Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The distribution of Xive implant patients and the type of implant site and survival rate in mandible

하악에 식립된 Xive implant 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형과 생존율

  • Jang, In-Kwon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science) ;
  • Shim, Joon-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science)
  • 장인권 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 심준성 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단)
  • Published : 2005.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is an analysis of distribution of patients who installed Xive implant in Yonsei University Hospital and types of implant site for about 2 years recall check and cumulative survival rate. 41 implant were used in this study. It shows the conclusion below. 1. Patients at the age of 40s and 50s were 60% of all implant cases and average number of implant was 2.4(man), and 1.9(woman). All cases were operated on mandible, 3 implants on anterior region and 38 implants on posterior region. 2. The major cause of tooth loss is dental caries(48.8%), followed by periodontal disease. 3. Most distribution of bone qaulity for mandibular implant site was type II(65.8%) and bone quantity was type B(75.6%). 4. The majority of implants were those of 11, 13mm in length(95%) and regular diameter in width (64%). 5. The 41(19 persons) Xive implants that were placed in the mandibular anterior and posterior region were all survival and showed a 100% 2 year cumulative survival rate. The results provided us with basic data on patient type, implant distribution, bone condition, and survival rate. We wish that our results coupled with other research data helps assist in the further study for better implant success rates, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. Waerhaug J. Periodontology and partial prosthesis. Int Dent J 1968:18(1):101 -107
  2. Carlsson G, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing dentures : A longitudinal clinical and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odont Revy 1967:18:27-54
  3. Pietrokovski J. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:456 -462 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90166-3
  4. Carr A, Laney WR. Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointe-grated oral implant prosthesis and patient with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:101-110
  5. Wetherell J, Smales R. : Partial dentures failure : A long-term clinical survey. J Dent Res 1980:8:333-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(80)90049-4
  6. Anjardn R. Mayan dental wonders. Oral Implant 1981:9:423
  7. Branemark PI. Breine D, Adel R. Hansson BO, Lindstrom J & Olsson A. : Intraosseous anchorage of dental prosthesis. 1. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1969:3:81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  8. Lekholm U. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws : A 10 year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-645
  9. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998:9:80-90 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090203.x
  10. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K, Immediate functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants : An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:26-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x
  11. Henry PH Laney W.R, Jemt T. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a prospective 5 years multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455
  12. Schnitman et al Ten-year results for Bra nemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12 :495-503
  13. 한창식, 허남기, 김연미, 최신 치과임플란트. 지성출판사, 2001
  14. Martinez H, Davarpannah M, Missika P, Celletti R & Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 12:423-432 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  15. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compen Contin Educ Dent 1994;15:152-160
  16. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surface: state of the art review. J Periodontology 1999:70:1523-1539 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  17. kenke E. Lehner B, Fenner M. Roman FS, Thams U, Neukam FW, Rade- spiel-Troger M. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of mini pigs : follow-up of implant stability and implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jan- Feb;20 (1):39-47
  18. Degidi M, Piattelli A. Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jan-Feb:20(1):99-107
  19. Lekholm D, Zarb G, Branemark PI. Tissue integrated prostheses Osseoin- tegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, Quintensence., 1985;199-209
  20. Buser D, Mericske SR, Benard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N et al. Long term evaluation of non submerged ITI iplants (I): 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1997:8:161 -172 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  21. 홍성재, 백정원, 김창성, 최성호, 이근우, 채중규, 김종관, 조규성. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한 치주과학회지 2002:32:(3):539-554
  22. Meskin LH. Brown LJ. Prevalence and patterns of tooth loss in the US employed adult and senior populations. J Dent Educ 1988:52:686-691
  23. Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided bone regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1990;1: 22-32 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
  24. Simion, M, Jovanovic SA, Trisi P, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allograft in humans. Int J.Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 1998;16:221-229
  25. 유호선, 소성수, 한동후, 조규성, 문익상 : 하악 대구치부위의 고정성 보철물에서 2개의 장폭경과 3개의 표준 임프란트의 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2002:32:(3):577-588
  26. 박지은, 윤정호, 정의원, 김창성, 조규성, 채중규, 김종관, 최성호, 임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형. 대한치주과학회지 2004:34:(4):819-836
  27. 이항빈, 백정원, 김창성, 최성호, 이근우, 조규성, 하악 제1,2대구치를 대체하는 단일 임플란트 간의 성공률 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34:(1): 101-112