• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to identify U.S. Baby Boomers' intention to move and their reasons for moving after retirement, and to examine the associations between their socio-demographic characteristics and housing characteristics, and their reasons for moving after retirement factors. A total of 403 usable data were collected through an online survey using a self-administrated questionnaire. For data analyses, descriptive statistics, factor analysis, t-test, and ANOVA were used. Almost 30% of the total respondents considered moving and 15% were strongly agreed to move after their retirement. The most frequently mentioned reasons for moving after retirement were 'a place with good weather', 'being close to leisure activities', and 'a change or decline of my current neighborhood'. Four factors of reasons for moving after retirement (quality of residential environment, need assistant, proximity to activities, and proximity to family/friends) were identified. Age, marital status, number of household, housing type, homeownership, length of residence, and number of bedroom were significantly associated with the four factors of reasons for moving. The results of this study provide a better understanding to U.S. Baby Boomers' housing behavior after retirement which is 10 years faster than Korea, and suggest insights of housing plan for Korean older adults.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2015

This study identifies intention to move, reasons for moving and housing preferences of US residents 55 and older living in non-subsidized and market-rate multifamily housing in the United States. Data were collected using an on-line survey; mixed methods were used for data analysis (N=431). Results show that more than half of the respondents intend to move. Senior residents who were younger than average age of the respondents, not married, renters, had no elevator, and reported lower residential satisfaction with their housing unit, multifamily housing community and local area were more likely to intend to move. Seven reasons for considering moving were found: finance, health, lifecycle stage, housing unit, multifamily housing community, other. When asked about their future housing, more than 80% desired independent living rather than assisted living facilities or nursing homes, 40% wanted to live in multifamily housing, and 51% hoped to own their housing rather than renting. The findings offer meaningful information to the multifamily housing industry in the United States and in countries where the population is aging and where multifamily housing is the predominant housing type.

• 한국인구학
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.159-178
• /
• 2008

이 연구의 목적은 그동안 인구이동 연구 자료의 한계로 인하여 분석되지 못하였던 이동의 선별성과 이동이유를 분석하여 이동의 동인을 밝히는 것이다. 최근 수도권의 인구집중 문제가 다시 부각되고 있기 때문에 분석은 수도권의 인구이동에 초점을 맞추었다. 이 연구에 사용된 자료는 1997년 통계청에서 시행한 인구이동 특별조사의 원자료이다. 분석의 대상은 조사시점 이전 5년간에 시.도간 이동을 경험한 가구주와 단독가구주이다. 선별성 분석은 수도권 이동자를 수도권 전입이동, 전출이동, 그리고 수도권내 이동으로 구분하여 비이동자의 특성과 비교하였다. 이동의 성향은 여성이 남성보다, 20대와 30대 초반 연령층이 다른 연령층에 비해서, 그리고 고학력자가 저학력자보다, 미혼자가 기혼자보다 더 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 수도권을 중심으로 이동의 방향별로 이동이유를 분석한 결과 수도권 전입이동에서는 직업요인이 압도적인 비중을 차지하고 있으며 수도권전출이동에서는 직업요인과 함께 가족요인이 중요하게 작용하고 있었다. 수도권내 이동에서는 직업요인과 함께 가족, 주택요인이 거의 같은 비중으로 이동에 영향을 미치고 있었다. 이동자의 특성과 이동이유를 교차분석해 보면 이동이유에 가장 영향을 많이 미치는 변수는 연령과 혼인상태와 같은 생애주기 변수였으며 이밖에도 학력수준과 거처의 점유형태등의 사회계층과 관련된 변수들도 영향을 미치고 있었다. 교육요인은 수도권 전입이동에 있어서도 그리 큰 비중을 차지하고 있지 않으며 전입과 전출 양방향에서 거의 비슷한 비중을 나타내었다. 결국 수도권 인구집중의 가장 큰 요인은 고학력, 젊은층의 취업관련 이동으로서 이들을 지방에서 정착시킬 수 있는 지방의 취업기회 확대가 수도권 인구집중 완화정책의 요체임을 확인하였다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.99-110
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to identify pre-elderly's housing mobility related characteristics (reasons for moving, change of personal life after move, housing attachment, and plan to future move) and to examine the associations between their socio-demographic characteristics and housing characteristics, and their housing mobility related characteristics. A total of 200 usable data were collected through personal survey using a questionnaire developed by the researcher. Samples were selected in Seoul and new towns in the capital area and a survey conducted from February, 2014 to December, 2014. For the analyses, descriptive statistics, factor analysis, t-test and ANOVA were used. The most frequently mentioned reasons for moving were 'a good place for nature and retirement life'. Age, education level, liiving expenses, locaion, tenure status, and housing size were the variables to show significant difference to reasons for moving. Respondents experienced positive personal life changes after moving, especially, 'physical health' and outgoing activity'. Respondents who moved to a new town was more positively changed. Personal life changes was the most important variable associated with 3 factors of housing attachment. Location, tenure status, housing size were the major variables to show differences to housing attaachment. Also, personal life changes after moving and housing attachment were the important variables affecting a plan to future move. In other words, the respondents who do not plan to future move showed higher positive life change and strong housing attachment.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.125-133
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to find the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing residents, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996). The data used for this research were a subset of data Choi and Paulsson (2011) surveyed from 12 Swedish cohousing units. Number of 216 cases whose age was 40 and over were selected and analyzed with Pearson correlations and hierarchical linear regressions by SPSS. The regression analyses included four main concepts as endogenous variables, which were participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out. The results showed that participation in common activities raised satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction but reduced intention to move out. Meanwhile, satisfaction with common space diminished intention to move out but did not impact overall life satisfaction. When overall life satisfaction was added to the final regression model, the direct impacts of security reasons, participation in common activities, and satisfaction with common space on intention to move out disappeared. It may be concluded that participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space acted as intervening variables in the tentative cohousing adjustment framework. Even though this study leaves further research on specifying the framework, it may be noteworthy as a first attempt that explains the flow of main concepts. This study may broaden the possibility of empirical studies to develop an analytical path model of housing adjustment for cohousing residents.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.81-92
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to identify difference in motivation of move to senior cohousing communities in Sweden during 10 years between the year of 2001 and 2010 by a longitudinal study. Questionnaire survey was used for the study. 313 data were collected from 12 senior cohousing communities, which were established by residents-initiated process. It includes 8 of Senior g${\aa}$rden cohousings in 2001 and 4 of +40 cohousings in 2010 nationwide in Sweden. The result indicates that there are significant differences in motivation of move to senior cohousing between 2001 and 2010. Comparing motivation of move to senior cohousing during 10 years, respondents of 2010 focus more on social merits than practical merits of cohousing as they move to cohousing communities. They stress more to the reasons as good contacts with neighbors, mutual supports, sharing common activities and getting rid of loneliness rather than burden of housing and garden management, and universal-designed house. The result of this study reveals motivation of move to senior cohousing has been changed during 10 years in Sweden.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.77-86
• /
• 2013

Cohousing is based on collaborative network, or fictive kin in the community. It could facilitate the goal of self-sufficiency. This research aims to investigate the motivation of move to cohousing communities in Sweden, and to find out if there are any significant differences according to two different cohousing types; between the +40 cohousing and the mixed-age cohousing. The +40 cohousing is a kind of senior cohousing in which residents are supposed to be aged over 40. Questionnaire survey was applied and 242 collected data were analyzed by SPSS statistical program. Notable differences in demographic and dwelling variables are found between the 2 groups. There are more women, singles, academics, and small dwellings in the +40 cohousing than in the mixed-age cohousing. Referring motivation of move, "sharing common activity" and "idea of cohousing" are commonly noticed as the main reasons why people move to cohousing communities. Major difference between the 2 groups is that residents of the +40 cohousing tend to stress more on social interaction with neighbors than practical merit. On the contrary, ones of the mixed-age cohousing focus more on practical advantage than social interaction. As a conclusion, it is evident that motivation of move to cohousing communities is different by cohousing types, which have different residents' characteristics. Cohousing could contribute to elevate marginal group's quality of life as an alternative living environment. Therefore, cohousing design has to be tailored to adapt residents' specific needs of different life-stages. In order to implement cohousing model into other countries, for instance into Korea, it needs to experiment with the notion of transplanting selected cohousing principles to a public housing development. In the mixed-age cohousing where more dual income families with young children than conventional housing developments reside, residents would need more practical advantage than emotional support in the community, while as residents in the senior cohousing need vice versa.

• 기독교교육논총
• /
• 제66권
• /
• pp.209-241
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 청년들의 교회 이동과 신앙생활 포기 의향에 대한 인식을 중심으로 해당 의향과 인식에 영향을 주는 요인을 분석하고, 이를 바탕으로 청년 사역을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제공해주고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 활용한 데이터는 2021년 Align Research Center for Christianity(ARCC)의 청년실태조사 데이터이며, 전국단위의 1,017명(남성, 409명, 여성 608명),이 최종 분석대상으로 활용되었다. 본 연구의 분석방법은 SPSS 23.0 프로그램을 활용하여 빈도분석 및 기술통계, 신뢰도 분석, 독립표본 t검증, 일원분산분석, 회귀분석이 적용되었다. 한국교회 내 청년들의 교회 이동과 신앙생활 포기 의향에 대한 인식을 분석한 결과 향후 교회 이동과 신앙생활 포기 인식에 대한 기초 통계를 확인 할 수 있었으며, 주요 항목에 대한 집단별(의향 수준별) 인식의 차이, 교회 이동 및 신앙생활 포기에 대한 영향 요인을 도출할 수 있었다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.121-132
• /
• 2003

This study has been performed to explore main reasons for staying in paid elderly residential care facilities among the residents. In this study, five males and seven females aged 65 to 82 were asked about main reasons for staying in the facilities. The answers of the qualitative interview were drawn as follows; first, some residents had suddenly decided to move into the facility due to critical life events such as bereavement, serious illness, or supporting problems. Second, some residents had taken a long period of considerations on whether staying home or in the facilities, because their health and family supports gradually diminished over the long life span. On the other hand, a few of them voluntarily chose to stay at the facilities, because they recognized supervised group activities, nutritionally well-planned meals, and health care as major inconveniences. In this study, suggestions were made as follows: first, guiding and settlement programs should be developed for the residents of the sudden events, particularly at early stage of admission. Second, intensive nursing care units should be in separation from healthy independent groups, so that the residents are relieved from stressful contacts with extremely ill patients in the residential area.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.376-387
• /
• 2017

창조계층은 전문 지식 및 기술을 가지고 창의적이고 혁신적인 업무에 종사하는 직업군을 뜻하며, 지역의 경제성장에 중요한 역할을 한다는 점에서 많은 관심을 받아 왔다. 이에 지역정부에는 도시의 경제 성장을 위해 창조계층을 유입하기 위한 각종 정책 및 방안들을 제시하고 있으나 실제 창조계층이 이동과 관련된 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 17차 노동패널 자료를 이용하여 창조계층의 이동특성과 이주동기를 분석하여 함의를 제공하고자 하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 창조계층은 비창조계층에 비하여 이동성이 높았다. 둘째, 창조계층 이동자는 여성보다 남성이, 20대와 30대의 젊은층이, 미혼보다는 기혼자, 전세 등 자가가 아니며, 아파트에 거주하는 이동자가 많았다. 셋째, 창조계층과 비창조계층이 이주 동기에는 차이가 존재하였다. 창조계층의 이주 동기는 주거 요인과 직장 요인이 중요한 역할을 하였다. 특히 비창조계층에 비하여 직장 요인이 더 중요한 것으로 분석되었다. 넷째, 인간관계, 편의시설 등의 변수는 창조계층의 이동에 중요한 영향을 주지 않았다.