• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제16D권3호
• /
• pp.353-360
• /
• 2009

대부분의 정보시스템은 컴포넌트 기반으로 아웃소싱에 의해 개발되고 있으며, 개발된 소프트웨어들은 통합되어 유지보수 되고 있다. 그러나 유지보수의 생산성과 효율성 제고를 위한 기반 연구인 비용 측정지표 및 비용 추정 모델에 관한 연구가 부족하다. 본 연구는 컴포넌트 기반의 소프트웨어에 대한 유지보수의 비용에 대한 측정지표를 제안하고, 제안한 측정지표의 의한 컴포넌트 소프트웨어의 유지보수 비용 추정 모델을 연구한다. 컴포넌트 기반의 유지보수 비용 측정지표를 추정하기 위하여 기존에 제시된 지표들을 비교 정리하고, 정리된 측정지표가 컴포넌트 소프트웨어 유지보수 유형에 따라 어떻게 적용되는지를 분류하고 유형별 비용 측정지표를 제안한다. 또, 제안한 측정지표를 이용한 컴포넌트 소프트웨어 유지보수 유형에 따른 비용 추정 모델을 제안한다. 제안한 추정 모델의 사례연구를 실시하여 유효성을 검증한다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.385-399
• /
• 2005

Objective: The objective was to extract a preliminary performance measurement indicators of nursing organizations in hospitals using the BSC(Balanced Score Card) developed by Kaplan and Norton, and to analyze the content validity and evaluation methods of the performance measurement indicators with actual nurses in the nursing organization as participants in the study. Methods: The preliminary performance measurement indicators was created through a literature review and had the content validity by a professional. This survey was sent via post to 316 nurse managers and nurses with more than 5 years of experience in seven secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Seoul Gyonggi district. The completed questionnaires were returned by mail. Results: Fourteen indicators for finances, 16 for customer services, 27 for internal business processes, and 13 for learning and growth were selected. Conclusion: Amidst a rapidly changing medical environment, a first step was taken towards developing a performance measurement from various perspectives for nursing organizations in hospitals from various perspectives, rather than just one or a past-oriented perspective. However, as the most important thing is to actually use these indicators, continuous interest in publicity and education must be developed.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.214-227
• /
• 2008

Today's dynamic competitiveness requires an organization to improve its performance measurement and management. Quality Management Systems (QMS) abound, the main ones being: ISO series, Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award (MBNQA), European Forum for Quality Management (EFQM), Six Sigma Business Scorecard and the Balanced Scorecard. Based on the literature, the IPMMM (Integrated Performance Measurement and Management Model) identified 7 key synthesized factors: leadership, strategy management and policy, customer and market, learning and growth, partnership and resources, internal processes and business results that are employed to investigate the key performance indicators of a car assembler using the Delphi methodology. In the 2 rounds of Delphi panels consisting of 20 senior management personnel, the $1^{st}$ round of 198 indicators in the IPMMM yielded 90 indicators. The $2^{nd}$ round yielded 43 performance indicators with 18 rated as critical based on the % assigned in the $1^{st}$ and $2^{nd}$ priority rating of "very important factor" and "key performance indicator" that must be ranked high on both of the priorities. The very critical indicators appeared to be: defect percentage and first time capability (tie in $1^{st}$ place) and revenue, goal setting, customer satisfaction index, on-time delivery, brand image, return on investment, Claim Occurrence Ratio, and debt being ranked from $3^{rd}$ to $10^{th}$. It can be surmised that an organization can identify and develop an appropriate set of performance indicators through the Delphi methodology and implement and manage them based on the Balanced Scorecard.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.462-472
• /
• 2007

Purpose: Purpose of the this study is to define the hemodialysis noncompliance Indicators and discriminant standards levels for low Flux Hemodialysis patients and development of Hemodialysis noncompliance measurement - brief form. Method: Data was collected from 269 hemodialysis patients. To establish the hemodialysis noncompliance Indicators and to discriminate standards, 13 hemodialysis nurses and 2 nephrology doctors are participated in professional group. To verify the indicators and discriminant standards, data was ananlyzed by the canonical discriminant analysis method using by SAS 8.3 program. Result: 4 Indicators- interdialysis weight gain(IWG); average of recent 4weeks, serum phophate level, skipping of hemodialysis and hemodialysis time shortening without permission- of hemodialysis noncompliance are established and discriminant standards are developed. Discriminant ability of these 4 noncompliance indicators is 99.7%(p=.000). Hemodialysis noncompliance measurement - brief form has 96.3% discriminant accuracy. Conclusion: Hemodialysis noncompliant patients have high risks. It means that special intervention to noncompliance is needed. Also continuous and objective assessment and standards of noncompliance are needed.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.111-123
• /
• 2022

지능정보화 사회에서 가장 핵심으로 발전하고 있는 인공지능은 인간에게 편의성과 긍정적인 삶의 변화를 가져오고 있다. 하지만 인공지능 발전과 함께 인간의 인격권과 재산이 위협받고, 윤리적인 문제가 발생하는 사례도 증가하고 있기 때문에 그에 따른 대안이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 인공지능의 역기능에서 가장 쟁점화되고 있는 인공지능 윤리(Artificial Intelligence Ethics) 문제를 인공지능 윤리원칙과 구성요소 기반 하에 우선적으로 인간의 인격권과 재산을 보호할 수 있도록 인공지능 윤리 측정지표를 연구, 개발하는 데 목표를 두었다. 인공지능 윤리 측정지표를 연구, 개발하기 위해 다양한 관련 문헌과 전문가 심층 면접(FGI), 델파이 설문조사를 실시하여 43개 항목의 윤리 측정지표를 도출하였다. 설문조사와 통계분석에 의하여 윤리 측정지표에 대한 기술통계량 분석, 신뢰도 분석, 상관관계 분석으로 40개 항목의 인공지능 윤리 측정지표를 확정하여 제안하였다. 제안된 인공지능 윤리 측정지표는 인공지능 설계, 개발, 교육, 인증, 운영, 표준화 등에 활용될 수 있으며, 안전하고 신뢰할 수 있는 인공지능 발전에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2010

Objectives: This study aims to compare quality indicators for the hemodialysis services between patients with health insurance and those with medical aid. Methods: This study used data from sampled hospitals that provided a hemodialysis service. A total of 2287 patients were selected, and the information for hemodialysis service has been granted from medical record reviews. A multi-level regression analysis was used to examine the differences in process and outcome indicators for hemodialysis between patients with health insurance and those with medical aid. Process indicators were defined as: frequency of hemodialysis, hemodialysis time, erythropoietin (EPO) use, measurement of hemodialysis dose at least once a month, measurement of phosphate at least once every three months, and measurement of albumin at least once every three months. Outcome indicators were defined as: hemodialysis adequacy, anemia management, blood pressure management, and calcium, phosphate and nutrition management. The total scores for outcome indicators ranged from 0 (worst) to 4 (best). Results: There was a significant difference in the measurement of hemodialysis dose at least once a month between patients with health insurance and those with medical aid (OR 0.66, 95% CI = 0.43 - 0.99). However, frequency of hemodialysis, hemodialysis time, EPO use, measurement of phosphate at least once every three months, measurement of albumin at least once every three months, hemodialysis adequacy management, Hb${\geq}$11 g/dL, blood pressure within the range of 100-140 /60-90 mmHg, calcium x phosphate${\leq}$55 $g^2/dL^2$ and albumin${\geq}$4 g/dL were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in outcome indicators for hemodialysis between the groups. Further studies are warranted into the mechanism that results in no differences in the outcome indicators for hemodialysis.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.26-45
• /
• 2005

The purposes of this study were to Identify the .level of measurement on quality Indicators and evaluate the existing indicators in order to determine the priority of quality indicators' application in Korean general hospitals. A survey was conducted using a questionnaire. The subjects were quality managers working at general hospital having over 300 beds. The criteria were relevance, reliability, precision, impact, application, and preference to evaluate quality indicators. According to these six criteria, each indicator was evaluated on a five point scale(5: excellent, 1: poor). The response rate was $40.4\%$. The hospitals have monitored the average of 3.8 indicators(median 4). The indicators such as return to operating room, unplanned readmission, cancellation of booked operations, death, hospital infection, cesarean section rate, volume per disease or procedure, readmission, re-operation, blood transfusion, and post-procedural complications were frequently measured. The top ten quality indicators in the evaluation by its relevance, validity, reliability, impact, preference and application were decubitus ulcer, clean wound infection, fall, unplanned return to operation room, transfusion reactions, foreign body left In during procedure, unplanned readmission, wound infection after contaminated surgery, postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma, and cesarean section rate in order. The high priority quality indicators frequently measured could be used as primary national indicators. Standardized guidelines about monitoring indicators and the utilization will preliminarily be needed to compare and reuse the data for various purposes and improve the quality of care continuously.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2000

This study was undertaken to develop performance measurement indicators in S Hospital, which is the largest component of Y Medical Center which implemented the Responsible Management System in 1993. To begin, strategic initiatives for S Hospital were reestablished based on Y Medical Center's goals and objectives. The BSC(Balanced Scorecard) was used to develop performance measurement indicators after validity checks by specialists. The results were that total 16 indicators were developed to measure performance for strategic initiatives. Those included the growth rate of patient revenues, operating profit to gross revenues, reduction rate in administrative expenses from a financial perspective; average medical expenses per adjusted patient, patient satisfaction survey for inpatients and outpatients and emergency room patients, return rate for treatment results from the customer's perspective; reduction rate in average length of hospital stay, expenses for lost cases of medical disputes, rate for contracted employees, the number of published reports per faculty member from an internal perspective; educational expenses for training medical staff and full time employees, adjusted patient per medical staff, and the number of cases implemented which were proposed by employees. Any organization needs to have its own explicit objectives to grow and develop and it is absolutely necessary to measure performance to accomplish them. The performance measurement indicators developed by this study are expected to be used as a tool to attain the objectives of S Hospital.

• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.129-141
• /
• 2024

최근 고등교육 정책이 학생중심으로 전환되면서 학생들의 학습성과 향상을 위한 대학의 관심이 증가하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 K대학의 학습성과 지표를 국내외 주요 학습성과 지표와 비교·분석하여, 우리나라 대학들의 학습성과 관리를 위한 발전방향을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 비교·분석을 위해 AHELO, NSSE, CLA+ 등 주요 학습성과 측정 도구의 세부 측정문항을 조사하였다. K대 주요 학습성과 지표와 타 학습성과 지표를 비교/분석한 결과, 대다수의 지표는 중복되고 있으나, 학습을 위한 학생 지원/시설, 교수자의 질, 커뮤니케이션 등 일부 지표는 K대에 부재한 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 지표를 기존 학습성과 지표에 추가할 것인지 아니면 다른 조사를 통해 이를 확인할 것인지 결정할 필요가 있으며, 같은 지표라도 측정 방식이 다른 지표들 중 일부는 측정 방식 변경을 고려할 필요가 있다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.61-87
• /
• 2008

도서관통계와 평가의 관련성이 국제표준안, 업무활동 영역, 항목간의 유사성 면에서 깊고, 불가분의 관계 속에 있음에도 한국 대학도서관의 통계와 평가는 생산단계 및 활용 면에서 전혀 연계되어 있지 않다. 이를 증명하기 위하여 국제표준, 통계데이터를 살펴 두 항목간에 연계적 상관관계를 살펴보아 정량적 데이터의 45%정도의 중복도가 있음을 밝혔다. 반면 기존의 국내 통계 항목과 평가 항목간에는 14-26%의 관계가 있으며, 새로이 연구 개발된 대학도서관통계 실용안에서는 상당히 발전된 관계성을 발견하였으며, 반면 상당한 특정성도 발견되었다. 이제 대학도서관통계 온라인시스템 개발단계에서 통계시스템의 목적 외에 평가시스템정보를 제공한다는 면을 고려하여 항목간의 포괄적 정보가 제공되도록 개발하는 것이 필요하다.