• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.139-151
• /
• 2018

Objectives: This study was to compare the self-evaluated outcomes of communication competency in dental hygiene process of care in the students of a dental hygiene department with the teaching evaluation, and to confirm the difference of communication competency by the evaluator. Methods: This study attempted to confirm the value and usefulness of self-evaluation and teaching evaluation on the communication competency. The subjects of this study were 43 junior students who took a course of dental medical communication at the dental hygiene department of a university located in 'A' city, and the self-evaluation and teaching evaluation were conducted using the evaluation paper which was modified from the communication evaluation tool in the previous studies. The collected data were subjected to the correspondence sample t-test to compare the difference between the communication competency self-evaluation before and after the education, and after communication education, while an independent sample T-test was conducted to compare the differences between the evaluators. Results: The student's self-evaluations before and after the education showed the statistically significant difference, moreover, the post-education competency scores were improved mostly in all the items more than the pre-education competency scores. The score of self-evaluation was higher than that of the teaching evaluation in all items except one question in the case of history-information collection stage. Conclusions: It is confirmed that there is an effect to allow the students to improve their communication competency in the dental health communication education in the dental hygiene department. To evaluate the student's communication competency, the mutual complement of self-evaluation and teaching evaluation should be confirmed in parallel each other.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.24-30
• /
• 2020

This paper proposes the approaches to the evaluation of learning using concepts of artificial intelligence. Among various techniques, deep learning algorithm is employed to achieve quantitative results of evaluation. In particular, this paper focuses on the process-based evaluation instead of the result-based one using face expression. The expression is simply acquired by digital camera that records face expression when students solve sample test problems. Face expressions are trained using convolutional neural network (CNN) model followed by classification of expression data into three categories, i.e., easy, neutral, difficult. To substantiate the proposed approach, the simulation results show promising results, and this work is expected to open opportunities for intelligent evaluation system in the future.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.540-552
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a nursing leadership program outcome evaluation system, required for accreditation of nursing education. Methods: A methodological design was used. To ensure the theoretical validity of the evaluation system, learning objectives for nursing education programs and job descriptions for nurses in Korea were verified by analyzing the relationships in the five attributes of the nursing leadership concept. The nursing leadership program outcome evaluation system was developed based on the Kim & Park's developmental model (2008). Results: The nursing leadership program outcome evaluation system was established, including implementation level, education curriculum, level of performance, evaluation method, rubrics, and Close-the-Loop. Conclusion: The developed evaluation system can be actively used in nursing education, and contribute to enhancing the leadership competencies of nursing students and graduate nurses.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.62-70
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for improving related policies and evaluation criteria in the future by analyzing trends of evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation in Korea. For this purpose, five surveys on industry-university cooperation by government departments, major general university evaluations, and evaluation indicators of specialized industry-university evaluations by the Ministry of Education were analyzed. As a result, most of the evaluation criteria for domestic industry-university cooperation have been composed of quantitative indicators and have a limited character as quantitative performance management for government projects. Although the Ministry of Education's evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation projects has gradually changed to a segmented index considering universities, industries, and regions, it needs to be supplemented for sustainability of industry-university cooperation. In order to promote sustainable industry-university cooperation in the future, it was suggested that first, it is necessary to supplementation of qualitative Indicators considering each university's characteristics, second, the composition of indicators related to reflect on demand in the process of the cooperation, and third, to build a virtuous cycle system for future operation of evaluation criteria.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.201-209
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for evaluating quality of the web site about elementary science education. Eight experienced specialists (three elementary science education specialists and five elementary school teachers engaging) in elementary science education verified content validity twice. The evaluation criteria for elementary school science were considering aspects of the characteristic and the quality of web site. The evaluation criteria can be categorized as being in five areas, fifty-seven items. The five areas were a purpose, a credibility, an efficiency, a data-type, an interactivity. Four web sites were analyzed for the subject of this study. Evaluators were nine elementary school teachers, who were educated in the use of instrument. The developed evaluation instrument in this study is considered valid and reliable. The content validity is 91.1%, and the reliability has a Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ of .82. The developed evaluation instrument in this study will verify the quality of web site, provide teachers and students with efficient information about elementary science education. In addition it suggests guidelines about design and devise web site to instructional developer or subject-matter expert.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2021

The objective of this research is to devise a BARS evaluation system as a performance evaluation plan for non-face-to-face capstone design and to verify the validity through the expert FGI as the remote education is highlighted as a new normal standard in the post corona epoch. The conclusion of this research is as follows. First, the non-face-to-face capstone design is a competency centered subject that allows you to develop the engineering and majoring knowledge and its function and attitude, and the achievement of program outcome is the objective competency, and the researcher proposes the BARS method evaluation, one of competency evaluation method, as a new performance evaluation plan. Second, for the evaluation of PO achievement of non-face-to-face capstone design, the researcher deduced 20 behavior identification standard(anchor) of BARS evaluation system, and developed the achievement standard per 4 levels. Third, as the evaluation tool of non-face-to-face capstone design, the presentation data(PPT), presentation video, product such as trial product(model), non-face-to-face class participation video, discussion participating video, team activity report, and result report for the evidential data of BARS evaluation were appeared as proper. Finally, the BARS evaluation plan of non-face-to-face capstone design would be efficiently made through the establishment of evaluation plan, the establishment of grading standard of BARS evaluation scale, the determination of evaluation subject and online BARS evaluation site.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.59-85
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 종합적인 평가 기준을 개발하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해서 먼저, 국내 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 운영 현황을 분석하고 과학영재교육센터 운영에 있어서 시급한 문제점을 도출하였고, 다음으로 ‘특수목적고’와 시·도교육청이 운영하고 있는 ‘과학영재반’과의 차별성을 위한 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 위상을 정립하기 위한 과학영재교육센터 평가의 기본 방향 및 평가틀을 구안하였다. 이를 바탕으로 과학영재교육센터 평가 영역별 평가 기준 및 평가 방법을 구안하였다. 마지막으로, 이상의 연구 결과를 바탕으로 실제 과학영재교육센터 평가에 적용하기 위한 평가 종류(시기)에 따른 평가 방법과 활용 방안을 정리·제시하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 과학영재교육센터 평가 기준은 우리나라 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 효율적인 평가를 위해 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.668-681
• /
• 2020

1948년부터 시작된 국외 군사교육과 1958년도에 육사 교수요원 학위취득을 위해 시행된 전문학위 위탁교육은 4차 산업혁명시대에 육군의 미래와 변혁을 주도할 인재를 육성하기 위해 앞으로도 더욱 확대될 것으로 전망된다. 그러나 육군의 위탁교육제도는 고비용 저효율이라는 비판을 받고 있으며 위탁교육 성과에 대한 체계적인 평가도 미흡하여 제도 전반에 대한 개선이 요구되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 CIPP 평가모형을 적용하여 육군 전문학위 위탁교육 성과평가 연구 결과를 4년이 지난 시점에서 평가영역을 재검증하고 위탁교육의 발전방향을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 육군의 위탁교육 변천 과정을 살펴보았고 육군 위탁교육 성과평가를 위한 CIPP 평가모형의 단계별 평가영역에 대한 타당성은 전문가 델파이 조사와 토의 결과를 적용하였다. 연구결과 위탁교육 성과평가를 위한 평가영역에 대한 타당성은 전문가 델파이 조사결과 모두 적합하였고 위탁교육에 대한 다양한 의견을 얻었다.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.91-111
• /
• 2024

Objective: The purpose of this study is to explore trends in institutional evaluation research in early childhood education through keyword network analysis. This aims to understand trends in academic discourse on institutional evaluation and gain implications for follow-up research and related policy directions. Methods: A total of 6,629 keywords were extracted from 572 dissertations and journal articles published from January 2006 to October 2023 for the purpose of analyzing and visualizing the frequency and centrality of keywords, as well as the structural properties of keyword networks. The analysis and visualization were conducted using the TEXTOM, UCINET6, and NetDraw programs. Results: First, the number of institutional evaluation studies increased steadily from 2006 to 2010 and then decreased, with a higher frequency of studies on daycare centers compared to kindergartens. Second, the most frequently occurring keyword in the analysis was 'daycare center,' and the highest connection strength was found in the term 'daycare-center-evaluation.' Third, network analysis revealed that key terms for institutional evaluation research included 'evaluation certification,' 'recognition,' 'evaluation indicators,' 'teacher,' 'daycare center,' and 'kindergarten.' In the ego network analysis for each institution, 'parent' emerged as a highly ranked keyword. Conclusion/Implications: This study confirmed the perspectives of previous studies by revealing the structure of core concepts in early childhood education institution evaluation research, and provided implications for follow-up and direction of institution evaluation

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.288-301
• /
• 2001

교육 정보화의 핵심은 정보 교육을 위한 인프라 구축과 정보 통신 기술의 교육적 활용에 있으며, 활용의 측면에서는 수업의 정보화를 지원할 수 있는 양질의 교육용 소프트웨어 확보가 관건이다. 이는 교육용 SW 평가 방안의 탐구가 얼마나 중요한 과제인가를 시사해 준다. 본 연구는 이와 같은 문제 인식을 바탕으로 첫째, 수요자 측면에서 양질의 교육용 소프트웨어를 선정하고 활용을 조장할 수 있는 과학적인 정보를 제공하고, 둘째, 개발자 측면에서 객관적인 품질 평가의 준거를 제공함으로써, 양질의 교육용 소프트웨어를 개발할 수 있는 방향과 정보를 제공함으로써 교육 정보화의 기반을 다지기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위해, 기존 교육용 SW 평가에 관련된 연구들을 분석하고, 소프트웨어 평가 준거를 교육적 차원, 운용적 차원, 기술적 차원의 세 영역으로 분류하고 세부 평가 준거를 도출하였다.