• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.39-45
• /
• 2002

Since 100PPM Qualify Certification System has been established by the Industrial Advancement Administration in 1995, 1000PPM Quality Innovation Movement has contributed much to the enhancement of quality competitiveness of Korea's parts industry. And in 2000, raised to a higher level, Single PPM Quality Certification System has been established by the Small and Medium Business Administration. Single PPM Qualify Innovation Movement seeks to reduce the number of defects to below 10 out of one million industrial items produced. Ultimately, Single PPM Quality Innovation Movement aims at achieving perfection, by enabling a zero defect rate in industrial production through the participation of all members of an organization. So this study aims to show the tangible and intangible effects of Single PPM Quality Certification System. and to suggest a methodology to improve current problems of Single PPM Quality Innovation Movement.

• 한국산업경영시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국산업경영시스템학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.265-272
• /
• 2002

Since 100PPM Quality Certification System has been established by the Industrial Advancement Administration in 1995, 100PPM Quality Innovation Movement has contributed much to the enhancement of quality competitiveness of Korea's parts industry. And in 2000, raised to a higher level, Single PPM Quality Certification System has been established by the Small and Medium Business Administration. Single PPM Quality Innovation Movement seeks to reduce the number of defects to below 10, out of one million industrial items produced. Ultimately, Single PPM Quality Innovation Movement aims at achieving perfection, by enabling a zero defect rate In industrial production through the participation of all members of an organization. So this study aims to show the tangible and intangible effects of Single PPM Quality Certification System. and to suggest a methodology to improve current problems of Single PPM Quality Innovation Movement.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.209-219
• /
• 2007

100PPM 품질인증시스템은 1995년 공업진흥청의 주도하에 추진되어져, 우리나라 산업부분의 품질경쟁력 제고에 기여하였다. 2000년에는 국내의 중소기업을 대상으로 보다 더 완벽한 수준의 Single PPM 품질인증시스템으로 상향 조정토록 하였고, 출하불량률과 시장 불량률 수준을 10ppm 이하로 줄이는 것을 품질목표로 하고 있다. 현재까지 1.818개의 회사들이 Single PPM 품질인증시스템을 인증 받았으며, Single PPM 품질혁신운동은 21C의 사회 경제적인 무결점 목표를 달성하기 위한 품질혁신운동이다. 이 논문의 목적은 Single PPM 품질혁신운동이 현재 처해있는 문제점들을 개선하고자, Kano 모델에 기반을 둔 글로벌 지속가능 품질혁신(GSQI) 지수를 개발하고, 이를 통하여 Single PPM 품질혁신운동의 개선을 도모하고자 함이다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.102-108
• /
• 2005

Single PPM Quality Innovation Movement is originally developed quality program in Korea for supplier's quality level-up since 1995. The quality target is below the 10ppm(parts per million) in outgoing quality and delivered goods plus field claim. Recently 1,053 companies is received Single PPM Quality Certification from government. This quality program is to realized the anticipated results not only duality level's increasing, but also company's confidence, competitiveness. We were able to obtain participations of 75 questionnaire, and derived statistics by means of SPSS/PC version 10.0. In this study, we find the bottleneck factor for promotion and upgrade S-PPM, and suggest a way out of difficulties.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.479-496
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to develop defense quality evaluation model in order to improve the problem of private sector quality evaluation model and propose the total integrated defense quality management model which enables to evaluate not only large defense industry, but also small-medium industry. Methods: This paper consider the characteristics on ISO 9001 Quality Management System, single PPM, PASS and defense quality and develop defense quality maturity model and index which enables to measure the current quality management level and characteristics and to evaluate operational characteristics in each maturity level for domestic defense industry. Results: From 176 DQMS certified defense industry, the defense quality maturity level is 68,2, C grade. The large defense industry shows, 80.9, A grade; medium industry 69.7, C grade; small-medium industry shows 54.1, D grade. Through the classified types of industries, the current level of quality management of defense industries was diagnosed and the areas to be supplemented for the total quality management were identified. Conclusion: Developed DQMI can be used as the basic information for spreading quality management activities in the defense industry by diagnosing the overall quality management of existing defense industries and quantifying the ambiguity of non-metric measurements and measurement standard that were presented as the threshold of the defense quality management system certification process.