• The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences
• /
• v.36 no.5A
• /
• pp.495-501
• /
• 2011

IEFT proposed MIPv6 for supporting IP movement. Mobile Node is involved signaling that cause handover latency in MIPv6. Recently, Proxy Mobile IPv6 is proposed by IETF for network-based mobility management to reduce overhead in mobile node still suffers from packet loss. PMIPv6 can decrease handover latency which related overhead in MN by using network agent. Therefore, MIPSHOP Working Group proposed fast handover for PMIPv6, fu this paper, we proposed packet bicasting scheme on dual interface mobile node that can support fast handover using PMIPv6 schemes. Further, a numerical analysis is provided to show the benefits of our scheme. In the analysis, various parameters are used to compare our scheme with another procedure.

• Journal of KIISE:Information Networking
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.301-310
• /
• 2008

In the existing literature, the handover process reveals numerous problems manifested by high movement detection latency. FMIPv6 can reduce packet loss using a tunnel-based handover mechanism. However, this mechanism may cause performance degradation due to the out-of-sequence packets. Recently. Proxy Mobile IPv6 is proposed for network-based mobility management to reduce overhead in mobile node. PMIPv6 can decrease handover latency which related overhead in MN by using network agent. In this paper, we proposed optimized fast handover scheme called Fast Proxy Mobile IPv6 (EF-PMIPv6). The proposed EF-PMIPv6 can support fast handover using fast IAPP and ND schemes. Further, a mathematical analysis is provided to show the benefits of our scheme. In the analysis, various parameters are used to compare our scheme with the current procedures, while our approach focuses on the reduction of handover latency.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.773-776
• /
• 2008

최근 WiBro, HSDPA 등의 무선 네트워크 기술의 급격한 발달과 휴대용 기기의 놀라운 성능향상으로 인해 이동 중에도 네트워크 연결성을 잃지 않기 위한 기술이 요구 되고 있다. 이러한 요구사항을 위한 IP 계층에서의 해결책을 보인 기술이 Mobile IP이다. Mobile IP 기술에는 호스트 기반의 이동성을 제공하는 MIPv6, FMIPv6, HMIPv6 등의 기술과 네트워크 기반의 이동성을 제공하는 PMIPv6 등이 IETF에서 RFC와 드래프트 문서를 통해 제시되었다. 각각의 네트워크 도메인은 이러한 이동성 관리 기술을 채택하여 이동성을 제공하는데 각 기술 간의 상호연동에 있어 몇 가지 문제점이 있다. 본 논문은 호스트 기반 이동성 관리 기술의 대표인 MIPv6와 네트워크 기반 이동성 관리 기술인 PMIPv6 간의 상호연동을 위하여 PMIPv6 네트워크를 식별하기 위한 새로운 방안을 제시하고 MIPv6와 PMIPv6가 상호연동하는 시나리오를 제시한다. 본 논문이 제안한 새로운 PMIPv6 Indication 방법과 시나리오는 이동 기기가 다양한 특성을 지닌 도메인 간을 로밍할 때 효율적으로 상호연동할 수 있다.

• The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences
• /
• v.38A no.4
• /
• pp.337-349
• /
• 2013

In this paper, we propose a new mobility management scheme, called i-FP(intelligent Fast PMIPv6). Our proposed i-FP scheme is addressed for solving the existing local mobility management problems from legacy frameworks. To move MN(Mobile Node) to other networks in one domain, i-FP employs three network entities which are extended from PMIPv6(Proxy Mobile IPv6), LMA(Local Mobility Anchor), MAG(Mobile Access Gateway) and MN. In i-FP, the three network entities can reduce the handover delay time of MNs. Also, i-FP uses an IP header swapping mechanism to avoid the traffic overhead and improve the throughput of network. To evaluate the performance of i-FP, we analyze our i-FP, HMIPv6(Hierarchical Mobile IPv6) and PMIPv6 which are legacy protocols of local mobility management in terms of various parameters. Finally, our i-FP scheme shows good performance(reduction of routing hops 10.2%, signaling costs 58.5% and handover delay 16.3%) than other network schemes for the total cost.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartC
• /
• v.18C no.6
• /
• pp.405-412
• /
• 2011

Our proposed mobility management scheme is based on Multicasting and HIP(Host Identity Protocol) in PMIPv6(Proxy Mobile IPv6) Networks, and allows users to handoff within and across different administrative domains. The main advantage of our scheme is to enable the inter-domain handoff of both types of nodes with a reduced signalling overhead and packet losses. Specifically, the scheme enables the interworking between host-based and network-based mobility support, by means of the interaction between PMIPv6 with Multicasting and HIP. Performance evaluations demonstrate that our scheme improves the handoff latency and packet losses compared to other global mobility management protocols.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartC
• /
• v.18C no.2
• /
• pp.111-118
• /
• 2011

Recently, with the popularity of smartphones, an interest in multi-networking service through wireless multi-interface of a mobile node is increased. Also, wireless networking technology for using wireless multi-interface has been studied. As the related work, in the IETF Netext WG, the extension of PMIPv6 protocol for multi-interface support is being discussed. Existing PMIPv6 protocol includes the functions for simultaneous access over multi-interfaces of a mobile node and inter-technology handover between multi-interfaces of the mobile node. However, in case of the existing protocol, the problem occurs when inter-technology handover is performed after simultaneous access on the PMIPv6 domain, this problem is the discontinuous of simultaneous connections. Therefore, the PMIPv6 Protocol cannot support flow based multi-homing service. In this paper, as a way to solve the problem, Hybrid Home Network Prefix scheme is proposed.

• Journal of Digital Contents Society
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.341-348
• /
• 2010

Unlike host-based IPv6 mobility support protocols such as Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6), and Fast handover for Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6), Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is expected to accelerate the real deployment of IPv6 mobility support protocol by using only collaborative operations between the network entities without mobile node (MN) being involved. In this paper, we analyze and compare the handover latency of network-based IPv6 mobility support protocol (i.e., PMIPv6) with the representative host-based IPv6 mobility support protocols such as MIPv6, HMIPv6, and FMIPv6. Analytical results show that the handover latency of PMIPv6 is considerably lower than those of MIPv6 and HMIPv6, and the handover latency of PMIPv6 becomes lower than that of FMIPv6 in case the wireless link delay is greater than the delay between mobile access gateway (MAG) and local mobility anchor (LMA).

• Journal of Digital Contents Society
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.283-290
• /
• 2013

The current centralized mobility control protocols such as proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) are dependent on a central mobility anchor to process all control/data traffic. However, such centralized mobility control protocols have some drawbacks such as traffic concentration into the core network and serious service degradation in case of the failure of such a centralized mobility anchor, etc. In this paper, therefore, in order to alleviate these drawbacks, we propose a PMIPv6-based distributed mobility control scheme considering a user's movement locality. Performance evaluation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme has apparent potentials to alleviate serious drawbacks of S-PMIP, which is a closely-related distributed mobility control scheme, as well as PMIPv6, while reducing the total mobility control cost.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.1344-1367
• /
• 2014

Mobile traffic is increasing a masse because of the propagation of the Internet and the development of wireless mobile technology. Accordingly, the Network Local Mobility Management (NETLMM) working group [1] of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has standardized Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) [2] as a protocol for accomplishing the transmissibility of mobile terminals. PMIPv6 is a network-led IP-based mobility management protocol, which can control terminal mobility without depending on the type of access system or the capability of the terminal. By combining PMIPv6 and the mobility of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), we can establish terminal mobility and session mobility through a more effective route. The mobility function can be improved and the overlap of function reduced as compared to that in the case of independent operation. PMIPv6 is appropriate for a non-real-time service using TCP, and SIP is appropriate for a real-time service using RTP/UDP. Thus, in the case of a terminal using both services, an effective mobility management is possible only by using PMIPv6 together with SIP. In order to manage mobility in this manner, researches on PMIPv6-SIP are in progress. In line with this trend, this paper suggests a new PMIPv6-SIP architecture where when a mobile terminal conducts a handover, a network-led handover while maintaining the session without the addition of a special function or middleware is possible along with effective performance evaluation through mathematical modeling by comparing the delay and the packet loss that occur during the handover to the Pure-SIP.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2007.10d
• /
• pp.205-209
• /
• 2007

한 접속망 (Access Network) 내에서 이동 노드의 이동성을 지원하는 협역 이동성에 대한 많은 연구가 진행되었다. 최근, 이동 노드에 이동성 프로토콜 스택의 탑재 없이도 협역 이동성을 지원하는 연구 즉, 이동 노드에 투영한 협역 이동성 연구인 Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6)가 IETF NetLMM WG에서 표준화가 진행되고 있다. 현재 3GPP, WiMAX 등의 이동통신 표준화 단체들은 PMIPv6를 이동통신 접속망을 위한 표준 이동성으로 채택하고 있다. 즉, 이러한 차세대 이동망 구조를 채택하는 통신 사업자들은 PMIPv6의 이동성을 채택할 것이다. 따라서, 이러한 이동통신 사업자들간의 이동성인 로밍도 PMIPv6를 그 골간으로 하게 될 것이다. 향후 이동통신 시장은 다양한 이동통신 사업자들이 자유롭게 경쟁하는 구조를 가질 것이며, 이들간 로밍이 빈번하게 이루어질 것으로 예상된다. 하지만, 현재 PMIPv6간의 이동성인 로밍은 구체적인 표준화 과정이 진행되고 있지 않으며, 광역 이동성을 위한 MIPv6 채택을 고려하고 있다 즉, 로밍을 하기 위해서는 PMIPv6로의 이동임에도 탈구하고 이동 노드에 MIPv6 스택을 요구한다. 본 논문에서는 PMIPv6를 채택하는 이동 사업자들간의 이동성인 로밍의 경우 이동 노드에 특별한 이동성 프로토콜 스택을 탑재하지 않은 이동 노드에 투명한 로밍 방안을 제시한다.