• Title/Summary/Keyword: U자형골

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Runoff Characteristics and Soil Moisture Distribution of ′U-shaped Goll′ Valley Head Slope (′U자형 골′ 곡두사면의 토양수분 분포와 유출특성)

  • 박종관;양해근
    • Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
    • /
    • v.39 no.1
    • /
    • pp.45-55
    • /
    • 2004
  • The paper describes the rainfall-runoff. soil moisture distribution and subsurface flow of 'U-shaped Goll' valley head slope to evaluate quantitatively the interaction between the water circulation system and geomorphic development. The findings are as follows: The fissure and the pipe entrance in front of 'U-shaped Goll' introduce a lot of direct runoff into either the soil pipe or the soil layer to accelerate the erosion of the soil layer, so that they are likely to contribute to the expansion and development of the soil pipe. Most of soil water is to be drained in pipe flow, while some of remaining soil water is to be fed into groundwater. Therefore, low rainfall intensity is thought to let both the groundwater level and the pipe flow react sensitively by the effects of the precedent rainfall even at events: As a result, the soil pipe is said to be an important factor having influence upon the material balance of 'U-shaped Goll' valley head slope. On the other hand, the groundwater shows greater specific flux at the top than at the bottom, and relatively larger specific flux is applied to the top to make 'U-shaped Goll' valley head slope go back to the top.

구릉지 완사면의 "U자형 골" 지형발달에 관한 수문학적 연구(제2보)-지형발달 추론을 중심으로-

  • 양해근;박종관
    • Proceedings of the KGS Conference
    • /
    • 2003.11a
    • /
    • pp.78-82
    • /
    • 2003
  • 지형은 지표물질의 변위 혹은 변형, 물질의 화학적 구조가 변함에 따라 변화한다(좌등구 외, 1990). 이러한 지형 프로세스는 물순환계와 밀접한 관계가 있으며, 지표공간을 이루는 대부분의 지형은 지상에 공급된 강우의 유출과정에서 형성된 것이라고 해도 과언이 아니다. 특히 곡저 또는 곡두는 유수의 배출통로인 동시에 유출특성에 기인한 각 종 지형프로세스에 의해서 형성된다(은전 외, 1996). (중략)

  • PDF

POST-OPERATIVE SKELETAL STABILITY OF THE MAXILLA TREATED WITH LE FORT I AND U-SHAPED OSTEOTOMIES IN SIMULTANEOUS MAXILLOMANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY (양악 악교정 수술에서 르포트 I형과 U-자형 복합 골절단술 후 상악골의 안정성에 관한 임상적 연구)

  • Kim, Min-Keun;Park, Young-Wook
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • v.31 no.6
    • /
    • pp.485-491
    • /
    • 2009
  • Postoperative skeletal stability was evaluated in combination of Le Fort I and U-shaped osteotomies for superior repositioning of maxilla in bi-maxillary surgeries in 30 consecutive patients. The fifteen patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy alone and the other fifteen patients underwent Le Fort I and U-shaped osteotomies. In all patients, the maxilla was first osteomized and fixed with absorbable plates system. A bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) of the mandible was then carried out and fixation was performed using absorbable plates. Maxillo-mandibular fixation with rubber ring was used for two weeks post-operatively in all patients. Lateral cephalograms were obtained pre-operatively, 1 day post-operatively, 6 months after surgery. The changes in anterior nasal spine (ANS), point A, upper incisior (U1), and point of maxillary tuberosity (PMT) were examined. The maxillas in the fifteen patients of both examination group were repositioned nearly in their planned positions during surgery and no significant post-operative changes in the examined points of the maxilla were found. These results suggest that a combination of a Le Fort I and U-shaped osteotomy is a useful technique for reliable superior repositioning of the maxilla. The post-operative change in the maxilla using this combination osteotomy was comparatively stable.

Comparison of Gap Pressure in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy versus Compressive Strength of Allogenous Wedge Bone Blocks (경골 근위부 개방 절골술 시 개방부 압력과 동종 쐐기 골편의 최대압축하중 비교)

  • Yoon, Kyoung Ho;Kim, Jung Suk;Kwon, Yoo Beom;Kim, Eung Ju;Lee, Myeong-Kyu;Kim, Sang-Gyun
    • Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
    • /
    • v.55 no.2
    • /
    • pp.127-134
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the relationship between the characteristics of allogenic bone block and the compressive strength of an allogenic bone block measured by biomechanical experiments, and (2) to compare the maximum pressure load of allogenic bone block with the gap pressure measured at the high tibial opening osteotomy. Materials and Methods: Ten patients who provided informed consent for gap pressure measurements during opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) were included. The gap pressures were measured at 1 mm intervals while opening the osteotomy site from 8 mm to 14 mm. Seventeen U-shaped allogenous wedge bone blocks were made from the femur, tibia, and humerus. The height, width, cross-sectional area, and cortex thickness of the bone blocks were measured, along with the maximum compressive load just before breakage. The relationship between these characteristics and the maximum pressure load of the bone blocks was evaluated. The gap pressures measured in OWHTO were compared with the maximum pressure loads of the allogenous wedge bone blocks to evaluate the possibility of inserting allogenous wedge bone blocks into the osteotomy site without a distractor in OWHTO. Results: The OWHTO gap pressure increased with increasing osteotomy site opening. The mean gap pressure, which occurred at a 14-mm opening, was 282±93 N; the maximum pressure was 427 N. The maximum pressure load of the allografts was 13,379±6,469 N (minimum, 5,868; maximum, 29,130 N) and was correlated significantly with the cortical bone thickness (correlation coefficient=0.693, p=0.002) and cross-sectional area (correlation coefficient=0.826, p<0.001). Depending on the sterilization method, the maximum pressure loads for the bone blocks were 13,406±5,928 N for freeze-dried and 13,348±7,449 N for fresh frozen. The maximum compressive load of the allogenous wedge bone blocks was 13.7-times greater than that in OWHTO opened to 14 mm (5,868 N vs. 427 N). Conclusion: The compressive strength of allogenous wedge bone blocks was sufficiently greater than the gap pressure in OWHTO. Therefore, allogenous wedge bone blocks can be inserted safely into the osteotomy site without a distractor.

Pest Control Effect and Optimal dose by Pesticide Dispersion Spray Method in the Paprika Cultivation (파프리카 시설재배지에서 약제 살포방법에 의한 해충방제 효과와 최적 살포함량)

  • Jin, Na Young;Lee, You Kyoung;Lee, Bo Ram;Jun, Jun Hack;Kim, Yu Seop;Seo, Mi Ja;Lim, Chi Hwan;Youn, Young Nam;Yu, Yong Man
    • The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.350-357
    • /
    • 2014
  • We studied on pesticide residue and pest control effect when using various types of sprayers on paprika cultivation. Additionally, a test was conducted to optimize chemical content per unit area in condition of optimum pest control. Two types of sprayer were tested (three times) on paprika cultivation which was divided into seven sections. Blind spots were also examined using a water sensitive paper when spraying chemical pesticide, remote controlled sprayer were confirmed to be not effective in terms of its spraying capacity. However, a U-shaped sprayer was confirmed that it sprayed enough on all the parts of a plant in green house including the blind spots. Additionally, it does not exceed the minimum residue limits on the all parts of pesticides residue conditions. When using remote controlled sprayer, water sensitive paper were changed to blue color (82.5% and 81.2%) in terms of controlling Bemisia tabaci and Aphis gossypii based on the two spraying manners. 53.0% and 42.6% of control effect were shown on the fair parts of the plants. However, on the poor parts on which pesticides were not well-sprayed, thus, not-remained, more number of pests increased. Meanwhile, on farming that only one type of pesticide has been used, resistance pests present with very low control effect, even though sufficient amount of pesticide was well-sprayed. On the test of the optimum amount of spraying per a unit area, which shows no differences in the two cases of using 5L and 2.5L of chemical pesticides on 9 plants of paprika that has 81.8% and 84.5% control effect, respectively.