• Journal of National Security and Military Science
• /
• s.9
• /
• pp.207-240
• /
• 2011

There are many information assurance schemes(i.e., evaluation criteria and methodology) for security assurance of information systems, since the security is one of the most important characteristics in the modem information systems. However, there are confusions among schemes and redundancies of assurance. In this paper, we survey and classify conventional information assurance schemes by view points of assurance targets, life-cycles and nations. We propose three new information assurance schemes as the result of survey. Those are as follows: the schemes of the assurance on the requirement itself which is evaluated and certificated after standardizing the security requirements about the organizations and the applications, on the developing information system, and on the accreditation and certification about new information system. This will be helpful to set up a security assurance of National Defense.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.23-43
• /
• 2009

For reliability and confidentiality of information security systems, the security engineering methodologies are accepted in many organizations. To improve the effectiveness of security engineering, this paper suggests a security methodology ISEM, which considers both product assurance and production processes, takes advantages in terms of quality and cost. To verify the effectiveness of ISEM, this paper introduces the concepts of quality loss, and compares the development costs and quality losses between ISEM and CC through the development of VPN system.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.63-78
• /
• 1998

Recently, to use the evaluated firewall is recognized as a solution to achieve the security and reliability for government and organizarions in Korea. Results of firewall evaluation using ITSEC(Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria) and CCPP(Common Criteria Protection Peofile)have been announced. Because there are problems to apply ITSECor CCPP for the firewall evaluation in korea environment, korea government and korea Information security Agency (KISA) decided to develop our own security dvaluation critrtia fir firewalls.As a result of the efforts, Korea firewall security evaluation criteria has been published on Feb. 1998. In this paper, we introduce Korea security evaluation criteria for firewalls. The ceiteria consists of functional and assurance requirements that are compatible with CC Evaluation Assurance Levels(EALs)

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2003

Security Policy Model is a structured representation using informal, semiformal or formal method of security policy to be enforced by TOE. It provides TOE to get an assurance to mitigate security flaws resulted from inconsistency between security functional requirements and functional specifications. Therefore, Security Policy Model has been required under an hish evaluation assurance level on an evaluation criteria such as ISO/IEC 15408(Common Criteria, CC). In this paper, we present an evaluation method for security policy model based on assurance requirements for security policy model in Common Criteria through an analysis of concepts, related researches and assurance requirements for security policy model.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.247-252
• /
• 2010

According to IT technology has evolved, a lot of information are moving through network. The correct internet users can obtain useful information. But incorrect users expose information and cause various damage for malicious purpose. To solve this problem, various information security products are being developed. For development of secure information security product, the development process should be secure. Also evaluation system is being used about product evaluation and security module for the assurance of secure product. In this paper, we proposed assurance system for secure development of information security product. Therefore this paper proposed more secure product development and assurance scheme.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Assurance Society Conference
• /
• 2004.05a
• /
• pp.141-144
• /
• 2004

The Common Criteria (CC) philosophy is to provide assurance based upon an evaluation of the IT product or system that is to be trusted. Evaluation has been the traditional means of providing assurance. It is essential that not only the customer' srequirements for software functionality should be satisfied but also the security requirements imposed on the software development should be effectively analyzed and implemented in contributing to the security objectives of customer's requirements. Unless suitable requirements are established at the start of the software development process, the resulting end product, however well engineered, may not meet the objectives of its anticipated consumers. By the security evaluation, customer can sure about the quality of the products or systems they will buy and operate. In this paper, we propose a selection guide for If products by showing relationship between security engineering and security evaluation and make help user and customer select appropriate products or system.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2019

Today, information security (INFOSEC) as a discipline is gaining more and more importance according to the emergence and extension of the cyberspace. Originated from Joint Doctrine for Information Operation (Joint Pub 3-13) by the U.S. Department of Defense, 'information assurance (IA)' is the concept widely used in the relevant field. Grown from the practice of information security, it encompasses broader and more proactive protection that includes countermeasures and repair, security management throughout an information system (IS)'s life-cycle, and trustworthiness of an IS in the process of risk analysis. In Korea, many industry professionals tend to misunderstand IA, remaining unaware of the conceptual differences between IA and INFOSEC. On this account, the current study attempted to provide a combined definition of IA by reviewing relevant literature. This study showed the validity of the wordings used in the proposed definition phrase by phrase.

• Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management
• /
• v.5 no.4
• /
• pp.109-116
• /
• 2009

In the paper, we designed an automatic security diagnostic evaluation System(SeDES) based on a security diagnostic evaluation model(SeDEM) for an organization's security assurance. The SeDEM evaluates a security level of an organization quantitatively by a security evaluation formula which is composed of security variables and security index as applying the statistical CAEL model for evaluate risk level of banks. The SeDES has a good expandability as changing security variables according to an organization scale, characteristics and so on. And it also has a excellent usage because it inputs only numeric data got from statistical technique to security index. We can understand more a security level correctly than the existent risk assessment system because it is possible to assess quantitatively with an security grade as well as score. analysis.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2004

Common Criteria(CC, ISO/IEC 15408) is an international standard for evaluation of Information Suity Systems(ISS). There need a suitable evidence of estimation of evaluation cost in an evaluation facility under the CC-based evaluation and assurance scheme. In this paper, we propose an evaluation effort model, which is based not only on assurance-level but also on product-type of ISS, by means of real experience of real evaluators, use-ratio concept and the Function Point of security function. The model is based not on a real evaluation environment of evaluation facility, but on CC, public PPs and product specific STs. Our result might be used as a basic model for estimation of evaluation cost and time of ISS in an CC-based evaluation and assurance scheme.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.71-75
• /
• 2004

The Common Criteria (CC) philosophy is to provide assurance based upon an evaluation of the IT product or system that is to be trusted. Evaluation has been the traditional means of providing assurance. It is essential that not only the customer' srequirements for software functionality should be satisfied but also the security requirements imposed on the software development should be effectively analyzed and implemented in contributing to the security objectives of customer's requirements. Unless suitable requirements are established at the start of the software development process, the re suiting end product, however well engineered, may not meet the objectives of its anticipated consumers. By the security evaluation, customer can sure about the quality of the products or sys tems they will buy and operate. In this paper, we propose a selection guide for If products by show ing relationship between security engineering and security evaluation and make help user and customer select appropriate products or system.