• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.39-48
• /
• 2020

Main research question of this study is about whether gated community (GC) as private urban governance gets along with local public goods by locating near to them. We examine this question through testing the Tiebout hypothesis from case study of Seoul, capital city of South Korea, in which GCs are so common to test the assumption empirically. For this, we examine the meaning of GC in 3 Es viewpoints; conceptualize the framework of Tieboutian co-evolution of GC and local public goods by hedonic price modeling. As a result, possibilities are found that GCs are to be seen from different point of view, viz. co-evolutionary mechanism between private and public governance; GCs effectively capture and represent the demand of residents for local public goods through voting by their collective locational choice. It allows us different kind of approach to investigate APTs as a co-evolutionary form of private and public urban order rather than seeing them only as a tool of speculative investment, particularly in rapidly urbanizing countries like Korea.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.137-154
• /
• 2023

본 연구의 목적은 도시재생사업의 효과적인 추진과 사업구조 구축을 위해, 거버넌스의 관점에서 민관 파트너십의 활용 방안을 모색하는 것이다. 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째로, 거버넌스의 관점에서 본 도시재생사업에서의 민관 파트너십 유형은 중앙정부 주도형, 지방정부 주도형, 민간사업자 주도형, 지역주민·커뮤니티조직 주도형으로 분류할 수 있다. 둘째로, 해외사례 분석을 통해 선진국들은 다양한 민관 파트너십의 구성을 통해 도시재생사업을 효과적으로 추진하고 있음이 확인된다. 셋째로, 국내의 도시재생사업에서 민관 파트너십 활용 방안으로, 도시재생사업의 유형과 규모의 다양화 방안 마련, 다양한 민관 파트너십 활용을 위한 제도설계 마련, 다양한 민간참여의 활용을 위한 교차보조 방식의 활용, 투명하고 효과적인 민관 파트너십에 필요한 사회적 자본의 형성 방안 마련을 제안하였다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권8호
• /
• pp.403-415
• /
• 2022

본 연구의 목적은 청주시 도시공원 민관거버넌스의 성과를 Ansell & Gash(2007)의 '협력적 거버넌스' 모델을 중심으로 분석하고 시사점을 찾는 데 있다. 협력적 거버넌스 모델이 제시한 4대 범주와 13개의 성공 요소를 활용해 해당 거버넌스의 성과와 한계를 분석했다. 분석 결과를 보면, 초기조건, 제도설계, 리더십, 협력과정 등 4대 범주 모두를 충족시키고 있다. 13개 요소 중 8개 요소가 '양호' 수준으로 분석되어 성공적인 거버넌스로 평가되었으며, 신뢰 구축과 헌신적 협력을 성공적 거버넌스의 핵심 요소로 볼 수 있다. 반면, 한계점이 드러난 5개 요소는 '보통' 수준으로 평가되었다. 이와 같은 분석 결과는 협력적 거버넌스의 개선을 위해서는 사후 이행관리 체계를 마련하고, 참여의 포용성을 더욱 강화하며, 제도적 설계 단계부터 간접참여 주체 및 대중과의 정기적인 소통의 장을 보장하는 규정과 실행이 필요하다는 시사점을 주고 있다. 본 연구는 객관적으로 검증된 모델의 평가 범주를 기준으로 분석하였지만, 평가는 주관적 판단에 따랐다는 한계가 있다.

• 한국지리정보학회지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.86-97
• /
• 2016

본 연구의 목적은 스마트시티 거버넌스의 유형과 특성을 분석하는데 있다. 스마트시티 거버넌스는 스마트시티를 계획, 시행, 운영하기 위한 추진 프로세스로서, 행정-기술-글로벌 거버넌스로 이루어지는 다층형 거버넌스 모델(Multi Layer Governance Model)로 구성되었다. 연구 분석 방법은 다층형 거버넌스 모델이며, 추진프로세스와 유형별 거버넌스를 각 요소별로 교차 분석할 수 있도록 모델링 되었다. 분석 결과, 행정거버넌스는 정부 중심 통치 거버넌스에서 공공과 민간 그리고 시민의 협치모델인 PPPP(Public Private People Partnership)로 변화되었다. 기술거버넌스는 ICTs-EcoTs-공간기술 간의 융복합을 중심으로, 물리적 센터통합과 정보통합플랫폼 그리고 클라우드 데이터센터와 같은 가상화도 동시에 진행되고 있었다. 글로벌거버넌스는 스마트시티의 해외수출을 목표로 스마트시티 체험지구나 실증단지와 같은 킬러상품의 개발, 포럼과 해외 로드쇼 등의 해외수출 플랫폼이 추진되고 있다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권8호
• /
• pp.141-148
• /
• 2021

Project management is a current trend of management in the public sphere, based on different principles, methods and tools. The tools include information technologies providing control over time, cost, quality and planning process in order to ensure accountability to interested parties. The goal of the research was to examine the impact of the integration of information systems in project management of the public sphere on the quality of public governance and administration using the example of infrastructure projects involving the private sector in developing countries. The methodology of the research is based on the concepts of "digital-era governance" (DEG), "Information governance" and "project governance" to determine the effectiveness of information systems and technologies in the management of infrastructure projects in the public sphere. The data from the countries with Lower middle income (India, Indonesia, Philippines, Ukraine, Vietnam) and Upper middle income (Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Romania, Russian Federation, Thailand, Turkey) for 1996-2020 were used to study the effects of DEG. The results show two main trends in the countries with Lower middle income and Upper middle income. The first trend is the development of digital governance, the concept of "digital-era governance" through information systems and performance measurement of the governance system, forecasting of investment flows of infrastructure projects, measurement of payback and effectiveness parameters for investment management in the public sector, decision support. The second trend is the existence of systemic challenges related to corruption, social and institutional factors through the development of democracy in developing countries and the integration of NPM similar to developed countries. The confidence of interested parties, especially private investors, in public authorities is determined by other factors - the level of return on investment, risks and assignment of responsibility, probability of successful completion of the project. These data still remain limited for a wide range of project participants, including citizens.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2015

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are very popular governance practices, as they enable the private partner to engage in business and have profits while the public partner improves the provision of public services. PPPs are organizational arrangements with a sector-crossing or sector-blurring nature, and are modes of governance - governance by partnerships or collaborative governance (Schuppert 2011). New models and applications of PPPs have been developed over time. Collaborative governance entails information exchange, action or movement harmonization, resource sharing, and capacity enhancement among the partners (Sale 2011; 2012a). As the national university, the University of the Philippines (UP) serves as a research university in various fields of expertise and specialization by conducting basic and applied research and development, and promoting research in various colleges and universities, and contributing to the dissemination and application of knowledge, among other purposes. (Republic Act 9500) It is the site of two (2) science and technology parks (Sale 2012b), one of which is the UP - Ayala Land Technohub. A collaboration between industry and the academe, the Technohub is envisioned as an integrated community of science and technology companies building a dynamic learning and entrepreneurial laboratory (UP-AyalaLand Technohub). This paper takes a closer look at the UP - Ayala Land Technohub as an example of a PPP or collaborative governance in science and technology parks. Have information exchange, action or movement harmonization, resource sharing, and capacity enhancement taken place in the Technohub? What are some significant outcomes of, and issues arising from, the PPP? What assessment indicators may be used? Is a governance instrument needed?

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.68-93
• /
• 2018

With the emergence of partnerships with private actors in public and cultural diplomacies, complexity in the relations among the various stakeholders involved has arisen, and yet the relevant research is insufficient to shed any beneficial light on such issues. By looking at public-private partnerships, the present study determined that resource dependence, trust, and risk are the main factors affecting the feasibility of partnerships, and inductively developed propositions on their effects. In an explorative case study, Germany (decentralized mode of governance) and South Korea (centralized mode of governance) were compared as exemplary contrasting system designs. The results revealed that risk and trust are likely to affect the feasibility of partnerships, whereas resource dependence is not. The following additional findings also were made: (1) there are cultural actors in a 'for profit, but with non-profit purposes' sector; (2) an interpersonal level of trust positively affects partnerships; (3) 'taking risks' brings about 'innovation'; (4) the existence of international commonalities between any two cases depending on the actors' shared role, whether public or private; (5) public actors' emphasis on mutual trust, program budget and execution, innovations coming from taking risks, commitment and ownership, and unexpected situations; (6) private actors' consideration of 'publicness' and grant-seeking or financial support as important incentives, and their desire that public actors to show more trust, professionalism, and ownership with less control over budget execution. With its qualitative approach and in-depth analysis, the present study yielded new insights, notwithstanding the relatively small sample data.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.15-28
• /
• 2022

Recently, government agencies are actively adopting the platform model as a means of public policy. However, existing studies on the public platform are minimal and have focused on user experiences or the possibility of public usage of the platform model. Now the research concerning building governance structure and utilizing network effects of the platform after adopting the platform model in the public sector is keenly required. This study intended to ignite academic dialogue on the governance of public platforms in the context of digital transformation. This study focused on a case of the 'Special delivery,' a public delivery app established by Gyeonggi-do. In order to analyze the characteristics of the public platform and its governance structure, data were collected from press releases, policy reports, and news articles. Data was analyzed using the frame of Hagui's platform design factors and Ansell & Gash's collaborative governance model. The results of the public platform analyses showed 1) incompleteness in the value trade-off accounting, which was designed for platform business based on general cost-benefit analysis, and 2) a closed governance structure that limits direct participation of diverse user groups(i.e., service provider, customer) in order to enhance providers' utility by preventing customers' excessive online activities. The results of this study provided theoretical and policy implications regarding designing the strategy for accounting for value trade-offs and functioning governance structure for public platforms.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제50권1호
• /
• pp.199-224
• /
• 2019

이 연구는 거버넌스에서 도서관의 역할을 규명하는 데에 그 목적이 있다. 거버넌스는 사적 행위자가 정치행정과정에 참여함으로써 성립되는데, 현대 사회의 복잡한 문제를 해결하기 위해 다양한 주체의 협력을 중시하기 때문이다. 공동체는 공공성을 가진 사적 행위자로서 거버넌스가 직접민주주의를 실현하게 돕는다. 또한 도서관은 공동체를 육성하는 기관이기도 하고 때로는 공동체 그 자체이기도 하다. 따라서 이 연구는 문헌연구를 통해 공동체와 거버넌스의 관계, 도서관과 공동체의 관계를 규명한다. 그리고 문헌연구를 바탕으로 실증연구를 수행하여 도서관과 거버넌스의 관계를 규명한다.

• 국토계획
• /
• 제54권4호
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to understand the perceptions of stakeholders in environmental conflicts. The private rental housing project in Busan Sasang-gu Jurye 3 District, which took place in 2017 is one of many cases of environmental conflicts between developers and local residents. The case is considered as a typical failure of collaborative governance that has consequently caused negative impacts to both local residents and government. To understand why local residents could not come to consensus even though the majority of them were against the development project, we analyzed residents' perceptions and subjective opinions towards environmental conflicts. This study adopted 'Q methodology' to investigate human subjectivity. The results showed three distinguished types of subjectivity structures. Each type was named as 'collaborative governance advocates', 'public administration distrusters', and 'current local government supporters' based on their characteristics. Participants in all three types showed opposition to environmental damages that can be caused by the private rental housing development, but they revealed different perspectives on the importance of public participation and institutional responsibility in the process of decision-making. This study makes better understand what makes it difficult to build collaborative governance as a means of overcoming environmental conflicts.