• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.3-20
• /
• 2014

세계적으로 인간의 활동에 따른 서식지 훼손 및 기후 변화에 의해 생물다양성이 감소하고 있다. 이에 따라, 생물 다양성의 감소를 막기 위해서 국제사회는 생물다양성 협약과 같은 협력 체제를 마련하는 등의 노력을 하고 있다. 지금까지 우리나라의 생물다양성 전략 및 계획은 주로 정부의 주도하에 정책적으로 진행되었으나, 국가에 의한 생물다양성전략은 보수적이며, 실행 계획이 구체적이지 않다는 단점을 가진다. 따라서 지자체 생물자원을 관리하기 위한 방법으로 지자체 생물다양성 관리전략을 제안하였다. 지자체 생물다양성 관리전략 수립을 위한 전략계획 및 세부계획을 제시하기 위해 생물다양성 협약, '2011~2020 생물다양성 전략계획', 우리나라 생물다양성 전략 및 이행계획과 해외 지자체 생물다양성 관리전략 우수 사례를 분석하였다. 결과적으로, 각각의 사례에서 중요하게 제시하고 있는 개별 생물종의 조사 및 보호, 보전지역의 지정 및 모니터링, 통합적 생태네트워크 관리, 생물다양성 전문기관의 설립과 전문가 양성방안, 지역의 인적 네트워크와 전통지식 활성화 방안, 생물산업 육성방안의 추진전략을 도출할 수 있었다. 이러한 지자체 생물다양성 관리전략의 이행은 '2011~2020 생물다양성 전략계획'의 목표를 달성하여 생물다양성을 보전하고 증진하는 데 큰 도움이 될 것이다.

• 한국노년학
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.531-548
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 장기요양보호 현장요양보호사들의 심리적 요인과 서비스 질, 직무만족 간의 관계를 실증분석을 통해 파악하여 서비스 질 향상의 기초자료를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 경기도 안산시, 안양시, 부천시, 광명시에 소재하는 노인요양시설에 근무하는 요양보호사에게 총 430부의 설문지를 배부하였으며, 미회수 및 불성실한 응답을 제외한 393부의 설문지를 분석에 활용하였다. 본 연구에서 밝혀진 주요결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 긍정심리자본은 서비스 질에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 긍정심리자본이 서비스 질에 미치는 영향을 직무만족이 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과를 토대로 다음과 같이 제언하였다. 첫째, 제도적 차원에서의 인적자원관리를 통한 긍정적 심리자원과 역량강화에 도움이 될 수 있는 정책이 요구된다. 둘째, 긍정심리자본이 직무만족과 서비스 질에 효과적이라는 사실을 인지하고 시설운영에 접목시킬 수 있는 기관 환경변화가 필요하다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.25-53
• /
• 2013

This study analyzes the effect of Computer Aided Innovation (CAI) to improve R&D Capabilities empirically. Survey was distributed by e-mail and Google Docs, targeting CTO of 235 SMEs. 142 surveys were returned back (rate of return 60.4%) from companies. Survey results from 119 companies (83.8%) which are effective samples except no-response, insincere response, estimated value, etc. were used for statistics analysis. Companies with less than 50billion KRW sales of entire researched companies occupy 76.5% in terms of sample traits. Companies with less than 300 employees occupy 83.2%. In terms of the type of company business Partners (called 'partners with big companies' hereunder) who work with big companies for business occupy 68.1%. SMEs based on their own business (called 'independent small companies') appear to occupy 31.9%. The present status of holding IT system according to traits of company business was classified into partners with big companies versus independent SMEs. The present status of ERP is 18.5% to 34.5%. QMS is 11.8% to 9.2%. And PLM (Product Life-cycle Management) is 6.7% to 2.5%. The holding of 3D CAD is 47.1% to 21%. IT system-holding and its application of independent SMEs seemed very vulnerable, compared with partner companies of big companies. This study is comprised of IT infra and IT Utilization as CAI capacity factors which are independent variables. factors of R&D capabilities which are independent variables are organization capability, process capability, HR capability, technology-accumulating capability, and internal/external collaboration capability. The highest average value of variables was 4.24 in organization capability 2. The lowest average value was 3.01 in IT infra which makes users access to data and information in other areas and use them with ease when required during new product development. It seems that the inferior environment of IT infra of general SMEs is reflected in CAI itself. In order to review the validity used to measure variables, Factors have been analyzed. 7 factors which have over 1.0 pure value of their dependent and independent variables were extracted. These factors appear to explain 71.167% in total of total variances. From the result of factor analysis about measurable variables in this study, reliability of each item was checked by Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. All measurable factors at least over 0.611 seemed to acquire reliability. Next, correlation has been done to explain certain phenomenon by correlation analysis between variables. As R&D capabilities factors which are arranged as dependent variables, organization capability, process capability, HR capability, technology-accumulating capability, and internal/external collaboration capability turned out that they acquire significant correlation at 99% reliability level in all variables of IT infra and IT Utilization which are independent variables. In addition, correlation coefficient between each factor is less than 0.8, which proves that the validity of this study judgement has been acquired. The pair with the highest coefficient had 0.628 for IT utilization and technology-accumulating capability. Regression model which can estimate independent variables was used in this study under the hypothesis that there is linear relation between independent variables and dependent variables so as to identify CAI capability's impact factors on R&D. The total explanations of IT infra among CAI capability for independent variables such as organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability are 10.3%, 7%, 11.9%, 30.9%, and 10.5% respectively. IT Utilization exposes comprehensively low explanatory capability with 12.4%, 5.9%, 11.1%, 38.9%, and 13.4% for organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability respectively. However, both factors of independent variables expose very high explanatory capability relatively for technology-accumulating capability among independent variable. Regression formula which is comprised of independent variables and dependent variables are all significant (P<0.005). The suitability of regression model seems high. When the results of test for dependent variables and independent variables are estimated, the hypothesis of 10 different factors appeared all significant in regression analysis model coefficient (P<0.01) which is estimated to affect in the hypothesis. As a result of liner regression analysis between two independent variables drawn by influence factor analysis for R&D capability and R&D capability. IT infra and IT Utilization which are CAI capability factors has positive correlation to organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability with inside and outside which are dependent variables, R&D capability factors. It was identified as a significant factor which affects R&D capability. However, considering adjustable variables, a big gap is found, compared to entire company. First of all, in case of partner companies with big companies, in IT infra as CAI capability, organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, and technology capability out of R&D capacities seems to have positive correlation. However, collaboration capability appeared insignificance. IT utilization which is a CAI capability factor seemed to have positive relation to organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, and internal/external collaboration capability just as those of entire companies. Next, by analyzing independent types of SMEs as an adjustable variable, very different results were found from those of entire companies or partner companies with big companies. First of all, all factors in IT infra except technology-accumulating capability were rejected. IT utilization was rejected except technology-accumulating capability and collaboration capability. Comprehending the above adjustable variables, the following results were drawn in this study. First, in case of big companies or partner companies with big companies, IT infra and IT utilization affect improving R&D Capabilities positively. It was because most of big companies encourage innovation by using IT utilization and IT infra building over certain level to their partner companies. Second, in all companies, IT infra and IT utilization as CAI capability affect improving technology-accumulating capability positively at least as R&D capability factor. The most of factor explanation is low at around 10%. However, technology-accumulating capability is rather high around 25.6% to 38.4%. It was found that CAI capability contributes to technology-accumulating capability highly. Companies shouldn't consider IT infra and IT utilization as a simple product developing tool in R&D section. However, they have to consider to use them as a management innovating strategy tool which proceeds entire-company management innovation centered in new product development. Not only the improvement of technology-accumulating capability in department of R&D. Centered in new product development, it has to be used as original management innovative strategy which proceeds entire company management innovation. It suggests that it can be a method to improve technology-accumulating capability in R&D section and Dynamic capability to acquire sustainable competitive advantage.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.80-95
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 서남해안 갯벌의 보호 및 관리 체계 모델을 제시함으로써 세계유산 신청을 위한 효율적인 보호 및 관리 체계를 구축하는데 있다. 서남해안 갯벌은 유네스코 세계유산에서 강조하고 있는 탁월한 보편적 가치에 대한 잠재적 가능성을 가지고 있다고 판단된다. 서남해안의 갯벌이 세계유산으로 등재되어 체계적으로 관리된다면 자연자원의 현명한 사용(wise use)을 통한 인간과 자연의 조화에 의해 전 세계 모든 인류가 지향해야할 지속가능한 발전을 이룩하는 대표적인 모범 사례가 될 수 있을 것이다. 이러한 관점에서 현재 서남해안 갯벌 대상지역의 보호 및 관리체계를 조사하고, 해외 유사 유산의 관리 사례 조사를 통해 서남해안 갯벌의 관리방향과 체계를 위한 현재의 관리정책을 수정하고 보완사항을 도출하여 우리의 실정에 맞는 모델을 제시하는 것은 세계유산 등재 추진을 위해 반드시 필요한 일이다. 서남해안 갯벌에 해당되는 전체 잠정목록 대상지에 대한 조사 결과, 세계유산의 보호를 위한 합리적인 관리체계를 개발하기 위해서는 보호지역의 추가 지정 및 확대가 필요한 상태이다. 또한 현재의 관리체계는 등재 추진부서(예 : 문화관광과)와 실제 갯벌 관리부서(예 : 해양수산과)로 이원화되어 있다는 문제점이 있다. 이러한 관리부서의 이원화는 세계유산을 합리적으로 추진하기 위한 중장기적인 관리계획을 수립하고 단위사업을 수행하고, 또한 향후 세계유산을 효율적으로 관리하기에 상당한 문제를 야기할 수 있다. 따라서 서남해안 갯벌의 세계유산 등재를 위해서는 보호지역의 확대와 지자체별 이원화된 관리체계의 통합, 그리고 중장기적 통합관리 계획을 수립하는 것이 필요하다. 이를 위해서는 서남해안 갯벌의 효율적이고 지속가능한 보호 및 관리를 위한 관 학 민 NGOs 등 다양한 이해 당사자들의 통합을 위한 협업체계를 구축하는 것이 필수적이다. 즉, 와덴해의 사례와 같이 민관산학의 협의체를 구성하여 유산의 보호 및 관리의 핵심주체인 지역주민의 토착지식과 의견을 기반으로 다양한 이해 당사자들의 의견을 모아, 이를 지역 또는 국가의 정책으로 입안하여 채택하는 상향식 구조를 갖는 것이 필요하다. 중장기적 관점의 통합계획에 있어서는 서남해안 갯벌의 자연 문화유산 보전 및 관리 통합계획 '서남해안 갯벌의 자연과 문화유산 보전 및 관리 통합계획(Integrated Plan for Conservation and Management on Natural and Cultural Heritages in Southwestern Coast Tidal Flat)'의 수립을 제안한다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.57-81
• /
• 2008

Knowledge is an essential strategic weapon for sustaining competitive advantage and is the key determinant for organizational growth. When knowledge is shared and disseminated throughout the organization, it increases an organization's value by providing the ability to respond to new and unusual situations. The growing importance of knowledge as a critical resource has forced executives to pay attention to their organizational knowledge. Organizations are increasingly undertaking knowledge management initiatives and making significant investments. Knowledge sourcing is considered as the first important step in effective knowledge management. Most firms continue to make an effort to realize the benefits of knowledge management by using various knowledge sources effectively. Appropriate knowledge sourcing strategies enable organizations to create, acquire, and access knowledge in a timely manner by reducing search and transfer costs, which result in better firm performance. In response, the knowledge management literature has devoted substantial attention to the analysis of knowledge sourcing strategies. Many studies have categorized knowledge sourcing strategies into intemal- and external-oriented. Internal-oriented sourcing strategy attempts to increase firm performance by integrating knowledge within the boundary of the firm. On the contrary, external-oriented strategy attempts to bring knowledge in from outside sources via either acquisition or imitation, and then to transfer that knowledge across to the organization. However, the extant literature on knowledge sourcing strategies focuses primarily on large organizations. Although many studies have clearly highlighted major differences between large and small firms and the need to adopt different strategies for different firm sizes, scant attention has been given to analyzing how knowledge sourcing strategies affect firm performance in small firms and what are the differences between small and large firms in the patterns of knowledge sourcing strategies adoption. This study attempts to advance the current literature by examining the impact of knowledge sourcing strategies on small firm performance from a holistic perspective. By drawing on knowledge based theory from organization science and complementarity theory from the economics literature, this paper is motivated by the following questions: (1) what are the adoption patterns of different knowledge sourcing strategies in small firms (i,e., what sourcing strategies should be adopted and which sourcing strategies work well together in small firms)?; and (2) what are the performance implications of these adoption patterns? In order to answer the questions, this study developed three hypotheses. First hypothesis based on knowledge based theory is that internal-oriented knowledge sourcing is positively associated with small firm performance. Second hypothesis developed on the basis of knowledge based theory is that external-oriented knowledge sourcing is positively associated with small firm performance. The third one based on complementarity theory is that pursuing both internal- and external-oriented knowledge sourcing simultaneously is negatively or less positively associated with small firm performance. As a sampling frame, 700 firms were identified from the Annual Corporation Report in Korea. Survey questionnaires were mailed to owners or executives who were most erudite about the firm s knowledge sourcing strategies and performance. A total of 188 companies replied, yielding a response rate of 26.8%. Due to incomplete data, 12 responses were eliminated, leaving 176 responses for the final analysis. Since all independent variables were measured using continuous variables, supermodularity function was used to test the hypotheses based on the cross partial derivative of payoff function. The results indicated no significant impact of internal-oriented sourcing strategies while positive impact of external-oriented sourcing strategy on small firm performance. This intriguing result could be explained on the basis of various resource and capital constraints of small firms. Small firms typically have restricted financial and human resources. They do not have enough assets to always develop knowledge internally. Another possible explanation is competency traps or core rigidities. Building up a knowledge base based on internal knowledge creates core competences, but at the same time, excessive internal focused knowledge exploration leads to behaviors blind to other knowledge. Interestingly, this study found that Internal- and external-oriented knowledge sourcing strategies had a substitutive relationship, which was inconsistent with previous studies that suggested complementary relationship between them. This result might be explained using organizational identification theory. Internal organizational members may perceive external knowledge as a threat, and tend to ignore knowledge from external sources because they prefer to maintain their own knowledge, legitimacy, and homogeneous attitudes. Therefore, integrating knowledge from internal and external sources might not be effective, resulting in failure of improvements of firm performance. Another possible explanation is small firms resource and capital constraints and lack of management expertise and absorptive capacity. Although the integration of different knowledge sources is critical, high levels of knowledge sourcing in many areas are quite expensive and so are often unrealistic for small enterprises. This study provides several implications for research as well as practice. First this study extends the existing knowledge by examining the substitutability (and complementarity) of knowledge sourcing strategies. Most prior studies have tended to investigate the independent effects of these strategies on performance without considering their combined impacts. Furthermore, this study tests complementarity based on the productivity approach that has been considered as a definitive test method for complementarity. Second, this study sheds new light on knowledge management research by identifying the relationship between knowledge sourcing strategies and small firm performance. Most current literature has insisted complementary relationship between knowledge sourcing strategies on the basis of data from large firms. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, this study identifies substitutive relationship between knowledge sourcing strategies using data from small firms. Third, implications for practice highlight that managers of small firms should focus on knowledge sourcing from external-oriented strategies. Moreover, adoption of both sourcing strategies simultaneousiy impedes small firm performance.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.59-70
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 창원시에 위치한 보호수를 체계적이고 합리적으로 관리하기 위한 기초자료 제공에 그 목적이 있다. 조사항목은 일반현황, 입지정보, 개체정보, 건강정보, 토양정보에 대해 조사하였다. 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 보호수 현황은 총 26개소에 위치하고 있으며, 수종은 느티나무, 팽나무, 푸조나무, 은행나무, 개서어나무, 반송, 굴참나무, 소나무, 왕버들 등 9종이다. 보호수 유형에서는 정자목이 가장 많았고, 대부분의 보호수가 수령 200년 이상이었다. 해발범위는 14~173m였고, 평탄지에 보호수가 많이 있었다. 입지유형의 경우 마을형, 산야형 순이었으며, 토지이용은 건물지가 가장 많았다. 수고범위는 8.0~30.0m, 지하고는 0.6~5.1m, 흉고직경은 240~700cm, 근원직경은 210~800cm이었다, 수관면적의 경우, 5번 느티나무가 가장 넓었다. 현황판은 23번과 26번을 제외하고 대부분 설치되어 있었다. 보호책이 설치된 지역은 9개소, 석축이 있는 지역은 14개소였다. 지지대가 설치된 지역은 5개소, 복토는 대부분 되어 있지 않았다. 바닥재질은 흙, 자갈과 식생의 순이었다. 고사지율 범위는 0~40%이며, 수피이탈율은 0~60%이었다. 공동이 있는 지역은 23개소였으며, 12번 푸조나무가 공동의 면적이 가장 넓었다. 답압 발생 지역은 7개소, 병충해 발생 지역은 2개소, 상처 발생 지역은 23개소, 뿌리 노출 지역은 13개소로 나타났다. 토양 분석 결과, 토양산도 pH 4.5~8.0, 유기물함량 3.5~69.8g/kg, 전기전도도 0.11~2.87dS/m, 유효인산 3.0~490.6mg/kg, 치환성 칼륨 0.10~1.05cmol+/kg, 치환성 칼슘 1.41~16.45cmol+/kg, 치환성 마그네슘 0.37~1.96cmol+/kg, 치환성 나트륨 0.25~2.41cmol+/kg, 양이온치환용량 8.35~26.55cmol+/kg으로 나타났다.