• 제목/요약/키워드: Qualitative Risk Assessment

검색결과 158건 처리시간 0.026초

위험 선별 및 분석 통합 자동화 시스템 개발에 대한 연구 (Study on Development of Automated System for Hazard Screening at Analysis)

  • 한의진;김용하;최승준;김구회;윤인섭
    • 한국화재소방학회논문지
    • /
    • 제17권4호
    • /
    • pp.20-27
    • /
    • 2003
  • 화학공장은 위험한 물리 화학적 특성을 가진 많은 물질들을 다루기 때문에 다른 어떤 공장보다 더 사고의 위험성이 크다. 띠라서 화학공장에서의 각 장치에 대한 위험성 평가는 반드시 필요하다. 현재 사용되고 있는 위험성 평가 방법은 정성적 또는 정량적인 방법으로 각각 개별적으로 적용되는데 정성적, 정량적의 통합된 방법을 적용하면 빠르고 쉽게 적용할 수 있다는 정성적인 방법의 장점과 정밀하게 평가될 수 있다는 정량적인 방법의 장점을 모두 갖출 수 있다. 이러한 통합된 위험성 평가방법을 적용하고 자동화한 ASCA(Automated System for Hazard Screening & Analysis)라는 S/W를 개발하여 실제 공정에 적용하였다. 본 연구에서는 방향족 긍정 중 H.T.U(Hydrotreating Unit)에 대하여 ASCA를 적용하여 각 장치의 상대 순위를 알아보고 D-101이라는 저장탱크에서 단열 실패로 온도 상승이 일어난 경우의 장치고장으로 인한 변수 이상과 발생 가능한 사고의 영향을 알아보았다. 이러한 통합 위험성 평가 시스템을 화학공장에 적용하여 봄으로써 사고 시나리오를 세워서 사고에 대한 비상사태를 대처할 수 있는 능력을 키울 수 있으며 사고를 예방할 수 있을 것이다.

환경위해성 평가를 위한 해충저항성 배추의 분자생물학적 특성 검정 및 계통 특이 마커 캐발 (Molecular Characterization and Event-Specific Marker Development of Insect Resistant Chinese Cabbage for Environmental Risk Assessment)

  • 임선형;김나영;이시명;우희종;신공식;진용문;조현석
    • Journal of Plant Biotechnology
    • /
    • 제34권4호
    • /
    • pp.347-354
    • /
    • 2007
  • 유전자변형 작물의 상업화를 위해서는 유전자변형 작물이 식품으로서의 안전성과 환경에 미치는 영향에 관한 평가가 이루어져야한다. 이를 위해 개발자는 유전자변형 작물의 방출이전에 유전자변형 작물 개발에 관한 정보를 제출해야만 한다. 본 연구는 유전자변형 작물의 환경 위해성 평가를 위한 분자생물학적 자료를 제공하고자 수행하였다. 아그로 박테리움 형질전환법을 통하여 해충저항성 CryIAc 유전자가 도입된 배추 형질전환체를 획득한 후, 분자생물학적인 분석을 통하여 유전자의 copy수, 안정성, 식물체내에서의 발현을 확인하였고, T-DNA의 배추게놈내의 인접서열을 분석하였다. T-DNA의 게놈내 삽입 인접서열을 바탕으로 유전자변형 배추를 동정할 수 있는 프라이머를 제작하였고, 이를 이용한 검정방법을 수립하였다. 계통 특이 프라이머를 이용한 해충저항성 배추 후대의 PCR 분석결과와 제초체 처리결과가 서로 일치하였다. 본 연구 결과로 환경위해성 평가를 위한 해충저항성 배추의 분자생물학적인 자료를 획득하였으며, 개발된 프라이머는 해충저항성 배추의 검출을 위하여 유용하게 사용할 수 있음을 확인하였다.

토양생태 위해성평가 제도 국내 도입방안 연구 (An Introductory Research for Development of Soil Ecological Risk Assessment in Korea)

  • 안윤주;김신웅;문종민;정승우;김록영;윤정기;김태승
    • 대한환경공학회지
    • /
    • 제39권6호
    • /
    • pp.348-355
    • /
    • 2017
  • 인간활동에 의한 토양오염은 지속적으로 발생되고 있으며, 이를 과학적이고 합리적으로 관리하기 위한 인체 및 생태 위해성평가의 중요성이 부각되고 있다. 하지만 국내에서 생태계를 수용체로 하는 위해성평가에 대한 제도적 장치가 마련되어 있지 않으며, 이에 대한 평가체계와 활용가능한 기반 마련이 필요할 것으로 사료된다. 본 연구에서는 국내형 토양생태 위해성평가(soil ecological risk assessment) 체계를 제시하였으며, 이를 수행하기 위한 구체적인 내용들을 정리하였다. 토양생태 위해성평가는 오염물질에 대한 생태계 보호수준을 의미하는 예측무영향농도 산출을 목적으로 하고, 토양생태 독성자료 수집 및 적합성 확인, 토양생태 독성자료 표준화, 생태독성자료 충족도 확인 및 예측무영향농도 산출, 생태위해도결정의 단계로 수행할 수 있다. 수집된 생태독성자료는 신뢰도지수에 따라 적합성을 먼저 확인하며, 필요기준(국내 서식종, 급 만성, 독성종말점, 토양특성 분류)에 따라 순차적으로 정리하여 평가체계에 적용하는 방안을 제안하였다. 예측무영향농도는 생태독성자료 수준에 따라 저신뢰, 중간신뢰, 그리고 고신뢰 수준 중 하나의 산출 기법을 이용하며, 이를 통해 최종적으로 생태 위해도를 결정하는 방식을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 차후 토양오염물질에 대한 생태위해성평가 지침 제정에 있어 기본 체계로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Development of Web-based Design Review System for Reliability and Safety Knowledge Management

  • 유이치 오츠카;타카시 유카와;요시하루 뮤토
    • International Journal of Safety
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.22-28
    • /
    • 2010
  • This paper describes a web-based design review system as a knowledge management system relating reliability and safety system design. Since people's consciousness for safety and security become sensitive and increases the need of establishing a proactive prevention method for internal failures and relating risks in products. It also means that prevailing tacit knowledge in retired workers, in order to transform them to be easily used to support new system development, become more important. When considering safety and reliability design, at least two data sheet are necessary; Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEA) and Risk Assessment (RA). These two data are practically made separately. However, it includes the concerns that a risk by failures during long-term use may not be noticed. To overcome this insufficiency, a support tool for integrating reliability evaluation and risk assessment data simultaneously is expected to be revealed. The authors have then developed a web-based design review system for reliability and safety system design. The system include various profitable functions; making FMEA and RA sheet, retrieving past data sheet for engineering change management and new product development and web-based discussion to increase the efficiency of discussion. The system is applied to one practical development works in order to demonstrate its effectiveness that is to be made clear by interviewing user's qualitative comment.

Social Engineering Attack Graph for Security Risk Assessment: Social Engineering Attack Graph framework(SEAG)

  • Kim, Jun Seok;Kang, Hyunjae;Kim, Jinsoo;Kim, Huy Kang
    • 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
    • /
    • 제23권11호
    • /
    • pp.75-84
    • /
    • 2018
  • Social engineering attack means to get information of Social engineering attack means to get information of opponent without technical attack or to induce opponent to provide information directly. In particular, social engineering does not approach opponents through technical attacks, so it is difficult to prevent all attacks with high-tech security equipment. Each company plans employee education and social training as a countermeasure to prevent social engineering. However, it is difficult for a security officer to obtain a practical education(training) effect, and it is also difficult to measure it visually. Therefore, to measure the social engineering threat, we use the results of social engineering training result to calculate the risk by system asset and propose a attack graph based probability. The security officer uses the results of social engineering training to analyze the security threats by asset and suggests a framework for quick security response. Through the framework presented in this paper, we measure the qualitative social engineering threats, collect system asset information, and calculate the asset risk to generate probability based attack graphs. As a result, the security officer can graphically monitor the degree of vulnerability of the asset's authority system, asset information and preferences along with social engineering training results. It aims to make it practical for companies to utilize as a key indicator for establishing a systematic security strategy in the enterprise.

가치구조화기법에 의한 매립지 유해성 등급화 (Assessment of Landfill Hazard Using the Value-Structured Approach)

  • 홍상표;김정욱
    • 환경영향평가
    • /
    • 제6권1호
    • /
    • pp.93-103
    • /
    • 1997
  • LHR(Landfill Site Hazard Ranking Model) was developed for ranking the relative hazard of landfill sites by using the method of value-structured approach. LHR consists of combining a multiattribute decision-making method with a Qualitative risk assessment approach. A pairwise com parisian method was applied to determine weights of landfill site factors related. To determine the hazard of landfill site, hydrogeological factors, waste characteristics factors and receptors factors were evaluated by LHR. LHR can help decision-makers prioritization of remediation of landfill sites through the relatively convenient and concise evaluation method of landfill site features related. LHR focuses mainly on pathways of groundwater and surfacewater for evaluating landfill hazard to receptors including humans. To validiate the applicability of LHR, Nanjido Landfill site, Metropolitan Landfill site, and Hwasung Landfill site were evaluated.

  • PDF

표준 원자력발전소 확률론적 안전성 평가의 인간 신뢰도 분석 평가 (Evaluation of Human Reliability Analysis Results in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Korea Standard Nuclear Power Plants)

  • 강대일;정원대;양준언
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.98-103
    • /
    • 2003
  • Based on ASME probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and NEI PRA peer review guidance, we evaluate a human reliability analysis (HRA) in probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for Korea standard nuclear power plants, Ulchin Unit 3&4, to improve it performed at under design. The HRA for Ulchin Unit 3&4 is assessed as higher than Grade I based on ASME PRA standard and as higher than Grade 2 based on NEI PRA peer review guidance. The major items to be improved identified through the evaluation process are the documentation, the systematic human reliability analysis, the participitation of operators in the works and review of HRA. We suggest the guidance on the identification and qualitative screening analysis for pre-accident human errors and solve some items to be improved using the suggested guidance.

Tailoring Psychosocial Risk Assessment in the Oil and Gas Industry by Exploring Specific and Common Psychosocial Risks

  • Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly;Leka, Stavroula;Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M.
    • Safety and Health at Work
    • /
    • 제9권1호
    • /
    • pp.63-70
    • /
    • 2018
  • Background: Psychosocial risk management [Psychosocial Risk Management Approach (PRIMA)] has, through the years, been applied in several organizations in various industries and countries globally. PRIMA principles have also been translated into international frameworks, such as PRIMA-EF (European framework) and the World Health Organization Healthy Workplace Framework. Over the past 10 years, an oil and gas company has put efforts into adopting and implementing international frameworks and standards for psychosocial risk management. More specifically, the company uses a PRIMA. Methods: This study explores available quantitative and qualitative risk data collected through the PRIMA method over the past 8 years in order to explore specific and common psychosocial risks in the petroleum industry. Results: The analyses showed a significant correlation between job resources and symptoms of work-related stress, there was a significant correlation between job demands and symptoms of work-related stress, and there were differences in psychosocial risk factors and symptoms of work-related stress onshore and offshore. The study also offers recommendations on how the results can further be utilized in building a robust system for managing psychosocial risks in the industry. Conclusion: The results from the analyses have provided meaningful and important information about the company-specific psychosocial risk factors and their impact on health and well-being.

시내버스용 HCNG 고압가스 충전소의 폭발 위험성 해석 (Risk Assessment of High Pressure HCNG Refueling Station Explosion by Numerical Simulation)

  • 강승규;김영구;최슬기;권정락
    • 한국연소학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국연소학회 2014년도 제49회 KOSCO SYMPOSIUM 초록집
    • /
    • pp.113-113
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study has been conducted for evaluation of qualitative/quantitative risk of HCNG filling station. In case of fire explosion occurred because of hydrogen, CNG, and HCNG leaking on same conditions, maximum overpressure was measured as 30kPa for hydrogen, 3.5kPa for HCNG, and 0.4kPa for CNG. The overpressure of HCNG was measured 7.75 times higher than that of CNG, but it was only 11.7% compared with hydrogen. When the explosion was occurred, in case of hydrogen, the measured influential distance of overpressure was 59m and radiant heat was 75m. In case of CNG, influential distance of overpressure was 89m and radiant heat was 144m would be estimated. In case of 30% HCNG that was blended with hydrogen and CNG, influential distance of overpressure was 81m and radiant heat was 130m were measured. As the explosion occurred with the same sized container that had 350bar for hydrogen and 250bar of CNG and HCNG, the damage distance that explosive overpressure and radiant heat influenced CNG was seen as the highest. HCNG that was placed between CNG and hydrogen tended to be seen as more similar with CNG.

  • PDF

독일에서의 환경영향의 정량적 평가 (Quantification of Ecological Impact as a Basis for Evaluation)

  • Schweppe-Kraft, Burkhard
    • 환경영향평가
    • /
    • 제2권2호
    • /
    • pp.59-71
    • /
    • 1993
  • Evaluation methods are employed in environmental impact assessment to choose between different project site, to determine the required measures to compensate impact and to decide whether the environmental impacts are more important than the social or economic effects of a project. The main obstacles that restrict use of quantitative evaluation method are a Lack of knowledge about the environmental effects (e.g. if impacts on wildlife or landscape amenities are predicted) and the relative importance of economic and social issues compared with nature conservation stability of ecosystem or landscape beauty. In Germany, the most common method for site planning is the "ecological risk analysis". It is a kind of multi-criteria-decision-method based on quantitative and qualitative description and ordinal ranking. The various kinds of "ecological balancing methods" that are more recently developed (within the last decade) to quantify the required amount for compensatory measures instead often use cardinal figures to express the value of ecosystems, the intensity of impacts, the need for additional measures to compensate for long recuperative periods when restoring ecosystems and so on. There are still only a view attempts to quantify decisions between environmental and socio-economic issues. Multicriteria-analysis as well as cost-benifit-analysis was used. Some new approaches which are still in a preliminary status are based on contingent valuation and on calculations for compensatory payments (instead of compensatory measures).

  • PDF