• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.271-287
• /
• 2018

This is a case study that defined collaborative utterances and analyzed how they appear in the problem-solving process when 5th-grade students solved problems in groups. As a result, collaborative utterances consist of an interchange type and a deliver type and the interchange type is comprised of two process: the verification process and the modification process. Also, in groups where interchange type collaborative utterances were generated actively and students could reach an agreement easily, students applied the teacher's help to their problem-solving process right after it was provided and could solve problems even though they had some mathematics errors. In interchange-type collaborative utterances, each student's participation varies with their individual achievement. In deliver-type collaborative utterances, students who solved problems by themselves participated dominantly. The conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, interchange-type collaborative utterances fostered students' active participation and accelerated students' arguments. Second, interchange-type collaborative utterances positively influenced the problem-solving process and it is necessary to provide problems that consider students' achievement in each group. Third, groups should be comprised of students whose individual achievements are similar because students' participation in collaborative utterances varies with their achievement.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.145-165
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to suggest how to go about teaching and learning secondary school algebra by analyzing problem-solving ability and problem-solving process through algebraic reasoning. In doing this, 393 students' data were thoroughly analyzed after setting up the exam questions and analytic standards. As with the test conducted with technical school students, the students scored low achievement in the algebraic reasoning test and even worse the majority tried to answer the questions by substituting arbitrary numbers. The students with high problem-solving abilities tended to utilize conceptual strategies as well as procedural strategies, whereas those with low problem-solving abilities were more keen on utilizing procedural strategies. All the subject groups mentioned above frequently utilized equations in solving the questions, and when that utilization failed they were left with the unanswered questions. When solving algebraic reasoning questions, students need to be guided to utilize both strategies based on the questions.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.217-231
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this paper is to investigate a new method for activating the metacognitive abilities that play a key role in the Mathematical Problem Solving Process (MPSP). The proposed research question is as follows: Can the MPSP activate metacognitive abilities of high school students in the pencil-and-paper environment using guidance material for metacognitive activities\ulcorner To solve this question, two case studies have been carried out. Two students for the study were selected via informal interview. They voluntarily took part in 13 experimental lectures. The activating paths of their metacognitive abilities in the MPSP were chronically described and analyzed. All the activating processes of the students focusing on the aspects of metacognitive behaviors were analyzed by means of interview, observation, self-report, and activity data. The two high school students participating in the MPSP voluntarily recognized and reflected their deficiencies in metacognitive abilities, and therefore maximized their own performance. They made quite significant progress in the course of activating their metacognitive abilities through voluntary participation and gained greater confidence in the MPSP. Hence they have become good problem solvers. They expressed not only the factors influencing their behavior but also their self-awareness during the metacognitive activities. In the long run, this experiment will increase possibilities for the internalization of the metacognitive process.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.627-651
• /
• 2005

This study was conducted to attain an in-depth understanding of students' mathematical representations and to present the educational implications for teaching them. Twelve mathematical tasks were developed according to the six types of problems. A task performance was executed to 151 third graders from four classes in DaeJeon and GyeongGi. We analyzed the types and forms of representations generated by them. Then, qualitative case studies were conducted on two small-groups of five from two classes in GyeongGi. We analyzed how individuals' representations became elaborated into group representation and what patterns emerged during the collaborative small-group learning. From the results, most students used more than one representation in solving a problem, but they were not fluent enough to link them to successful problem solving or to transfer correctly among them. Students refined their representations into more meaningful group representation through peer interaction, self-reflection, etc.. Teachers need to give students opportunities to think through, and choose from, various representations in problem solving. We also need the in-depth understanding and great insights into students' representations for teaching.

• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.113-130
• /
• 2009

수학 문제해결 교육에 가장 많은 영향을 끼친 것은 폴리아(G. Polya)의 이론이다. 폴리아가 제시하는 발견술은 수학 문제해결 과정을 명시적으로 세분화여 드러내고 정리한 것이다. 이와는 달리, 수학 문제해결 과정의 암묵적 차원을 강조하고 있는 폴라니(M. Polanyi)의 이론은 폴리아의 이론과 상보적 관계에 있는 것으로 조명될 필요가 있다. 이 글에서는 폴라니의 인식론을 개관하고, 이를 바탕으로 하는 그의 문제해결 교육 이론을 고찰한다. 지식과 앎을 개인의 마음의 총체적 작용으로 보는 폴라니는 문제해결에 있어서 지적, 정서적 부분과 함께 헌신과 몰두를 강조한다. 또한 명시적 앎 이면에 있는 묵식에 있어서 교사의 역할을 중시한다. 이와 같은 폴라니의 관점은 현재 우리나라 학생들의 수학 문제 해결 양상을 이해하고 문제점을 파악하는 데에도 의미 있는 시사를 제공한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.207-226
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to design and develop the processes of tasks and assessment rubrics of open-ended tasks, and those for the 5th graders of elementary school mathematics. 7 tasks were finally developed, and 'problem understanding', 'problem solving process', 'communication' were selected as the criteria for assessment rubrics. The result was that the ability of mathematical power covering problem understanding ability, problem solving ability and mathematical communication ability was low. Specifically, problem understanding ability was the highest, problem solving ability was middle, and mathematical communication ability was the lowest.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.15-29
• /
• 2012

One of the important aims in mathematics education is to enhance mathematical thinking for students. And students posing questions is a vital process in mathematical thinking as it is part of the reasoning and communication of their learning. This paper investigates how students develop their mathematical thinking through working on tasks in fractions and posing their own questions after successfully solved the problems. The teaching was conducted in primary five classes and the results showed that students' reasoning is related to their analogy with what previously learned. Also, posing their problems after solving the problem not only helps students to understand the structure of the problem, it also helps students to explore on different routes in solving the problem and extend their learning content.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.351-374
• /
• 2018

2015 개정 교육과정에서는 수학 교과 역량으로서의 문제 해결 능력을 함양하기 위한 교수 학습 방법으로 협력적 문제 해결과 수학적 모델링을 새롭게 제시하였다. 따라서 이에 대한 교사들의 이해를 지원하는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 협력적 문제 해결과 수학적 모델링을 수학 수업에 반영하여 구체적인 지도 방안으로서 문제 및 수업지도안의 개발, 필요한 교사의 역할을 제시하였다. 10차시의 문제 해결 과정에서 학생들은 스스로 수학적 모델을 구성하였고, 해결 방법을 공유하면서 모델을 수정 보완하였다. 특히 교사가 문제 해결을 공유하고 논의하는 과정을 명확히 안내하는 경우에 학생들이 서로의 해결 방법을 비교하고 자신의 해결 방법을 보완하는 모습이 보다 잘 나타났다. 연구 결과를 토대로 수학 교과 역량으로서의 문제 해결 능력을 함양하기 위한 지도 방안에 대한 시사점을 논의하였다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.43-66
• /
• 2006

지금까지 수학적 의사소통과 수학적 태도에 관한 선행연구는 주로 쓰기 활동을 통한 자료 수집을 통해 많이 이루어져 왔다. 또한 프로젝트 활동이나 소집단 토의 활동에 대한 연구는 여러 차례 있었으나, 이를 수학적 의사소통 영역과 수학적 태도면에서 연관시켜 분석한 선행연구는 없었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 학생들을 소집단으로 구성하여 프로젝트형 문제를 해결하는 과정을 촬영하여 살펴본 후, 그 속에서 수학적 의사소통은 어떻게 전개되고 있으며, 수학적 태도의 측면에서는 어떤 현상이 관찰되는지 알아보고 그 시사점을 추출해 보고자 하는데 연구의 목적이 있다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.361-384
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 연립일차방정식에 관한 문장제에서 IDEAL 문제 해결 모형을 바탕으로 "구조-표현"을 강조한 교수-학습을 실시하였을 때 학생들의 문제해결 과정을 탐구하였다. 연구 결과, 구조-표현을 강조한 학급의 학생들이 이를 강조하지 않은 학급의 학생들보다 문제해결 능력이 향상되었으며, 동치문제, 동형문제, 유사문제를 더 정확하게 구별하였다. 또한, 구조-표현을 강조한 학급의 학생들이 그렇지 않은 학급의 학생들보다 문맥에 대한 이해 및 불완전한 정보 추출에서의 오류, 미지수간의 내적 관계에 대한 수학적 기호표현으로의 불완전한 전이 오류, 적절하지 않은 방정식 생성 오류의 발생 빈도가 적었다. 그리고, IDEAL 문제 해결 모형의 문제의 확인 단계(I)와 문제의 정의 단계(D)에서 학생들이 문제 해결 계획을 수립하기 위해 문제를 읽고 이해하여 문제를 해결하는 과정을 중점적으로 분석한 결과, 직접 변환 모델과 구조 도식 모델이 나타났다.