• Advances in Energy Research
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.13-33
• /
• 2013

The present work is an attempt to provide an overview, about the status of R&D and current trends in Hydrogen Production using High Temperature Reactors. Bibliographic references from the INIS database, the Science Direct database and the NTIS database were downloaded and analyzed. Ten year data on the subject, published between 2001 and 2010, was selected for the study. Appropriate qued ry formulations on these databases, resulted in the retrieval of 621 unique bibliographic records. Using the content analysis method, all the records were analyzed. Part One of the analysis details Scientometric R&D indicators, Part Two is a subject-based analysis, grouped under: A. International Initiatives and Programmes for Hydrogen Production; B. European R&D initiatives for Hydrogen production; C. National Initiatives and Programmes for Nuclear Hydrogen Production; D. Reactor Technologies for Nuclear Hydrogen production; E. Fuel Developments; F. Hydrogen Production Processes using HTRs and G. Materials Consideration for Nuclear Hydrogen Production. The results of this analysis are summarized in the study.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1997년도 제11회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.247-265
• /
• 1997

1996년부터 우리나라 국가연구개발사업에 PBS(Project Base System)를 전면도입, 시행함에 따라 국가목표에 따른 정부예산의 효율적 배분과 경쟁원리에 의한 연구수주와 관련하여 효율성 개념이 강조되고 있다. 관련 사업규정에 의하여 제공되고 있는 현행정보는 목표달성도 중심의 효과성 평가에는 적합하게 구성되어 있으므로 효율성 평가를 적용하는데 다소 문제가 있다. 그러므로, 국가연구개발사업의 성과평가에서 효과성과 효율성을 함께 평가하기 위해서는 현행정보에 대한 보완이 필요하며, 이를 위해서는 미국 정부회계기준위원회(GASB) 개념보고서에서 제시한 바 있는 SEA(Service Efforts and Accomplishments) 정보를 도입·적용하는 것이 바람직할 것이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 SEA정보에 관련된 선행연구결과를 소개하고, 아울러 국가연구개발사업의 성과평가에 적용가능한 SEA측정치를 개발하여 제시하였다. 국가연구개발사업의 성과평가에서 추가적인 정보로 제공하게 될 SEA측정치는 (1)투입측정치 (2)결과측정치 (3)산출측정치 (4)투입 대 성과와의 관련성 (5)설명정보의 5개 범주로 구성되어 있다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.2841-2846
• /
• 2016

Background: Tobacco use is the single most important preventable risk factor for cancer. Surveillance of tobacco-related cancers (TRC) is critical for monitoring trends and evaluating tobacco control programmes. We analysed the trends of TRC and evaluated the population-based cancer registry (PBCR) in Delhi for simplicity, comparability, validity, timeliness and representativeness. Materials and Methods: We interviewed key informants, observed registry processes and analysed the PBCR dataset for the period 1988-2009 using the 2009 TRC definition of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We calculated the percentages of morphologically verified cancers, death certificate-only (DCO) cases, missing values of key variables and the time between cancer diagnosis and registration or publication for the year 2009. Results: The number of new cancer cases increased from 5,854 to 15,244 (160%) during 1988-2009. TRC constituted 58% of all cancers among men and 47% among women in 2009. The age-adjusted incidence rates of TRC per 100,000 population increased from 64.2 to 97.3 among men, and from 66.2 to 69.2 among women during 1988-2009. Data on all cancer cases presenting at all major government and private health facilities are actively collected by the PBCR staff using standard paper-based forms. Data abstraction and coding is conducted manually following ICD-10 classifications. Eighty per cent of cases were morphologically verified and 1% were identified by death certificate only. Less than 1% of key variables had missing values. The median time to registration and publishing was 13 and 32 months, respectively. Conclusions: The burden of TRC in Delhi is high and increasing. The Delhi PBCR is well organized and generates high-quality, representative data. However, data could be published earlier if paper-based data are replaced by electronic data abstraction.