• 제목/요약/키워드: implant success rate

검색결과 173건 처리시간 0.023초

하악에 식립된 Xive implant 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형과 생존율 (The distribution of Xive implant patients and the type of implant site and survival rate in mandible)

  • 장인권;정의원;김창성;심준성;조규성;채중규;김종관;최성호
    • Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
    • /
    • 제35권2호
    • /
    • pp.437-448
    • /
    • 2005
  • This study is an analysis of distribution of patients who installed Xive implant in Yonsei University Hospital and types of implant site for about 2 years recall check and cumulative survival rate. 41 implant were used in this study. It shows the conclusion below. 1. Patients at the age of 40s and 50s were 60% of all implant cases and average number of implant was 2.4(man), and 1.9(woman). All cases were operated on mandible, 3 implants on anterior region and 38 implants on posterior region. 2. The major cause of tooth loss is dental caries(48.8%), followed by periodontal disease. 3. Most distribution of bone qaulity for mandibular implant site was type II(65.8%) and bone quantity was type B(75.6%). 4. The majority of implants were those of 11, 13mm in length(95%) and regular diameter in width (64%). 5. The 41(19 persons) Xive implants that were placed in the mandibular anterior and posterior region were all survival and showed a 100% 2 year cumulative survival rate. The results provided us with basic data on patient type, implant distribution, bone condition, and survival rate. We wish that our results coupled with other research data helps assist in the further study for better implant success rates, etc.

Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading

  • Kim, Seong-Beom;Yun, Pil-Young;Kim, Sang-Yun;Yi, Yang-Jin;Kim, Ji-Yun;Kim, Young-Kyun
    • The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
    • /
    • 제8권5호
    • /
    • pp.396-403
    • /
    • 2016
  • PURPOSE. Early loading of implant can be determined by excellent primary stability and characteristic of implant surface. The implant system with recently improved surface can have load application 4-6 weeks after installing in maxilla and mandible. This study evaluated the effect of healing period to the stability of hydrophilic tapered-type implant at maxillary posterior area. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study included 30 patients treated by hydrophilic tapered-type implants (total 41 implants at maxilla) and classified by two groups depending on healing period. Group 1 (11 patients, 15 implants) was a control group and the healing period was 12 weeks, and Group 2 (19 patients, 26 implants) was test group and the healing period was 6 weeks. Immediately after implant placement, at the first impression taking, implant stability was measured using Osstell Mentor. The patients also took periapical radiographs after restoration delivery, 12 months after restoration and final followup period. The marginal bone loss around the implants was measured using the periapical radiographs. RESULTS. All implants were survived and success rate was 97.56%. The marginal bone loss was less than 1mm after 1 year postoperatively except the one implant. The stabilities of the implants were not correlated with age, healing period until loading, insertion torque (IT), the diameter of fixture and the location of implant. Only the quality of bone in group 2 (6 week) was correlated with the stability of implant. CONCLUSION. Healing period of 6 weeks can make the similar clinical prognosis of implants to that of healing period of 12 weeks if bone quality is carefully considered in case of early loading.

악안면 외상 후 식립된 임플란트의 예후에 관한 연구 (THE STUDY ON THE PROGNOSIS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS WHICH HAS BEEN INSTALLED AFTER MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA)

  • 전하룡;김종원;홍종락;김창수
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제32권4호
    • /
    • pp.348-351
    • /
    • 2006
  • Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success rate of dental implant on post-traumatic region to rehabilitate missing teeth. Patients and Methods 5 patients who had been treated due to maxillofacial trauma during 2000 to 2004 at samsung medical center were selected for this study. 22 dental implants were installed to them for restoring missing teeth. The success rate of these dental implants was evaluated with criteria by T. Albrektsson. We divided installed 22 implants into 2 categories. One category consisted rough surface implants group and smooth surface implants group. And the other category consisted more healing group and less healing group. The healing time was calculated from point of trauma. Results The success rate of dental implants is 68.2% that is lower than other studies because of poor vascularity of bone bed and mechanical stress according to trauma. Rough surface implants group and More healing group showed superior success rate to others. (P < 0.05). Conclusion We found that to increase success rate, it may need rough surface implants and longer healing period.

$Renova^{(R)}$ 임플란트 식립 후 단기간의 생존율에 대한 다각적 분석 (Multilateral analysis of $Renova^{(R)}$ implant placement and its Survival rate)

  • 양진혁;김성태;정의원;남웅;정영수;심준성;문홍석;이근우;조규성;최성호
    • Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
    • /
    • 제38권3호
    • /
    • pp.413-428
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: Given the predictability of dental implant procedure from the studies of successful osseointegration, implant dentistry is often the treatment of choice to replace missing teeth in edentulous patient instead of the fixed prosthesis or removable denture. The $Renova^{(R)}$ dental implant has a RBM(Resorbable Blast Media) surface, internal hex prosthetic connection and a tapered design. At this study gives the analysis of the implant and the short term survival rate of the implant. Material and Methods: In this study, a multilateral analysis was performed on the subjects undergoing placement with $Renova^{(R)}$ implant between August 2006 and February 2008 in Yonsei University dental hospital. 96 implants were placed in 56 patients and they were surveyed for cumulative survival rate. Among them 78 implants in 44 patients were surveyed for the rest analyses. Result: 1. The cumulative survival rate was 96.88% of 96 implants in 56 patients. 2. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.803mm and the marginal bone loss in augmentation group has higher value than the marginal bone loss in non augmentation group. 3. The health scale for the implants were 87% in success group, 9% in satisfactory survival group, 1% in compromised survival group, and 3% in failure group. 4. Two implants placed in poor bone posterior area by 2-stage failed during prosthetic procedure. Conclusion: $Renova^{(R)}$ dental implant showed high cumulative survival rate in installation on partial edentulous ridge and could be a predictable implant system.

단일 임플란트지지 보철물의 후유증에 관한 체계적 연구 (A systematic review of the complications of single implant-supported restorations)

  • 장문택
    • Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
    • /
    • 제36권4호
    • /
    • pp.925-938
    • /
    • 2006
  • The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the complications of single implant-supported restorations followed more than 5-year. Thirty-five studies were selected for the systematic review. A total of 3932 single implants were included at the beginning of studies. Thirty-one implants were removed before loading and 91 implants after loading. The overall implant loss rate was 3.1 %. Implant losses were concentrated on the period between loading and 2-year follow-up, and, after a stable period, increased after 5-year follow-up. The mean marginal bone loss at single-tooth implants was well within 0.2 mm/year, i.e., acceptable annual bone loss by the implant success criteria. However, considerable amounts of single implants suffered a marginal bone loss at implant more than 0.2 mm/year. Fistula was a frequent biological complication in the early studies. The most frequent technical problem was a screw loosening, but its frequency was reduced after the use of a gold screw and torque controller. Within the limits of this study, the complications of single implants might be underestimated due to the lack of information about the biological and technical complications available in the relevant literature.

Randomized controlled clinical trial of 2 types of hydroxyapatite-coated implants on moderate periodontitis patients

  • Kim, Hyun-Suk;Yun, Pil-Young;Kim, Young-Kyun
    • Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
    • /
    • 제46권5호
    • /
    • pp.337-349
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the peri-implant tissue conditions and prospective clinical outcomes associated with 2 types of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants: (1) fully HA-coated implants and (2) partially HA-coated implants with resorbable blast medium on the coronal portion of the threads. Methods: Forty-four partially edentulous patients were randomly assigned to undergo the placement of 62 HA-coated implants, and were classified as the control group (partially HA-coated, n=30) and the test group (fully HA-coated, n=32). All patients had chronic periodontitis with moderate crestal bone loss around the edentulous area. The stability and clinical outcomes of the implants were evaluated using the primary and secondary implant stability quotient (ISQ), as well as radiographic, mobility, and peri-implant soft tissue assessments around the implants. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney test were used to evaluate differences between and within the 2 groups, with P values <0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The fully HA-coated implants displayed good retention of crestal bone, and insignificant differences were found in annual marginal bone loss between the 2 types of HA-coated implants (P>0.05). No significant differences were found in the survival rate (group I, 100%; group II, 100%) or the success rate (group I, 93.3%; group II, 93.8%). The fully HA-coated implants also did not significantly increase the risk of peri-implantitis (P>0.05). Conclusions: The fully HA-coated implants did not lead to an increased risk of peri-implantitis and showed good retention of the crestal bone, as well as good survival and success rates. Our study suggests that fully HA-coated implants could become a reliable treatment alternative for edentulous posterior sites and are capable of providing good retention of the crestal bone.

임플란트 장기간 유지와 변연골 소실에 영향을 주는 요인들에 대한 후향적 연구 (The risk factors for implant survival and marginal bone loss: a retrospective long-term study)

  • 이은우;정하나;조유진;김옥수
    • 구강회복응용과학지
    • /
    • 제38권2호
    • /
    • pp.97-109
    • /
    • 2022
  • 목적: 3년 이상 기능한 임플란트의 장기 추적을 통해 임플란트 실패에 기여하는 위험지표를 조사하고 변연골소실(MBL)간의 상관관계를 분석하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 2003년부터 2017년까지 전남대학교 치과병원에서 임플란트 수술 기왕력이 있는 환자의 진료기록부를 토대로 후향적 조사 시행하였다. 환자의 인구통계학적 변수 및 임상적 변수와 임플란트 주위 변연골소실 평가를 위한 치근단 방사선 사진을 사용하여 임플란트 생존율을 분석하였다. 환자의 임상변수와 임플란트 실패의 상관관계를 규명하기 위해 후진소거법을 이용한 다중회귀분석 시행하였고, 임플란트 장기생존율과 MBL 및 초기 안정성 간의 상관관계를 규명하기위해 Pearson 상관분석 시행하였다. 결과: 다중회귀분석 결과 지대주 연결 유형(β = -.189, P < .05), SPT 유무(β = -.163, P < .05), 당뇨(β = -.164, P < .05), 골수염(β = -.211, P < .05)이 MBL과 음의 상관관계가 있었다. 임플란트 장기 성공률에 항응고제, 임플란트 2차수술 시 PTV값이 영향을 미쳤다. 결론: 임플란트 장기 성공을 위해서는 적절한 지대주 연결 유형을 선택해야 하며, 주기적 SPT가 필요하다. 당뇨병, 골다공증 같은 전신 질환과 항응고제 사용 질환을 고려해야한다. 또한 임플란트 2차 수술시 높은 PTV가 임플란트 장기 생존율과 상관관계가 있기 때문에 보철 수복 전 초기 안정성을 신중히 고려해야한다.

Antimicrobial surfaces for craniofacial implants: state of the art

  • Actis, Lisa;Gaviria, Laura;Guda, Teja;Ong, Joo L.
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제39권2호
    • /
    • pp.43-54
    • /
    • 2013
  • In an attempt to regain function and aesthetics in the craniofacial region, different biomaterials, including titanium, hydroxyapatite, biodegradable polymers and composites, have been widely used as a result of the loss of craniofacial bone. Although these materials presented favorable success rates, osseointegration and antibacterial properties are often hard to achieve. Although bone-implant interactions are highly dependent on the implant's surface characteristics, infections following traumatic craniofacial injuries are common. As such, poor osseointegration and infections are two of the many causes of implant failure. Further, as increasingly complex dental repairs are attempted, the likelihood of infection in these implants has also been on the rise. For these reasons, the treatment of craniofacial bone defects and dental repairs for long-term success remains a challenge. Various approaches to reduce the rate of infection and improve osseointegration have been investigated. Furthermore, recent and planned tissue engineering developments are aimed at improving the implants' physical and biological properties by improving their surfaces in order to develop craniofacial bone substitutes that will restore, maintain and improve tissue function. In this review, the commonly used biomaterials for craniofacial bone restoration and dental repair, as well as surface modification techniques, antibacterial surfaces and coatings are discussed.

지르코니아 프레임워크를 이용한 시멘트 유지형 임플란트-지지 단일 크라운과 연결 크라운의 보철적 합병증 (Technical complications of cement-retained implant-supported single crowns and splinted crowns with zirconia frameworks)

  • 유상춘;배정윤
    • 대한치과보철학회지
    • /
    • 제55권1호
    • /
    • pp.26-31
    • /
    • 2017
  • 목적: 지르코니아 프레임워크를 이용한 시멘트 유지형 임플란트-지지 단일 크라운과 연결 크라운의 성공률과 보철적 합병증을 임상적으로 평가하는 것이다. 대상 및 방법: 67명의 환자에서 75개 수복물(단일 51개, 연결 24개)을 지르코니아 프레임워크를 이용한 시멘트 유지형 임플란트-지지 단일 크라운 혹은 연결 크라운으로 수복했다. 모든 수복물은 임시 시멘트로 합착했다. 보철적 합병증과 성공률을 조사하고, 나이, 성별, 보철물의 위치, 대합치, 보철물의 유형이 보철적 합병증에 미치는 영향을 평가했다. 결과:평균 22.2개월의 관찰 결과, 최종 누적 성공률은 66.9 (73.2 - 60.6)%였다. 유지 상실이 16개 보철물(단일 14개, 연결 2개)에서 나타났고, 지대주 나사 풀림과 비니어 도재 파절은 단일 크라운에서만 각각 2개의 보철물에서 나타났다. 단일 크라운과 연결 크라운에 대한 Kaplan-Meier 생존분석 결과, 최종 누적 성공률은 각각 58.9 (66.6 - 51.2)%, 87.5 (96.1 - 78.9)%를 보여 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었지만, 다른 고려 요인들은 보철적 합병증에 통계적으로 유의성이 없었다. 결론: 보철적 합병증은 유지 상실이 가장 많았고, 지대주 나사 풀림 및 비니어 도재 파절은 단일 크라운에서만 비교적 적게 관찰되었다. 나이, 성별, 보철물의 위치, 대합치에 따른 보철적 합병증에 미치는 영향은 유의한 차이가 없었지만, 상부 보철물을 연결 크라운으로 제작했을 때, 단일 크라운으로 제작한 경우보다 높은 성공률을 보였다.

임플란트 주위 골변화와 생존율에 대한 연구 (The study on the survival rates and crestal bone changes around the implants)

  • 최현숙;정현주;김옥수;김영준
    • Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.303-315
    • /
    • 2004
  • The success and failure of dental implants depends on various factors such as patient's systemic status, quantity and quality of surrounding bone, presence or absence of marginal infection and mechanical loading condition. The measurement of crestal bone changes around the implants is implemental to evaluate the success and long-term prognosis of the implant. This study was to evaluate the cumulative survival rate of the implants which had been placed in the Department of Periodontics, Chonnam National University Hospital between 1992 and 2003, and to observe the crestal bone loss around the implants which had at least 2 consecutive periapical radiographs after connecting the transmucosal abutment. The radiographs were scanned and digitalized, and the crestal bone levels on the mesial and distal surface of implants were measured using Image analyzer (Image Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics, USA), immediately after implant placement, at 2nd surgery, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and every year thereafter. Any bone loss was not observed during the period between the 1stand 2nd surgery, and the bone loss was 0.86 ${\pm}$ 0.92 mm for the first year of loading after connecting the transmucosal abutment. After 1 year of loading, annual bone loss was 0.1 ${\pm}$ 0.27 mm, and total bone loss was 0.90 ${\pm}$ 0.80 mm (during the average follow-up periods of 22.5 ${\pm}$ 25.6 Mos), The implant, with smooth surface, in the mandible, and with the fixed bridge prosthesis showed greater bone loss, compared to those, with the rough surface, in the maxilla and with single crown. In systemically diseased patients (including DM or osteoporosis), the greater bone loss was observed. The cumulative survival rate among 432 implants was 94.10% for 7 years. Among 15 failed implants, 9 implants were removed due to mobility from disintegration of bone-implant interface. From this results, crestal bone loss around the implants were greatest during 1 year after transmucosal abutment connection, and various factors could affect peri-implant bone loss. To prevent and predict the bone loss around the implants and improve the prognosis, further comprehensive maintenance and follow-up schedules are required.