, remove a source of potentially dangerous conflicts between states, and furthermore afford some safeguard of the rights and interests of non-space powers which otherwise are likely to be eroded by incipient customs based on at present almost complete freedom of action of the space powers.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.113-124
• /
• 2008

A worldwide trend of permitting system for industrial installation to achieve a high level of protection of the environment has been moved from single media to multimedia in approach. The Council of the European Community issued the Directive 96/61/EC, the IPPC Directive, concerning integrated pollution prevention and control in 1996. The IPPC Directive is one of the most ambitious legal measures that the European Union (EU) has initiated with a view to applying the prevention principle for industrial activities. The IPPC aims to achieve the integrated prevention and reduction of environmental pollution emitted by those industrial installations with a higher potential of emissions to the environment. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recommended on Environmental Performance Reviews of Korea in 2006 that IPPC permitting concept should be considered for large stationary sources at the national and regional levels. Any Korean law doesn't provide for integrated pollution control with a single process covering all pollution from economic activities. However, one exception might be the "environmentally-friendly companies" certification scheme, introduced in 1995, in which participants agree to meet targets beyond the legal emission limit values in exchange for government technical and financial support to operate environmental management systems. The other exception might be Environmental impact assessment (EIA) of projects, in 1977, which has been strengthened and reinforced to be more preventive through development of the prior environmental review system (PERS) in 1999. The aim of this work is to introduce the contents of IPPC Directive at the viewpoint of Korea policy and to survey the integrated approaching concept of Environmentally-Friendly Companies (EFC) Certification Scheme and EIA policy of Korea. The study will be helpful in the future to prepare the infrastructure of integrated permitting system and to enforce the integrated permit which the authorities of local government issues on industrial activities. It can be said that the data calculated through both EFC Certification Scheme and EIA will be discussed as worthful information to determine Korean BAT reference notes for integrated permitting process.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.455-465
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 오피스텔의 생활형 숙박업으로의 용도전환을 활성화하기 위해서 어떠한 제도적 개선방안이 필요한지 연구하였다. 연구방법으로는 첫째, 오피스텔의 생활형 숙박업 용도 전환 저해요소를 정립하였다. 둘째, AHP방식을 이용하여 향후 오피스텔을 생활형 숙박업으로 용도 전환하는 것을 활성화할 목적에서 제도적 혹은 운영적 측면에서 개선이 시급한 중요도를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 오피스텔의 생활형숙박업 용도변경 저해요인으로 4개 항목 13개의 세부지표가 도출되었다. AHP 결과, '기존 분양계약자 100% 동의 요건'이 1위, '용도지역지구 중 상업/준주거지역' 2위, '전문 위탁운영업체 부족' 3위, '상대정화구역' 4위, '복잡한 인허가 절차로 용도변경 지연' 5위, '위탁운영사 운영 리스크' 6위, '시설물 관리 부담' 7위, '관련 제도 홍보부족' 8위, '건축법 내 생활형 숙박시설 개념 미비' 9위, '주차장, 하수도, 소방시설 등 기본 건축 요건' 10위, '환기시설 설치' 11위, '객실별 욕실 또는 샤워실 설치' 12위, '취사시설 설치' 13위로 나타났다.

• 한국방재안전학회논문집
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2014

최근 들어 주택 및 집합건물에서 화재가 발생할 경우 스프링클러가 설치되어 있지 않거나, 설치되어 있어도 제대로 작동하지 않아서 많은 인명과 재산상의 손실을 초래하는 경우를 자주 목격하게 된다. 건축물 화재가 발생하면 초기에 진압하는 소화설비로써 가장 적합한 것은 스프링클러라 여겨진다. 하지만 국내의 경우 법체계의 미비로 인해 스프링클러 설비가 가진 본연의 성능을 발휘하지 못하고 있다. 우리나라 기준은 스프링클러 설비의 설치 대상을 업종과 건축물 형태에 따라 단순하게 분류하며, 건물의 용도나 건축물의 층수로 구분하고 있는 실정이다. 특히 층수가 11층 이상인 특정소방대상물에만 모든 층에 스프링클러를 설치하게 되어 있을 뿐, 법적으로 10층 이하의 건물에는 스프링클러를 설치하지 않아도 되는 안전의 사각지대에 놓여 있다. 본 연구에서는 스프링클러 설비에 관한 개념, 국내외 법체계상에서 규정하는 스프링클러의 설치기준, 그리고 근래에 발생한 화재사고에서 스프링클러 설치 및 관리기준의 허점으로 인해 피해를 키운 사례를 분석하여 그 원인과 시사점을 도출하였다. 결과적으로 국내의 경우 신축 건물에 대해서 층수에 관계없이 모든 집합건물은 스프링클러를 의무적으로 설치하게 하는 법 및 제도적 장치를 마련해야 한다. 또한 기존의 건축물 중에 스프링클러가 설치되어 있지 않은 건물의 경우에는 신규로 스프링클러를 설치하고자 하면, 정부 보조금을 지급하여 스프링클러 설치를 장려하는 정책적 시행도 요구된다. 더욱이 스프링클러의 설치적 기준의 강화뿐만 아니라 전문기술자격자에 의한 수시, 정기점검을 강화하는 등 스프링클러의 운용 및 유지에 대한 관리적 기준도 보완하여 화재 발생 시 소방 활동이 제대로 이루어지도록 해야 한다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.585-594
• /
• 2018

가상화폐는 금융분야에서 블록체인(Block chain), 인공지능(Artificial Intelligence: AI), 빅데이터(Big Data) 등의 신기술이 접목되면서 등장하게 되었다. 본 연구는 최근 세계적으로 대두된 가상화폐에 대한 쟁점들을 탐구하였고, 중앙정부로부터 벗어나 분권화된 개별 거래로 보안이 강화된 블록체인의 장점과 이를 악용하여 여러 문제가 발생되는 단점에 관련된 내용을 포함하였다. 가상화폐는 인터넷에서 익명으로 거래되는 특성상 랜섬웨어, 사기, 마약거래, 탈세, 자금세탁 등 범죄에 크게 노출되어 있다. 범죄자들은 익명으로 거래되는 가상화폐를 이용하여 수사기관의 추적을 쉽게 피하고 있다. 정부의 규제 안이 계속 발표되고 있고, 가상화폐 거래소에서도 자율 규제 안이 발표되었으나 근본적인 해결방안이 필요한 실정이다. 본 논문의 목적은 가상화폐의 악용사례에 대한 문제점을 고찰하여 가상화폐의 건전한 거래를 활성화할 수 있는 방안을 찾는 것이다. 그러나 가상화폐 거래를 활성화시키고 제도적으로 안정화시키는데 있어서 한 국가의 노력만으로 이루어지지 않는다는 한계가 있다. 미성년자 및 외국인의 거래금지와 사용자 실명화는 상당히 환영 할만한 조치이나 이는 단순한 디지털 상품이 아닌 화폐 본연의 기능을 증대하는 수단으로 거듭나는 계기가 되기 위해서 아직까지 많은 과제들이 산재하다. 가상화폐의 음성적인 측면보다는 양성적인 측면이 더욱 활성화 될 수 있도록 전 세계 공통의 노력이 필요하다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2011

As a marketing vehicle to survive in intensified retailing competition, retailer brand development has been adopted by retailers in Korea. As evidence, the retailer brand share of a major retailer, Tesco Korea, has grown from 20% in 2007 to 22.8% in the first half of 2008. It means that retailers have provided more and more retailer brand foods for customers. With the growing accessibility to retailer brand foods, it would be expected that the number of retailer brand food claims will increase. Customers have increasingly exposed to a variety of marketing activities conducted by retailers. When buying the retailer brand foods, customers tend to be affected by marketing activities of retailers. Despite the fact that customers trust retailers and then, buy their brand foods, in case of food accidents caused by production process, customers have to seek compensation from a retailer brand supplier. Of course, a retailer tends to shift its responsibility to its suppliers. Accordingly, it is not easy for customers to solve food claims. The research, therefore, aims at exploring the relationship between the buying-decision processes of retailer brand customers and which side takes legal responsibility for food claims. To effectively achieve the research aim, the author adopted a quantitative and a qualitative research technique, in order to supplement the disadvantages of each method. Before field research, based on the developed research model, the author pre-tested questionnaire with 10 samples, amended, and handed out to 400 samples. Amongst them, 316 questionnaires are available. For a focus group interview, 9 participants were recruited, who are students, housewives, and full-time workers, aged from 20s to 40s. Through the focus group interview as well as the questionnaire results, it was found that most customers were influenced by a retailer or store image in a customer's mind, retailer reputation and promotional activities. Surprisingly, customers think that the name of a retailer is a more important factor than who produces retailer brand foods, even though many customers check a retailer brand supplier, when making a buying-decision. Rather than retailer brand suppliers, customers trust retailers. That is why they purchase retailer brands. Nevertheless, production-related food claims is not involved with retailers. In fact, it would be difficult for customers to distinguish whether a food claim is related to selling or manufacturing processes. Based on research results, from a customer perspective, the research suggests that the government should require retailers to take the whole responsibility for retailer brand food claims, preventing retailers from passing the buck to retailer brand suppliers. In case of food claims, in order for customers to easily get the compensation, it is necessary to reconsider the current system. If so, retailers have to fully get involved in retailer brand production stage, and further, the customer awareness of retailer brands will be improved than ever before. Retailers cannot help taking care of the whole processes of retailer brand development, because of responsibility. As a result, the process to seek compensation for food claims might become easier, and further, the protection of customer right might be improved.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.81-93
• /
• 2016

영국 FSMA 체계에서는 일반적 금지조항이 있음에도 불구하고, 변호사, 회계사 및 보험계리사 등 전문직 종사자들의 금융서비스 제공에 대한 면책조항을 제공하여 전문직종사자들이 적용면제규제대상업무를 수행할 수 있도록 한다. 특히 영국 재무부가 지정하는 전문직협회를 DPBs라고 칭하고 있으며, DPBs(designated professional bodies)는 반드시 규칙(rule)을 보유하여 해당 회원들의 적용면제규제대상업무를 감독하고 규제하는 역할을 수행한다. 또한 FSA는 DPBs의 역할에 대한 정보를 보지(保持)하고 있어야 하며, 다른 부류의 업자 또는 다른 종류의 규제대상업무와 형평성을 고려해서 전문직종사자의 면책조항에 대한 지침을 마련해야 할 의무도 있다. 한편, "자본시장법"에서는 국내 전문직종사자의 금융서비스 제공을 본연의 업무나 부수적 업무에 상관없이 투자자문업에서 명시적으로 적용을 제외시키고 있다. 영국 FSMA 체계에서는 전문직종사자의 금융서비스 제공이 본연의 업무로서 수행되려면 반드시 인가업자와 같이 인가를 받아야 하며, 부수적으로 행하더라도 일반적 금지에서의 적용면제 조항을 준수하도록 하고 있다. 따라서 투자자보호를 위해 입법론적으로 국내 전문직종사자의 금융서비스 제공에 관한 법적 제도를 마련할 필요성이 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권10호
• /
• pp.583-595
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 전담간호사의 운영현황 및 업무 실태를 전수조사 하여 전담간호사 관련 정책 수립의 기초 자료를 제공하기 위해 시도되었다. 총 318개의 종합병원 이상의 의료기관 부서장에게 설문조사를 시행했고, 141개 병원에서 근무하는 704명의 전담간호사를 대상으로 2011년 4월부터 5월에 자료수집이 시행되었으며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 12.0 program을 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과 전담간호사의 평균연령은 32.5세이며, 교육수준은 대졸이 가장 많았고, 전문간호사 자격증 보유자는 13.4%이었고, 전담간호사의 전반적인 업무 만족도는 5점 만점에 평균 3.13점이었으며, 불명확한 업무 구분이 전담간호사를 가장 힘들게 하는 요인으로 나타났다. 전담간호사 역할정립을 위해 업무에 대한 법적 보호 장치 마련(5점 만점에 평균 4.71)이 가장 시급한 것으로 나타났다. 현재 전담간호사 실태는 열악한 근무환경으로 인한 낮은 만족도, 부적합한 자격과 업무에 대한 법적 보호장치가 마련되어 있지 않은 속에서 어려움을 겪고 있다. 향후 전담간호사의 활용도를 향상시키기 위해 전담간호사를 법적으로 보호할 수 있는 장치를 마련하고, 교육 프로그램을 개설하며, 한국 실정에 맞는 전담간호사 제도 확립이 절실하다고 할 수 있겠다.