• 아동학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.191-211
• /
• 2001

This in-depth study of portfolio method centered on efficient methods of application, including teacher education. The study was carried out in 2 public kindergartens in Taegu. The efficient portfolio assessment method was developed by revisions after successive applications, observations, and discussions with the teachers of both kindergartens. The resulting efficient portfolio method is composed of step 1: portfolio conference and planning; step 2: development of the portfolio in the process of teaching and learning; step 3: selection of the materials for the portfolio; step 4: analysis of the portfolio; and step 5: use of the portfolio method. The practical application of the portfolio assessment is included in the forms used for teachers' observations of children's play and educational interventions. Teachers' interventions include verbal interaction, presentation of materials, and participating as partners. This teaching-learning method consists of teaching and assessment by sensitive and instant responses to children's needs.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.301-309
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to investigate the measuring range of portfolio assessment on students' abilities, using correlation coefficients of portfolio assessment with four other assessment methods. A portfolio system was developed based on low units of elementary fourth grade science, and applied to three fourth-grade science classes in Daejeon Metropolitan area and Gyunggi-do. Four different assessment methods, multiple-choice (short answer type), essay-type item, mind-mapping and laboratory assessment were also administered and scored by two elementary teachers attending graduate school. Correlation coefficients between portfolio assessment and four assessment methods were calculated with SPSS. Portfolio assessment showed moderate correlation with multiplechoice (short answer), essay-type, and mind-mapping, and low correlation with laboratory assessment. Portfolio assessment showed high correlation with multiple-choice assessment in 'understanding' and 'application' domains, but showed low correlation in 'recall' and 'inquiry' domains. In conclusion, portfolio assessment could measure various abilities measured by other assessment methods.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.43-56
• /
• 2000

Main feature of portfolio assessments is the integration between assessment and instruction. Based on this feature, we developed portfolio assessment regarding feedback fitted into elementary school science classes. The portfolio assessment model is consisted with three steps; the plan of assessment, the practice of portfolio assessment, and the application of assessment result. In the last step, feedbacks of the assessment result were represented to students. From this model, we inspect the possibility of application in elementary school science.

• Human Ecology Research
• /
• 제61권2호
• /
• pp.195-218
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study was to present a class case that verified the validity, reliability, and usefulness of a portfolio assessment in a cohousing class in the housing area of home economics. To achieve this objective, 241 male and female students in eight classes of the third grade of a junior high school in Gyeonggi-do, Korea, were enrolled in a project class on establishing a cohousing village in which the portfolio assessment method was applied for a total of 10 sessions for approximately four weeks from May 24 to June 16, 2021. To ensure the validity of the portfolio assessment, we designed the lesson after presenting the curriculum goals in detail using the backward design model and developed a specific rubric and conducted all evaluations and feedback based on the rubric to ensure objectivity and reliability. The online tool Padlet was used as a portfolio, which allowed students to easily upload their work, receive feedback from the teacher, and interact with their peers. After the class, the students reflected on the rubric and were generally satisfied with the class using portfolio assessment. This study is expected to facilitate the use of the portfolio assessment method in the classroom, while also supporting student growth and development.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 1998

Portfolio assessment provides many opportunities to foster children's creativity and to increase their responsibility for learning. few research study has been conducted in this area, and this assessment method has scarcely been administered in primary science class, Proper and effective use of portfolio assessment in our primary science class requires basic research on how to design and administer the method. Based on the earlier study on typical structures and components of portfolio assessment, the assessment instrument was developed on various primary science topics, The development team was consisted of one science education specialist and nine pre-service elementary school teachers. It takes ten months to develop instruments for 27 class hours. The development process was reciprocal in that development and revision cycle was repeated more than 7 times. The portfolio assessment instruments consist of instructional objectives, developers' evidence for the objectives, and assessment criteria. Adopting a new way of assessment into science class inevitably causes lots of confusions to teachers and children. The absence of basic research studies must be a critical barrier for successful administration of a new assessment method such as portfolio assessment. further research is required in the preparation and administration of portfolio assessment in our primary science classroom.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2001

The Purpose of this study is to find the effects of the portfolio assessment on elementary students' scientific knowledge, inquiry process skill, scientific attitudes in the teaching of science. And finally the parents' response to the portfolio assessment is also investigated. In order to reach the goal of this study, the investigator developed the evaluation instrument such as an experimental report and a cumulative observation sheet for the 4th-grade Unit-1 'Light Propagation' and Unit-3 'Separating Mixtures', and then these were administered to 42 4th-grade elementary students in Inchon. Based upon the findings and within the limitations of this study, several conclusions can be drawn regarding the problems investigated. First, as the portfolio assessment offers enough information about individual student's performance, it has a highly positive effect on evaluating the students' scientific knowledges. It can also make possible to grasp the several aspects of the student's progress. Second, the portfolio assessment can be implemented without giving students any psychological pressure from testing itself. Therefore, the portfolio assessment is an effective means of appraising inquiry process skills. Third, the portfolio assessment is effective to evaluate the students' attitude toward science by means of individual records which include such aspects that is hardly found by the teacher who teaches science in the class. Fourth, as most parents showed a positive response to this portfolio assessment, it is considered to be effective method of appraising the result of teaching science at elementary school. Accordingly, this study demonstrated that the portfolio assessment is an effective method that can assess students' scientific knowledges, inquiry process skills, and scientific attitudes gained from science teaching-learning. Therefore, it is necessary to implement the portfolio assessment to other grade students as well in the following study where teacher may give more encouragements and suggestions to sti dents for the better learning motives. Also teachers should suggest more definite evaluation criteria to students so that they may improve the students' self and peer evaluation skills.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.71-83
• /
• 2000

최근 교육평가의 논의에서 포트폴리오는 대안적 평가의 한 유형으로 부각되고 있다. 즉 포트폴리오 평가는 평가의 보편적인 접근과는 달리 학생들의 학습 활동을 전 시간에 걸쳐 수집하고 평가하는 혁신적인 평가 방법으로 대두된다. 특히 공학교육에서의 이러한 접근은 공학교육의 특성상 의미있는 접근이 되며, 이 연구에서는 공학교육에서의 포트폴리오의 평가의 개념을 논의하고 나아가 실제로 공학교육에서 포트폴리오를 평가에 적용할 수 있는 절차를 제안하는 것이었다. 이 연구의 탐색 결과는 학생들이 학습 목표를 도발하는데 서류화한 학생들의 활동 생산물을 수집하고 평가하는 유목적적, 체계적, 성찰적 과정으로 정의되며, 적용을 위한 절차는 포트폴리오의 목적, 내용, 평가, 활용의 네 단계를 제안하였다.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2006

교육에 있어 평가는 교육 주체뿐만 아니라 때로는 국민적인 관심사가 된다. 최근 교육인적자원부에서 제시하는 개혁안과 사회의 요구를 반영할 때, 숫자 하나로 학생의 모든 성취 정도를 나타내는 전통적인 검사 방법은 한계가 있다. 이에 따라 구성주의를 바탕으로 교육 평가 분야에 수행평가가 대두되었으며, 포트폴리오 (Portfolio)는 수행평가 철학을 구현하는 대표적이고 효율적인 한 방법이다. 포트폴리오 평가 기법의 많은 장점과 함께 단점 역시 지적되었는데, 물리적 공간과 비용의 문제 그리고 자료접근과 검색의 비효율성 등이 그것이다. 이런 포트폴리오의 단점을 극복하면서 학생들의 ICT (Information & Communication Technology) 활용능력 향상까지 도모할 수 있는 것이 전자 포트폴리오 (Electronic Portfolio) 평가 기법이다. 본 연구의 목적은 전자 포트폴리오 평가 절차 모형을 개발하고, 각 단계별로 지침이 될 수 있는 구체적인 활동을 제안하는 것이다. 개발된 포트폴리오 평가 절차 모형은 준비, 개발, 평가, 활용의 네 단계로 이루어져 있으며 각 단계별로 교사와 학생의 활동을 구분하여 제시하였다. 본 모형은 교사, 학생, 학부모에게 포트폴리오 평가에 대한 안내를 제공하고, 교사에게는 평가과정 전반에 걸친 지침을 제공할 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.23-34
• /
• 1997

For the balanced realization of these values of mathematical culture, we need to innovate mathematics classrooms, for which we need to make use of portfolio assessment. First, portfolio assessment can be regarded as a method of synthesizing a variety of resources for systematic evaluation. Second, portfolio assessment can be used as a tool of building up learners' positive attitude toward mathematics, by which we can identify the latent possibility of learners' development and help them develop confidence in mathematics. Third, portfolio assessment can play an important role as a tool for exploring the method of teaching and learning in which learners recognize the value of mathematics and are interested in mathematical activities, as we have seen in the report on the Gulliver's Travels Project.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 1999

이 연구의 주요 목적은 증거집(포트폴리오) 평가를 적용할 때 초등학교 학생들의 과학 지식, 탐구능력, 태도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고 학생들의 증거집 평가에 대한 인식을 조사하는 것이다. 비교집단은 충북 청원군 미원면의 M초등학교 4학년 45명이며, 실험집단은 대전광역시 G초등학교 4학년 36명이다. 사전 검사로 과학지식 검사1, 과학탐구능력검사, 과학 태도 검사를 두 집단에 실시하였다. 실험집단은 증거집 평가를 적용한 수업을 비교집단은 전통적인 수업을 약 6주 동안 실시하였다. 두 집단 모두 사후 검사로 과학지식 검사2, 과학 탐구능력검사, 과학 태도 검사를 실시하였다. 증거집 평가에 대한 인식 검사지를 실험집단에 실시하였다. 결과는 SPSS를 이용하여 통계적으로 분석하였다. 비교집단이 실험집단보다 과학 지식 검사에서 높은 성취를 보였다. 과학 탐구능력과 과학 태도에서는 의미있는 차이가 없었다. 하위 영역 분석 결과 과학적 태도에서 실험집단이 비교집단보다 통계적으로 유의미하게 높은 성취를 보였다. 학생들의 증거집 평가에 대한 인식은 매우 긍정적으로 나타났다. 학생들은 증거집 평가에 대한 흥미, 학습 참여도, 자기 주도적 학습, 고차적 사고, 앞으로 참여 의사 등과 같은 대부분의 하위 영역에서 긍정적인 반응을 보였다.