• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.29 no.1_2
• /
• pp.119-133
• /
• 2011

This paper proposes an infeasible interior-point algorithm with full-Newton step for linear programming. We introduce a special self-regular proximity to induce the feasibility step and also to measure proximity to the central path. The result of polynomial complexity coincides with the best-known iteration bound for infeasible interior-point methods, namely, O(n log n/${\varepsilon}$).

• Korean Management Science Review
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.43-60
• /
• 2004

Every iteration of interior-point methods of large scale optimization requires computing at least one orthogonal projection. In the practice, symmetric variants of the Gaussian elimination such as Cholesky factorization are accepted as the most efficient and sufficiently stable method. In this paper several specific implementation issues of the symmetric factorization that can be applied for solving such equations are discussed. The code called McSML being the result of this work is shown to produce comparably sparse factors as another implementations in the $MATLAB^{***}$ environment. It has been used for computing projections in an efficient implementation of self-regular based interior-point methods, McIPM. Although primary aim of developing McSML was to embed it into an interior-point methods optimizer, the code may equally well be used to solve general large sparse systems arising in different applications.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.27 no.3_4
• /
• pp.567-579
• /
• 2009

Recently, Peng et al. proposed a primal-dual interior-point method with new search direction and self-regular proximity for LP. This new large-update method has the currently best theoretical performance with polynomial complexity of O($n^{\frac{q+1}{2q}}\;{\log}\;{\frac{n}{\varepsilon}}$). In this paper we use this search direction to propose a primal-dual interior-point method for convex quadratic programming (QP). We overcome the difficulty in analyzing the complexity of the primal-dual interior-point methods for convex quadratic programming, and obtain the same polynomial complexity of O($n^{\frac{q+1}{2q}}\;{\log}\;{\frac{n}{\varepsilon}}$) for convex quadratic programming.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2009

A primal-dual interior point method(IPM) not only is the most efficient method for a computational point of view but also has polynomial complexity. Most of polynomialtime interior point methods(IPMs) are based on the logarithmic barrier functions. Peng et al.([14, 15]) and Roos et al.([3]-[9]) proposed new variants of IPMs based on kernel functions which are called self-regular and eligible functions, respectively. In this paper we define a new kernel function and propose a new IPM based on this kernel function which has $O(n^{\frac{2}{3}}log\frac{n}{\epsilon})$ and $O(\sqrt{n}log\frac{n}{\epsilon})$ iteration bounds for large-update and small-update methods, respectively.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.9-23
• /
• 2010

In this paper we generalize large-update primal-dual interior point methods for linear optimization problems in [2] to the $P_*(\kappa)$ linear complementarity problems based on a new kernel function which includes the kernel function in [2] as a special case. The kernel function is neither self-regular nor eligible. Furthermore, we improve the complexity result in [2] from $O(\sqrt[]{n}(\log\;n)^2\;\log\;\frac{n{\mu}o}{\epsilon})$ to $O\sqrt[]{n}(\log\;n)\log(\log\;n)\log\;\frac{m{\mu}o}{\epsilon}$.