• 제목/요약/키워드: Setting process

검색결과 1,524건 처리시간 0.027초

삽수 직접정식이 방울토마토 양액재배에 있어서 생육 및 수량에 미치는 영향 (Effect of Immediate Setting with Lateral Branch Cuttings on Growth and Yield of Cherry Tomatoes in Soilless Culture)

  • 장전익;박용봉;지성한;양희준
    • 생물환경조절학회지
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.79-88
    • /
    • 1996
  • 방울토마토 잠액 수경재배에 육묘단계를 생략한 재배기술을 확립하기 위하여 ‘Pico’, ‘Pepe’ 및 ‘Koko’ 3품종의 측지를 육묘상에서 15일간 육묘한 것과 양액 재배상에 바로 정식하고 양액의 농도를 표준과 50% 농도의 2수준으로 처리하여 생육상태와 수량을 조사하였다. 1. 직접정식이 육묘정식보다 초기 생육단계에서 초장이 길었고, 엽수가 많았으며 엽면적이 넓었다. 수확시기는 직접정식이 육묘정식보다 6일 정도 빨랐고 품종간에는 ‘Pepe’가 다른 2품종보다 빨랐으며 양액 농도간에는 차이가 없었다. 2. 과일 1개당 평균 무게는 정식묘가 양액의 농도에 따른 영향은 없었고 품종간에는 ‘Pepe’가 적었다. 그리고 수량은 표준농도의 양액에 직접 정식한 ‘Pepe’에서 가장 많았다. 3. 과즙의 당도는 직접 정식한 구가 육묘 정식한 구보다 높았고 품종간에는 ‘Pepe’가 높았다.

  • PDF

국회도서관장 전문가 임명 정책 의제화 과정 분석 - Kingdon의 다중흐름모형을 적용하여 - (An Analysis of Agenda-setting Process to Appoint Library Professional as the Director of National Assembly Library: Based on the Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model)

  • 연지은;김기영
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제51권3호
    • /
    • pp.293-322
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구의 목적은 2014년 국회도서관장 전문가 임명 정책의 의제화 과정을 대상으로, Kingdon의 다중흐름모형을 적용하여, 이 정책이 의제화된 과정과 함께, 정책을 지속적으로 지지한 정책선도자의 특성을 밝히는 것이다. Kingdon의 다중흐름모형은 비합리적 의사결정모형으로, 문제흐름, 정치흐름, 정책흐름이 상호독립적으로 존재하다가 특정 시점에서 결합하여 정책의 창이 열림으로써 정책이 의제화된다는 모형이다. 분석 결과 국회도서관 전문가 임명을 둘러싼 세 흐름 중 정책 의제화에 가장 큰 영향을 준 것은 정치흐름으로 나타났으며, 야당 소속의 국회의원을 정책선도자로 확인하고, 그 동기 및 자원, 전략을 분석하였다. 나아가 이 정책의 의제화 과정에서 도서관계의 가시적인 활동이 확인되지 않은 가운데 의제화가 성공했다는 점을 바탕으로 도서관정보정책에서의 도서관계의 역할에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다.

사물인터넷 표준화의 상대적 중요도 결정을 위한 계층분석방법 응용 (Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Relative Importance Determination of Internet of Things Standardization)

  • 우훈식
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제39권1호
    • /
    • pp.47-55
    • /
    • 2016
  • As one of recent issues in the information and communication industry, internet of things has attracted attention to provide intelligent infrastructure services which connect and share data and information between real and virtual world. According to the development of these internet of things technologies, types of machines, telecommunication devices, and terminals are increasing tremendously. In this situation, connectivity and interoperability between internet of things components are important issues to build a hyper connected society. To visualize this society, it is important to set up and develop information and communication technology (ICT) standards among stakeholders. However, under limited budget and human resources, it is essential to rank standardization work items for setting standards with respect to efficiency. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for setting standardization strategies within group decision making. As a multi-criteria group decision making tool, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted and applied to determine the priorities of setting work items. The proposed method first defines decision making problem with objective, criteria, and alternatives which produces a hierarchy consisting of upper and lower criteria. Then, pairwise comparisons of academy and public sector experts are performed with respect to their relative meaning and importance. Individual surveys of expert groups are collected and summarized to determine relative criteria importance measures. Furthermore, to deliver reliable importance criteria measures, differences between academy and public sector expert groups are compared and tested using Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The results are illustrated for useful guidelines to practical group decision making in standardization strategy establishments.

사이버공간의 특성과 의제 전개과정: 일반네티즌공간과 참여네티즌공간의 차이 (The Agenda-Setting Process in Cyberspace: The Difference between Open Cyberspace and Closed Cyberspace)

  • 박은희;이수영
    • 한국언론정보학보
    • /
    • 제18권
    • /
    • pp.99-130
    • /
    • 2002
  • 본 연구는 '성수여중생폭력사건(2000년 4월 12일 발생)'을 계기로 갖게 된 관심, 즉 사이버공간이 우리 사회에 기여하는 부분 혹은 그 가능성은 무엇인지에 대한 관심에서 출발한다. 사이버공간 안에서 발의되는 수많은 의제들이 어떤 경우는 사라지고 어떤 경우는 큰 반향을 일으켜 매스미디어로 공간을 넓혀가기도 하는데 그 과정에 영향을 미치는 요인들은 무엇인지, 또 사이버공간에 매스미디어의 대안적 공간으로 자리잡기 위해서는 어떻게 활용되어야 하는지를 알아보고자 힘이 연구의 목적이다. 성수여중사건이 지니는 특징은 첫째, 의제 발의의 주체가 소시민이라는 것, 둘째, 사이버공간이 기존 주류미디어에 접근하기 어려운 개인의제를 매스미디어의제로 발의될 수 있도록 가교역할을 했으며, 셋째는 사이버공간 안에서 확산된 하나의 사건이 온라인은 물론 오프라인으로의 운동차원으로 그 영역을 급속히 확 대해 갔다는 점들이다. 연구결과를 통해 제안할 수 있는 것은 사이버공간이 전체 사회의 민주주의 발전에 기여하는 대안공간으로 작동하려면 사이버만으로 국한되지 않고 사이버공간과 매스미디어, 사이버공간과 오프라인 사이의 상호작용이 절대적으로 필요하다는 점이다.

  • PDF

3, 4, 5세 유아의 과학적 문제해결과정을 통한 자성체와 비자성체에 대한 과학적 지식의 변화 (Changes in Scientific Knowledge During Young Children's Scientific Problem Solving with Magnetic and Nonmagnetic Objects)

  • 권미경;신은수
    • 아동학회지
    • /
    • 제28권1호
    • /
    • pp.55-69
    • /
    • 2007
  • This research examined age differences in the way 3-, 4-, 5-year-old children solve scientific problems involving magnetic and nonmagnetic objects. Their scientific process skills and scientific concepts were examined in 1) hypothesis setting, 2) hypothesis verification and 3) hypothesis application. Data was analyzed by one-way and two-way ANOVA and Scheffe. Children's scientific process skill presented differences by age in each phase of problem solving. That is, the scientific concept level demonstrated by 4-year-olds was higher than that of the 3-year-olds. That of the 5-year-olds was higher than the 4-year-olds. In addition, in all age groups, the children showed a higher level of understanding about magnetic and non-magnetic objects in the hypothesis application phase than in the hypothesis setting phase.

  • PDF

계층분석방법을 이용한 IPv6 멀티네트워킹 표준화항목 우선순위 결정 (Setting Priorities on Standardization Work Items of IPv6 Multi-networking Using Analytical Hierarchy Process)

  • 우훈식
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제34권1호
    • /
    • pp.25-32
    • /
    • 2011
  • Under limited resources such as budgets and experts, it is essential to set promotion priorities for standardization work items on IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6) multi-networking technologies. Opinions of domain experts are surveyed and analyzed utilizing a multi-criteria decision making tool, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Weights of ten evaluation criteria are identified and applied to calculating importance degree of eight work items. According to descending order of importance degree, priorities of work items are determined. The processes and results of this study may provide not only an approach of setting promotion priorities for standardization work items but also a practical guide of implementing of a multi-criteria decision analysis.

패션점포의 관계마케팅 형성과정모형에 관한 이론적 고찰 (A Study on the Relationship Marketing Process Model for Fashion Stores)

  • 김지연
    • 한국의류산업학회지
    • /
    • 제7권6호
    • /
    • pp.609-616
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purposes of this study were to investigate relationship marketing in fashion retail setting through literatures and were to set up a relationship marketing model which is suitable for fashion stores. In order to achieve the purposes of this study, concepts and properties of relationship marketing were studied through the previous studies. Relationship marketing research tendency in retail setting was examined and relationship marketing strategies of fashion stores were examined. As a results, relationship marketing process model for fashion stores was developed. The variables influenced on long-term relationship intention of fashion consumers may be relationship benefits, satisfaction, trust, and commitment. Relationship benefits might have an influence on satisfaction, trust, and commitment. Finally commitment might have an influence on long-term relationship intention. Also, Consumer buying characteristics and consumer relationship disposition might have an influence on relationship marketing process model for fashion stores.

건강보험보장성 정책결정과정의 평가와 재설계 (Improving Priority-setting procedures for NHI benefit package)

  • 윤희숙;권순만;권용진
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제20권2호
    • /
    • pp.53-68
    • /
    • 2010
  • In health care, the process of resource allocation becomes a controversial process of rationing, as scarce resources are allocated between the numerous health care interventions. Especially for the last few years, decisions to define and expand the benefit package of National Health Insurance have always become the object of fierce criticism. It is partly because we have not reached a collective agreement as to what the most important criteria for spending priorities are. This paper considers the procedures and the principles which could be used to determine rationing in health care, and emphasizes the need to have explicit principles which determine patient access to care and to have an evidence base to inform rationing decisions. Also, the need to set up a public committee is suggested to take rationing decisions on behalf of government and NHS and to present them as evidence-based decisions.

AHP를 이용한 고령친화제품 유망기술의 우선순위 설정에 관한 연구 (A Study on Priority Setting for Promising Technology in Division of Senior Friendly Product using the AHP)

  • 유재성
    • 대한안전경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제17권2호
    • /
    • pp.207-214
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this paper is an application of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) in the priority setting of promising technology in division of senior friendly product based on the previous studies. In this paper, the decision criteria for evaluating promising technologies in division of senior friendly product are identified and the hierarchical structure of decision making process is developed systematically. Subsequently the values of weights for relative importance among decision criteria are derived using AHP methodology, and the score of importance of promising technology in division of senior friendly product with respect to each criterion is evaluated. Finally the score of each promising technology in division of senior friendly product is quantified in order to prioritize them. We discuss implications of our results with a viewpoint of technology policy in division of senior friendly product.

선도기술개발사업(G7)의 정책결정 과정 분석: 범부처간 추진 과정 및 민간 전문가 역할을 중심으로 (Analysis for the Policy Making Process of G7 Project in 1990s)

  • 이찬구
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.167-200
    • /
    • 2008
  • This work firstly aims to analyse how the policy makers had been able to sort out the two policy issues, 'how did the MOST establish the inter-departmental project' and 'why did the MOST give a legal power to the private experts', in the process of policy making for Highly Advanced National(HAN) project, called G7 Project, which had been implemented for 10 years in 1990s. Then, this will discuss the policy implications available to the similar policy areas in the future. The result shows that the agenda setting of the G7 Project, one of the successful national R&D projects in Korea, had been initiated by a few leaders who had have the perspective of pioneer. In addition, this explains that private experts had more played than civil servant did in the process of policy formation, which had been backed up by the R&D plannin4g system then introduced in R&D management process for the frist time. This case study will provide policy makers with the opportunities to remind 'the necessities of the policy management by the system not actors', 'more effective management of distribution policy' and 'the better role of related experts in the policy making process'. Also, above issues will make both the practitioners and the researchers again consider how to improve the rationality and effectiveness of the policy making process in the field of science and technology.

  • PDF