The Development of Evaluation Model for New Business Projects Using AHP and Case Study of Telecommunication Equipment Company

AHP를 이용한 신규사업과제의 평가모형 개발 및 통신장비회사의 사례연구

  • 조성백 (런던대학교) ;
  • 한인구 (한국과학기술원 테크노경영대학원)
  • Published : 2002.03.01

Abstract

The launch of a new business is crucial to the future growth and profitability of a company. A new business project typically requires a large amount of resources while it has a high possibility of failure. The evaluation of new business opportunities is therefore quite a critical decision-making to companies. This evaluation includes screening of a large number of criteria at a time which often makes desision-making very complicated. Management should evaluate the business alternatives in a sound and consistent manner that is hard to achieve because the new business evaluation is a typical semi/unstructured decision-making problem. The difficulty in such an evaluation will increase if it is required for management to consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. Under these circumstances, this study has proposed a decision-making framework that utilizes analytical hierarchy process(AHP). This study has identified a set of criteria essential to the new business evaluation and suggested a systematic framework for it. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are incorporated into the single framework in this study.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Mathematical Psychology v.27 Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments Aczel, J.;T.L, Saaty https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7
  2. IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management v.EM-21 R&D Project Selection Models : An Assessment Baker, N.R. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1974.6448498
  3. Management Science v.21 Recent Adveances in R&D Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods Baker, N.R.;J. Freeland https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.21.10.1164
  4. Croporate Venturing Block, Z.;I.C., MacMilan
  5. Engineering Economist v.37 no.1 Multiattribute Evaluation within a Present Value Framework and Its Relation to the Analytic Hierarchy Process Boucher, T.O.;E.L., MacStravic https://doi.org/10.1080/00137919108903055
  6. The Economic Analysis of Industrila Projects Bussy, L.E.
  7. Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advaned manufacturing Systems Canade, J.R.;W.G., Sullivan
  8. Master Thesis, KAIST Graduate School of Management The Decelopment of the Evaluation Model and Case Study for e-Business Company Using AHP Choi, H.
  9. Industrial Marketing Management v.4 Why New Industrial Products Fail Cooper, R.G. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(75)90005-X
  10. European J. Marketing v.14 no.5/6 Project New Prod : Factors in New Product Success Cooper, R.G. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004906
  11. IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management v.EM-34 no.3 Defining the New Product Strategy Cooper, R.G. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1987.6498880
  12. Industrial Marketing Management v.13 Criteria for Screening New Industrial Products Cooper, R,G,;U., Brentani https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(84)90027-0
  13. Industrial Marketing Management v.16 no.3 Success Factors in Product Innovation Cooper, R.G.;E.J., Kleinschrridt
  14. Harvard Business Review Key Options in Market Selection and Product Planning Corey, E.R.
  15. J. Marketing Diagnosing the Product Portfolio Day, G.S.
  16. Expert Choice Inc. Expert Choice Inc.
  17. MacMillan College Publishing Co. Marketing Decisions for New and Mature Products 2/e Hirish, R.D.;M.P., Peters
  18. Cost Accounting 8/e Horngren, C.T., G. Foster,;S., Datar
  19. R&D Mnagement v.25 no.3 The Relative Importance of New Product Success Determinants-Perception Versus Reality Kleinschmidt, E.J.;R.G., Cooper https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1995.tb00919.x
  20. Engineering Economist v.40 no.4 Designing a Comperhensive Business Performance Evaluation System : An Analytical Hierachical Model Lee, H., W., Kwak,;I., Han https://doi.org/10.1080/00137919508903159
  21. Harvard Business Review Discovery-Driven Planning McGrath, R.G.;I.C., MacMillan
  22. The Psychological Review The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two : Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information Miller, G.A.
  23. INTERFACES v.17 no.2 The Capital Budgeting Process : Theory and Practice Mukherjee, T.K.;G.V., Henderson https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.17.2.78
  24. New Business : Strategy and Practice Park, C.Y.;S.H., Kim
  25. J. Product Innovation Management v.6 Expert Systems : An Emerging Technology for Selecting New Product Winners Ram, S.;S., Ram https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(89)90003-9
  26. Sloan Management Review v.Spring Entering New Businesses : Selecting Strategies for Success Roberts, E.B.;C.A., Berry
  27. J. Mathematical Psychology v.15 A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures Saay, T.L. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  28. IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management v.EM-30 no.3 Priority Setting in Complex Problems Saaty, T.L. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1983.6448606
  29. European J. Operational Research v.48 How to Make a decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process Saaty, T.L. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  30. Proceedings of American Philosophical Society v.106 The Architecture of Complexity Simon, H.A.
  31. Building Effective Decision Support Systems Sprague, L.W.;E.D.,Carlson
  32. IRWIN Timmons, J.A.
  33. Design and Marketing of New Products Urban, G.L.;J.R., Hauser
  34. Harvard Business Review Designing Product and Business Portfolios Wind, Y.;V., Mahajan
  35. Management Science v.26 no.7 Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Wind, Y.;T.L., Saaty https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641