• Title/Summary/Keyword: evaluation procedure

Search Result 2,446, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

A Simple Procedure of Seismic Performance Evaluation for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in Korea

  • Kim, Taewan
    • Architectural research
    • /
    • v.15 no.3
    • /
    • pp.159-166
    • /
    • 2013
  • This study was aimed at analyzing the three-step seismic performance evaluation procedure of Korea Infrastructure Safety Cooperation and proposing a new procedure suitable for unreinforced masonry buildings in Korea. For the study, it was investigated the performance evaluation results of five example URM buildings. First of all, it was found that the performance evaluation procedure for the URM buildings should be different from that for the other structural systems. As a result, a simple procedure of seismic performance evaluation was proposed, which includes elimination of elastic and inelastic push-over analysis and reduction of performance levels and evaluation steps. With the simple procedure, the URM buildings could be evaluated more easily than the other structures. It would be expected that the procedure can provide structural engineers with a simple and easy way to evaluate the seismic performance of the Korean URM buildings. Nevertheless, the procedure must be revised continuously by reflecting new research products for the URM buildings in Korea.

An Evaluation of Informal Environmental Education Program Based on Evaluation Procedure Model - A Case Study on the Evaluation of Non-Indigenous, Invasive Species Management Program in New York State - (절차 모형에 따른 사회 환경교육 프로그램의 평가 - 뉴욕주의 외래종 관리 프로그램 평가 사례를 중심으로 -)

  • ;Marianne E. Krasny
    • Hwankyungkyoyuk
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.83-100
    • /
    • 2002
  • This study introduced various theories and related studies on the evaluation of informal environmental education programs and suggested an evaluation procedure for them. The case study on the procedure and the result of Non-indigenous, Invasive Species Management/Education program evaluation was provided, which was conducted by Cornell University in cooperation with Cornell Cooperative Extension, The Nature Conservancy, and Finger Lake Land Trust. The procedure model that was used in this study was based on Herman et al. (1987) and slightly modified for the environmental education program evaluation. The procedure and results indicated that the implementation of NIS management/education program properly accomplished it's intended goal and objectives. This study also specifically described its implications for the evaluation of environmental education programs in informal settings.

  • PDF

Some Thoughts on the Seismic Performance Evaluation Procedure of Urban Railway Infrastructures (도시철도 시설물의 내진성능평가체계에 대한 소고)

  • Hur, Jin-Ho;Kim, Jin-Ho
    • Proceedings of the KSR Conference
    • /
    • 2011.05a
    • /
    • pp.1539-1543
    • /
    • 2011
  • Due to recent large earthquakes around the world, there are increasing social needs for seismic safety of urban railway infrastructures. Urban railway infrastructures are applied different seismic performance evaluation procedure each of overground structures, underground structures and bridge structures, and the characteristics of urban railway infrastructures are not properly considered in the procedure. This study presents problems in the existing seismic performance evaluation procedure of urban railway infrastructures and proposes necessities of unified evaluation procedure.

  • PDF

A Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies for Railway Investments of China and Korea

  • Sun Sunduck D.
    • Proceedings of the KOR-KST Conference
    • /
    • 1998.09a
    • /
    • pp.65-70
    • /
    • 1998
  • Economic evaluation methodologies for railway investments of China and Korea are comparatively analyzed. Chinese procedures specified in the new economic evaluation manual of 1997 were compared with those of Korea based on the economic evaluation manual of 1982. As expected those procedures reflect general economic requirements of the respective countries. Several differences in the specification are also noted. Details of the specification of Chinese procedure far exceed Korean specification, while Korean manual is rich of explanation on the fundamental theory. Differences in the procedure of calculating benefits of investments are most conspicuous, and specific requirements of carrying out a optimum opening year analysis in Korean procedure is notable. Despite of these differences in the procedure, two methodologies share same objective of ensuring selection of economically and financially sound railway projects. Both procedures of China and Korea, however, limit their evaluation scope on railways alone. Therefore, they are needed to expand scope of evaluation to encompass the idea of multi-modal or inter-modal evaluation, which will eventually contribute to build truly efficient national comprehensive transportation system.

  • PDF

Some Thoughts on the Preliminary Seismic Performance Evaluation Procedure of Subway Infrastructures (도시철도 시설물의 내진성능 예비평가체계에 대한 소고)

  • Park, Beom-Ho;Lim, Nam-Hyoung;Lee, Tae-Hyung;Kim, Kee-Dong;Kim, Jin-Ho
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.666-674
    • /
    • 2010
  • There is a few problems in the preliminary seismic performance evaluation procedure of subway infrastructures, such as cut-and-cover tunnel structures and bridge structures, recently because the characteristics of subway infrastructures are not properly considered in the procedure. In particular, the evaluation procedure of vehicular bridge structures is applied to subway bridges without any modification. Moreover, the present evaluation procedure is lack of both theoretical and empirical backgrounds, which makes the evaluation less reliable. This paper presents problems in the existing preliminary evaluation procedure and proposes possible modification(revision) to the procedure.

ESTIM : A Support System for Task-based Evaluation of User Interface (ESTIM : 사용자 직무지식에 기반한 인터페이스 평가 지원시스템)

  • Ryu, Ho-Gyeong;Yun, Wan-Cheol
    • Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.18 no.3
    • /
    • pp.55-72
    • /
    • 1999
  • Evaluation of user interfaces has to be performed in an intuitive and subjective manner by experts especially when the problem comes to the complexity and consistency of sophisticated interface procedures. The manual analysis and evaluation of logical interfaces also tends to be slow and laborious. To make the evaluation more formal and objective, the criteria and the procedure with which the evaluation can proceed must be explicitly prescribed. Furthermore, to make the formal procedure as practical as subjective expert evaluation, the criteria must reflect the user knowledge of the target tasks since the task knowledge plays the role of a basis for users to understand the interface organizations and procedures. This paper describes ESTIM, a support system for task-based evaluation of user interface, that includes the interface evaluation criteria and implies an evaluation procedure. The support system can be used either in an interactive manner by the analyst during the evaluation or in an automatic evaluation mode. It was verified that the result of automatic evaluation by ESTIM matched the results of expert evaluation fairly well.

  • PDF

FUNCTION ORIENTED VE ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION PROCEDURE USING FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION

  • Jong-Hyeob Kim;Chang-Taek Hyun;Taehoon Hong
    • International conference on construction engineering and project management
    • /
    • 2009.05a
    • /
    • pp.1195-1200
    • /
    • 2009
  • Two important concepts in VE are "function" and "cost." Cost can be expressed quantitatively. Unlike cost, the function can only be expressed qualitatively. Thus, to accurately evaluate the performance in VE analysis, it is required that the functional aspect should be considered a qualitative one. This study suggests a procedure of function oriented evaluation which can evaluate function enhancement of a VE proposal more logically and objectively. To conduct this study, problems were induced via case analysis, and solutions were found. In addition, the existing simple evaluation procedures were corrected, and a function enhancement evaluation procedure via function classification was suggested. For function classification, the use of the concepts, which were "intended function" and "additionally obtained function," was suggested. Function oriented evaluation procedure to VE proposals which is suggested in this study is expected to be a great help in treating valuable functions through VE job plan.

  • PDF

Linear Seismic Performance Evaluation Procedure of the Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Facilities (저층 철근 콘크리트 시설물 선형 내진 성능 평가)

  • Kim, Doo-Hwan;Jeong, Ui-Do;Song, Kwan Kwon;Kim, Seong Pil
    • Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures
    • /
    • v.18 no.2
    • /
    • pp.129-135
    • /
    • 2018
  • Following a 5.8 magnitude earthquake on September 12, 2016 in Gyeongju Province, a magnitude 5.4 earthquake occurred in the northern region of Pohang City on November 15, 2017 in South Korea. Only 7.9 % of the building structures are earthquake-resistant, according to the recent survey conducted by the government agencies in October 2017. In this paper, the linear analysis seismic performance evaluation procedure of the existing school structures presented in the revised methodology(Seismic Performance Evaluation Procedure and Rehabilitation Manual for School Facilities) was introduced. In this paper, the linear analysis evaluation procedure presented in the revised methodology was introduced and the seismic performance index of the example structure was evaluated using the linear analysis evaluation procedure. The seismic retrofit was verified by the linear and nonlinear dynamic analyses using Perform 3D. The analysis results show that the dissipated inelastic energy is concentrated on the retrofitted shear wall and the maximum inter-story drift of the stadium model structure with damping system satisfies the requirement of the current code.

Suggestion of a Safety Evaluation Procedure to Improve Probiotic Safety (프로바이오틱스 안전성 문제 개선을 위한 안전성 평가방법의 제안)

  • Kim, Sejeong;Yoon, Yohan;Oh, Sejong
    • Journal of Dairy Science and Biotechnology
    • /
    • v.38 no.2
    • /
    • pp.99-111
    • /
    • 2020
  • Probiotics are actively being studied for their efficacious anticancer, anticholesterol, and antidiabetic properties. As novel probiotic strains are being developed continuously, new strain-specific safety issues may be reported. Therefore, a procedure for the safety evaluation of probiotic strains is needed. In this study, we investigated the current status of domestic and foreign guidelines for the evaluation of safety of probiotics and suggested a general probiotic safety evaluation process. In other countries, the guidelines for probiotic evaluation are provided and managed separately. However, in Korea, general guidelines are provided regarding the use of functional ingredients, and specific guidelines for the use of probiotics are lacking. A review step based on the characteristics of the probiotics has been introduced in the procedure for safety evaluation of probiotics. Additionally, it has been suggested that the safety evaluation process should consider the results of the functional and genomic analysis for strain identification. Moreover, the factors to be evaluated are presented separately for the notified and non-notified strains. The suggested evaluation procedure may ensure the safety of probiotics, thereby promoting enhanced utilization of probiotics as functional products.

Test and Evaluation Procedures of Defense AI System linked to the ROK Defense Acquisition System (국방획득체계와 연계한 국방 인공지능(AI) 체계 시험평가 방안)

  • Yong-Bok Lee;Min-Woo Choi;Min-ho Lee
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.46 no.4
    • /
    • pp.229-237
    • /
    • 2023
  • In this research, a new Test and Evaluation (T&E) procedure for defense AI systems is proposed to fill the existing gap in established methodologies. This proposed concept incorporates a data-based performance evaluation, allowing for independent assessment of AI model efficacy. It then follows with an on-site T&E using the actual AI system. The performance evaluation approach adopts the project promotion framework from the defense acquisition system, outlining 10 steps for R&D projects and 9 steps for procurement projects. This procedure was crafted after examining AI system testing standards and guidelines from both domestic and international civilian sectors. The validity of each step in the procedure was confirmed using real-world data. This study's findings aim to offer insightful guidance in defense T&E, particularly in developing robust T&E procedures for defense AI systems.