• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.77-97
• /
• 2017

ERP is an essential information system (IS) that many companies are operating on the basis of this solution. Since ERP is a very important system that is used in business operation and provides quantified information about the efficiency and productivity of the business activities, difference of competitiveness between companies that have successfully implemented ERP and those that do not have is very large. According to a survey done by a global consulting firm, far less than half of the companies are evaluated as successfully internalizing ERP into their organizations. Therefore, there is a need for an accurate assessment of ERP usage and an improvement of ERP based on it and the need become to increase largely. However, in reality, there is neither the systematic evaluation methods or any research about this topic. This study proposes a framework for evaluating the routinization of ERP throughout the life cycle of the ERP based on both the literature in the enterprise architecture, ERP lifecycle, ERP success areas, and actual experience of the authors in ERP implementation. The proposed framework intends to satisfy the following functional requirements : 1) the entire lifecycle of ERP should be evaluated; 2) evaluation of ERP should be performed from the enterprise-wide perspective; 3) evaluation should focus on the core activities of the organization; and objective evaluation criteria should be used in the evaluation.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.241-248
• /
• 1991

The aim of this study is to propose the criteria for a evaluation model of the lifetime household work and organize the model. The results were as follows: Three criteria for a evaluation model of the life-time household work were proposed. $\circled1$ An appropriate framework of the evaluation model should be based on the transition of the family life. $\circled2$ The model should include major variables influencing the value of household work of homemaker. $\circled3$ The model should be flexible enough to accommodate various evaluation methods, and should reflect idiosyncracies of different evaluation methods. In view of the criteria stated above, the present study is based on the family life cycle framework. And the age of the last offspring exhibits a consistent major influence in the evaluation based on the household work hours, while the education level of homemakers shows a consistent major influence in the evaluation based on household worker. So as to reflect these two major variables in the family life cycle framework.

• 한국산업융합학회 논문집
• /
• 제25권6_2호
• /
• pp.1017-1027
• /
• 2022

Development of social overhead capital (SOC) requires huge national finance, and performance issues such as cost-efficiency, safety, and environment have been constantly raised. However, currently each construction client has limited access to its own projects' performance without analytic methodology for industry-level comparisons and benchmarking for improvement. To overcome this problem, this study proposes a comprehensive performance analysis framework for post-evaluation of large-scale construction projects. To this end, this study performed a case study of advanced countries (the U.S., the U.K. and Japan) and consultation with related experts to develop a tailored performance analysis framework for the Post- Construction Evaluation and Management system in Korea. The developed framework covers three categories (project performance, project efficiency, and ripple effect), nine areas (cost, schedule, change, safety, quality, demand, benefit-cost ratio, civil complaint, and defect), and 31 detailed metrics. Using industry-level project performance database and statistical techniques, the proposed framework can be used not only to diagnose excellent and unsatisfactory performance areas for completed construction projects, but also to provide reference data for future similar projects. This study can contribute to the improvement of clients' performance management practices and effectiveness of construction projects.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.315-324
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 정책적으로 법적 구속력이 있는 건축물의 환경조형물을 대상으로 도시환경의 질적 수준을 향상시킬 수 있는 평가 및 심의방법 개선방향을 고찰하고 제시하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해서 도시환경조형물의 개념을 정립하고 환경조형물의 인지과정 및 도시환경과 불특정다수의 관람자를 포함한 사회적인 상황과 요인을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 환경조형물의 미술장식제도에 관한 고찰과 현행제도의 문제점을 분석하고 이를 토대로 개선된 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 대상 주요도시는 서울시를 비롯한 중부권의 대전시, 영남권의 부산시, 호남권의 광주시의 주요 4대도시의 공공미술제도와 심의방식을 분석하였다. 환경조형물의 설치는 건축주와 작가만의 문제가 아닌 도시문화환경 창출이라는 인간 심성의 질적 가치를 제고하는 방안을 고찰하여 제안하는 것이 주요 목적이다. 미술장식제도가 갖는 사회문화적 가치를 재확인하고 도시문화환경개선의 관점에서 보다 효과적인 방향으로 운영상의 문제점과 원인을 개선하여 공공미술심의제도의 수준을 높이고 이를 토대로 인간과 환경을 위한 심의방식 및 평가방법의 개념의 틀을 추출하고자 한다.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.290-295
• /
• 2023

The global warming by greenhouse gases causes climate change and disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis frequently, leading to great damage. It is important to build efficient and scalable disaster response services to minimize the damage. Existing disaster warning service by the mobile text is limited by the scalability and the data size to be delivered. In this paper, we propose a framework for disaster response services that is efficient and flexible by allowing to adopt various indexing schemes and scalable by supporting any number of clients in disaster situations anytime and anywhere. Also, the framework by wireless data broadcast can be free from the limitation of the size of data to be delivered. We design and implement the proposed framework and evaluate the framework. For the evaluation, we simulate the implemented framework by adopting various indexing schemes like HCI, DSI and TTSI, and by comparing the access times of the clients. Through the evaluation, we show that the proposed framework can provide efficient and scalable and flexible disaster response services.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1995년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집; 전남대학교; 28-29 Apr. 1995
• /
• pp.797-806
• /
• 1995

An ergonomic evaluation model which can properly evaluate the design of a product or workplaces was developed to evaluate a new product in the early stage of design. Although several evaluation models have been developed and are in use in the field of ergonomics, they lack an integrated framework and analysis techniques. In this research, an ergonomic evaluation model was developed according to the framework which accommodates desirable components of the model. The framework represents the integration of four components: man model, workplace modeller, ergonomic evaluation functions and knowledge bases, which interact with a common object-oriented database. Components were developed individually and integrated with the workplace modeller. The generation and manipulation of man models, workplace modelling, and ergonomic evaluation features such as reach and visibility were implemented. The developed evaluation model has demonstrated distinct advantages of the flexibility to adapt another features for the ergonomic evaluation model and the better usability for users.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.53-73
• /
• 2002

The launch of a new business is crucial to the future growth and profitability of a company. A new business project typically requires a large amount of resources while it has a high possibility of failure. The evaluation of new business opportunities is therefore quite a critical decision-making to companies. This evaluation includes screening of a large number of criteria at a time which often makes desision-making very complicated. Management should evaluate the business alternatives in a sound and consistent manner that is hard to achieve because the new business evaluation is a typical semi/unstructured decision-making problem. The difficulty in such an evaluation will increase if it is required for management to consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. Under these circumstances, this study has proposed a decision-making framework that utilizes analytical hierarchy process(AHP). This study has identified a set of criteria essential to the new business evaluation and suggested a systematic framework for it. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are incorporated into the single framework in this study.

• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.51-67
• /
• 2001

In this study we developed a framework to evaluate environmental education programs through lived experience in nature and the framework was applied to a neat case,'2001 Green Camp'. The framework consists of 4 items; goals and objectives, instructional planning, teaching and learning, methods and learning operation and environment. Learning outcomes such as changes to the levels of knowledge, attitude, participation and environmental sensitivity are not included in the evaluation framework but evaluated through direct questions to students. Two researchers observed and evaluated programs with the framework. This study reflected various perspectives of researchers, teachers, students and staff members.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.29-46
• /
• 1996

In the past decade, considerable effort has been devoted unsuccessfully to the development of information technology (IT) evaluation frameworks in the information systems area. Based on the literature review in this area and the decision analysis field, two competing evaluation frameworks are developed in this study: the direct evaluation framework and the indirect evaluation framework. A case study on Firm K shows that the latter is more practically efficient and theoretically appropriate but requires the adequate training for practitioners in order not to get confused the weight of an evaluation variable with the product of this weight and the score of the variable. Another finding is that Weill's conversion effectiveness is neither possible nor necessary to measure in the process of evaluating an IT although it is in theory an important concept.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.23-39
• /
• 2009

다양한 요구사항을 최신의 IT서비스로 제공하기 위해서는 끊임없는 기술 개발과 비즈니스의 이해가 필수적이지만, IT서비스 업계의 한정된 인력과 수행력으로 충족시키기에는 현실적으로 불가능하다. 따라서 IT서비스 업계에서는 다양한 산업군의 사업을 객관적인 방법으로 평가하여 사업의 우선순위 도출을 통해 집중해야 할 사업선택 전략이 필수적으로 요구된다. 본 연구는 다양하고 불확실한 사업을 객관화되고 산업별 특화된 기준으로 평가할 수 있는 프레임워크 개발을 목적으로 한다. 구조화된 평가요인은 가중치와 평가 가이드 라인을 제공함으로써 정량적, 정성적 평가를 통해 IT서비스 사업의 경쟁력지수(CI：Competitiveness Index)를 도출할 수 있도록 설계되었다. 개발된 평가요인과 프레임워크는 실무에 적용되어 이해관계자간의 갈등 조정 및 의사결정자의 종합적 판단을 지원할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.