• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.123-143
• /
• 2007

이 연구는 조세특례제한법상 세액공제 및 세액감면 등의 직접감면과 준비금 손금산입 등의 간접감면의 세제혜택이 기업가치와 관련성이 있는지를 Ohlson(1995)모형을 토대로 1999년부터 2001년까지 3개년도 제조업을 대상으로 총 497개를 대상으로 실증분석하였다. 연구결과 주주지분 장부가치측면에서 직접 감면제도에 의한 기업합리화 적립금(누적액)과 당기전입 기업합리화적립금이 기업가치에 긍정적인 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 세제지원의 성격과 사후관리제도의 정도 및 지속성의 차이로 인하여 기업가치 관련성에 있어서 서로 차이가 있을 수 있음을 보여주는 것이라 할 수 있다. 특히, 주주지분 장부가치측면과 회계이익측면에서 각각의 감면제도가 기업가치에 미치는 정도의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 정책당국에서 간접감면제도의 조세정책적 실효성을 재검토 할 필요성의 여지를 가질 수 있음을 보여주고 있다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.63-86
• /
• 2020

선박 조세 리스금융은 리스기간 초기에 선박에 대한 고속 감가상각을 통해 대규모 감가상각비(비용)를 발생시켜 세제혜택을 받고 그 세제혜택의 상당 부분을 선사(Lessee)에게 이전시켜 선사의 선박 구매 비용을 절감시켜 주는 선박 리스금융 기법의 하나이다. 이러한 선박 조세 리스제도는 일본이 1978년 저금리 기조 하에 기 축적된 자국 중소기업의 여유자금 활용 및 외국자본 유치 등을 위해, 프랑스는 1998년 자국의 조선과 해운 산업 지원을 위해 각각 도입하였다. 선박 조세 리스제도의 세제혜택 규모는 선박에 대한 감가상각률, 법인세율, 선박 또는 SPC 소유권 이전에 따른 매각차익에 대한 과세제도 등에 따라 국가별로 다르다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라 실정에 가장 적합한 한국형 선박 조세 리스제도의 가상모형을 설계한 후 실제 거래에 적용할 경우 생성되는 세제혜택을 산출하여 프랑스와 일본의 세제혜택과 비교 분석하여 보았다. 분석결과, 세제혜택 규모를 국가별로 보면 프랑스 18.9%, 일본 13.6%, 한국(가상모형) 14.5%로 분석되었다. 이는 세제혜택 규모에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 국가별 감가상각률과 법인세율에 따라 차등화된 것이며, 결국 이 두개의 요율이 가장 높은 프랑스가 세제혜택 규모가 가장 큰 것으로 나타났다. 한국형 가상모형의 경우 세제혜택을 선사와 투자자가 75 : 25로 분배할 경우 선사는 선가의 약 10.9%, 투자자는 선가의 약 3.6%에 해당하는 세제혜택을 향유하게 될 것으로 예상된다. 본 연구는 조세 리스제도의 세제혜택과 관련한 제한된 정보와 자료에도 불구하고 프랑스의 조세 리스제도를 기반으로 우리나라에 적용 가능한 한국형 선박 조세 리스제도의 가상 모형을 설계하여 보았다. 따라서 본 연구의 가상모형을 바탕으로 향후 해운·금융·법률 전문가 그룹의 보다 전문적이고 실용적인 후행연구가 활성화되어 멀지 않은 장래에 선박 조세 리스제도가 국내에 도입되기를 기대해 본다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.135-159
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Rrsearch is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments'industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime MinisterJanuary 2001, commits an additional ${\$}$3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims toworld competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around ${\$}$400mi11ion a year. This cost is expected to rise to over hall a billion by 2005-06 (commonwealth or Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권12호
• /
• pp.475-480
• /
• 2020

Investing in the tax-benefit funds is the best way for the inexperienced investors who do not have knowledge, expertise, and the time to research the information by themselves. This study describes the benefits of tax-benefit funds in Thailand. The tax-benefit funds consist of retirement mutual funds (RMFs) and super saving funds (SSFs). There are many kinds of funds investment policies on offer. The tax-benefit funds provide the opportunity to investors, which they are able to invest a small amount and draw more benefits. They hire fund managers to manage their money. These funds are able to help investors to meet their goals. The RMFs are suitable for investors who want to have money for retirement, investing every year, and getting tax exemption. The investors who invest in RMFs are able to deduct the tax income by including other retirement funds not exceeding THB500,000.00 per year. The SSFs match for the investors who need to obtain the tax exemption and long-term investment for at least ten years. The SSFs provide the benefit to investors that they are able to deduct taxable income not more than THB200,000.00 per year. Finally, these funds are tax-except and promoted for retirement savings.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.363-376
• /
• 2012

현재 우리나라는 종교단체를 대상으로 지방세법상의 비과세 감면에 대한 세제혜택을 부여하고 있다. 그러나 다른 한편으로는 종교라는 특수성을 반영하지 않은 채 다른 기능을 수행하는 비영리법인과 동일한 세제를 적용함으로써 여러 문제를 발생시키고 있다. 또한 대부분의 조세지원이 재산과 관련한 세목에 집중적으로 이루어져 비과세 감면의 본래 기능과 취지가 많이 퇴색되고 있다. 이는 지방재정의 취약을 가져올 뿐만 아니라 필요한 분야에 대하여 최소한의 지원을 해야 하는 유인제도의 기본적인 취지에서도 벗어나는 현상이라고 할 수 있다. 특히, 종교단체의 재산과 관련한 지방세혜택을 지양하고 선진국과 같이 다양한 기부를 유도해 나갈 수 있도록 종합적인 문제해결방안이 강구되어야 할 것이다. 현재 세법에서 부여하고 있는 종교단체의 조세의무에 대해서 이제는 종교단체 스스로가 변화된 의식이 필요로 하며, 또한 정부도 종교단체의 과세관련 자료 등을 체계적으로 정리, 관리하고 필요할 시에는 이를 제시하여 마찰이 없는 범위 내에서 종교단체 스스로의 조세의무이행을 적극 유도하여야 할 것이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 상황들을 고려하여 종교단체와 관련한 지방세 과세제도를 살펴보고 우리나라 종교단체의 지방세 과세제도에 대한 문제점과 그 개선 방안을 제시하고 있다. 이는 지방세법상 종교단체의 비과세 감면에 대한 개선방안을 제시함으로써 향후 지방자치단체의 재정에 기여하게 될 것이다.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제7권
• /
• pp.401-426
• /
• 2001

The form of company divides private and coporate companies. In general. private company has direct connection with owner's fortunes. On the contrary, cooperate company is established by a group of people who invest capital funds on their company and has an independent character. In the case of private company, their are many merits that owner can obtain all the benefits without divisions. However, the owner can mix up the control of accounting between public and private matters. As a result confusing, it is difficult to estimate financial situation of company and is limited to fund supply. Futhermore, owner has unlimited liabilities with law credit as a social cognition. Especially, the government tries to induce conversion of private company into cooperation one on the basis of benefits of tax and so on. In those situations, the purpose of this thesis is to study the management benefits with the conversion of private company into cooperate one focucing on the related tax reduction effect. To do this, I have reviewed all of the related textual achievements and tested the real significancy of tax reduction effect of conversion empirically. Finally, I have concluded that the conversion of private company into coporate one has many benefits including significant tax reduction effect. In other side, I have considered and reviewed many difficulties related conversion privated company into cooperate one and suggested some improvements as results. This thesis is comprises 5 chapters as follows; The first chapter explains purposes and methodologies and extents of this study. The second chapter deals the theoretical basis of conversion of private company into cooperate one and cooperates diverse benefits and types and processes of conversion. The preceding research achievements are also reviewed in this chapter. The third chapter deals empirical testing on the real tax reduction effect of the conversion. The analysis is proceeded through t-test of difference of tax between pre and after conversion. The result is presented so positively that I can conclude that cooperate conversion of private company has real benefit of tax reduction. The forth chapter deals the difficulties and improvements related with conversion. They are considered and reviewed at various aspects such as practical, financial and tax aspect. In fifth chapter, I summarise all of the significant points of this study and have conclusions in various aspects at last. In final point, this study is not enough in sample numbers and sample collecting area for empirical testing of significant tax reduction effect of cooperate conversion and research of more foreign achievements. Those are remained as continuing future studies.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.145-168
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.95-118
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister?in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to?build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity.?It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400?million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.169-184
• /
• 2020

Purpose - This research is intended to analyze the current status and problems of tax benefits in the R&D sector and suggest ways to improve tax credit for research and manpower development expenses when various countries fiercely develop efforts to enhance national competitiveness through increased investment in R&D Design/methodology/approach - This study will examine the current status of the tax support system for domestic and foreign R&D, and suggest improvement measures to expand research and development activities in the future. Findings - First, a plan may be considered to abolish and perpetuate the sunset deadline for tax credit for research and manpower development expenses as in the case of the United States and Japan. This perpetuation can be a proactive measure to actively support long-term R & D investment in companies facing economic decisions under uncertainty. Second, it should be revised to raise the tax credit rate of large corporations, which are shrinking every year, compared to SMEs, so that both large corporations and SMEs can improve their international competitiveness and secure excellent technologies through R & D. Finally, the target technologies for each new growth engine and source technology should be expanded to various fields, including national cybersecurity enhancement technology, aviation engine technology, carbon emission and global cooling technologies, which are areas of interest in major overseas R&D countries, to help active R&D and investment in these areas. Research implications or Originality - This study can find a contribution in comparing and analyzing the national R&D tax support system and presenting improvement measures at a time when the benefits of tax credit for research and manpower development expenses of large companies are decreasing due to frequent tax law revisions and the government's factors of increasing tax revenues. In addition, recent research and development items and research technologies of foreign countries were analyzed by Nature's top 10 major science and technology issues, and advanced technologies that should be applied to target technology areas by new growth engine and source technology were specifically investigated and presented.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제7권
• /
• pp.93-111
• /
• 2001

In this article, we perform an international overview of accounting standards for tax effect accounting(or income taxes). Specially, we compare accounting standards for tax effect accounting of U.S. and International Accounting Standards. The principal component of U.S. accounting standards for tax effect accounting is as follow. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109) represents the culmination of a multi-year process in which Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reviewed and subsequently modified the requirements for accounting for income taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an 'asset and liability' approach for the accounting for income taxes. That is, deferred income taxes are viewed as assets and liabilities of the firm, and deferred tax expenses id determined by the current-year change in the firm's deferred tax liabilities and assets. Previously, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 11, Accounting for Income Taxes (APB No. 11) required a 'deferral' approach to accounting for income taxes. The primary intent of the deferral approach was to match tax expense with corresponding revenues and expenses for the year in which the revenues and expenses were recognized in the financial statement. Unlike the SFAS No. 109, APB No. 11 did not require firms to adjust deferred tax balances for subsequent events such as changes in tax rates or laws. And, the principal deference between SFAS No. 109 and the previous statement on accounting for income taxes, SFAS No. 96, is that SFAS No. 109 requires firms to recognize deferred tax assets for the tax benefits of tax credit or operating loss carryforwards, no matter how likely the firm was to realize these benefits, and this was one of the reasons for its demise.