• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.245-252
• /
• 2018

이 논문에서는 방사선사법 제정에 반영해야하는 주요내용 및 방사선사법 필요성을 확인하기 위하여 방사선사의 인식 차이를 조사하였다. 방사선사법 제정에 대하여 방사선사를 대상으로 한 인식조사의 결과에서 "중요하다" 이상의 우선순위는 방사선사법 제정(90.1%), 방사선사 업무로 "조영제 주사" 법제화(85.8%), "의료방사선 정책 심의 위원회" 법제화(85.8%), "방사선사 윤리위원회"의 법제화(80.9%), 협회 방사선사 의무가입의 법제화(71.6%)이었다. "보통" 이상의 우선순위는 방사선사법 제정(100%), "의료방사선 정책 심의위원회" 법제화(97.1%), 방사선사 윤리위원회"의 법제화(95.1%), 방사선사 업무로 "조영제 주사" 법제화(95.1%), 인증평가제 도입 필요성(94.34)이었다. 필요성과 중요도에서 방사선사법은 최우선 과제로 여겨지고 개별 안건에 따라서 필요성과 중요도의 차이는 존재한다. 이는 방사선사법 제정의 논리적 근거와 정책방향을 결정하는 자료로 활용 가능할 것이다.

• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.178-183
• /
• 2012

We investigated the latest trend of u-Health and relations with clinical technologist. Since 2000, Korea has become an aging society. Korea will become an aged society by 2018, and it is expected to enter the ultra-high aged society by 2026. Increase in over 65 years population means that the desire of medical service and care demand for the elderly is greatly required. In addition, many predicted Korean national health insurance would falter financially. Medical suppression policies and regulations are also amended continuously. U-Health based on the IT industry and development of related technologies and industries contains the variety concepts of telemedicine, telehealth, e-health, u-healthcare and POCT. Especially, the use of POCT supplied quick clinical examination is extending steadily in medical center and hospital, which will generate the field friction between nurses and medical technologists. In the transition situation from provider-centric service to consumer-driven health care system, this study recommended the principal role and correspondence of clinical laboratory workers and offered information about changes in healthcare market and the basic concept of expert system, measurement and the diagnosis principle to clinical technicians throughout the investigation of the recent research and government policy trends.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제44권5호
• /
• pp.503-512
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to check the extent to which "instruction of physician or dentist" defined in the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act is applied in relation to radiography examination procedures for radiological technologists. In addition, it is intended to present basic data on the requirement to revise the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act in the radiological technologist's duty area and scope of work, The subjects of this study were radiological technologists with license, and the response data were collected after sending the questionnaire link written on the online questionnaire form. The final number of respondents were 1,018, and the response rate was 6.8%. Most of the negative responses were "I have never received 'instruction' for radiologic examination by a physician or dentist, including a radiologist in a medical environment." There were a high perception that "the professionalism in radiation examination on radiological technologists are higher than that of a physician or dentist." They answered that the current continuing education has a great impact on maintaining and continuing professionalism and learning new knowledge in the radiology field. In addition, the radiological technologists provide a very high level of education in areas related to radiography procedure ethics such as patient care, patient safety, and patient privacy protection, as well as specialized fields such as radiation-related examination methods, radiography examination dose, and patient exposure dose. Radiological technologists replied that they were receiving it consistently. In conclusion, in the current medical environment, the 'instruction' of a physician or dentist cannot be seen as being realistically performed. The phrase 'instruction' of a physician or dentist as defined in the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act is considered inappropriate in respect of the fact that the state recognizes the qualifications of the medical service technologist through a license. It is thought that revision to a new term suitable for the current medical environment is necessary.

• 대한방사선협회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.281-282
• /
• 2001

• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제52권2호
• /
• pp.158-163
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 상대가치점수제도의 운영 및 개정연구의 합리적인 개선방안과 의료기사 업무 행위의 근거를 도출하였다. 연구에 참여한 7개 기관의 규모를 분석한 결과, 상근 진단검사의학과 전문의 평균 5명, 임상병리사는 평균 53명으로 전문의 1명당 10.6명으로 나타났다. 전문인력영역점수 평균은 18점, 기관별 합계점수의 평균은 78점이었다. 등급 및 가산율(%)은 2~3등급과 질가산율은 2~3%으로 큰 편차는 나타나지 않았다. 병리 검사 및 생리기능검사를 제외한 건강보험청구 평균 진단검사건수는 9,618,062건에 상대가치점수 총합의 5%는 4,378,146점이었다. 자료포락분석(DEA)분석결과 임상병리사의 적정인력은 상대가치 점수 49,974점당 1명으로 나타났다. 결론적으로 본 연구의 분석결과 임상병리사의 적정인력은 상대가치 점수 총합 5만점당 1명으로 설정하는 것이 바람직할 것으로 판단되며, 인력의 생산성 제고 및 보건 의료 자원의 균형 배분을 위한 근거로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.213-223
• /
• 2022

Although the number of computed tomography(CT) is increasing every year, it is insufficient to establish appropriate workload calculation standards of radiologic technologist to provide optimal medical services to patients, such as patient safety management and infection management. The purpose of this study is to present guidelines for calculating the appropriate workload of radiologic technologist by analyzing the work flow of CT procedures and the time required for CT examination in major hospitals. As for the study subjects and methods, the appropriate process for each step of CT examination was investigated to systematically present the process and time required for the actual examination, and the CT procedure time of 104,105 adult patients and 465 pediatric patients under the age of 6 were analyzed. For the time required, data according to the use of contrast medium, procedure type, and adult/child were collected and compared. The test time of CT examination using contrast medium took about 13 minutes when one radiologic technologist worked and about 9 minutes when two radiologic technologists worked. The time required for the procedures were statistically significant depending on the presence or absence of contrast medium, multi-phase procedure, and patient age (considering pediatric patients). As a result, in order to thoroughly perform patient safety and infection management, the appropriate workload increased by about 40% when there were two radiologic technologists. The limit workload was an average of 32 people per day with one radiologic technologist per 15 minutes, and 48 people per day with two radiologic technologist per 10 minutes. This is a marginal workload, and in the case of procedures that require more time to acquire radiographic images, the interval between reservations should be widened.

• 대한방사선협회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.92-93
• /
• 1999

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 2006

방사선과의 의료 서비스에 대한 환자의 만족도 평가 및 방사선사와 환자간의 인식차를 평가하여 방사선과 의료 서비스의 개선방향에 대해 알아보았다. 그 결과 대부분의 설문결과에"보통이다"이상의 답변을 하였으며, 부족한 부분으로는"접수수속의 복잡함, 검사 대기시간이 긴 점 및 환자 보호자의 방사선차폐 미실시"를 들었다. 또한 이 항목들은 환자뿐 아니라 방사선사들도 인식을 하고 있는 부분으로 환자에 대한 적극적인 배려가 필요하다고 사료된다. 그리고 방사선사와 환자의 인식차를 줄이기 위해서는 서비스를 제공하는 방사선사의 노력이 가장 필요하며, 이를 위해서는 정기적으로 환자관점에서의 의료서비스 만족도 조사를 통해 환자가 느끼는 서비스의 품질수준을 평가하고 만족도가 낮은 사항에 대해서는 만족도를 높이기 위한 개선책 마련에 힘써야 할 것이다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제44권5호
• /
• pp.525-534
• /
• 2021

In order to provide high-quality medical services to the public and contribute to the improvement of public health, it is necessary to enact an independent law according to the work of radiological technologists. Therefore, this study intends to review the regulations related to radiographers in the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act. and to present opinions and directions for enactment of individual laws for radiological technologists. An online survey was conducted to 15,000 radiological technologists working in medical institutions and education sites in Korea; 1,027 people (6.85%) responded. The questionnaire consisted of 3 questions on demographic characteristics, 5 questions on the scope of work, and 12 questions on the revision of the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act. and the establishment of the Radiological Technologist Independent Act. Reliability and factor analysis were performed on 9 questions measured on a Likert 5-point scale in "Revision of the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act. and the establishment of the Radiological echnologist Independent Act" among the questionnaire items. Reliability for the total 9 questions was Chronbach α=0.728. There was a high perception that the regulations related to radiological technologists were insufficient in the current Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act., and the perception that examinations performed by radiological technologists at medical institutions were included in medical practice was high. If the Radiological Technologist Independent Act is enforced, a high percentage of respondents said that they could receive legal protection through the institutionalization of the scope of work, that the status of radiological technologists would be improved, and the scope of work would be expanded. The response that the scope of work of radiological technologists should be included was the highest at 96.6%. In the analysis according to demographic characteristics, it was found that 96.7% of the respondents were agreed regardless of the factors. Radiological technologists will have to work hard to secure the public health by coping with new radiology devices, procedures and treatment methods. Therefore, as the results of this study, it is expected that the enactment and implementation of the Radiological Technologist Independent Act will contribute to the improvement of the quality of treatment for patients and to the public health.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.293-300
• /
• 2024

2023년 10월 31일 의료기사 등에 관한 법률의 개정에 따라 방사선사 면허를 취득하기 위해서는 현장실습과목을 필수로 이수하여야 한다. 이에 따라 의료기관 현장실습의 실태를 조사하여 개정된 의료기사법을 알리고, 현장실습의 실효성을 높이기 위한 개선방안을 제안하고자 한다. 2023년 3월부터 4월까지 의료기관에 종사하는 방사선사를 대상으로 설문을 시행하였다. 설문지는 국내 포털사이트인 N사의 폼을 통해 받았으며, 응답자는 120명이었다. 현장실습 학생의 교육을 담당한 경험이 있는 응답자는 68.3%인 82명이었다. 의료기사 등에 관한 법률 개정으로 방사선사면허를 취득하기 위해 현장실습이 의무화된 사실을 알고 있는 응답자는 58%로 나타났다. 의료기사 등에 관한 법률 제9조 무면허자의 업무 금지 등에 따라 대학 등에서 취득하려는 면허에 상응하는 교육과정을 이수하기 위하여 실습 중에 있는 사람의 실습에 필요한 경우는 해당 의료기사 등의 업무를 수행할 수 있다는 사실을 알고 있는 응답자는 50%로 나타났다. 현재 현장 실습 시 어떤 교육을 하는지 묻는 질문에 참관, 환자 안내 및 환자 자세 유지와 이동 외에 방사선을 발생시키는 행위를 하게 한다는 응답자는 6%로 나타났다. 면허 취득을 위한 현장실습이 의무화됨에 따라 앞으로의 교육 방향에 묻는 질문에 77%의 응답자가 현행보다 더 많은 것을 교육할 것이라고 응답하였다. 현장실습의 적절한 전체 시간을 묻는 질문에는 12주 480시간이 35%, 8주 320시간이 33%, 16주 640시간이 27%로 나타났다. 현행 현장실습은 각종 규제에 따라 부실한 교육여건이며, 학생들의 만족도 또한 낮음을 알 수 있다. 그러나 의료기사 등에 관한 법률이 개정됨에 따라 방사선사 면허를 취득하기 위해 현장실습이 의무화되었으며, 현장실습의 교육여건을 개선할 필요가 있다. 이에 따라 원자력안전법과 진단용방사선발생장치의 안전관리에 관한 규칙을 준수하며, 표준화된 실습 목표와 평가 시스템 도입, 수련 병원 지정과 교육 전담 방사선사 지정, 확대된 실습 기간과 모의실습을 도입하여 현장실습 교육의 내실화가 필요하다.