• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.89-105
• /
• 2010

Research methodology on Traditional Medicine in East Asia refers to logical thinking system, empirical positivism system and methodology of developing these knowledge systems. Logical thinking system of abstract concepts such as analogy or abduction and positivism system of reasonable explanation such as the five elements and their characteristic theory have been used in various ways empirically or in the form of humanities and knowledge system was developed through parallel structure of empirical positivism and exegetical studies. After the 16th century, evidence was required along with the tradition of putting emphasis on rationality, logicality and empirical positivism and characteristics of medical humanities can be found in emphasizing on medical ethics. Data that can be considered as structural review paper or meta analysis from original data of research on Traditional East Asian Medicine should be evaluated as historical evidence which is equivalent to specialist opinion, descriptive disease research, single case report or case series. Historical evidence based medicine is a research method using Historical evidence to selectively support data that are faithful to traditional theory with higher possibility to be used in future traditional east Asian medicine that links between traditional knowledge and scientific research methodology. Moreover, historical evidence based medicine tries to re-evaluate the value of traditional knowledge and ultimately, guides the direction of development of traditional medicine through scientific rationality based on history and culture.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제54권
• /
• pp.76-97
• /
• 2011

가추법은 문화연구의 방법론으로서 어떤 의미를 지니는가? 이 논문은 문화연구의 방법론 논의가 연구방법이 아닌 인식론적 맥락에서 이루어져야 함을 주장하고, 이를 위해 가추법의 의미를 문화연구의 방법론의 측면에서 재해석한다. 논리학자이자 기호학자인 찰스 샌더스 퍼스는 연역법이나 귀납법으로는 불가능한 새로운 명제나 지식을 발견하기 위해 가추법을 제안한다. 근대의 과학적 실증주의가 객관성과 확실성의 논리에 기대고 있다면, 가추법은 경험된 현상으로부터 새로운 전제를 찾아내는 발견의 논리로서 의미를 지닌다. 이 논문에서는 학문과 지식의 생산 구조와 역사적 맥락을 살펴보고, 그 과정에서 형성된 과학적 연구방법의 신화를 비판한다. 그리고 사회와 문화를 연구하는 방법론적 대안으로서 가추법이 갖는 의의를 살펴보고, 가추법이 문화연구의 방법론에 던져주는 시사점은 무엇인지 논의한다. 이를 통해 문화연구가 방법론으로서 갖추어야 할 세 가지 요소, 즉 '직관'과 '공감'과 '지적 협업'의 중요성과 의미를 탐색한다. 결국 문화연구는 관찰할 수 있는 현재로부터 알 수 없는 실재를 찾아내는 발견의 논리가 되어야 함을 주장한다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 1994

Major studies of Home Economics have had an intention to keep the standard scientific perspective based on value-free and positivism. But in the early 20C there was a change within scientific philosophy and the holistic perspective has risen in the part of scocial and natural science. The phenomenon dealt in the field of Home Economics is the interaction between human and environment and it regards human and family behavior in the context of the environment as a major object. This interaction can be micro/macro and objectiv $e_jective, So it has a very complex trait. The goal of this study is to verify the applicability of Human Ecology as an alternative framework to explain each level of the family phenomena. Further it is concluded that it is very efficient to present Human Ecology as a general theory for Home Economics because there are increasing demands for understanding interdependence and persuing for balanced co-existence between human and encironment. Finally this study concludes that Human Ecology is not a past theory but a very comprehensive one to construct and abstract theory-building.ng.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.183-200
• /
• 1998

이 연구는 과학철학 심리학 과학교육, 과학 교육과정 학습지도 평가 등과 관련이 있는 문헌을 조사 분석하고 그것이 과학교육의 여러 측면에 던져주는 시사점을 기술할 목적으로 수행되었다. 과학철학에 관해서는 전통적 과학철학과 현대의 과학철학 그리고 현대의 과학관으로 제기된 STS를 중심으로 조사 분석하였으며, 심리학은 전통적 심리학과 아울러 구성주의와 사회심리학을 그 대상으로 하였다. 한편, 과학철학과 심리학이 과학교육에 던져주는 시사점은 과학교육의 정의, 과학교육의 목적, 과학 교육과정, 과학 학습지도, 과학교육 평가를 중심으로 기술하였다. 이 연구에서는 과학교육을 과학에 의한 또는 과학을 통한 교육으로 정의했고, 과학교육의 목적으로 과학적 소양과 의사결정력의 함양을 강조하였으며, 과학의 교육과정에 과학의 윤리적 측면을 포함시켜야 함을 주장했다. 이 연구에서는 또 과학은 집단토의법과 협력학습법으로 학습지도되어야 하며, 그 결과의 평가는 인지구조가 변화된 정도의 측정에 주안점을 두어야 한다고 주장했다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.713-725
• /
• 1993

This paper presents methodological paradigms : quantitative positivistic (logical empiricism) as the received tradition in the scientific inquiry and qualitative naturalistic (post -positivism or nataralism) as a new paradigm in the Kuhnian sense. Various kind of qualitative methods under the umbrella term, qualitative inquiry, were briefly introduced. Details on the definition, epistemology, naming of subject, field technique (participant observation and ethnographic interview) of ethnographic research method as an adequate method for studying on the unique nursing phenomena in Korean culture were done. Besides, the concept of triangulation, issues on the methododogical paradigm, a criteria for rigor of qualitative naturalistic inquiry were mentioned.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.90-98
• /
• 2010

The concepts of laws like regularity or persistence or recurrence those are discovered in nature, became the essential elements in speculative philosophy, study and scientific technology. Western civilization was spread out by these natural laws. As this background, this study is aimed to research the theories of natural laws and the development of geometry as the descriptive tools and the development aspects of the concepts of space. According to Whitehead's four theories on the natural laws, the result of this study that aimed like that as follows. First, the theories on the immanence and imposition of the natural laws were the predominant ideas from ancient Greek to before the scientific revolution, the theory on the simple description like the positivism made the Newton-Cartesian mechanism and an absolutist world view. The theory on the conventional interpretation made the organicism and relativism world view according to non-Euclidean geometry. Second, the geometrical composition of ancient Greek architecture was an aesthetics that represented the immanence of natural laws. Third, in the basic symbol of medieval times, the numeral symbol was the frame of thought and was an important principal of architecture. Fourth, during the Renaissance, architecture was regarded as mathematics that made the order of universe to visible things and the geometry was regarded as an important architectural principal. Fifth, according to the non-Euclidean geometry, it was possible to present the natural phenomena and the universe. Sixth, topology made to lapse the division of traditional floor, wall and ceiling in contemporary architecture and made to build the continuous space. Seventy, the new nature was explained by fractal concepts not by Euclidean shapes, fractal presented that the essence of nature had not mechanical and linear characteristic but organic and non-linear characteristic.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.185-200
• /
• 1997

In this study the meaning of well-being and welfare of home has been analyzed and a new direction in which home economics should advance has been suggested, This study not only would help the characteristics of home economics be properly understood and its displinary position take its own place but also a conceptual analysis which might be uncommon in the studies of learned circles of Korean home economics would be a basis for establishing the uniqueness of the discipline named by home economics. Based on the critical theory of Habermas it has been demonstrated that well-being and welfare of home have been emphasized unfairly in the physical and technical aspects and such a partial pursuit of positivism and purposive rationality of scientific technology has resulted in the situation that home would be gradually encroached and controlled by the social system pursuing purposive rationality. As an alternative to overcome this kind of problems communicative rationality that has em hasis on the process of intersubjective understanding and agreement has been focused. The meaning of well-being and welfare of home has been established through the classification of family life actions in to technical action practical action and emancipatory action, And the characteristics of them have been examined and ideal directionns of each element have been discussed.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.101-107
• /
• 2017

In this paper, We propose the aesthetic exploration of horseback riding is considered to be the process of pursuing physical, mental, emotional, and social beauty. Despite the search effect of aesthetics in various aspects, the study of equestrian aesthetics in the field of physical education in Korea is very insufficient. Equestrian aesthetics is being studied in the field of special physical education and is being studied in the fields of rehabilitation and therapeutic horseback riding. Horse riding is a type of exercise. However, studies that track and observe various changes are inadequate. The purpose of this study is to explore the theory of equestrian aesthetics and to explore the possibility of approaching aesthetic theory from the top of horseback riding and to extend the area of equestrian game aesthetically. Until now, horse riding has been thought to be an aristocratic sport. Today, however, everyone can participate. Horseback riding is a sport for raising livelihoods, and it is a special sport that animals and humans enjoy in harmony. Equestrianism is a method of aesthetics from below, a philosophical method of aesthetics from the top, and a scientific method of empirical or positivistic direction. This study examines equestrian aesthetics from aesthetic point of view through the whole process of horse riding. The purpose of this study is to explore the aesthetics of horse riding through an aesthetic approach from the top, and to study the nature of aesthetics, a philosophical debate on beauty, Art can be divided into two categories: empiricism and positivism. For the sake of simplicity, the former is called the philosophical method, the latter is called the scientific method, and the latter is called the aesthetic from the bottom. Generally, in art, artistic, artistic works, perfumers, if you are grasped in the triangular shape, equestrian aesthetics can be described as triplets such as horse riding, passengers, and spectators. It was not easy to give satisfactory results in suggesting a new theory or a clear discussion due to lack of precedent research.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.68-80
• /
• 2013

This study is about expressive aspects of subversive mimesis found in architectural design under 2nd Modernity. Architectural works under 2nd Modernity are described based on pseudo-scientific positivism and philosophical ontology of Deleuze. However, subversiveness found in works of arts by architects such as Rem Koolhaas present a few complexities to relay on such a description. This is about 'subversiveness' which absorbs the positive and negative factors of modernity which has been multi-layered as 'cultural capital'. This study aims to identify meta-phenomenon as well as the specific correlations between expression and purposes of any work of art that is presented in the form of subversiveness. To achieve this aim, this study approached with the concepts of appropriation and detournment based on Adorno's subversive mimesis concept. Meta-phenomena of architectural design methods occur from relations of three, which are social reality, artist, and work of art. This was connected to productivity of mimesis practice of self-reference and self-examination, which was then, summed up from the perspectives of appropriation in pure arts and d$\acute{e}$tournment of situationalists. Based on this work, subversive expressive characteristics of architecture under 2nd Modernity were framed from the perspectives of the absorption of cultural capital, reflection and negation, autonomy, instrumentality, and meta properties. In this way, this study found that Adorno's subversiveness should be effective for creative and methodological systemization in terms of interpretation of cognition, practice, and effect after materialization.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.155-178
• /
• 2001

논리실증주의자들이 주장한 과학적 관찰의 이론독립성 논제와 핸슨과 쿤 등이 주장한 관찰의 이론의존성 논제는 관찰과 이론의 관계에 대해 우리가 고려할 수 있는 모든 가능성을 대표하지 않는다. 관찰의 이론독립성 논제가 문제가 있듯이 이론의존성 논제 역시 문제가 있다. 이 글에서 필자는 과학적 관찰에 대한 자연스러운 인식적 태도를 제안할 것이다. 자연스러운 인식적 태도는 이론의존성을 인정하면서도 관찰 또는 실험의 중요성을 강조함으로써 그 동안 이론 중심적인 맥락에서 무시되어왔던 관찰과 실험의 새로운 역할들을 인정한다. 먼저 관찰의 이론의존성 논제를 지지하는 입장으로서 핸슨과 쿤의 이론이 검토된다. 이어서 핵킹의 실험주의 입장이 소개되고, '관찰이 이론에 선행하는 경우'와 '잘못된 이론과 올바른 관찰이 결합하는 경우'를 중심으로 이론의존성 논제의 문제점이 제시된다. 또한 이론이 갖는 두 가지 역할 즉 관찰을 유도하는 역할과 검사의 목표로서의 역할에 주목하여 이론의존성 논제의 이론적 문제점이 논의된다. 이러한 논의를 중합하여 관찰에 대한 자연스러운 인식적 태도가 이론독립성 논제와 이론의존성 논제, 그리고 실험주의간의 비교를 통하여 제시 된다.