• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2022

개방형동료심사는 투고된 학술논문을 투명하게 심사할 목적으로 심사자의 신원, 심사의견, 심사결과를 저자를 포함한 일반 독자에게 공개하는 심사 방식이다. 개방형동료심사 인식에 관한 선행연구가 진행되었지만, 국내 과학기술 분야 학술지 편집담당자 관점에서 이러한 인식을 조사하고 분석한 연구는 찾아볼 수 없었다. 구체적으로, 학술지 편집위원의 개방형동료심사 적용 의향, 적용 시기 및 새로운 심사 방식을 채택할 때 예상되는 도전과 기회, 개방형동료심사 지원을 위한 투고심사시스템 요구사항에 관한 조사 및 분석은 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 논문은 개방형동료심사에 대한 학술지 편집담당자의 인식을 조사하고 이러한 심사를 편리하게 지원하는 투고심사시스템의 핵심적인 요구사항을 이해하기 위해, 설문문항 준비, 설문조사 실시, 응답 결과를 분석하였다. 또한, 일부 과학기술 학술지 편집위원장을 대상으로 개방형동료심사에 관한 표적집단인터뷰를 수행하였다. 이후, 개방형동료심사 인식에 관한 본 연구의 분석 결과, 표적집단인터뷰 결과 및 국외 유사 설문조사 사례를 비교, 분석하고 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구 결과는 국내 학술단체에서 새로운 논문심사 방식의 정책 수립 및 시행, 투고심사시스템의 개방형동료심사를 위한 기능 탑재 및 선택 등의 의사결정에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.538-542
• /
• 2022

Performing the first peer review of a plastic surgical research article can be an overwhelming task. However, it is an essential scholarly skill and peer review is used in a multitude of settings: evaluation of journal articles, conference abstracts, and research proposals. Furthermore, peer reviewing provides more than just the opportunity to read and help improve other's work: peer reviewing can improve your own scientific writing. A structured approach is possible and recommended. In these ten tips, we provide guidance on how to successfully conduct the first peer reviews. The ten tips on peer reviewing concern: 1) Appropriateness: are you qualified and prepared to perform the peer review? 2) Familiarization with the journal and its reviewing guidelines; 3) Gathering first impressions of the paper followed by specific tips for reviewing; 4) the abstract and introduction; 5) Materials, methods, and results (including statistical considerations); and 6) discussion, conclusion, and references. Tip 7 concerns writing and structuring the review; Tips 7 and 8 describe how to provide constructive criticism and understanding the limits of your expertise. Finally, Tip 10 details why-and how-you become a peer reviewer. Peer review can be done by any plastic surgeon, not just those interested in an academic career. These ten tips provide useful insights for both the aspiring and the experienced peer reviewer. In conclusion, a systematic approach to peer reviewing is possible and recommended, and can help you getting started to provide quality peer reviews that contribute to moving the field of plastic surgery forward.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.261-276
• /
• 2005

Peer review is a well-known, pervasive and most reliable method for assessment of research proposals. But with the strength of peer review, it also has some various limitations and shortcomings. This study suggests the use of bibliometric indicators as a counterbalance of shortcomings and mistakes in peer review. Bibliometric indicators suggested in this study are somewhat different from the conventional ones. Bibliometric indicators with limited number of papers, use of impact factor and discrimination first and corresponding authors from co-authors may produce a more resonable indicators. In this way bibliometric indicators can be considered as complementary to a peer review.

• Toxicological Research
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2004

Evaluation of toxicological pathology is to some extend subjective judgments by pathologist and the accuracy of pathologist's works is based on the individual training and experiences. It has been required to establish a peer review system for toxicologic pathology and these review system has been employed by various practice of toxicological pathology. It would be pointed out that the possible causes of drifts in pathology are due to 1) lack of knowledge or experience of individual pathologists, 2) poorly maintained consistence of grading among animals in study, 3) different interpretation of findings between pathologists, or 4) pathology data processing. Example cases of diagnostic errors and current practice of peer review including tissue selection criteria, documentation and problem resolution for short-term and carcinogenicity studies were introduced. For sound regulatory system and high integrity of practice in toxicological pathology, current approaches of peer review system were reviewed.

• Journal of Korean Medical Science
• /
• 제33권46호
• /
• pp.287.1-287.14
• /
• 2018

Integrity of authorship and peer review practices are important considerations for ethical publishing. Criteria for authorship, as delineated in the guidelines by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), have undergone evolution over the decades, and now require fulfillment of four criteria, including the need to be able to take responsibility for all aspects of the manuscript in question. Although such updated authorship criteria were published nearly five years ago, still, many major medical and specialist journals have yet to revise their author instructions to conform to this. Inappropriate authorship practices may include gift, guest or ghost authorship. Existing literature suggests that such practices are still widely prevalent, especially in non-English speaking countries. Another emerging problem is that of peer review fraud, mostly by authors, but also rarely by handling editors. There is literature to suggest that a proportion of such fake peer review may be driven by the support of some unscrupulous external editing agencies. Such inappropriate practices with authorship malpractices or disagreement, or peer review fraud, have resulted in more than 600 retractions each, as identified on the retractions database of Retractionwatch.com. There is a need to generate greater awareness, especially in authors from non-English speaking regions of the world, about inappropriate authorship and unethical practices in peer review. Also, support of any external editing agency should be clearly disclosed by authors at the time of submission of a manuscript.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.159-184
• /
• 2017

OECD는 투자위원회를 중심으로 각국 NCP들이 OECD 가이드라인을 효과적으로 이행하기 위한 일환으로 NCP 간 동료평가(Peer Review)를 강조하는 추세이다. 각 NCP로서는 동료평가가 자발적인 성격이라고는 하지만 부정적인 평가를 받게 되는 경우 국제적으로 많은 비난을 받을 소지가 크고 국가 이미지에도 심각한 타격을 입을 가능성이 높다. 더군다나 지난 2017년 3월, 기업책임경영에 관한 작업반(Working Party on Responsible Business Conduct) 회의에서 한국 NCP에 대하여 2019년 동료평가를 시행하기로 결정하였다. 이에 본 논문에서는 NCP 동료학습의 의의와 현황, 최근 시행되었던 덴마크와 벨기에 동료평가 사례들을 검토함으로써 우리 정부가 2019년 동료평가에 어떻게 대비해야 하는지 정책적 제언을 하고 있다.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.376-381
• /
• 2009

일반적으로 프로젝트를 수행하는 과정에서 적절한 기술 계획에 따라 진척도 및 성과에 대한 기술검토를 규칙적으로 실시하게 된다. 그러나 일정 시점에서 수행되는 기술검토를 진행하는 과정에서 불명확한 진척도 및 성과 보고, 의견의 불일치, 시간지연 등 여러 가지 문제가 발생한다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 규칙적인 기술검토 이전에 동료검토를 진행하게 된다. 본 연구에서는 연구개발을 수행하는 과정에 활용되는 효과적인 동료검토 프로세스를 개발하였으며, 추가적으로 동료검토에 관한 일반적인 오해와 개선방안에 대해 서술하였다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.494-512
• /
• 2010

전 세계적으로 융복합 지향적 연구활동이 강화됨에 띠라 연구분야의 다양성과 새로운 연구분야의 개척은 물론 국가간 협력을 통한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 이러한 새로운 형태의 연구가 계속 발굴되고 있는데 반해 그 연구를 정확히 평가하고 객관적으로 검증하는 방법에는 한계가 있는 현실이다. 동료평가(peer Review)만으로는 정확한 연구과제 평가가 제한적이라는 인식이 확대되고 있으나 이를 보완할 객관적인 평가방법의 제사는 아직 실증적으로 검증되지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 최근 새롭게 추진된 국가연구개발사업에 동료평가와 신규 계량지표에 의한 평가를 적용하여 그 결과의 반영비율 및 상관도를 측정하였다. 그 결과 계량지표의 적용이 실증적으로 유의미한 결과를 갖는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.106-113
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to identify factors associated with effective peer-assisted learning (PAL) for nursing students. This review examined studies on PAL in nursing education. The literature was searched using terms including 'nursing & peer assisted learning,' 'nursing & peer learning,' and 'nursing & peer teaching.' Potentially relevant research on PAL was identified, and 12 studies were determined to meet the inclusion criteria. This review includes five qualitative, three mixed-methods, and three experimental studies published on the topic. In the studies reviewed, practicum classes were found to use PAL the most. Students of the same age were most commonly the subjects of PAL, as indicated in six papers. PAL has been suggested to affect participants' knowledge, self-efficacy, confidence, and anxiety. The findings indicate that interactions between peers promote learning and lead to mutually positive responses, which provide opportunities for self-development. Finally, students' learning outcomes improve and their confidence in their knowledge and skills increases as they experience the role of student nurse. These findings indicate that PAL can be utilized as an efficient learning method in nursing education programs. However, effective strategies for using PAL to achieve learning objectives and maximize learning outcomes are needed.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.195-208
• /
• 2009

The main body of research literature on peer relations has focused on its effects on children's psychosocial and emotional development from preschool period to adolescence. Topics of the research generally consist of peer acceptance/rejection, friendships, and peer victimization. In the review of domestic and international research conducted since late 1990, research trends and issues are described in this paper. Findings suggest some measures in interventions, prevention, and policies in promoting positive peer relations. Some social skill trainings are needed for children to react appropriately in peer relations and get along with their peers. In addition, there is a need for differentiation of the intervention programs by participants' roles in bullying situations and gender of children. Moreover, a longitudinal research is required to enhance the understanding of developmental changes in peer relations.