• Title/Summary/Keyword: University

Search Result 715,005, Processing Time 0.261 seconds

The study about achievement and improvement plans of the university assessment of industrial point of view (산업계관점 대학평가의 성과와 개선방안)

  • Kim, Wang-jun;Jang, Keui-deok;Kim, Min-kyu;Park, Juhyoung
    • Journal of Engineering Education Research
    • /
    • v.21 no.5
    • /
    • pp.54-63
    • /
    • 2018
  • The university assessment of Industrial point of view that is the evaluation of university's outcomes was started in 2008 to find out university's social and industrial contribution rate by evaluating the added value of raising up competent people and technical development through university courses. This study is for analyzing outcomes of university assessment of Industrial point of view in the second period and searching for improvement suggestions of evaluation indexes and ways. The outcomes of university assessment of Industrial point of view in the second period is that are the contributions overcoming the difference of industrial requests and university's courses, information offering to university about industrial requests, the substantiate indicator for evaluating the suitability of university's courses and the improvement of university's competitiveness through course's upgrades, The ways improving the university assessment of Industrial point of view are introducing the ways of industrial university's consulting, evaluation for certification and involving graduate school's courses assesment, reinforcing the analysis of industrial requests, improving the indexes of courses and setting up feedback system.

Application of Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography to Thoracic Oncology Imaging

  • Cherry Kim;Wooil Kim;Sung-Joon Park;Young Hen Lee;Sung Ho Hwang;Hwan Seok Yong;Yu-Whan Oh;Eun-Young Kang;Ki Yeol Lee
    • Korean Journal of Radiology
    • /
    • v.21 no.7
    • /
    • pp.838-850
    • /
    • 2020
  • Computed tomography (CT) is an important imaging modality in evaluating thoracic malignancies. The clinical utility of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DESCT) has recently been realized. DESCT allows for virtual monoenergetic or monochromatic imaging, virtual non-contrast or unenhanced imaging, iodine concentration measurement, and effective atomic number (Zeff map). The application of information gained using this technique in the field of thoracic oncology is important, and therefore many studies have been conducted to explore the use of DESCT in the evaluation and management of thoracic malignancies. Here we summarize and review recent DESCT studies on clinical applications related to thoracic oncology.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

  • Tae-Han Kim;In-Ho Kim;Seung Joo Kang;Miyoung Choi;Baek-Hui Kim;Bang Wool Eom;Bum Jun Kim;Byung-Hoon Min;Chang In Choi;Cheol Min Shin;Chung Hyun Tae;Chung sik Gong;Dong Jin Kim;Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho;Eun Jeong Gong;Geum Jong Song;Hyeon-Su Im;Hye Seong Ahn;Hyun Lim;Hyung-Don Kim;Jae-Joon Kim;Jeong Il Yu;Jeong Won Lee;Ji Yeon Park;Jwa Hoon Kim;Kyoung Doo Song;Minkyu Jung;Mi Ran Jung;Sang-Yong Son;Shin-Hoo Park;Soo Jin Kim;Sung Hak Lee;Tae-Yong Kim;Woo Kyun Bae;Woong Sub Koom;Yeseob Jee;Yoo Min Kim;Yoonjin Kwak;Young Suk Park;Hye Sook Han;Su Youn Nam;Seong-Ho Kong;The Development Working Group for the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022 Task Force Team
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.23 no.1
    • /
    • pp.3-106
    • /
    • 2023
  • Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.