• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제33권5호
• /
• pp.625-632
• /
• 2003

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the importance and sensitivity to nursing interventions of four nursing sensitive nursing outcomes selected from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). Outcomes for this study were 'Knowledge: Diet', 'Knowledge: Disease Process', 'Knowledge: Energy Conservation', and 'Knowledge: Health Behaviors'. Method: Data were collected from 183 nurses working in 2 university hospitals. Fehring method was used to estimate outcome and indicators' content and sensitivity validity. Multiple and stepwise regression were used to evaluate relationships between each outcome and its indicators. Result: Results confirmed the importance and nursing sensitivity of outcomes and their indicators. Key indicators of each outcomes were found by multiple regression. 'Knowledge: Diet' was suggested for adding new indicators because the variance explained by indicators was relatively low. Not all of the indicators selected for stepwise regression model were rated for highly in Fehring method. The R² statistics of the stepwise regression models were between 18 and 63% in importance by selected indicators and between 34 and 68% in contribution by selected indicators. Conclusion: This study refined what outcomes and indicators will be useful in clinical practice. Further research will be required for the revision of outcome and indicators of NOC. However, this study refined what outcomes and indicators will be useful in clinical practice.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.245-257
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study was to validate caregiver outcomes included Nursing Outcomes Classification(NOC) developed by Johnson and Maas at the University of Iowa. A sample of 73 nurse experts working in university affiliated hospitals participated in this study. They were asked to rate indicators that examplified the outcomes on a scale of 1(indicator is not at all characteristic) to 5(indicator is very characteristic). A questionnaire with an adaptation of Fehring's methodology was used to establish the content validity of outcomes. The results were as follow: 1. Eight outcome label were considered to be 'supporting' and three outcome label were considered to be 'nonsupporting'. 2. 'Caregiver-Patient Relationship' attained an OCV score of 0.64 and the highest OCV score among caregiver outcomes.. 3. 'Caregiver Emotional Health' attained an OCV score of 0.54 and the lowest OCV score among caregiver outcomes. Replication study will be needed and outcomes sensitive to Korean culture need to be developed.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.163-178
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 공공도서관에서 운영하는 프로그램의 성과를 측정할 수 있는 시스템의 구축을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 로직모델을 기반으로 개발된 도서관 성과측정 프레임워크를 적용하고 사서가 직접 KOLAS에서 데이터를 반출하고 성과평가 시스템에 업로드하여 성과를 측정하고 결과를 출력할 수 있도록 시스템(LibOutcomes system)을 구축하였다. 연구 결과, 성과평가 시스템을 이용한 성과 측정은 시각적으로 결과를 확인하기에 유용하였다. 또한 웹 기반 시스템으로 구축함으로써 접근 및 이용의 용이성을 확보할 수 있었고, 향후 KOLAS의 한 기능으로 확장할 수 있는 가능성을 제시하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.42-50
• /
• 2013

The main purpose of this study was to develop a program outcomes assessment tool using reflection journal. Reflection journal has recently come to gain more attention from school as an alternative assessment tool. Although numerous studies reconfirmed the educational importance and value of reflection journal as an assessment tool, research on the assessment tool of the engineering accreditation, based on education view is scarce. After literature reviews about the case studies on the program outcomes assessment, this study, to analyse the current assessment tools, and then, examined the educational implications of reflection journal as a program outcomes assessment tool. This study suggested the assessment tool using reflection journal for PO6 (teamwork) and PO11 (engineering ethics), one of the most important assessment items in engineering accreditation. In this study, we used the performance criteria, assessment criteria, rubric, and closed the loop to measure the teamwork and engineering ethics. The result of this study is significant in terms of guiding the future evaluation system development for program outcomes.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.152-165
• /
• 1998

Background : In this paper patient outcomes research is going to be reviewed and described, to be compared with relevant studies, and to consider the application in Korea. Methods : We compiled and reviewed the articles and materials related to patient outcomes research especially by PORT(Patient Outcomes Research Team) and rearranged them for seeking the main point and comparing with relevant studies. Results : Patient outcomes research emphasizes patient outcomes as well as conventional clinical outcomes. It is prospective study observing effectiveness in real situation instead of efficacy in ideal condition. Patient outcomes research comprises of 6 fields ; literature review and meta-analysis, use of claims data, decision modeling, outcomes assessment, cost of care, dissemination of research findings. SAA(small-area variations analysis), appropriateness study and clinical practice guideline are connected with patient outcomes research. Conclusion : In view of the fact that current medical policy in Korea is shifting its focus from accessibility to the improvement in quality and cost containment, and is stressing patient-based research, patient outcomes research is one direction for which the medicine is accountable and assessable. Considering that the number of patient receiving medical treatment in Korea is higher than the West, patient outcomes research has competitive power as against the West.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.154-166
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The core of accreditation for nursing education is to improve the ability and quality of graduates through a CQI system based on outcomes. For program outcomes of nursing education accreditation criterion, it is necessary to understand the relationship among education assessment, objective and curriculum. Methods: The focus of this study was on program outcomes and the assessment. First measures for improving the general problems of program outcomes associated with the assessment system were stated. Detailed measure for practicing program outcomes, the assessment system and the assessment tool using Rubrics were discussed. Results: Detailed measure were established for practicing the program outcomes, assessment system and assessment tool, which makes use of rubrics, program outcome No 3 of the Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. Conclusion: Therefore it is expected that the assessment system established in this study will allow universities to conduct program outcomes and assessment.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.329-342
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to identify the issues which how situational constraints of negotiation affect outcomes. To achieve the purpose of this research, a multiple regression model was set up to identify the relationships between situational constraints of negotiation and negotiation outcome on international trade contracts. To implement the study, empirical questionnaires were collected from Korean business men who have actually conducted international trade with foreign firms. Reliability analysis and factor analysis were used to assess the reliability and validity of research variables. and multiple regression analysis were used for testing the relationships between situational constraints of negotiation and negotiation outcome. From this study, following results were identified; i) situational constraints of negotiation effects on negotiation outcomes ii) arbitrary and continuous situations affect significantly positive on negotiation outcomes iii) submissive situations affect significantly negative effects on negotiation outcomes In conclusion, participant of negotiation and their managers try to promote negotiation situation toward to arbitrary and continuous situations if they have any availability.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2011

본 연구의 목적은 한국과 미국의 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 사례를 비교 분석함으로써 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 개선을 위한 시사점을 제공하는 것이다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 사례연구방법이 적용되었다. 미국에서 공학교육인증을 우수하게 수행하고 있는 5개 대학 프로그램과 한국에서 공학교육혁신센터를 주축으로 연구를 수행하여 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계를 개선한 3개 대학을 선정하여 각각의 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 사례를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 각 프로그램에서 설정한 학습성과, 학습성과를 평가하는 수준, 학생의 학습성과 달성도 평가 방법, 분석 및 개선 실적 측면에서 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 결과에 기반하여 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 개선을 위해서는 학생의 학습성과 달성도 평가방법에 대한 관심보다는 프로그램의 특성이 반영된 학습성과 설정, 학습성과 평가결과 분석 및 개선에 대한 보다 구체적인 계획 수립, 수집된 자료에 근거하여 교육과정을 지속적으로 개선하는 데 보다 노력을 기울일 것을 제안하였다.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.489-499
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the importance and contribution of 9 nursing outcomes and their indicators that could be applied to cerebrovascular patients. Methods: Data were collected from 175 neurosurgical nurses working at two university affiliated hospitals and five secondary hospitals located in Gwang-ju. The Fehring method was used to estimate outcome content validity(OCV) and outcome sensitivity validity(OSV) of nursing outcomes and their indicators. Stepwise regression was used to evaluate relationship between outcome and its indicators. Results: The core outcomes identified by the OCV were Tissue Perfusion: Cerebral, Nutritional Status, Neurological Status, and Wound Healing: Primary Intention, whereas highly supportive outcomes identified by the OSV were Oral Health, Self-Care: ADL, and Nutritional Status. All the critical indicators selected for Fehring method were not included in stepwise regression model. By stepwise regression analysis, the indicators explained outcomes from 19% to 52% in importance and from 21% to 45% in contribution. Conclusion: This study identified core and supportive outcomes and their indicators which could be useful to assess the physical status of cerebrovascular patients. Further research is needed for the revision and development of nursing outcomes and their indicators at neurological nursing area.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.62-68
• /
• 2011

Many engineering schools in Korea implement ABEEK programs. One of the core parts of ABEEK is accreditation criterion 2, the program outcomes and their appraisal. This paper tries to discuss the program outcomes and to study the impact of applying the program outcomes to one of the graduation requirements. We show simple survey results for implementing ABEEK programs concerning the program outcomes and their relation to graduation requirements. If the program outcomes are used as one of the graduation requirements, some graduates may satisfy the average grade point for graduation requirements but can not meet the program outcome criteria satisfied by other than regular classes. In this case, the graduate may have trouble to try to meet the program outcome criteria, since he may not be able to stay in school without taking classes. The problems of setting the levels of program outcomes as graduation requirements, non classwork related program outcomes, and work burden to professors should be also prudently reviewed for successful ABEEK implementation.