• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.1715-1718
• /
• 2015

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging of breast, reported to be a high sensitivity of 94% to 100%, is the most sensitive method for detection of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate our clinical experience in MRI-guided breast lesion wire localization in Chinese women. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 patients with 46 lesions undergoing MRI-guided breast lesion localization were prospectively entered into this study between November 2013 and September 2014. Samples were collected using a 1.5-T magnet with a special MR biopsy positioning frame device. We evaluated clinical lesion characteristics on pre-biopsy MRI, pathologic results, and dynamic curve type baseline analysis. Results: Of the total of 46 wire localization excision biopsied lesions carried out in 44 female patients, pathology revealed fourteen malignancies (14/46, 30.4%) and thirty-two benign lesions (32/46, 69.6%). All lesions were successfully localized followed by excision biopsy and assessed for morphologic features highly suggestive of malignancy according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category of MRI (C4a=18, C4b=17, C4c=8,C5=3). Of 46 lesions, 37 were masses and 9 were non-mass enhancement lesions. Thirty-two lesions showed a continuous kinetics curve, 11 were plateau and 3 were washout. Conclusions: Our study showed success in MRI-guided breast lesion wire localization with a satisfactory cancer diagnosis rate of 30.4%. MRI-guided wire localization breast lesion open biopsy is a safe and effective tool for the workup of suspicious lesions seen on breast MRI alone without major complications. This may contribute to increasing the diagnosis rate of early breast cancer and improve the prognosis in Chinese women.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• v.21 no.9
• /
• pp.1087-1094
• /
• 2020

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer, suffers from low sensitivity for clinically significant cancer. The use of diagnostic multiparametric MRI has increased the relevance of targeted biopsy techniques such as MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy and direct (in-bore) MRI-guided biopsy, which have higher detection rate for clinically significant cancer. Although primarily used in patients who remain at high clinical suspicion for prostate cancer despite a negative systematic biopsy, with the increasing use of upfront diagnostic MRI, these biopsies are expected to replace routine systematic biopsies. This pictorial essay aims to enhance our understanding of the concepts of these biopsy techniques so that they can be performed safely and provide maximum diagnostic yield.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.84 no.2
• /
• pp.345-360
• /
• 2023

In Korea, the number of institutions providing breast MRI, as well as the number of breast MRIs, has recently increased. However, MRI-guided procedures, including biopsy and needle localization, are rarely performed compared to ultrasound-guided or stereotactic biopsy. As breast MRI has high sensitivity but limited specificity, lesions detected only on MRI require pathologic confirmation through MRI-guided biopsy or surgical excision with MRI-guided needle localization. Thus, we aimed to review MRI-guided procedures, including their indications, techniques, procedural considerations, and limitations.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• v.22 no.7
• /
• pp.1087-1099
• /
• 2021

MRI has become important for the detection of prostate cancer. MRI-guided biopsy is superior to conventional systematic biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer. MRI is also increasingly used for monitoring patients with low-risk prostate cancer during active surveillance. It improves patient selection for active surveillance at diagnosis, although its role during follow-up is unclear. We aim to review existing evidence and propose a practical approach for incorporating MRI into active surveillance protocols.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.84 no.6
• /
• pp.1220-1232
• /
• 2023

The prostate cancer diagnosis has traditionally been based on a systematic biopsy method in which tissue samples are randomly obtained from the prostate 10-12 sites. However, there are concerns as the method can fail to diagnose all prostate cancers or lead to over-detection of clinically insignificant cancers. MRI-guided prostate targeted biopsy has been proposed to address these shortcomings. This method involves identifying suspicious lesions using MRI and performing targeted biopsies under ultrasound or MRI guidance. We review the methods of MRI-based targeted biopsy and discuss recent guidelines and trends in prostate cancer diagnosis.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.625-637
• /
• 2022

With regard to the indolent clinical characteristics of prostate cancer (PCa), the more selective detection of clinically significant PCa (CSC) has been emphasized in its diagnosis and management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has advanced technically, and recent international cooperation has provided a standardized imaging and reporting system for prostate MRI. Accordingly, prostate MRI has recently been investigated and utilized as a triage tool before biopsy to guide tissue sampling to increase the detection rate of CSC beyond the staging tool for patients in whom PCa was already confirmed on conventional systematic biopsy. Radiologists must understand the current paradigm shift for better PCa diagnosis and management. This article reviewed the recent literature, demonstrating the diagnostic value of pre-biopsy prostate MRI with targeted biopsy and discussed unsolved issues regarding the paradigm shift in the diagnosis of PCa.

• Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.339-346
• /
• 2003

MRI provides anatomical structure information with superb spatial resolution that can be utilized in clinical surgeries. Advanced image processing techniques in conjunction with the MRI-guided surgery is expected to be of great importance in brain surgeries in the near future. In this paper, we introduce an image-guided surgery technique using the stereo matching method. To perform image-guided biopsy operations, we made MRI markers, camera markers and a detection probe marker. To evaluate the accuracy of the image-guided system. we made a silicone phantom. Using the phantom and markers, we have performed MRI-guided experiments with a 1.5 Tesla MRI system. It has been verified from phantom experiments that our system has a positioning error less than 1.5%. Compared with other image guided surgery system, our system shows better positioning accuracy.

• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.41-46
• /
• 2010

Purpose : To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of papillary lesions of the breast. Materials and methods : Among 45 papillary lesions diagnosed at ultrasonography-guided core biopsy (USCB), 27 benign papillary lesions in 22 patients who underwent breast MRI were reviewed. The excsional biopsy was performed in 1-10 days after MRI was done. In MRI findings, lesions were considered suspicious if they show irregular, rim enhancement, or linear enhancement in morphologic evaluation, or washout enhancement pattern of delayed phase in dynamic enhancement characteristics. Diffusionweighted images were analyzed according to visibility of lesions. MRI findings were correlated with pathologic results at excisional biopsy. Results : At excisional biopsy, two lesions (9%) were diagnosed malignant in 22 benign papillary lesions without atypia by USCB and 4 (80%) were malignant in 5 benign papillary lesions with atypia by USCB. Among 18 lesions detected on MRI, 16 lesions showed suspicious findings on MRI, 11 lesions (69%) were diagnosed as benign and 5 (31%) were malignant. Among 12 lesions detected on diffusion weighted imaging, 10 lesions were diagnosed as benign and 2 were malignant. MRI findings were not significantly correlated with pathologic results at excisional biopsy. Conclusion : MRI findings were not useful to predict malignancy in benign papillary lesions diagnosed at USCB, because MRI findings of these were mostly suspicious (88.9%, 16/18). The benign papillary lesion should be included in the false positive lesion on breast MRI.

• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2012

Breast MRI is the most accurate adjunctive to the mammography for the screening of breast cancer. Despite lack of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of MRI screening, it is now recommended for the women at high risk for breast cancer by the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network based on several prospective observational studies. In Korea, a retrospective study reported that preoperative MRI screening of the contralateral breast in women with unilateral breast cancer was associated with reduced metachronous cancer incidence. To introduce breast MRI as a supplemental modality to screening mammography in Korea, standardization and education of interpretation, establishment of MR-guided biopsy and adequate indication, and evaluation of cost-effectiveness and should be preceded.

• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.43-51
• /
• 2014

Purpose : To review MR imaging finding of papillary lesion identified as additional suspicious lesion on MR image in women with biopsy-proven breast cancer and to evaluate upgrading rates after subsequent surgical histopathological diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Among 1729 preoperative MR image of women with biopsy proven breast cancer, US-guided CNB-proven 22 papillary lesions from 21 patients, which showed additional suspicious contrast enhancement other than index cancer on MR image, were subjected to the study. Some of these lesions underwent surgery, thus the comparisons between the histopathologic results were able to be compared to the results of US-guided CNB. Also retrospective analysis was done for MR findings of these lesions by BI-RADS MRI lexicon. Results: On MR imaging, 8 mass lesions, 7 non-mass lesions, 7 focus lesions were detected. All of the focus lesion (100%, 7/7) was diagnosed as benign lesion and showed plateau and washout pattern in dynamic MR image. After excisional biopsy, one of 9 benign papilloma (11.1%), 3 of 3 papillary neoplasm with atypia component (100%), 3 of 5 papillary neoplasm (60%) were upgraded to malignancy such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Conclusion: The MR images of papillary lesions diagnosed by US-guided CNB exhibit no significant differences between malignancy and benign lesion. Also 41.2% of the lesion (7/17) was upgraded after subsequent surgery. Thus all of the papillary lesions require excisional biopsy for definite diagnosis and the MR imaging, it's just not enough by itself.