• Title/Summary/Keyword: Policy and Program evaluation

Search Result 397, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Policy Evaluation of the Large-scale Research Facility by Period: Focusing on PSL-II Accelerator (대형연구시설 정책의 시기별 평가: 3세대 방사광가속기를 중심으로)

  • Yun, Sujin
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.285-311
    • /
    • 2017
  • PSL-II Accelerator is a large-scale research facility located in Pohang, which was established in 1988 and operated since 1995. It is a program to be promoted to contribute to basic science research in Korea by applying it to cutting-edge research in the field of basic and applied science. It is estimated that around KRW 787.9 billion was invested for construction and operation in the near-30-year period until 2016. Although there have been various evaluations of the need, importance and effectiveness of accelerator in relation to the accelerator policy, most of them emphasize the successful outcome of the present time and suggest the government's need for sustained support in the future or suggest policy implications for improving the policy in a comprehensive manner. And there was no systematic analysis of the results on a comprehensive review or the various policy evaluations of the accelerator policy. In this study, three stages of PSL-II accelerator program were evaluated, and five main criteria of policy activity were considered. The purpose of this study is to suggest the policy implications related to the principles of policy activity which is essential in construction and operation of similar large-scale research facilities in addition to PSL-II accelerator.

Economic Evaluation of Vaccinations - a Methodologic Review (예방접종의 경제성 평가방법과 사례)

  • Chun, Byung Chul
    • Pediatric Infection and Vaccine
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.20-29
    • /
    • 2008
  • The basis of the economic evaluation of vaccination is the balance between the use of the resources (input) and the improvements that result from the vaccination (output). Techniques used for economic evaluation of vaccination are cost analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis. Cost analysis seeks to characterize the costs of a given vaccination program. Cost-effective analysis is to helps policy-makers decide on the best use of allocated resources, whether cost-benefit analysis is to helps policy-makers decide on the overall allocation of resources. Cost-utility analysis is a specific form of cost-effective analysis in which outcomes are reduced to a common denominator such as the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) or disability-adjusted life year (DALY). Many economic analyses have been conducted on vaccines in the world, but there have been a little studies on economic evaluation on vaccines in Korea. This paper reviewed the methodology used to economic evaluation on vaccines and immunizations and addressed some examples of the methods.

  • PDF

A Research on the development of evaluation model for the government's recognition regarding the program accrediting organizations in Higher Education (고등교육 프로그램 평가인증기관의 정부인정 평가모형 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Kyung-Soo;Hwang, Myung-Ku;Lee, Tae-Hee
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.87-98
    • /
    • 2012
  • The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology has been implementing the government's recognition project regarding the program accrediting organizations in Higher Education. This research is to establish an evaluation model for the government's recognition process of the program accrediting organizations, and develop the evaluation categories, items and indices for the model. The research has set the concept for the government's recognition regarding the program accrediting organizations and designed an evaluation model for such organizations. The evaluation model embraces a preliminary evaluation process, assessing an eligibility of the accrediting organizations for the higher education based on the formalities set forth for the government recognition organization accrediting process. It also includes the main evaluation process, which assess the eligibility based on the evaluation standards stipulated in the associated legislation and regulations. In addition, through in-depth verification processes by experts, this research finalized 2 evaluation domains, 5 evaluation categories, 24 evaluation items and 33 evaluation indices.

Analysis research about awareness of demanders of recuperation allowance for dental clinic health insurance in Daejun and Chunchung area (대전·충청지역 치과건강보험 요양급여비용 청구자의 인식도 분석조사)

  • Kim, Sung-Hee;Kim, Min-Ja;Nam, Yong-Ok
    • Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.275-289
    • /
    • 2011
  • Objectives : The recognition rate for issues and improving resolution for the recuperation income expense claim policy was examined. Methods : 1,135 copies of survey have been sent to the group of people who have claimed the dental recuperation income expense to dental recuperation institutions in Daejeon, Chungcheong Do that are registered to the health insurance evaluation and estimation office as of the May 2010 and 207 surveys that were regarded to be sincere for answering were analyzed. Results : Majority of respondence were belonged to the dentist institutions with more than 5 years of claim experiences as well as 10~50% of claim rate. The recognition of medical fee evaluation guideline was normal level, and negative recognition was higher to the health center with daily charge policy compare to the dental hospital and university affiliated dental center with treatment charge policy, Highest opinion for inappropriateness of dentist with significance was found (p<0.05). The openness of evaluation cases are regarded to be discharged through the transparent evaluation and most of the opinions for insurance claim evaluation adjustment are within the both 'Do not understand the evaluation guideline and program error of disease category, code and program' with significance(p<0.05). The reaction after the evaluation adjustment was high in reflection on the claim process after examining the reason for the evaluation adjustment through the evaluation and estimation office and university affiliated dental institution and dental center was regarded to be most active and deputy reclaimment was seemed to be most actively discharge the objection registration task (p<0.05). The claim error improving resolution recognition was highly prioritized to the accurate charting for the disease title and treatment description, improving the setting of claim program, and most highly recognized by the university affiliated dental hospital/dental center and comparably low by health center(p<0.05). and although the most of the responds of treatment description and browsing the medical fee was positive, 50% of dentists disagreed the idea so that this was creating a significant discrepancy with other groups(p<0.05). Conclusions : From this research, the recognition of medical fee evaluation guideline for dental (university) hospital and dentists were negative and high adjustment experience was examined as lacking of evaluation guideline understanding and error of disease name, code and programs and deputy reclaimment, university affiliated dental hospital/dental center were most actively handle the objection registration tasks and dentists have objection on the treatment description and browsing the treatment fee so that if these indexes can be referred to implement into the recuperation income claim process, this can be regarded to be a opportunity to create mutual credibility between recuperation institution, treatment pensioner and the evaluation institutions.

Opinions of Hospital Staffs on the Korean Hospital Standardization Program and Its Criteria for Quality Activities (병원표준화심사의 질 향상 관련 항목에 대한 평가와 개선방안)

  • Kim, Chang-Yup;Lee, Sang-Il;Lee, Kun-Sei;Shin, Young-Soo
    • Quality Improvement in Health Care
    • /
    • v.2 no.1
    • /
    • pp.126-135
    • /
    • 1995
  • Background: Korean Hospital Standardization Program(KHSP), as a hospital accreditation program initiated and promoted by Korean Hospital Association since 1981, has played a key role in the hospital quality improvement in structural aspect particularly. Recently, however, KHSP has been critisized by hospitals and health personnels in that it is unpractical to be utilized as an initiative to improve hospital quality. In particular, the section of quality assurance in KHSP, strongly influenced by old version of Hospital Accreditation of Joint Commission in U.S.A., has been required to be fundamentally revised. For design of new criteria in quality assurance section, a survey for evaluation of existing program and collection of opinions for ideal one was conducted. Methods: For a month in 1994, structured questionnaires were administered by mailing to 470 hospital staffs from 200 hospitals, participated in the survey for the 1994 KHSP in each hospital. The total number of respondents was 116. Results: Less than half of the respondents(34.5%) value positively on the impact of current KHSP in general on the quality improvement of their hospitals. Moreover, most responses indicated that KHSP should be reorganized towards more practical and applicable one. Current KHSP criteria for quality activities in hospitals were regarded as a unpractical one which should be basically renewed. For new criteria and standards, most respondents emphasized the importance of applicability of those in real situations. Conclusion: For the KHSP to be effective, new evaluation criteria for quality activities should be more practical and fully accommodated to hospital situations in reality.

  • PDF

Common Criteria of statistics using DEVS Modeling (DEVS 모델링을 이용한 보안제품 공동평가 통계)

  • Lee, Ki Sung;Kim, Tae Kyung;Seo, Hee Suk
    • Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management
    • /
    • v.6 no.2
    • /
    • pp.71-80
    • /
    • 2010
  • This thesis is purposed on developing security product co-evaluation statistics administrate program which is can administrate or analysis CC accreditation product using by DEVS modeling via portal site of member of CCRA. Via developing security product evaluation statistics administrate program, it can analysis the trend of all countries of the world in many ways, and noticed the ways of evaluation and accreditation of most countries via scheme analysis. Except this, it can analysis the situation of accreditation trend of any countries via data analysis of ICCC 2009. Also, For trend analysis to evaluation technique of CCRA member, it analyzed up to date technology and policy of the evaluation organization and the Certification Authority of most countries. And it peformed analysis the most trend of information security of evaluation authorization in CCRA member countries. In this program, It provide the function of trend statistics analysis which can statically analyzed the evaluation accreditation trends of most countries and automatical statistics by categorization ( by Product, Class and statistics in national) and report creation functions which can easily extraction and use the needed data. It has been updated the related informations until latest accredited product using by CC(Common Criteria) portal home page's data.

A Study on Developing Science Service of Science and Technology Policy (과학기술 정책의 과학화 서비스 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Shin, Mun-Bong;Chun, Seung-Su;WhangBo, Taeg-Keun
    • Journal of Information Technology Services
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.83-92
    • /
    • 2012
  • The development of science and technology oriented knowledge society accelerates the convergence between scientific theory and industrial technology and increases the complexity problem of social and economic sectors. These cause the difficulty of securing the reliability and objectivity of science and technology policy. These also are barriers of balanced evaluation between rational science and technology policy making, management, and policy coordination. In this regard, Advanced countries in science and technology develops policy support system and promotes the program of evidence-based SciSIP(Science of Science and Innovation policy) together. This paper introduces a new approach developing science service of science and technology policy utilizing business intelligence technology in Korea. Also, it proposes the integration method of policy knowledge base and component-based service supporting S&T policy decision-making process and introduces services case studies.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and the Level of Self-Management Support on the Metabolic Syndrome Management Program at Public Health Centers in Seoul Metropolitan City (서울시 보건소 대사증후군관리사업의 효과와 자가관리 지원수준 평가)

  • Kim, Dong-Ok
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.29 no.1
    • /
    • pp.19-26
    • /
    • 2019
  • Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the level of self-management support on the Metabolic Syndrome Management Program at public health centers in Seoul metropolitan city. Methods: The effectiveness on the Metabolic Syndrome Management Program were analyzed using secondary data from 1,312 community residents who were receiving program. The level of self-management support on Metabolic Syndrome Management Program was evaluated using an 'Assessment of Primary Care Resources and Supports for Chronic Disease Self-Management' from four public health centers. Results: The effectiveness on the Metabolic Syndrome Management Program was showed that decreased smoking (p= 0.044) and drinking (p< 0.001), and increased healthy dietary habit (p< 0.001) in health behaviors. It was showed that decreased triglyceride (p= 0.002) and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p< 0.001) in clinical indicators. The level of self-management support on Metabolic Syndrome Management Program was 98.1 points and it meaned that implementation is done in an organized and consistent manner using a team approach. There was difference in the level of self-management support by public health centers (p= 0.003). Conclusion: The Metabolic Syndrome Management Program in public health centers was effective, and level of self-management support was done as organizational level, but patient input and mental health were insufficient.

Evaluation on the implementation of the immunization registry program at the Public Health Centers (보건소 예방접종 전산프로그램의 운영 현황 분석)

  • 이건세;이석구;이무식;신의철;김영택;이연경
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-84
    • /
    • 2003
  • Immunization has been one of the most effective measures preventing from infectious diseases. However, children routine vaccination rate of Korea was 68.2% and it was not higher than expected. Korean government revised the School Health Law for every primary school children to submit the vaccination certificate record from 2005. It is quite important national Infectious disease prevention policy to keep the immunizations rate high and monitor the immunizations rate continuously. To do this, National Institute of Health introduced the National Immunization Registry(NIR) Program at 2000. Objective : The aims of this study was to evaluate the Immunization Registry program which has been implementing since 2000 at the Public Health Centers(PHC). Methods : The mail survey was done from November 2001 to January 2002. 169 (69%) Public Health Centers among 244 PHC were responded. Results : The respondents of PHC sud the Immunization Registry(IR) program had reduced the workload (18.5%). 69.2% said they inputted the immunization data into the IR program after the shots were given. 86.5% said they hadn´t checked or retrieved the children lists who had missed the scheduled immunization. Only 17.2% said the speed of internet for the R program was good. It showed that 20% of respondents hadn´t written down documents, records on immunization any more. Even there were a lot of negative results, the respondents of PHC thought that the IR program was effective. They especially agreed that the IR program could make the job accurate (81.5%), convenient (71.3%), and reduced the chances of making mistakes (71.3%), increase the service quality (78.5%). And they were well adapting the job process of the IR (79.63%). Bivariate analysis showed that the software program was the important determinants of IR success. The only Bit Computer software program has been evaluated to be less satisfactory than the Integrated (Posdata operating system + Bit software) program. Other variables, such as age, duration of present job, and location of PHC (metropolitan, small city, rural area) were not significantly related. Conclusion : It seemed that the success of NIR might depend on the software program. Because Integrated program, which has been developed from 1994, include not only the general operating and management program for PHC but also IR program. It was natural to prefer Integrated program to Bit software program. So we can suggest that it is essential for the NIR to be successful that not only the immunization software program but also hardware equipments and public health information system should be further improved.

Determination of Strategic Business Units in the Health Promotion Service Adreas of Health Center (보건소 건강증진사업에서의 전략적 사업영역 결정)

  • 이선희;조희숙;박혜숙;박영숙;김한중;손명세;이지전;이상욱
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.8 no.2
    • /
    • pp.110-124
    • /
    • 1998
  • Determining of Strategic Business Units in the organization is a major critical process for improving the organizational performance. On increasing the demands for extension in function of health center, many health centers are trying to provide the various services. But most health center determined the kind and level of service without scientific considerations. The purposes of this study are to develope the model for determination of strategic business units in health center and to test the availability of implementation for it. Our model is rooted from the McKinsey matrix analysis of Product Portfolio Analysis which used widely in marketing field. We modified the evaluation criteria of the McKinsey matrix analysis for health care field appropriately. Our evaluation criteria are categorized into two concepts; contribution of service, availability of service. At first, in terms of contribution of service, market size, market growth rate, needs and demands of regional people, existences of alternative services in that region, correspondence with health policy. The other component, availability of service are included the availability of manpower, financial availability, the level of knowhow on service, acceptance of health care manpower. In the result of analysis, we could conclude that antismoking and antialcoholics education programs, health screening program are important strategically in that aspects of contributions and availability of services. Also, vaccination program is important in that aspect of service availability and diet and exercise program, health library are meaningful in the aspect of service contribution. Therefore, we think that efforts to investigate the evaluation criteria for priority setting or determination of service area in health center are useful challenges.

  • PDF