• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.213-246
• /
• 2005

Despite of the impressive progress made in the Evolutionary techno-economics during the last two decades, there have been very little, if not at all, theoretical advancement in explaining an endogenous mechanism of transforming a technological paradigm within self-perpetuatingstructural dynamics. The question poorly attempted was raised by Schumpeter a century ago in his effort to overcome the well-known 'Walras' trap'. Although there have been increasing number of researchers recently tackling the issue quite seriously from within the Evolutionary school, I see it that radical reconstruction of the basic principle of Evolutionary research framework is urgently needed to solve the century long fundamental question, from evolutionary approach to transformational approach. In the paper, I will show the theoretical feasibility of explaining an endogenous mechanism of paradigm transformation, relying upon the concept of localized dynamics and the concept of morphogenetic structuration. It should be emphasized that there must be aendogenous process of deepening structural Instability generated in the process of economic coordination to secure efficient circular flow. The concept of development bottleneck initiated by the Baumol's cost disease could be regarded as one of the important source of such mechanism. Unfortunately, however, it is a brief conceptual description presented in the paper rather than a comprehensive analytical model, due to the space limitation imposed.

• 사회경제평론
• /
• 제38호
• /
• pp.85-128
• /
• 2012

본 논문의 목적은 기업의 존재이유와 기업의 범위결정을 신슘페터주의 진화경제학의 관점에서 설명하는 것이다. 본 논문에서는 Witt(1998)의 리더쉽 관점을 통해 소규모 벤처 기업의 탄생을 설명하고 복잡한 위계조직으로 변한 후에는 기업가의 인지 및 조정능력과 의사소통능력의 한계 때문에 기업의 역량을 분리하는 것이 어렵다는 점을 논증한다. 본 논문의 기업이론은 기존이론과 비교했을 때 1) 기능주의적 설명과 진화론적 설명을 통합하고, 2) 산업 차원에서 기업의 범위 결정을 논할 수 있고, 3) 기업 범위의 산업 내 이질성을 설명할 수 있고, 4) 기업 범위의 변화를 설명하는데 적합하다는 강점을 지니고 있다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-45
• /
• 2012

This paper reviews the emerging literature on innovation policy from a practitioner's perspective, reviews the policy implications of an evolutionary perspective in economics, and identifies newly emerging areas of innovation policy analysis. We show that an innovation system is a dominant policy discourse, that there are limits of policy implications from an evolutionary perspective, and that there is a need for explicitly policy motivated analysis grounded in a broad evolutionary perspective. Innovation policy studies are an area in pre-paradigmatic stages whose dynamism originates from the interaction of theory, policy, and policy learning. The limited usefulness of policy implications derived directly from either conceptual or empirical analysis requires more explicitly policy focused research.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.66-77
• /
• 2014

This paper aims at exploring a conceptual framework of analyzing the evolutionary processes of regional economies by reconciling the notion of regional resilience and the concepts prevailing in the disciplines of evolutionary economics and geography. The resilience framework appears to offer a promising outlet with which combination of the seemingly contradictory conceptions is made possible. It can address why some regions manage to adapt to external shocks, renew themselves, or lock out themselves, while others are more locked in decline. In addition, it can also explain how the spatial organization of economic production, distribution, and consumption is transformed over time. Then, regional economic resilience, together with its accompanying vehicle of panarchy, emerges as a workable framework of explaining regional differentiation in regional economic performance and trajectories. Despite the risk of being a fuzzy concept, the resilience conception can be properly operationalized to provide policy principles of regional economic innovation adjusted to region-specific contexts.

• International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.247-255
• /
• 2004

The majority of real-world problems encountered by engineers involve simultaneous optimization of competing objectives. In this case instead of single optima, there is a set of alternative trade-offs, generally known as Pareto-optimal solutions. The use of evolutionary algorithms Pareto GA, which was first introduced by Goldberg in 1989, has now become a sort of standard in solving Multiobjective Optimization Problems (MOPs). Though this approach was further developed leading to numerous applications, these applications are based on Pareto ranking and employ the use of the fitness sharing function to maintain diversity. Another scheme for solving MOPs has been presented by J. Nash to solve MOPs originated from Game Theory and Economics. Sefrioui introduced the Nash Genetic Algorithm in 1998. This approach combines genetic algorithms with Nash's idea. Another central achievement of Game Theory is the introduction of an Evolutionary Stable Strategy, introduced by Maynard Smith in 1982. In this paper, we will try to find ESS as a solution of MOPs using our game model based co-evolutionary algorithm. First, we will investigate the validity of our co-evolutionary approach to solve MOPs. That is, we will demonstrate how the evolutionary game can be embodied using co-evolutionary algorithms and also confirm whether it can reach the optimal equilibrium point of a MOP. Second, we will evaluate the effectiveness of our approach, comparing it with other methods through rigorous experiments on several MOPs.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.34-55
• /
• 2001

With increasing globalization, a proper policy for global inter-city networking strongly required, which presumes the study on the heterogeneity among regional innovation systems. While surveying the research results of the Evolutionary Economics, 1 stress that regional systems of innovation differ in technological capacities, industrial structures, institutional arrangements and socio-cultural features. 1 make the empirical investigation based on the data of Busan and Hamburg, making clear the regional specificities among regional innovation systems. The results show that regional systems of innovation in Busan and Hamburg are quitely asymmetric. They suggest also the limitation of neo-classical assumption on the ‘homogeneous production function’ and that policy-makers in regions should make the policy for ‘global inter-cities networking’, based on perspectives of regional heterogeneity.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.509-526
• /
• 2008

본 연구의 목적은 진화경제학적 관점으로 한국 신발산업의 진화적 발전경로를 분석하는 것이다. 산업의 변화를 연구함에 있어 진화론적 관점은 기업의 선택과 모방, 진입과 퇴출, 기술적 특성과 혁신과정 등 산업의 발전경로에 관한 복잡한 요인들이 어떻게 생성되고 지속되며 공진화하는지를 설명할 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있다. 한국 신발산업에 관한 기존의 연구들은 한국 신발산업의 쇠퇴 요인을 임금 상승과 노동집약적 산업의 환경 변화의 측면에서 찾고 있다. 이에 반해, 본 연구에서는 한국 신발산업의 쇠퇴 요인을 국내 기업의 전략적 선택과 모방의 경로, 지배적 기술 패러다임, 기업을 둘러싸고 있는 제도적 규제의 문제, 그리고 글로벌생산체제로 변화하는 메조 궤적의 진화적 발전경로의 측면에서 찾고자 하였다. 이러한 분석 결과를 토대로 한국의 신발산업은 스포츠화, 특히 혁제운동화의 제조기술에 대한 학습과정과 OEM 주문생산에 기초하여 성장했으며, 한국 신발산업의 사양화는 대내외 환경변화에 따른 경쟁조건과 시장선택체제에 적응하기 위한 기업의 진화적 선택과정에 따른 결과임을 강조한다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 2016

Essences, needs and features of formation of national innovative development model of Kazakhstan are proved on the basis of analysis of various research approaches to realization of the modernization that exist in the world economic theory. For studying the problems of innovative development of the country, there was a need for the formulation of a number of definitions, disclosure of their contents, changing the approaches to reform, as well as adjusting their targets. In the article the general scientific research methods used dialectic, abstraction, systemic and situational approach, empirical and theoretical and analytical methods, and logic modeling. The proposed approach to the implementation of innovative development based on the use of evolutionary and institutional approaches to the study of the problems of implementing an effective innovation policy. This approach is intended to contribute to the development of a forward strategy of modernization, innovative development and higher competitiveness of the national economy. The study proved the causes and features of the implementation of innovative development model in Kazakhstan.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.117-143
• /
• 2014

기존의 기술 진화 경로 연구는 주로 거시적 동향 분석 수준에서 이루어져 왔으며 포괄적인 기술정책 방향 수립에는 시사점이 있었으나, 기업 기술 및 특허전략에는 활용가치가 낮았다. 2000년대부터 논문 및 특허 등의 데이터를 활용해 미시적인 기술의 진화 경로를 분석하고, 기업 기술전략에 적용하려는 연구가 증가하고 있다. 그러나 대부분 과거 진화 경로의 서술에 그치고 있으며 기술의 진화 또는 파생-융합 등의 변화에 대한 분석은 전문가의 정성적 판단에 상당부분 의존하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 특허 인용 네트워크를 구축해 미시적 기술의 진화 경로를 도출하고, 기술의 진화와 파생을 동적 기술트리를 통해 분석하는 방법론을 제시한다. 동적 기술트리 분석은 기술의 핵심요소를 체계화하고, 신기술 요소의 신규성과 확장성을 평가해 차세대 기술진화와 파생에 대한 정량적 판단을 가능하게 한다. 이를 통해 차세대 신기술과 파생기술에 대하여 파악, 평가, 비교하고 나아가 예측의 토대를 구축한 것이 본 연구의 의의이다. 본 연구의 결과는 기술 및 특허전략과 포트폴리오 구축의 신뢰성을 높일 수 있는 좋은 도구가 될 것이다. 본 연구에서 제안한 방법론을 이용하여 최근 전력산업에서 기존 교류 송전의 대안으로 주목을 받고 있는 초고압 직류송전 시스템 기술을 대상으로 실증분석을 수행하였다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.135-160
• /
• 2004

We witness now the changing techno-economic paradigm and the emerging learning economy. Reflecting on these changes, the group of Evolutionary Economists study recently the theory on regional innovation system, but their research results are still now not theoretically ‘systemized’. Moreover, they often indeed speak of the ‘social capital’, but do not investigate that. This paper tries to systemize their empirical findings and theoretical results and integrate the discussions on social capital in fields of sociology into a mathematical model. This study emphasizes the role of social capital in the innovating process.