Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (간호행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (한국간호행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Assessment System for Nursing Bachelor Degree Program Outcomes: Focused on Communication Ability Improvement

간호학 학사학위 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 개발 사례: 의사소통 능력 향상을 중심으로

  • Received : 2013.07.19
  • Accepted : 2014.02.25
  • Published : 2014.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The core of accreditation for nursing education is to improve the ability and quality of graduates through a CQI system based on outcomes. For program outcomes of nursing education accreditation criterion, it is necessary to understand the relationship among education assessment, objective and curriculum. Methods: The focus of this study was on program outcomes and the assessment. First measures for improving the general problems of program outcomes associated with the assessment system were stated. Detailed measure for practicing program outcomes, the assessment system and the assessment tool using Rubrics were discussed. Results: Detailed measure were established for practicing the program outcomes, assessment system and assessment tool, which makes use of rubrics, program outcome No 3 of the Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. Conclusion: Therefore it is expected that the assessment system established in this study will allow universities to conduct program outcomes and assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. Song JE, Park JW, Yoo MS. Nursing program learning and development of assessment system- centrally about improvement of applying skills of the nursing process based on critical thinking skills-the first time learning and research-based nursing curriculum presentation competition. Seoul: Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education (KABONE); 2013.
  2. Kim BK, Park JY. A study on assessment method of program outcomes. Engineering Education Research. 2008;11(4):46-57. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2008.11.4.46
  3. Park MJ. A new approach to curriculum development in higher education: Competence-based curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2008;26(4):173-197. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.26.4.200812.008
  4. Baek SG. Principles of performance assessment. Seoul: Kyoyookbook; 2000.
  5. Stiggins RJ. Student-centered classroom assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall; 1994.
  6. Kim JG. Curriculum and assessment. Seoul: Dongmunsa; 2009.
  7. McMillan JH. Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.; 2004.
  8. Park YK. The relationship between course assessment and program objective evaluation in engineering education accreditation: Toward a practical evaluation of program objectives. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2010;13 (4):87-92.
  9. Yu I-K. A study on the effective managerial schemes of an accredited engineering program. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2007;10(2):62-72. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2007.10.2.62
  10. Hur D. Case study with regard to ABEEK assessment process for program outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2009;12(1):57-63. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2009.12.1.57
  11. Jin SH, Cho WS. A case analysis of program outcomes assessment systems for engineering education accreditation of South Korea and USA. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2011;14(2):13-20. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2011.14.2.13
  12. Lee YT, Lim CI. A study on the development of program outcomes assessment system using reflection journal. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2013;16(3):42-50. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2013.16.3.42
  13. Besterfield-Sacre M, Shuman LJ, Wolfe H, Atman CJ, Mc- Gourty J, Miller RL, et al. Defining the outcomes: A framework for EC-2000. IEEE Transactions on Education. 2000;43 (2):100-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/13.848060
  14. Choi HS. Curriculum and education evaluation. Gyeonggi-do: Kyoyookbook; 2008.
  15. Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Committee of College and University Examiners. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay; 1956.
  16. Kim JY, Kang SJ, Kang BS, Kim DI. A study on development of the assessment system for the program outcomes on the communication skill competence. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2011;14(6):41-47. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2011.14.6.41
  17. Kim M, Yoon W, Kim D, Chung JT, Kim B. The study of assessment tool as an outcomes achievement: Part 3 Undergraduate thesis. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 2007;10(1):97-108. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2007.10.1.97
  18. Goodrich H. Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership. 1997;54(4):14-17.
  19. Marzano RJ, Pickering D, McTighe J. Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 1993.
  20. Arter JA, McTighe J. Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Corwin; 2001.
  21. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook II affective domain. New York, NY: David McKay; 1963.
  22. Arranz P, Ulla SM, Ramos JL, Del Rincon C, Lopez-Fando T. Evaluation of a counseling training program for nursing staff. Patient Education and Counseling. 2005;56(2):233-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.017
  23. Kim IS, Jang KS, Lee MH, Ha NS, Hong YM, Lee TH. New nursing management. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; 2009.
  24. Stuart GW, Sundeen SJ. Principles and practice of psychiatric nursing. 2nd ed. Toronto: Mosby; 1983.
  25. Yim HB, Koh OJ, Cho H, Kim HK, Chong SO, Shon JN. Study on perceived concept about therapeutic communication of nurses working in psychiatric ward. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 1996;5(1):88-99.
  26. George JB. Nursing theories: The base for professional nursing practice. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2002.
  27. Hwang E-M. Non-verbal behavior for effective communication. Textlinguistics. 2008;24:313-335.
  28. Ju JS. The effects of the communication training program for university students' communication and human relationship [master's thesis]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2005.
  29. Choi EY.(The) effects of a communication skills group on high school students' self-concept and communication ability [master's thesis]. Busan: Kosin University Graduate School of Education; 2004.
  30. Hyland T. Reconsidering competence. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 1997;31(3):491-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00070

Cited by

  1. A Study on application Course Embedded Assessment(CEA) for Program Outcome Assessment in Nursing Education vol.16, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.5.3121
  2. Development of Program Outcome Self-Assessment Tool in Korean Nursing Baccalaureate Education vol.21, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.2.215
  3. The Development of the Integrated Nursing Practicum Education Matrix based on Learning Outcomes vol.21, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.4.528
  4. 일개 간호대학 학생의 학습성과 평가관리를 위한 웹 기반 학습성과 관리시스템 vol.16, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2015.16.4.2665
  5. 간호학 학사학위 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 개발 사례: 간호리더십 능력 향상을 중심으로 vol.22, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2016.22.5.540
  6. 시뮬레이션 기반 실습 교육이 간호대학생의 비판적 사고성향, 의사소통능력, 임상수행능력에 미치는 효과 vol.18, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.4.93
  7. Course Embedded Assessment 기반 간호교육 프로그램학습성과 평가체제 개발 vol.23, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.2.135
  8. 간호대학생의 아동간호학 임상실습 자가평가 분석 vol.15, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2017.15.9.355
  9. Reliability and validation of the Korean Compassionate Communication Scale vol.6, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2019-0026
  10. 기본간호학실습에서 학습성과 평가도구의 적용 사례: 의사소통능력 평가를 중심으로 vol.21, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.4.173
  11. 설계기반 연구를 통한 의학교육 Continuous Quality Improvement 운영 경험 vol.22, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2020.22.3.189
  12. 간호교육 프로그램 학습성과 간접측정도구의 활용을 위한 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증 vol.21, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2021.21.08.608