• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제54권5호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2012

This paper presents the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate water resources plan for agricultural reservoir. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to estimate weight and priority of alternatives to find out the most reasonable and efficient way of water resources assessment. The 6 criteria that both decision maker and beneficiary are satisfied have been identified to secure agricultural water resources and then the priority of 10 subcriteria was set. An enhanced PROMETHEE-AHP model was used to perform pairwise comparison and find out the priority of each alternative because the existing decision making model have uncertainty and ambiguity. Comparison analysis of decision making models was carried out to find a way of suitable decision making and validity of PROMETHEE-AHP model was suggested.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2007

We derive priority decision making on healthcare service technology standardization in the home network through the decision support process with industry professionals. We configured a research group with 4 industrial areas including Industry, Academic, Research Institution and Medical Institution. And we also applied AHP methodology for the priority decision making. The research group decides an evaluation criteria which are consisted of marketability, technology, ripple effect, strategy for national policies in order to make a priority for healthcare service on a home network. And it is also decided 7 fields and 24 sub-fields, technically. In order to make a priority for the standardization, we use an AHP methodology, that is more objective and feasible, as a decision tool. After two-phase survey that consists of paper survey and face to face meeting, we get a conclusion that home healthcare content is at the top and then wireless home network follows it.

• ETRI Journal
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.558-569
• /
• 2017

In this study, a non-preemptive M/G/1 queueing model of a spectrum handoff scheme for cognitive wireless networks is proposed. Because spectrum handoff gives secondary users an opportunity to carry on their transmissions, it is crucially important to determine the actions of primary users. In our queueing model, prioritized data traffic is utilized to meet the requirements of the secondary users. These users' packets are categorized into three different priority classes: urgent, real-time, and non-real time. Urgent data packets have the highest priority, while non-real time data packets have the lowest priority. Riverbed (OPNET) Modeler simulation software was used to simulate both reactive and proactive decision spectrum handoff schemes. The simulation results were consistent with the analytical results obtained under different load and traffic conditions. This study also revealed that the cumulative number of handoffs can be drastically decreased by exploiting priority classes and utilizing a decent spectrum handoff strategy, such as a reactive or proactive decision-based strategy.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.147-155
• /
• 2004

The goal of this paper is to offer a quantitative decision model using Quality Function Deployment(QFD). We consider the factors outsourcing that affect the benefits of the organization and the fifth alternatives that were selected to be considered for outsourcing as customer requirements and technical attributes in QFD. For selecting the outsourcing system, we compute the priority considering interdependencies among alternatives. Thus this paper propose a decision model, which uses the quality function deployment to help practitioners set priority and users in structuring the outsourcing problems.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.101-113
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study are to develop a SDSS (Spatial Decision Support System) that can incorporate diverse opinions of stakeholders related the designation of protected areas (PA), and to employ the model for the readjustment of the boundary line of the Jirisan National Park of Korea. The SDSS would lead to more rational and less controversial decision-making during the expansion or removal of PA in Korea. Research methods are as follows. Firstly, to select evaluation criteria for SDSS for PA designation by using expert interview and literature survey. Secondly, to measure their preferences on the designation of additional PA or the removal of a part of PA based on the opinions of various stakeholders such as local residents, environmental groups, or public officials. Thirdly, to produce conservation priority maps based on a multi-criteria decision making technique. The SDSS would be used to rational decision making for the expansion of PA or the release of a certain part of PA by reflecting diverse preferences on biodiversity conservation and economic interest of residents. The visualization of conservation priority maps would also increase the efficiency of such decision making processes. The evaluation criteria for the expansion of PA for biodiversity conservation includes vegetation conservation value, wildlife conservation value, and the habitats of key species. The evaluation criteria for the removal of PA includes the proximity to roads and the boundary of PA, land use types, and conservation zoning of the PA. Preference weights are based on data collected from the Jirisan National Park. Both the conservation priority and removal priority maps are based on land parcels so that property rights of all parcels would be correctly represented.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.161-166
• /
• 2011

This study proposes a priority model for program directors in charge of Corporate Social Contribution to make the best decision. This empirical analysis aims to discover the most significant area among various programs of Corporate Social Contribution Activities. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to test the priority model. The study attempts to demonstrate how the model helps providing better decision choices in corporate practices. The priority preference in Corporate Social Contribution Activities programs among corporate social contribution practitioners, PR professors and NGO activists are studied for their priority on corporate social contribution programs, among they valued com mon benefit social activity most important.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2008년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.41-50
• /
• 2008

The study proposes a priority model for program directors in charge of Corporate Social Contribution to make the best decision. This empirical analysis aims to discover the most significant area among various programs of Corporate Social Contribution Activities. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to test the priority model. The study attempts to demonstrate how the model helps providing better decision choices in corporate practices. The priority preference in Corporate Social Contribution Activities programs among corporate social contribution practitioners, PR professors and NGO activists is examined in order to present preferred programs of corporate social contribution programs, which they value the most as a part of overall social welfare.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.127-135
• /
• 2008

하수관거 개량사업의 주된 목적은 Inflow/Infiltration (I/I)를 제거 및 통수능력 확보이다. 최근 노후 하수관거의 개 보수 및 신설 사업이 활발히 이루어지고 있으나 현재의 사업들은 관거 데이터의 부족, 유량 및 수질 자료의 장기적인 측정 미비 등으로 인하여 효율적인 사업을 진행시키기에 무리가 있다. 본 연구에서는 하수관거 개량사업을 보다 효율적으로 진행시키기 위하여 Rehabilitation Weighting Model (RWM)과 Rehabilitation Priority Model (RPM)로 구성된 의사결정모형을 개발하였다. RWM은 시간 및 예산상의 제약으로 인하여 주요 지점에서만 관측되는 I/I를 상류의 각 관거별로 I/I를 산정하며, 관거별 I/I는 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)를 통하여 산정된 8개 결함항목별 가중치에 따라서 결정된다. RPM은 Genetic Algorithm (GA)를 이용하여 소유역별 최적개량우선순위를 산정한다. 이것은 공사 기간 중 발생하는 I/I를 최소화시키기 위한 소유역별 공사 순서를 설정함으로써 하수처리장의 처리비용을 절감시킴으로써 하수관거 개량사업의 효율적인 시행을 위한 판단 기준을 제시해준다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.93-111
• /
• 2020

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to observe the relative priorities of importances among the modified versions of Block chain system, being based on AHP decision support model which should be also proposed in this paper. Design/methodology/approach Four versions modified from the beginning of Block chain were divided into Public& Permissionless, Private&Permissionless, Public&Permissioned and Private&Permissioned types. Five criteria for evaluating the four versions whether the version were suitable for Medical information system were introduced from five factors of Technologies Accept Model, which were Security, Availability, Variety, Reliability and Economical efficiency. We designed Decision support model based on AHP which would select the best alternative version suitable for introducing the Block chain technology into the medical information systems. We established the objective of the AHP model into finding the best choice among the four modified versions. First low layer of the model contains the five factors which consisted of Security, Availability, Variety, Reliability and Economical efficiency. Second low layer of the model contains the four modified versions which consisted Public&Permissionless, Private&Permissionless, Public&Permissioned and Private& Permissioned types. The structural questionnaire based on the AHP decision support model was designed and used to survey experts of medical areas. The collected data by the question investigation was analyzed by AHP analysis technique. Findings The importance priority of Security was highest among five factors of Technologies Accept Mode in the first layer. The importance priority of Private&Permissioned type was highest among four modified versions of Block chain technologies in second low layer. The second importance priority was Private&Permissionless type. The strong point of Private&Permissioned type is to be able to protect personal information and have faster processing speeds. The advantage of Private& Permissionless type is to be also able to protect personal information as well as from forging and altering transaction data. We recognized that it should be necessary to develop new Block chain technologies that would enable to have faster processing speeds as well as from forging and altering transaction data.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.108-116
• /
• 2017

국내 교량은 공용 연수의 증가로 인하여 추후 유지관리 비용이 상당히 증가 될 것으로 예상된다. 이에 대응하여 정부와 관련 부처는 한정된 예산을 효율적으로 분배하고, 유지관리 우선순위를 합리적으로 선정할 수 있는 방법 개발에 집중하고 있다. 본 연구는 위험도기반의 유지관리 우선순위 선정 모델을 개발하기 위하여 교량의 파손을 야기하는 일반적인 위험 인자 14개를 선정하고, AHP분석을 수행하여 중요 인자 5개를 선별하였다. 기존 문헌 고찰과 전문가 자문을 통하여 선정된 인자에 대한 평가 기준, 영향도 가중치 등을 도출하였고 이를 활용하여 엑셀시트 기반의 위험도기반 우선순위 선정 기초 모델을 제시하였다. 본 모델을 기존의 유지관리 우선순위 선정 방법과 병행하여 사용한다면 보다 합리적인 교량 유지관리 우선순위를 도출 할 수 있을 것이다.